The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated

What is the perceptual experience of variability? Unconscious perceptual processes are well-calibrated to variability, as are unconscious motor processes, whereas cognitive processes are not well-calibrated and tend to underestimate variability. Regarding the perceptual experience of variability, pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1083-1103
1. Verfasser: Witt, Jessica K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1103
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1083
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 45
creator Witt, Jessica K.
description What is the perceptual experience of variability? Unconscious perceptual processes are well-calibrated to variability, as are unconscious motor processes, whereas cognitive processes are not well-calibrated and tend to underestimate variability. Regarding the perceptual experience of variability, perceivers are sensitive to differences in the variability of ensembles of objects, but any potential biases have not yet been explored. In the current experiments, participants viewed a set of lines at various orientations that were presented 1 at a time in a random order. Participants judged whether the orientations within each set were more similar to each other or more disperse. Although participants were sensitive to differences in spread, participants overestimated the variability of the set by 50%. The results have implications for mechanisms underlying ensemble perception, which is the extraction of summary statistics from a set of objects. In particular, there are both shared and unique processes related to perceiving similarities across objects (such as the mean orientation) and perceiving differences (such as their spread). Both visual abilities were thorough and used the full set of lines, rather than using only a subset, but the perception of spread relied more heavily on differences presented at the beginning whereas perception of the mean relied more heavily on features of the lines at the end of the animation. The results also have implications for visualizations of uncertainty, such as hurricane forecasts. A perceptual bias to overestimate variability could help counteract cognitive biases to underestimate variability. Public Significance Statement The perceptual system is sensitive to variability in a group of objects but is also highly biased to overestimate variability. This perceptual bias has implications for how people will understand visualizations and could also have implications for diagnosing cancer. If people or doctors overestimate variability, this could affect decisions such as when to evacuate in anticipation of severe weather or whether or not a radiograph contains cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xhp0000648
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232477670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232477670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-27ce2adc369c372f8204acca2f7e6079705b1ed53e8b72df1505b1db58ad3e833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F1L3TAYB_AgG3rmvPEDjMBuxlg1L02TXoo4JxxQ0HkbnqZPNdLTdkkKnm-_dMcXWG4CT375k_wJOebshDOpT58fJ5ZXVZo9suK1rAsutP5AVozVVcGVkAfkU4xPC-JG7ZMDyXlZGqVW5PbuEekNBodTmqGnF88TBo-DQzp29B6Ch8b3Pm2pH-jaD0ivl-MEyY8DvYr0MiCkfpsvwsMDBkjYfiYfO-gjHr3sh-T3z4u781_F-vry6vxsXYA0JhVCOxTQOlnVTmrRGcFKcA5Ep7FiutZMNRxbJdE0WrQdV8ugbZSBNs-kPCTfdrlTGP_MGJPd-Oiw72HAcY5WCClKrSvNMv36H30a5zDk1_1TQtaq4ll93ykXxhgDdnYKfgNhazmzS9X2veqMv7xEzs0G2zf62m0GP3YAJrBT3DoIybseo5tDyBUuYbZU1uTo_Ju_5QyIaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232239561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Witt, Jessica K.</creator><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Witt, Jessica K. ; Gauthier, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>What is the perceptual experience of variability? Unconscious perceptual processes are well-calibrated to variability, as are unconscious motor processes, whereas cognitive processes are not well-calibrated and tend to underestimate variability. Regarding the perceptual experience of variability, perceivers are sensitive to differences in the variability of ensembles of objects, but any potential biases have not yet been explored. In the current experiments, participants viewed a set of lines at various orientations that were presented 1 at a time in a random order. Participants judged whether the orientations within each set were more similar to each other or more disperse. Although participants were sensitive to differences in spread, participants overestimated the variability of the set by 50%. The results have implications for mechanisms underlying ensemble perception, which is the extraction of summary statistics from a set of objects. In particular, there are both shared and unique processes related to perceiving similarities across objects (such as the mean orientation) and perceiving differences (such as their spread). Both visual abilities were thorough and used the full set of lines, rather than using only a subset, but the perception of spread relied more heavily on differences presented at the beginning whereas perception of the mean relied more heavily on features of the lines at the end of the animation. The results also have implications for visualizations of uncertainty, such as hurricane forecasts. A perceptual bias to overestimate variability could help counteract cognitive biases to underestimate variability. Public Significance Statement The perceptual system is sensitive to variability in a group of objects but is also highly biased to overestimate variability. This perceptual bias has implications for how people will understand visualizations and could also have implications for diagnosing cancer. If people or doctors overestimate variability, this could affect decisions such as when to evacuate in anticipation of severe weather or whether or not a radiograph contains cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000648</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31144855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cognitive Processes ; Consciousness States ; Human ; Humans ; Imagery ; Motor Processes ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Perceptual Orientation ; Space Perception - physiology ; Stimulus Variability ; Uncertainty ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1083-1103</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-27ce2adc369c372f8204acca2f7e6079705b1ed53e8b72df1505b1db58ad3e833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31144855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gauthier, Isabel</contributor><creatorcontrib>Witt, Jessica K.</creatorcontrib><title>The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>What is the perceptual experience of variability? Unconscious perceptual processes are well-calibrated to variability, as are unconscious motor processes, whereas cognitive processes are not well-calibrated and tend to underestimate variability. Regarding the perceptual experience of variability, perceivers are sensitive to differences in the variability of ensembles of objects, but any potential biases have not yet been explored. In the current experiments, participants viewed a set of lines at various orientations that were presented 1 at a time in a random order. Participants judged whether the orientations within each set were more similar to each other or more disperse. Although participants were sensitive to differences in spread, participants overestimated the variability of the set by 50%. The results have implications for mechanisms underlying ensemble perception, which is the extraction of summary statistics from a set of objects. In particular, there are both shared and unique processes related to perceiving similarities across objects (such as the mean orientation) and perceiving differences (such as their spread). Both visual abilities were thorough and used the full set of lines, rather than using only a subset, but the perception of spread relied more heavily on differences presented at the beginning whereas perception of the mean relied more heavily on features of the lines at the end of the animation. The results also have implications for visualizations of uncertainty, such as hurricane forecasts. A perceptual bias to overestimate variability could help counteract cognitive biases to underestimate variability. Public Significance Statement The perceptual system is sensitive to variability in a group of objects but is also highly biased to overestimate variability. This perceptual bias has implications for how people will understand visualizations and could also have implications for diagnosing cancer. If people or doctors overestimate variability, this could affect decisions such as when to evacuate in anticipation of severe weather or whether or not a radiograph contains cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Consciousness States</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Motor Processes</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Perceptual Orientation</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Stimulus Variability</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0F1L3TAYB_AgG3rmvPEDjMBuxlg1L02TXoo4JxxQ0HkbnqZPNdLTdkkKnm-_dMcXWG4CT375k_wJOebshDOpT58fJ5ZXVZo9suK1rAsutP5AVozVVcGVkAfkU4xPC-JG7ZMDyXlZGqVW5PbuEekNBodTmqGnF88TBo-DQzp29B6Ch8b3Pm2pH-jaD0ivl-MEyY8DvYr0MiCkfpsvwsMDBkjYfiYfO-gjHr3sh-T3z4u781_F-vry6vxsXYA0JhVCOxTQOlnVTmrRGcFKcA5Ep7FiutZMNRxbJdE0WrQdV8ugbZSBNs-kPCTfdrlTGP_MGJPd-Oiw72HAcY5WCClKrSvNMv36H30a5zDk1_1TQtaq4ll93ykXxhgDdnYKfgNhazmzS9X2veqMv7xEzs0G2zf62m0GP3YAJrBT3DoIybseo5tDyBUuYbZU1uTo_Ju_5QyIaA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Witt, Jessica K.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated</title><author>Witt, Jessica K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-27ce2adc369c372f8204acca2f7e6079705b1ed53e8b72df1505b1db58ad3e833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Consciousness States</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Motor Processes</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Perceptual Orientation</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Stimulus Variability</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witt, Jessica K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witt, Jessica K.</au><au>Gauthier, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1083</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1083-1103</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><abstract>What is the perceptual experience of variability? Unconscious perceptual processes are well-calibrated to variability, as are unconscious motor processes, whereas cognitive processes are not well-calibrated and tend to underestimate variability. Regarding the perceptual experience of variability, perceivers are sensitive to differences in the variability of ensembles of objects, but any potential biases have not yet been explored. In the current experiments, participants viewed a set of lines at various orientations that were presented 1 at a time in a random order. Participants judged whether the orientations within each set were more similar to each other or more disperse. Although participants were sensitive to differences in spread, participants overestimated the variability of the set by 50%. The results have implications for mechanisms underlying ensemble perception, which is the extraction of summary statistics from a set of objects. In particular, there are both shared and unique processes related to perceiving similarities across objects (such as the mean orientation) and perceiving differences (such as their spread). Both visual abilities were thorough and used the full set of lines, rather than using only a subset, but the perception of spread relied more heavily on differences presented at the beginning whereas perception of the mean relied more heavily on features of the lines at the end of the animation. The results also have implications for visualizations of uncertainty, such as hurricane forecasts. A perceptual bias to overestimate variability could help counteract cognitive biases to underestimate variability. Public Significance Statement The perceptual system is sensitive to variability in a group of objects but is also highly biased to overestimate variability. This perceptual bias has implications for how people will understand visualizations and could also have implications for diagnosing cancer. If people or doctors overestimate variability, this could affect decisions such as when to evacuate in anticipation of severe weather or whether or not a radiograph contains cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31144855</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0000648</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2019-08, Vol.45 (8), p.1083-1103
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232477670
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Cognitive Processes
Consciousness States
Human
Humans
Imagery
Motor Processes
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Perceptual Orientation
Space Perception - physiology
Stimulus Variability
Uncertainty
Visual Perception
title The Perceptual Experience of Variability in Line Orientation Is Greatly Exaggerated
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Perceptual%20Experience%20of%20Variability%20in%20Line%20Orientation%20Is%20Greatly%20Exaggerated&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Witt,%20Jessica%20K.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1083&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1083-1103&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0000648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232477670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232239561&rft_id=info:pmid/31144855&rfr_iscdi=true