Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK
Lewis et al argue that the curent plan for a national missile defense system is like the one suggested in the 1960s, it also won't work. The "Safeguard" plan of 1968 and the current proposal are discussed.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific American 1999-08, Vol.281 (2), p.36-41 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Magazinearticle |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 41 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 36 |
| container_title | Scientific American |
| container_volume | 281 |
| creator | Lewis, George N. Postol, Theodore A. Pike, John |
| description | Lewis et al argue that the curent plan for a national missile defense system is like the one suggested in the 1960s, it also won't work. The "Safeguard" plan of 1968 and the current proposal are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/scientificamerican0899-36 |
| format | Magazinearticle |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_223262216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26058362</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26058362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-95f7b5b727c435a06133a98edb1b725fed11507eb205e214cd7b29abf966802a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIIwrcTE2l-a2lHrF2oJUugyZ9ARTpjM1mS668zV8PZ_EKSNd6VmcHw7_dxYfQhcEXxPM1CC5AFUTfHB2BbHdFVZa50wcoB7RQ5FLrOQh6mHMRK4kY8foJKUlbocK3ENX8_dtNrFNqCtbZi8hpVBCdgseqgTZfDr5_vyatfn6fIqOvC0TnP1mH73d381Gj_l4-vA0uhnnjire5Jp7WfBCUumGjFssCGNWK1gUpD1yDwtCOJZQUMyBkqFbyIJqW3gthMLUsj667P6uY_2xgdSYVUgOytJWUG-SoZRRQSkRbVN3TRfrlCJ4s45hZePWEGx2dszfdgzbsYOOrWyzibAn__XZEucdsUxNHfdAa5ErJij7AU6MeAs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>223262216</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Lewis, George N. ; Postol, Theodore A. ; Pike, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, George N. ; Postol, Theodore A. ; Pike, John</creatorcontrib><description>Lewis et al argue that the curent plan for a national missile defense system is like the one suggested in the 1960s, it also won't work. The "Safeguard" plan of 1968 and the current proposal are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-7087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0899-36</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCAMAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Scientific American, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Ballistic missiles ; Defense ; Defense spending ; Intercontinental ballistic missiles ; Military defense ; Missile defense ; Missile design ; Missiles ; National missile defense ; National security ; Radar ; Sensors ; Warheads</subject><ispartof>Scientific American, 1999-08, Vol.281 (2), p.36-41</ispartof><rights>Copyright Scientific American, Incorporated Aug 1999</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-95f7b5b727c435a06133a98edb1b725fed11507eb205e214cd7b29abf966802a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26058362$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26058362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,803,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, George N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postol, Theodore A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, John</creatorcontrib><title>Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK</title><title>Scientific American</title><description>Lewis et al argue that the curent plan for a national missile defense system is like the one suggested in the 1960s, it also won't work. The "Safeguard" plan of 1968 and the current proposal are discussed.</description><subject>Ballistic missiles</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Defense spending</subject><subject>Intercontinental ballistic missiles</subject><subject>Military defense</subject><subject>Missile defense</subject><subject>Missile design</subject><subject>Missiles</subject><subject>National missile defense</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Warheads</subject><issn>0036-8733</issn><issn>1946-7087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIIwrcTE2l-a2lHrF2oJUugyZ9ARTpjM1mS668zV8PZ_EKSNd6VmcHw7_dxYfQhcEXxPM1CC5AFUTfHB2BbHdFVZa50wcoB7RQ5FLrOQh6mHMRK4kY8foJKUlbocK3ENX8_dtNrFNqCtbZi8hpVBCdgseqgTZfDr5_vyatfn6fIqOvC0TnP1mH73d381Gj_l4-vA0uhnnjire5Jp7WfBCUumGjFssCGNWK1gUpD1yDwtCOJZQUMyBkqFbyIJqW3gthMLUsj667P6uY_2xgdSYVUgOytJWUG-SoZRRQSkRbVN3TRfrlCJ4s45hZePWEGx2dszfdgzbsYOOrWyzibAn__XZEucdsUxNHfdAa5ErJij7AU6MeAs</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Lewis, George N.</creator><creator>Postol, Theodore A.</creator><creator>Pike, John</creator><general>Scientific American, Incorporated</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK</title><author>Lewis, George N. ; Postol, Theodore A. ; Pike, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-95f7b5b727c435a06133a98edb1b725fed11507eb205e214cd7b29abf966802a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Ballistic missiles</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Defense spending</topic><topic>Intercontinental ballistic missiles</topic><topic>Military defense</topic><topic>Missile defense</topic><topic>Missile design</topic><topic>Missiles</topic><topic>National missile defense</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Warheads</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, George N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Postol, Theodore A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pike, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Scientific American</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, George N.</au><au>Postol, Theodore A.</au><au>Pike, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK</atitle><jtitle>Scientific American</jtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>281</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>36-41</pages><issn>0036-8733</issn><eissn>1946-7087</eissn><coden>SCAMAC</coden><abstract>Lewis et al argue that the curent plan for a national missile defense system is like the one suggested in the 1960s, it also won't work. The "Safeguard" plan of 1968 and the current proposal are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Scientific American, Incorporated</pub><doi>10.1038/scientificamerican0899-36</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-8733 |
| ispartof | Scientific American, 1999-08, Vol.281 (2), p.36-41 |
| issn | 0036-8733 1946-7087 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_223262216 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Ballistic missiles Defense Defense spending Intercontinental ballistic missiles Military defense Missile defense Missile design Missiles National missile defense National security Radar Sensors Warheads |
| title | Why National Missile Defense WON’T WORK |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A06%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20National%20Missile%20Defense%20WON%E2%80%99T%20WORK&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20American&rft.au=Lewis,%20George%20N.&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=281&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=36-41&rft.issn=0036-8733&rft.eissn=1946-7087&rft.coden=SCAMAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/scientificamerican0899-36&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26058362%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223262216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26058362&rfr_iscdi=true |