Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients
Introduction: Although behavioral health treatment can improve distress and pain functioning for patients with chronic pain, few who are referred by their primary care physician will see a behavioral health specialist. Given the benefits of integrating behavioral health into primary care, this may b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Families systems & health 2019-06, Vol.37 (2), p.120-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Families systems & health |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Miller-Matero, Lisa R Dykhuis, Kate E Clark, Shannon M Coleman, Joseph P Ahmedani, Brian K |
description | Introduction: Although behavioral health treatment can improve distress and pain functioning for patients with chronic pain, few who are referred by their primary care physician will see a behavioral health specialist. Given the benefits of integrating behavioral health into primary care, this may be an avenue for delivering a psychological intervention for chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to optimize a psychological intervention for patients with chronic pain to be delivered in primary care, utilizing the perspectives of providers and patients. Method: Psychologists (n = 9), primary care providers (n = 9), and patients with chronic pain (n = 9) participated in separate focus groups. Participants reviewed the proposed 4-session intervention, provided feedback prompted by a set of open-ended questions, and completed a survey. Results: Statements from focus groups were transcribed and coded into 2 thematic categories: (a) content of the intervention and (b) logistics and design. Participants believed that offering a brief, behavioral intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic was feasible and useful. All providers (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would refer a patient to this intervention, and 100% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that they would participate. Discussion: Feedback solicited from the focus groups led to alterations to the treatment manual, such as adding a fifth session, using different psychological strategies, and logistical changes in delivery (i.e., meeting biweekly and intervisit contacts). The modified version of this intervention will be evaluated with a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/fsh0000416 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232136833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A592555734</galeid><sourcerecordid>A592555734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a658t-41ff765b2f09bba1a6fb39c30ce18ad152309946b3345551ab38aa39a8b7db533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN022L00AQAOAgineefvEHSEAQX9pzN9u8-e0sehaKLXh-XibpJN0jzdadTfH8M_5VJ7Z6rZTDJCSb5JnZgZ0NgqdSnEuh0rcVLQUfI5ncC05lrvKhSER0n8cil8M0jtKT4BHRdW8ylTwMTpQUcRYrcRr8vHII3rR1OAfThnzNnVmBuwnH4PBdOFt7szI_egBtOGk91g48LsI53ZRL29jalND8_uE22Hpj2_A9EAMezNHRGktvNkihrfZiyNPgYCZ-sRuz4IABT8TpuShOR4-DBxU0hE92z7Pg68cPV-NPw-nscjK-mA4hiTM_HMmqSpO4iCqRFwVISKpC5aUSJcoMFjKOlMjzUVIoNYrjWEKhMgCVQ1akiyJW6ix4uc27dvZbh-T1ylCJTQMt2o50FKlIqiRTPX3-D722nWu5OlZJquJEZPJuFYmcF0Kmt6qGBrVpK-sdlP3U-iLOIy41VSNWwyOqxhYdNLbFyvDnA39-xPO5wJUpjwa8Oghg4_G7r6Ej0pMvn__bZpfTuwrf2dI2DdaoeQXHs0P_Ys8vERq_JNt0fVvRIRzswaIj0yLxjUy99LSt5YC_3vLSWSKHlV5ve09Lofs9pG_3EONnu5XrihUu_tI_m4bBmy2ANeg19zQ4b8oGqeyc46btk2nOGWkZCfULmXEhFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2220983617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Miller-Matero, Lisa R ; Dykhuis, Kate E ; Clark, Shannon M ; Coleman, Joseph P ; Ahmedani, Brian K</creator><contributor>Polaha, Jodi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller-Matero, Lisa R ; Dykhuis, Kate E ; Clark, Shannon M ; Coleman, Joseph P ; Ahmedani, Brian K ; Polaha, Jodi</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Although behavioral health treatment can improve distress and pain functioning for patients with chronic pain, few who are referred by their primary care physician will see a behavioral health specialist. Given the benefits of integrating behavioral health into primary care, this may be an avenue for delivering a psychological intervention for chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to optimize a psychological intervention for patients with chronic pain to be delivered in primary care, utilizing the perspectives of providers and patients. Method: Psychologists (n = 9), primary care providers (n = 9), and patients with chronic pain (n = 9) participated in separate focus groups. Participants reviewed the proposed 4-session intervention, provided feedback prompted by a set of open-ended questions, and completed a survey. Results: Statements from focus groups were transcribed and coded into 2 thematic categories: (a) content of the intervention and (b) logistics and design. Participants believed that offering a brief, behavioral intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic was feasible and useful. All providers (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would refer a patient to this intervention, and 100% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that they would participate. Discussion: Feedback solicited from the focus groups led to alterations to the treatment manual, such as adding a fifth session, using different psychological strategies, and logistical changes in delivery (i.e., meeting biweekly and intervisit contacts). The modified version of this intervention will be evaluated with a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-7527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/fsh0000416</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31058530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavior therapy ; Behavioral medicine ; Behavioral psychology ; Behaviour therapy ; Care and treatment ; Chronic Pain ; Chronic Pain - therapy ; Clinical trials ; Company business management ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Focus Groups - methods ; Health ; Health Care Psychology ; Health Personnel ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Integrated Services ; Intervention ; Male ; Management ; Medical care utilization ; Methods ; Pain management ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Management - trends ; Patients ; Patients - psychology ; Physicians ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Primary Health Care - standards ; Psychologists ; Psychology ; Qualitative Research ; Quality Improvement ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Retirement benefits ; Test Construction</subject><ispartof>Families systems & health, 2019-06, Vol.37 (2), p.120-130</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Psychological Association, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Psychological Association, Inc.</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a658t-41ff765b2f09bba1a6fb39c30ce18ad152309946b3345551ab38aa39a8b7db533</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7044-7831</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31058530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Polaha, Jodi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller-Matero, Lisa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykhuis, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmedani, Brian K</creatorcontrib><title>Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients</title><title>Families systems & health</title><addtitle>Fam Syst Health</addtitle><description>Introduction: Although behavioral health treatment can improve distress and pain functioning for patients with chronic pain, few who are referred by their primary care physician will see a behavioral health specialist. Given the benefits of integrating behavioral health into primary care, this may be an avenue for delivering a psychological intervention for chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to optimize a psychological intervention for patients with chronic pain to be delivered in primary care, utilizing the perspectives of providers and patients. Method: Psychologists (n = 9), primary care providers (n = 9), and patients with chronic pain (n = 9) participated in separate focus groups. Participants reviewed the proposed 4-session intervention, provided feedback prompted by a set of open-ended questions, and completed a survey. Results: Statements from focus groups were transcribed and coded into 2 thematic categories: (a) content of the intervention and (b) logistics and design. Participants believed that offering a brief, behavioral intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic was feasible and useful. All providers (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would refer a patient to this intervention, and 100% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that they would participate. Discussion: Feedback solicited from the focus groups led to alterations to the treatment manual, such as adding a fifth session, using different psychological strategies, and logistical changes in delivery (i.e., meeting biweekly and intervisit contacts). The modified version of this intervention will be evaluated with a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavior therapy</subject><subject>Behavioral medicine</subject><subject>Behavioral psychology</subject><subject>Behaviour therapy</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic Pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Focus Groups - methods</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Care Psychology</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrated Services</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical care utilization</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Management - trends</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Retirement benefits</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><issn>1091-7527</issn><issn>1939-0602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqN022L00AQAOAgineefvEHSEAQX9pzN9u8-e0sehaKLXh-XibpJN0jzdadTfH8M_5VJ7Z6rZTDJCSb5JnZgZ0NgqdSnEuh0rcVLQUfI5ncC05lrvKhSER0n8cil8M0jtKT4BHRdW8ylTwMTpQUcRYrcRr8vHII3rR1OAfThnzNnVmBuwnH4PBdOFt7szI_egBtOGk91g48LsI53ZRL29jalND8_uE22Hpj2_A9EAMezNHRGktvNkihrfZiyNPgYCZ-sRuz4IABT8TpuShOR4-DBxU0hE92z7Pg68cPV-NPw-nscjK-mA4hiTM_HMmqSpO4iCqRFwVISKpC5aUSJcoMFjKOlMjzUVIoNYrjWEKhMgCVQ1akiyJW6ix4uc27dvZbh-T1ylCJTQMt2o50FKlIqiRTPX3-D722nWu5OlZJquJEZPJuFYmcF0Kmt6qGBrVpK-sdlP3U-iLOIy41VSNWwyOqxhYdNLbFyvDnA39-xPO5wJUpjwa8Oghg4_G7r6Ej0pMvn__bZpfTuwrf2dI2DdaoeQXHs0P_Ys8vERq_JNt0fVvRIRzswaIj0yLxjUy99LSt5YC_3vLSWSKHlV5ve09Lofs9pG_3EONnu5XrihUu_tI_m4bBmy2ANeg19zQ4b8oGqeyc46btk2nOGWkZCfULmXEhFQ</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Miller-Matero, Lisa R</creator><creator>Dykhuis, Kate E</creator><creator>Clark, Shannon M</creator><creator>Coleman, Joseph P</creator><creator>Ahmedani, Brian K</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association, Inc</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-7831</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients</title><author>Miller-Matero, Lisa R ; Dykhuis, Kate E ; Clark, Shannon M ; Coleman, Joseph P ; Ahmedani, Brian K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a658t-41ff765b2f09bba1a6fb39c30ce18ad152309946b3345551ab38aa39a8b7db533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavior therapy</topic><topic>Behavioral medicine</topic><topic>Behavioral psychology</topic><topic>Behaviour therapy</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic Pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Focus Groups - methods</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Care Psychology</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrated Services</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical care utilization</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Management - trends</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Retirement benefits</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller-Matero, Lisa R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dykhuis, Kate E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Shannon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Joseph P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmedani, Brian K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Families systems & health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller-Matero, Lisa R</au><au>Dykhuis, Kate E</au><au>Clark, Shannon M</au><au>Coleman, Joseph P</au><au>Ahmedani, Brian K</au><au>Polaha, Jodi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients</atitle><jtitle>Families systems & health</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Syst Health</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>120-130</pages><issn>1091-7527</issn><eissn>1939-0602</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Although behavioral health treatment can improve distress and pain functioning for patients with chronic pain, few who are referred by their primary care physician will see a behavioral health specialist. Given the benefits of integrating behavioral health into primary care, this may be an avenue for delivering a psychological intervention for chronic pain. The purpose of this study was to optimize a psychological intervention for patients with chronic pain to be delivered in primary care, utilizing the perspectives of providers and patients. Method: Psychologists (n = 9), primary care providers (n = 9), and patients with chronic pain (n = 9) participated in separate focus groups. Participants reviewed the proposed 4-session intervention, provided feedback prompted by a set of open-ended questions, and completed a survey. Results: Statements from focus groups were transcribed and coded into 2 thematic categories: (a) content of the intervention and (b) logistics and design. Participants believed that offering a brief, behavioral intervention for chronic pain in a primary care clinic was feasible and useful. All providers (100%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would refer a patient to this intervention, and 100% of patients agreed or strongly agreed that they would participate. Discussion: Feedback solicited from the focus groups led to alterations to the treatment manual, such as adding a fifth session, using different psychological strategies, and logistical changes in delivery (i.e., meeting biweekly and intervisit contacts). The modified version of this intervention will be evaluated with a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>31058530</pmid><doi>10.1037/fsh0000416</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-7831</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-7527 |
ispartof | Families systems & health, 2019-06, Vol.37 (2), p.120-130 |
issn | 1091-7527 1939-0602 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232136833 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Behavior therapy Behavioral medicine Behavioral psychology Behaviour therapy Care and treatment Chronic Pain Chronic Pain - therapy Clinical trials Company business management Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - methods Evidence-based medicine Female Focus Groups - methods Health Health Care Psychology Health Personnel Health Personnel - psychology Human Humans Integrated Services Intervention Male Management Medical care utilization Methods Pain management Pain Management - methods Pain Management - trends Patients Patients - psychology Physicians Primary care Primary Health Care Primary Health Care - methods Primary Health Care - standards Psychologists Psychology Qualitative Research Quality Improvement Quality of Health Care - standards Retirement benefits Test Construction |
title | Treating Pain in Primary Care: Optimizing an Integrated Psychological Intervention Based on Perspectives of Psychologists, Primary Care Providers, and Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A40%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treating%20Pain%20in%20Primary%20Care:%20Optimizing%20an%20Integrated%20Psychological%20Intervention%20Based%20on%20Perspectives%20of%20Psychologists,%20Primary%20Care%20Providers,%20and%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Families%20systems%20&%20health&rft.au=Miller-Matero,%20Lisa%20R&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=120-130&rft.issn=1091-7527&rft.eissn=1939-0602&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/fsh0000416&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA592555734%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2220983617&rft_id=info:pmid/31058530&rft_galeid=A592555734&rfr_iscdi=true |