Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom

Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival. To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances. A cross-sectional postal survey of prostat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2019-08, Vol.76 (2), p.228-237
Hauptverfasser: Donnelly, David W., Gavin, Anna, Downing, Amy, Hounsome, Luke, Kearney, Therese, McNair, Emma, Allan, Dawn, Huws, Dyfed W., Wright, Penny, Selby, Peter J., Kind, Paul, Watson, Eila, Wagland, Richard, Wilding, Sarah, Butcher, Hugh, Mottram, Rebecca, Allen, Majorie, McSorley, Oonagh, Sharp, Linda, Mason, Malcolm D., Cross, William R., Catto, James W.F., Glaser, Adam W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 2
container_start_page 228
container_title European urology
container_volume 76
creator Donnelly, David W.
Gavin, Anna
Downing, Amy
Hounsome, Luke
Kearney, Therese
McNair, Emma
Allan, Dawn
Huws, Dyfed W.
Wright, Penny
Selby, Peter J.
Kind, Paul
Watson, Eila
Wagland, Richard
Wilding, Sarah
Butcher, Hugh
Mottram, Rebecca
Allen, Majorie
McSorley, Oonagh
Sharp, Linda
Mason, Malcolm D.
Cross, William R.
Catto, James W.F.
Glaser, Adam W.
description Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival. To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances. A cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors diagnosed 18–42mo previously. Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems and vitality were patient reported using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. General health was also self-assessed. Regional variations were identified using multivariable log-linear regression. A total of 35823 men responded, 60.8% of those invited. Self-assessed health was significantly lower than the UK average in Wales and Scotland. Respondents reported more urinary incontinence in Scotland, more urinary irritation/obstruction in Scotland and Northern Ireland (NI), poorer bowel function in Scotland and NI, worse sexual function in Scotland, and reduced vitality/hormonal function in Scotland, Wales, and NI. Self-assessed health was poorer than the English average in South Yorkshire and North-East and Cumbria, with more urinary incontinence in North-East and Cumbria and Peninsula, greater sexual problems in West Midlands, and poorer vitality in North-East and Cumbria and West Midlands. Limitations include difficulty identifying clinically significant differences and limited information on pretreatment conditions. Despite adjustment for treatment, and clinical and sociodemographic factors, quality of survival among prostate cancer survivors varied by area of residence. Adoption of best practice from areas performing well could support enhanced survival quality in poorer performing areas, particularly with regard to bowel problems and vitality, where clinically relevant differences were reported. We conducted a UK-wide survey of patient's quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Outcomes were found to vary depending upon where patients live. Different service providers need to ensure that all prostate cancer patients receive the same follow-up care. Prostate cancer survivors from England report better quality of survival than those from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, with differences unrelated to treatment type, and patient and disease characteristics. Within England, regional variations in general health and functional outcome also exist.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232138250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030228381930329X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232138250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a6e461118dff68b90be56aabc505fa34a7a5e6b19d33606b4461725436db68783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtP3DAQgK2qqCyPf1BVPvaSMLYTx3uptFq1pSoIWh5Xy0kmi1dJDLazFf8eL7tw7GlGo29eHyGfGeQMmDxb5zj5ybucA5vnUOTA1AcyY6oSWVVK-EhmIIBnXAl1SI5CWAOAKOfiEzkUDCQozmek-Ysr60bT03vjrYkpD9SO9M9kehufqevozeQ3dpOIxeDGFb3Ekf6z8YFeexeiiUiXZmzQ00WTCoHGB6R3o43Y0t92XLVuOCEHnekDnu7jMbn78f12eZ5dXP38tVxcZE0BKmZGYiEZY6rtOqnqOdRYSmPqpoSyM6IwlSlR1mzeCiFB1kWiK14WQra1VJUSx-Trbu6jd08ThqgHGxrsezOim4LmXHAmFC8hocUOfb3ZY6cfvR2Mf9YM9FavXuudXr3Vq6HQSW9q-7LfMNUDtu9Nbz4T8G0HYPpzY9Hr0FhMelrrsYm6dfb_G14ASf-NjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232138250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Donnelly, David W. ; Gavin, Anna ; Downing, Amy ; Hounsome, Luke ; Kearney, Therese ; McNair, Emma ; Allan, Dawn ; Huws, Dyfed W. ; Wright, Penny ; Selby, Peter J. ; Kind, Paul ; Watson, Eila ; Wagland, Richard ; Wilding, Sarah ; Butcher, Hugh ; Mottram, Rebecca ; Allen, Majorie ; McSorley, Oonagh ; Sharp, Linda ; Mason, Malcolm D. ; Cross, William R. ; Catto, James W.F. ; Glaser, Adam W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, David W. ; Gavin, Anna ; Downing, Amy ; Hounsome, Luke ; Kearney, Therese ; McNair, Emma ; Allan, Dawn ; Huws, Dyfed W. ; Wright, Penny ; Selby, Peter J. ; Kind, Paul ; Watson, Eila ; Wagland, Richard ; Wilding, Sarah ; Butcher, Hugh ; Mottram, Rebecca ; Allen, Majorie ; McSorley, Oonagh ; Sharp, Linda ; Mason, Malcolm D. ; Cross, William R. ; Catto, James W.F. ; Glaser, Adam W.</creatorcontrib><description>Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival. To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances. A cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors diagnosed 18–42mo previously. Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems and vitality were patient reported using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. General health was also self-assessed. Regional variations were identified using multivariable log-linear regression. A total of 35823 men responded, 60.8% of those invited. Self-assessed health was significantly lower than the UK average in Wales and Scotland. Respondents reported more urinary incontinence in Scotland, more urinary irritation/obstruction in Scotland and Northern Ireland (NI), poorer bowel function in Scotland and NI, worse sexual function in Scotland, and reduced vitality/hormonal function in Scotland, Wales, and NI. Self-assessed health was poorer than the English average in South Yorkshire and North-East and Cumbria, with more urinary incontinence in North-East and Cumbria and Peninsula, greater sexual problems in West Midlands, and poorer vitality in North-East and Cumbria and West Midlands. Limitations include difficulty identifying clinically significant differences and limited information on pretreatment conditions. Despite adjustment for treatment, and clinical and sociodemographic factors, quality of survival among prostate cancer survivors varied by area of residence. Adoption of best practice from areas performing well could support enhanced survival quality in poorer performing areas, particularly with regard to bowel problems and vitality, where clinically relevant differences were reported. We conducted a UK-wide survey of patient's quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Outcomes were found to vary depending upon where patients live. Different service providers need to ensure that all prostate cancer patients receive the same follow-up care. Prostate cancer survivors from England report better quality of survival than those from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, with differences unrelated to treatment type, and patient and disease characteristics. Within England, regional variations in general health and functional outcome also exist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31060822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cancer Alliances ; Patient-reported outcomes ; Prostate cancer ; Quality of survival ; Regional variation ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2019-08, Vol.76 (2), p.228-237</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a6e461118dff68b90be56aabc505fa34a7a5e6b19d33606b4461725436db68783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a6e461118dff68b90be56aabc505fa34a7a5e6b19d33606b4461725436db68783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228381930329X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31060822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hounsome, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNair, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huws, Dyfed W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kind, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Eila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagland, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilding, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottram, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Majorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Malcolm D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catto, James W.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Adam W.</creatorcontrib><title>Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival. To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances. A cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors diagnosed 18–42mo previously. Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems and vitality were patient reported using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. General health was also self-assessed. Regional variations were identified using multivariable log-linear regression. A total of 35823 men responded, 60.8% of those invited. Self-assessed health was significantly lower than the UK average in Wales and Scotland. Respondents reported more urinary incontinence in Scotland, more urinary irritation/obstruction in Scotland and Northern Ireland (NI), poorer bowel function in Scotland and NI, worse sexual function in Scotland, and reduced vitality/hormonal function in Scotland, Wales, and NI. Self-assessed health was poorer than the English average in South Yorkshire and North-East and Cumbria, with more urinary incontinence in North-East and Cumbria and Peninsula, greater sexual problems in West Midlands, and poorer vitality in North-East and Cumbria and West Midlands. Limitations include difficulty identifying clinically significant differences and limited information on pretreatment conditions. Despite adjustment for treatment, and clinical and sociodemographic factors, quality of survival among prostate cancer survivors varied by area of residence. Adoption of best practice from areas performing well could support enhanced survival quality in poorer performing areas, particularly with regard to bowel problems and vitality, where clinically relevant differences were reported. We conducted a UK-wide survey of patient's quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Outcomes were found to vary depending upon where patients live. Different service providers need to ensure that all prostate cancer patients receive the same follow-up care. Prostate cancer survivors from England report better quality of survival than those from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, with differences unrelated to treatment type, and patient and disease characteristics. Within England, regional variations in general health and functional outcome also exist.</description><subject>Cancer Alliances</subject><subject>Patient-reported outcomes</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Quality of survival</subject><subject>Regional variation</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtP3DAQgK2qqCyPf1BVPvaSMLYTx3uptFq1pSoIWh5Xy0kmi1dJDLazFf8eL7tw7GlGo29eHyGfGeQMmDxb5zj5ybucA5vnUOTA1AcyY6oSWVVK-EhmIIBnXAl1SI5CWAOAKOfiEzkUDCQozmek-Ysr60bT03vjrYkpD9SO9M9kehufqevozeQ3dpOIxeDGFb3Ekf6z8YFeexeiiUiXZmzQ00WTCoHGB6R3o43Y0t92XLVuOCEHnekDnu7jMbn78f12eZ5dXP38tVxcZE0BKmZGYiEZY6rtOqnqOdRYSmPqpoSyM6IwlSlR1mzeCiFB1kWiK14WQra1VJUSx-Trbu6jd08ThqgHGxrsezOim4LmXHAmFC8hocUOfb3ZY6cfvR2Mf9YM9FavXuudXr3Vq6HQSW9q-7LfMNUDtu9Nbz4T8G0HYPpzY9Hr0FhMelrrsYm6dfb_G14ASf-NjA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Donnelly, David W.</creator><creator>Gavin, Anna</creator><creator>Downing, Amy</creator><creator>Hounsome, Luke</creator><creator>Kearney, Therese</creator><creator>McNair, Emma</creator><creator>Allan, Dawn</creator><creator>Huws, Dyfed W.</creator><creator>Wright, Penny</creator><creator>Selby, Peter J.</creator><creator>Kind, Paul</creator><creator>Watson, Eila</creator><creator>Wagland, Richard</creator><creator>Wilding, Sarah</creator><creator>Butcher, Hugh</creator><creator>Mottram, Rebecca</creator><creator>Allen, Majorie</creator><creator>McSorley, Oonagh</creator><creator>Sharp, Linda</creator><creator>Mason, Malcolm D.</creator><creator>Cross, William R.</creator><creator>Catto, James W.F.</creator><creator>Glaser, Adam W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom</title><author>Donnelly, David W. ; Gavin, Anna ; Downing, Amy ; Hounsome, Luke ; Kearney, Therese ; McNair, Emma ; Allan, Dawn ; Huws, Dyfed W. ; Wright, Penny ; Selby, Peter J. ; Kind, Paul ; Watson, Eila ; Wagland, Richard ; Wilding, Sarah ; Butcher, Hugh ; Mottram, Rebecca ; Allen, Majorie ; McSorley, Oonagh ; Sharp, Linda ; Mason, Malcolm D. ; Cross, William R. ; Catto, James W.F. ; Glaser, Adam W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a6e461118dff68b90be56aabc505fa34a7a5e6b19d33606b4461725436db68783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer Alliances</topic><topic>Patient-reported outcomes</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Quality of survival</topic><topic>Regional variation</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donnelly, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hounsome, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNair, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allan, Dawn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huws, Dyfed W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selby, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kind, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Eila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagland, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilding, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mottram, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Majorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Oonagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharp, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Malcolm D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, William R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catto, James W.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Adam W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donnelly, David W.</au><au>Gavin, Anna</au><au>Downing, Amy</au><au>Hounsome, Luke</au><au>Kearney, Therese</au><au>McNair, Emma</au><au>Allan, Dawn</au><au>Huws, Dyfed W.</au><au>Wright, Penny</au><au>Selby, Peter J.</au><au>Kind, Paul</au><au>Watson, Eila</au><au>Wagland, Richard</au><au>Wilding, Sarah</au><au>Butcher, Hugh</au><au>Mottram, Rebecca</au><au>Allen, Majorie</au><au>McSorley, Oonagh</au><au>Sharp, Linda</au><au>Mason, Malcolm D.</au><au>Cross, William R.</au><au>Catto, James W.F.</au><au>Glaser, Adam W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>228</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>228-237</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Prostate cancer incidence, treatment, and survival rates vary throughout the UK, but little is known about regional differences in quality of survival. To investigate variations in patient-reported outcomes between UK countries and English Cancer Alliances. A cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors diagnosed 18–42mo previously. Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems and vitality were patient reported using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. General health was also self-assessed. Regional variations were identified using multivariable log-linear regression. A total of 35823 men responded, 60.8% of those invited. Self-assessed health was significantly lower than the UK average in Wales and Scotland. Respondents reported more urinary incontinence in Scotland, more urinary irritation/obstruction in Scotland and Northern Ireland (NI), poorer bowel function in Scotland and NI, worse sexual function in Scotland, and reduced vitality/hormonal function in Scotland, Wales, and NI. Self-assessed health was poorer than the English average in South Yorkshire and North-East and Cumbria, with more urinary incontinence in North-East and Cumbria and Peninsula, greater sexual problems in West Midlands, and poorer vitality in North-East and Cumbria and West Midlands. Limitations include difficulty identifying clinically significant differences and limited information on pretreatment conditions. Despite adjustment for treatment, and clinical and sociodemographic factors, quality of survival among prostate cancer survivors varied by area of residence. Adoption of best practice from areas performing well could support enhanced survival quality in poorer performing areas, particularly with regard to bowel problems and vitality, where clinically relevant differences were reported. We conducted a UK-wide survey of patient's quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Outcomes were found to vary depending upon where patients live. Different service providers need to ensure that all prostate cancer patients receive the same follow-up care. Prostate cancer survivors from England report better quality of survival than those from Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, with differences unrelated to treatment type, and patient and disease characteristics. Within England, regional variations in general health and functional outcome also exist.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31060822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.018</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2019-08, Vol.76 (2), p.228-237
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232138250
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cancer Alliances
Patient-reported outcomes
Prostate cancer
Quality of survival
Regional variation
Treatment
title Regional Variations in Quality of Survival Among Men with Prostate Cancer Across the United Kingdom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A02%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20Variations%20in%20Quality%20of%20Survival%20Among%20Men%20with%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Across%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Donnelly,%20David%20W.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=228-237&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232138250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232138250&rft_id=info:pmid/31060822&rft_els_id=S030228381930329X&rfr_iscdi=true