Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability
Objective: Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States. Design: Team web...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2019-10, Vol.56 (9), p.1213-1219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1213 |
container_title | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Alfonso, Allyson R. DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M. Ramly, Elie P. Noel, Daphney Y. Levy-Lambert, Dina Wang, Maxime M. Kantar, Rami S. Flores, Roberto L. |
description | Objective:
Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States.
Design:
Team websites were reviewed, and teams with no accessible website or |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1055665619850441 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232106687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1055665619850441</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2232106687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c382969b8b375f98383f37a2b456e34cbc2937b68420bfc9351eccacaddffa273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozo_uXUnAzWxa89NJJ8tL4-jAwIiMuGwq6Ypk6O5ck77C7GbhS8zr-STmckeFATd1Cuo7pwqKkFecveW8695xppTWSnNrFGtb_oQcc9Wqhittn9a-jpv9_IiclHLDmFBcmOfkSHIurDXtMfm5KQVLmXFZaQp0M2OOHhbaTxhW-gkmWLHpMywxBfARJloNqTZrTEuz2W5z-oEjvUaYy6-7e_oVXYkrFhpSrvY11uDmKu-lYn2qUjfBMtLPCCO4OMX19gV5FmAq-PJBT8mX8_fX_cfm8urDRb-5bLzUaq3VCKutM052KlgjjQyyA-FapVG23nlhZee0aQVzwVupOHoPHsYxBBCdPCVnh9x69fcdlnWYY_E4TbBg2pVBCCk409rs0TeP0Ju0y0u9rlKma5mQhlWKHSifUykZw7DNcYZ8O3A27D80PP5Qtbx-CN65Gce_hj8vqUBzAAp8w39b_xv4G8UUmko</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287402380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Alfonso, Allyson R. ; DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M. ; Ramly, Elie P. ; Noel, Daphney Y. ; Levy-Lambert, Dina ; Wang, Maxime M. ; Kantar, Rami S. ; Flores, Roberto L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R. ; DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M. ; Ramly, Elie P. ; Noel, Daphney Y. ; Levy-Lambert, Dina ; Wang, Maxime M. ; Kantar, Rami S. ; Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States.
Design:
Team websites were reviewed, and teams with no accessible website or <30 sentences of content were excluded. Website content was scored by presence/absence of 20 variables derived from ACPA approval standards. Readability was evaluated with 8 scales. Readability was then compared to American Medical Association (AMA) recommendations. The relationship between website content and readability was assessed.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Content and readability of team websites.
Results:
From 167 reviewed teams, 47 (28.1%) had nonfunctional links, 17 (10.2%) had no accessible website, and 39 (23.4%) had <30 sentences. The average content score for all 111 team websites included was 14.5 (2.6) of 20. The combined average reading level across all scales (10.7 [1.9]) exceeded the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level; this finding held true for each individual website. Children’s Hospital-affiliated teams (n = 86) had a significantly higher content score (14.8 vs 13.5; P = .03) and better readability as evidenced by lower reading grade level (10.5 vs 11.4; P = .04). On linear regression, a higher content score significantly predicted better readability (β = −0.226; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Websites published by ACPA-approved CLP teams vary in accessibility and content and exceed the recommended reading level. These findings could inform future efforts to improve patient-oriented resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1055665619850441</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31129984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Birth defects ; Dentistry ; Reading ; Regression analysis ; Teams ; Websites</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2019-10, Vol.56 (9), p.1213-1219</ispartof><rights>2019, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c382969b8b375f98383f37a2b456e34cbc2937b68420bfc9351eccacaddffa273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c382969b8b375f98383f37a2b456e34cbc2937b68420bfc9351eccacaddffa273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2245-2054</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1055665619850441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1055665619850441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31129984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramly, Elie P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Daphney Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Lambert, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Maxime M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objective:
Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States.
Design:
Team websites were reviewed, and teams with no accessible website or <30 sentences of content were excluded. Website content was scored by presence/absence of 20 variables derived from ACPA approval standards. Readability was evaluated with 8 scales. Readability was then compared to American Medical Association (AMA) recommendations. The relationship between website content and readability was assessed.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Content and readability of team websites.
Results:
From 167 reviewed teams, 47 (28.1%) had nonfunctional links, 17 (10.2%) had no accessible website, and 39 (23.4%) had <30 sentences. The average content score for all 111 team websites included was 14.5 (2.6) of 20. The combined average reading level across all scales (10.7 [1.9]) exceeded the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level; this finding held true for each individual website. Children’s Hospital-affiliated teams (n = 86) had a significantly higher content score (14.8 vs 13.5; P = .03) and better readability as evidenced by lower reading grade level (10.5 vs 11.4; P = .04). On linear regression, a higher content score significantly predicted better readability (β = −0.226; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Websites published by ACPA-approved CLP teams vary in accessibility and content and exceed the recommended reading level. These findings could inform future efforts to improve patient-oriented resources.</description><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc2KFTEQhYMozo_uXUnAzWxa89NJJ8tL4-jAwIiMuGwq6Ypk6O5ck77C7GbhS8zr-STmckeFATd1Cuo7pwqKkFecveW8695xppTWSnNrFGtb_oQcc9Wqhittn9a-jpv9_IiclHLDmFBcmOfkSHIurDXtMfm5KQVLmXFZaQp0M2OOHhbaTxhW-gkmWLHpMywxBfARJloNqTZrTEuz2W5z-oEjvUaYy6-7e_oVXYkrFhpSrvY11uDmKu-lYn2qUjfBMtLPCCO4OMX19gV5FmAq-PJBT8mX8_fX_cfm8urDRb-5bLzUaq3VCKutM052KlgjjQyyA-FapVG23nlhZee0aQVzwVupOHoPHsYxBBCdPCVnh9x69fcdlnWYY_E4TbBg2pVBCCk409rs0TeP0Ju0y0u9rlKma5mQhlWKHSifUykZw7DNcYZ8O3A27D80PP5Qtbx-CN65Gce_hj8vqUBzAAp8w39b_xv4G8UUmko</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creator><creator>DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M.</creator><creator>Ramly, Elie P.</creator><creator>Noel, Daphney Y.</creator><creator>Levy-Lambert, Dina</creator><creator>Wang, Maxime M.</creator><creator>Kantar, Rami S.</creator><creator>Flores, Roberto L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-2054</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability</title><author>Alfonso, Allyson R. ; DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M. ; Ramly, Elie P. ; Noel, Daphney Y. ; Levy-Lambert, Dina ; Wang, Maxime M. ; Kantar, Rami S. ; Flores, Roberto L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c382969b8b375f98383f37a2b456e34cbc2937b68420bfc9351eccacaddffa273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alfonso, Allyson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramly, Elie P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noel, Daphney Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy-Lambert, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Maxime M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantar, Rami S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Roberto L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alfonso, Allyson R.</au><au>DeMitchell-Rodriguez, Evellyn M.</au><au>Ramly, Elie P.</au><au>Noel, Daphney Y.</au><au>Levy-Lambert, Dina</au><au>Wang, Maxime M.</au><au>Kantar, Rami S.</au><au>Flores, Roberto L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1213</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1213-1219</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><abstract>Objective:
Informed decision-making relies on available information, including online resources. We evaluated the content and readability of websites published by American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA)-approved cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) teams in the United States.
Design:
Team websites were reviewed, and teams with no accessible website or <30 sentences of content were excluded. Website content was scored by presence/absence of 20 variables derived from ACPA approval standards. Readability was evaluated with 8 scales. Readability was then compared to American Medical Association (AMA) recommendations. The relationship between website content and readability was assessed.
Main Outcome Measure(s):
Content and readability of team websites.
Results:
From 167 reviewed teams, 47 (28.1%) had nonfunctional links, 17 (10.2%) had no accessible website, and 39 (23.4%) had <30 sentences. The average content score for all 111 team websites included was 14.5 (2.6) of 20. The combined average reading level across all scales (10.7 [1.9]) exceeded the AMA-recommended sixth-grade reading level; this finding held true for each individual website. Children’s Hospital-affiliated teams (n = 86) had a significantly higher content score (14.8 vs 13.5; P = .03) and better readability as evidenced by lower reading grade level (10.5 vs 11.4; P = .04). On linear regression, a higher content score significantly predicted better readability (β = −0.226; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Websites published by ACPA-approved CLP teams vary in accessibility and content and exceed the recommended reading level. These findings could inform future efforts to improve patient-oriented resources.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31129984</pmid><doi>10.1177/1055665619850441</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-2054</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-6656 |
ispartof | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2019-10, Vol.56 (9), p.1213-1219 |
issn | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232106687 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Birth defects Dentistry Reading Regression analysis Teams Websites |
title | Assessment of American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-Approved Teams’ Websites for Patient-Oriented Content and Readability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T01%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20American%20Cleft%20Palate-Craniofacial%20Association-Approved%20Teams%E2%80%99%20Websites%20for%20Patient-Oriented%20Content%20and%20Readability&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=Alfonso,%20Allyson%20R.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1213&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1213-1219&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1055665619850441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232106687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287402380&rft_id=info:pmid/31129984&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1055665619850441&rfr_iscdi=true |