Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry
Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intuba...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.466-470 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 470 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 466 |
container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lembersky, Olga Golz, Dustin Kramer, Casey Fantegrossi, Andrea Carlson, Jestin N. Walls, Ron M. Brown, Calvin A. |
description | Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intubation sedation and associated factors.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) from 25 EDs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). Patients were considered to have received post-intubation sedation if they received any of the following medications within 15 min of ETI completion; propofol, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, and morphine. We calculated odds ratios for post-intubation sedation.
Of the 11,748 eligible intubations, 9099 received post-intubation sedation (77.5%) while 2649 did not (22.5%). Pre-intubation hypotension (odds ratio; 95% confidence Interval) (0.27; 0.24–0.31) and post-intubation hypotension (0.27; 0.24–0.31) were associated with lower odds of post-intubation sedation. Patients with a medical indication compared to a traumatic indication for ETI had higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation (1.16; 1.05–1.28) as did those that underwent rapid sequence intubation (15.15; 13.56–16.93). Use of succinylcholine was associated with a higher odd of post-intubation sedation compared to a long-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e. rocuronium or vecuronium) (1.89; 1.68–2.12).
Post-intubation sedation rates in NEAR are higher than previously reported and multiple factors including the indication for intubation and succinylcholine use, are associated with higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232120749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675719303043</els_id><sourcerecordid>2417017512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-32c5bf5f58aca597ddb53d1d8acf0cdf11817580888ee3b6fc942651384bbe333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggS1y4JHjsOH8Ql1XV0koVSKicLceetI42cbAdqn0HHhovW4rEgdN45N_3jWY-Ql4DK4FB_X4s9YhTyRl0JZMlA_aEbEAKXrTQwFOyYY2QRd3I5oS8iHFkDKCS1XNyIgAEE3W3IT8vtEk-RKpj9MbphJbeu3RHFx9T4ea09jo5P9OI9vjQQ8JAccJwi7PZU4uLDmnCOdG_-Ae6pV9x8SHRIfiJ3twh_fz7R-_o-aN268K93mfy1sUU9i_Js0HvIr56qKfk28X5zdllcf3l09XZ9rowoq1SIbiR_SAH2WqjZddY20thweZ2YMYOAHl_2bK2bRFFXw-mq3gtIYv7HoUQp-Td0XcJ_vuKManJRYO7nZ7Rr1FxLjhw1lRdRt_-g45-DXmLTFXQsDwIeKb4kTLBxxhwUEtwkw57BUwdslKjOmSlDlkpJlXOKovePFiv_YT2UfInnAx8PAKYb_HDYVDRuHw3tC6gScp69z__X_KYp5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417017512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lembersky, Olga ; Golz, Dustin ; Kramer, Casey ; Fantegrossi, Andrea ; Carlson, Jestin N. ; Walls, Ron M. ; Brown, Calvin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lembersky, Olga ; Golz, Dustin ; Kramer, Casey ; Fantegrossi, Andrea ; Carlson, Jestin N. ; Walls, Ron M. ; Brown, Calvin A. ; On Behalf of the NEAR Investigators ; NEAR Investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intubation sedation and associated factors.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) from 25 EDs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). Patients were considered to have received post-intubation sedation if they received any of the following medications within 15 min of ETI completion; propofol, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, and morphine. We calculated odds ratios for post-intubation sedation.
Of the 11,748 eligible intubations, 9099 received post-intubation sedation (77.5%) while 2649 did not (22.5%). Pre-intubation hypotension (odds ratio; 95% confidence Interval) (0.27; 0.24–0.31) and post-intubation hypotension (0.27; 0.24–0.31) were associated with lower odds of post-intubation sedation. Patients with a medical indication compared to a traumatic indication for ETI had higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation (1.16; 1.05–1.28) as did those that underwent rapid sequence intubation (15.15; 13.56–16.93). Use of succinylcholine was associated with a higher odd of post-intubation sedation compared to a long-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e. rocuronium or vecuronium) (1.89; 1.68–2.12).
Post-intubation sedation rates in NEAR are higher than previously reported and multiple factors including the indication for intubation and succinylcholine use, are associated with higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31130369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Datasets ; Diazepam ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Etomidate ; Fentanyl ; Head injuries ; Hypotension ; Intubation ; Ketamine ; Midazolam ; Morphine ; Patients ; Propofol ; Respiratory tract ; Sedation ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.466-470</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-32c5bf5f58aca597ddb53d1d8acf0cdf11817580888ee3b6fc942651384bbe333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-32c5bf5f58aca597ddb53d1d8acf0cdf11817580888ee3b6fc942651384bbe333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675719303043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31130369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lembersky, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golz, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantegrossi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jestin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Ron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Calvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On Behalf of the NEAR Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEAR Investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intubation sedation and associated factors.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) from 25 EDs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). Patients were considered to have received post-intubation sedation if they received any of the following medications within 15 min of ETI completion; propofol, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, and morphine. We calculated odds ratios for post-intubation sedation.
Of the 11,748 eligible intubations, 9099 received post-intubation sedation (77.5%) while 2649 did not (22.5%). Pre-intubation hypotension (odds ratio; 95% confidence Interval) (0.27; 0.24–0.31) and post-intubation hypotension (0.27; 0.24–0.31) were associated with lower odds of post-intubation sedation. Patients with a medical indication compared to a traumatic indication for ETI had higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation (1.16; 1.05–1.28) as did those that underwent rapid sequence intubation (15.15; 13.56–16.93). Use of succinylcholine was associated with a higher odd of post-intubation sedation compared to a long-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e. rocuronium or vecuronium) (1.89; 1.68–2.12).
Post-intubation sedation rates in NEAR are higher than previously reported and multiple factors including the indication for intubation and succinylcholine use, are associated with higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diazepam</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Etomidate</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Head injuries</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Ketamine</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Sedation</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggS1y4JHjsOH8Ql1XV0koVSKicLceetI42cbAdqn0HHhovW4rEgdN45N_3jWY-Ql4DK4FB_X4s9YhTyRl0JZMlA_aEbEAKXrTQwFOyYY2QRd3I5oS8iHFkDKCS1XNyIgAEE3W3IT8vtEk-RKpj9MbphJbeu3RHFx9T4ea09jo5P9OI9vjQQ8JAccJwi7PZU4uLDmnCOdG_-Ae6pV9x8SHRIfiJ3twh_fz7R-_o-aN268K93mfy1sUU9i_Js0HvIr56qKfk28X5zdllcf3l09XZ9rowoq1SIbiR_SAH2WqjZddY20thweZ2YMYOAHl_2bK2bRFFXw-mq3gtIYv7HoUQp-Td0XcJ_vuKManJRYO7nZ7Rr1FxLjhw1lRdRt_-g45-DXmLTFXQsDwIeKb4kTLBxxhwUEtwkw57BUwdslKjOmSlDlkpJlXOKovePFiv_YT2UfInnAx8PAKYb_HDYVDRuHw3tC6gScp69z__X_KYp5s</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Lembersky, Olga</creator><creator>Golz, Dustin</creator><creator>Kramer, Casey</creator><creator>Fantegrossi, Andrea</creator><creator>Carlson, Jestin N.</creator><creator>Walls, Ron M.</creator><creator>Brown, Calvin A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry</title><author>Lembersky, Olga ; Golz, Dustin ; Kramer, Casey ; Fantegrossi, Andrea ; Carlson, Jestin N. ; Walls, Ron M. ; Brown, Calvin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-32c5bf5f58aca597ddb53d1d8acf0cdf11817580888ee3b6fc942651384bbe333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diazepam</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Etomidate</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Head injuries</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Ketamine</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Sedation</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lembersky, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golz, Dustin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantegrossi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Jestin N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Ron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Calvin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>On Behalf of the NEAR Investigators</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEAR Investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lembersky, Olga</au><au>Golz, Dustin</au><au>Kramer, Casey</au><au>Fantegrossi, Andrea</au><au>Carlson, Jestin N.</au><au>Walls, Ron M.</au><au>Brown, Calvin A.</au><aucorp>On Behalf of the NEAR Investigators</aucorp><aucorp>NEAR Investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>466</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>466-470</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Previous work has suggested low rates of post-intubation sedation in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) in the emergency department (ED) with limited data examining factors associated with sedation use. Utilizing a national database; we sought to determine the frequency of post-intubation sedation and associated factors.
We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) from 25 EDs from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). Patients were considered to have received post-intubation sedation if they received any of the following medications within 15 min of ETI completion; propofol, midazolam, diazepam, ketamine, etomidate, fentanyl, and morphine. We calculated odds ratios for post-intubation sedation.
Of the 11,748 eligible intubations, 9099 received post-intubation sedation (77.5%) while 2649 did not (22.5%). Pre-intubation hypotension (odds ratio; 95% confidence Interval) (0.27; 0.24–0.31) and post-intubation hypotension (0.27; 0.24–0.31) were associated with lower odds of post-intubation sedation. Patients with a medical indication compared to a traumatic indication for ETI had higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation (1.16; 1.05–1.28) as did those that underwent rapid sequence intubation (15.15; 13.56–16.93). Use of succinylcholine was associated with a higher odd of post-intubation sedation compared to a long-acting neuromuscular blocking agent (i.e. rocuronium or vecuronium) (1.89; 1.68–2.12).
Post-intubation sedation rates in NEAR are higher than previously reported and multiple factors including the indication for intubation and succinylcholine use, are associated with higher odds of receiving post-intubation sedation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31130369</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2020-03, Vol.38 (3), p.466-470 |
issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232120749 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Age Analgesics Anesthesia Datasets Diazepam Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Etomidate Fentanyl Head injuries Hypotension Intubation Ketamine Midazolam Morphine Patients Propofol Respiratory tract Sedation Ventilators |
title | Factors associated with post-intubation sedation after emergency department intubation: A Report from The National Emergency Airway Registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20post-intubation%20sedation%20after%20emergency%20department%20intubation:%20A%20Report%20from%20The%20National%20Emergency%20Airway%20Registry&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Lembersky,%20Olga&rft.aucorp=On%20Behalf%20of%20the%20NEAR%20Investigators&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=466&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=466-470&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2417017512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417017512&rft_id=info:pmid/31130369&rft_els_id=S0735675719303043&rfr_iscdi=true |