Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing

Holistic processing refers to the processing of objects as wholes rather than in a piecemeal, part-based fashion. Despite a suggested link between expertise and holistic processing, the role of experience in determining holistic processing of both faces and objects has been questioned. Here, we comb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. General 2020-01, Vol.149 (1), p.31-41
Hauptverfasser: Chua, Kao-Wei, Gauthier, Isabel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. General
container_volume 149
creator Chua, Kao-Wei
Gauthier, Isabel
description Holistic processing refers to the processing of objects as wholes rather than in a piecemeal, part-based fashion. Despite a suggested link between expertise and holistic processing, the role of experience in determining holistic processing of both faces and objects has been questioned. Here, we combine an individual differences approach with an experimental training study and parametrically manipulate experience with novel objects to examine the determinants of holistic processing. We also measure object-recognition ability. Our results show that although domain-general visual ability is a predictor of the ability to match object parts, it is the amount of experience people have individuating objects of a category that determines the extent to which they process new objects of this category in a holistic manner. This work highlights the benefits of dissociating the influences of domain-general ability and domain-specific experience, typically confounded in measures of performance or "expertise." Our findings are consistent with those in recent work with faces showing that variability specific to experience is a better predictor of domain-specific effects than is variability in performance. We argue that individual differences in holistic processing arise from domain-specific experience and that these effects are related to similar effects of experience on other measures of selective attention.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xge0000628
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232480883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232480883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-9fce9a0baa0a05acce025e10b97b2b9932bc3c7a4dd05c977a683de0f1c22cd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_Agiq6Pix9ACl5EqSaZ9JGj7PqCBYXVc0jTqUT6MmlFv70p6wM8OJdA-M0_YYaQQ0bPGYXs4v0ZaaiU5xtkxiTImIfaJDNKZRqDEMkO2fX-ZUKQp9tkBxgTIodkRlaLrtG2jVc9GltZE1299-gstgajBQ7oGtuij-7a0r7ZctR1tLBVhW4CPrJtdNvV1g-h8cF14crb9nmfbFW69njwde6Rp-urx_ltvLy_uZtfLmMtcjbEsjIoNS20ppom2hikPEFGC5kVvJASeGHAZFqUJU2MzDKd5lAirZjh3JQc9sjJOrd33euIflCN9QbrWrfYjV5xDlzkNM8h0OM_9KUbXRt-pzgAh4RlNPtXhSwuKKTTs6drZVznvcNK9c422n0oRtW0EPW7kICPviLHosHyh35vIICzNdC9Vr3_MNqFadbozejClIcpTDEhFQs98AmmkJTJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232240362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Chua, Kao-Wei ; Gauthier, Isabel</creator><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chua, Kao-Wei ; Gauthier, Isabel ; Cowan, Nelson</creatorcontrib><description>Holistic processing refers to the processing of objects as wholes rather than in a piecemeal, part-based fashion. Despite a suggested link between expertise and holistic processing, the role of experience in determining holistic processing of both faces and objects has been questioned. Here, we combine an individual differences approach with an experimental training study and parametrically manipulate experience with novel objects to examine the determinants of holistic processing. We also measure object-recognition ability. Our results show that although domain-general visual ability is a predictor of the ability to match object parts, it is the amount of experience people have individuating objects of a category that determines the extent to which they process new objects of this category in a holistic manner. This work highlights the benefits of dissociating the influences of domain-general ability and domain-specific experience, typically confounded in measures of performance or "expertise." Our findings are consistent with those in recent work with faces showing that variability specific to experience is a better predictor of domain-specific effects than is variability in performance. We argue that individual differences in holistic processing arise from domain-specific experience and that these effects are related to similar effects of experience on other measures of selective attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-3445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xge0000628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31144835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Dissociation ; Experience Level ; Face ; Face Perception ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Individual Differences ; Individuality ; Learning ; Male ; Mental health ; Object Recognition ; Recognition, Psychology - physiology ; Selective Attention ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2020-01, Vol.149 (1), p.31-41</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-9fce9a0baa0a05acce025e10b97b2b9932bc3c7a4dd05c977a683de0f1c22cd23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31144835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Cowan, Nelson</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chua, Kao-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><description>Holistic processing refers to the processing of objects as wholes rather than in a piecemeal, part-based fashion. Despite a suggested link between expertise and holistic processing, the role of experience in determining holistic processing of both faces and objects has been questioned. Here, we combine an individual differences approach with an experimental training study and parametrically manipulate experience with novel objects to examine the determinants of holistic processing. We also measure object-recognition ability. Our results show that although domain-general visual ability is a predictor of the ability to match object parts, it is the amount of experience people have individuating objects of a category that determines the extent to which they process new objects of this category in a holistic manner. This work highlights the benefits of dissociating the influences of domain-general ability and domain-specific experience, typically confounded in measures of performance or "expertise." Our findings are consistent with those in recent work with faces showing that variability specific to experience is a better predictor of domain-specific effects than is variability in performance. We argue that individual differences in holistic processing arise from domain-specific experience and that these effects are related to similar effects of experience on other measures of selective attention.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Dissociation</subject><subject>Experience Level</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Face Perception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Object Recognition</subject><subject>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</subject><subject>Selective Attention</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-3445</issn><issn>1939-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_Agiq6Pix9ACl5EqSaZ9JGj7PqCBYXVc0jTqUT6MmlFv70p6wM8OJdA-M0_YYaQQ0bPGYXs4v0ZaaiU5xtkxiTImIfaJDNKZRqDEMkO2fX-ZUKQp9tkBxgTIodkRlaLrtG2jVc9GltZE1299-gstgajBQ7oGtuij-7a0r7ZctR1tLBVhW4CPrJtdNvV1g-h8cF14crb9nmfbFW69njwde6Rp-urx_ltvLy_uZtfLmMtcjbEsjIoNS20ppom2hikPEFGC5kVvJASeGHAZFqUJU2MzDKd5lAirZjh3JQc9sjJOrd33euIflCN9QbrWrfYjV5xDlzkNM8h0OM_9KUbXRt-pzgAh4RlNPtXhSwuKKTTs6drZVznvcNK9c422n0oRtW0EPW7kICPviLHosHyh35vIICzNdC9Vr3_MNqFadbozejClIcpTDEhFQs98AmmkJTJ</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Chua, Kao-Wei</creator><creator>Gauthier, Isabel</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing</title><author>Chua, Kao-Wei ; Gauthier, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a481t-9fce9a0baa0a05acce025e10b97b2b9932bc3c7a4dd05c977a683de0f1c22cd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Dissociation</topic><topic>Experience Level</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Face Perception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Object Recognition</topic><topic>Recognition, Psychology - physiology</topic><topic>Selective Attention</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chua, Kao-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chua, Kao-Wei</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><au>Cowan, Nelson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. General</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Gen</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>31-41</pages><issn>0096-3445</issn><eissn>1939-2222</eissn><abstract>Holistic processing refers to the processing of objects as wholes rather than in a piecemeal, part-based fashion. Despite a suggested link between expertise and holistic processing, the role of experience in determining holistic processing of both faces and objects has been questioned. Here, we combine an individual differences approach with an experimental training study and parametrically manipulate experience with novel objects to examine the determinants of holistic processing. We also measure object-recognition ability. Our results show that although domain-general visual ability is a predictor of the ability to match object parts, it is the amount of experience people have individuating objects of a category that determines the extent to which they process new objects of this category in a holistic manner. This work highlights the benefits of dissociating the influences of domain-general ability and domain-specific experience, typically confounded in measures of performance or "expertise." Our findings are consistent with those in recent work with faces showing that variability specific to experience is a better predictor of domain-specific effects than is variability in performance. We argue that individual differences in holistic processing arise from domain-specific experience and that these effects are related to similar effects of experience on other measures of selective attention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31144835</pmid><doi>10.1037/xge0000628</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-3445
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2020-01, Vol.149 (1), p.31-41
issn 0096-3445
1939-2222
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232480883
source APA PsycARTICLES; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Attention - physiology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Dissociation
Experience Level
Face
Face Perception
Female
Human
Humans
Individual Differences
Individuality
Learning
Male
Mental health
Object Recognition
Recognition, Psychology - physiology
Selective Attention
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
title Domain-Specific Experience Determines Individual Differences in Holistic Processing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domain-Specific%20Experience%20Determines%20Individual%20Differences%20in%20Holistic%20Processing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20General&rft.au=Chua,%20Kao-Wei&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=31-41&rft.issn=0096-3445&rft.eissn=1939-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xge0000628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232480883%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232240362&rft_id=info:pmid/31144835&rfr_iscdi=true