Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility
Although psychological evaluations are a routine component of the bariatric surgery process, the goals commonly identified for bariatric psychological evaluations have not been realized. This brief report describes a revised bariatric psychological evaluation designed to repurpose the evaluation tow...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavioral medicine 2020-08, Vol.43 (4), p.660-665 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 665 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 660 |
| container_title | Journal of behavioral medicine |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Rutledge, Thomas Ellison, Jenna K. Phillips, Amanda S. |
| description | Although psychological evaluations are a routine component of the bariatric surgery process, the goals commonly identified for bariatric psychological evaluations have not been realized. This brief report describes a revised bariatric psychological evaluation designed to repurpose the evaluation towards more achievable and equally valuable goals. Changes include revisions to the evaluation contents and administration methods. The revised evaluation: (1) includes pre- and post-bariatric psychological assessments to capture important surgery-related changes in psychosocial status, physical functioning, and quality of life; (2) incorporates measures of functional capacity, treatment adherence, and patient-centered goals; (3) improves clinical utility by using the post-surgery assessment data to identify patients who may benefit from psychosocial interventions; (4) expands opportunities for bariatric psychology research. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232100712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629754763</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629754763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-4819b92dbb3cf8ec72f1b1f354dc7b1e21d58f1df32f8dbb226731dbc04a27943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpaDZp_0APxdBLL041km3ZxxDSphAolAR6E7I88irI0layF_bfV5tNGlqWooNg5nvDzHuEvAd6AZSKzwlo29Qlha6klDa0hFdkBbXgJa8ZvCYrCrkoBNSn5Cylhz3UVd0bcsoBmKh4vSI_f-DWJuvHYl5j0ato1RytLjZpp9fBhdFq5QrcKreo2QZfzKGw0yaGLRbaWf_YVn4oIiZUUa-LZbbOzru35MQol_Dd039O7r9c313dlLffv367urwtddXSuaxa6PqODX3PtWlRC2agB8PratCiB2Qw1K2BwXBm2kwx1ggOQ69ppZjoKn5OPh3m5p1-LZhmOdmk0TnlMSxJMsbZ3i1gGf34D_oQlujzdpliXZst7MQLNSqH0noT5qj0fqi8bFgn6ko0PFPlEWpEj1G54NHYXP6LvzjC5zfgZPVRATsIdAwpRTRyE-2k4k4ClfuD5CF-meOXj_FLyKIPTxcu_YTDH8lz3hngByDllh8xvljwn7G_AQrHuTs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229806097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rutledge, Thomas ; Ellison, Jenna K. ; Phillips, Amanda S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Thomas ; Ellison, Jenna K. ; Phillips, Amanda S.</creatorcontrib><description>Although psychological evaluations are a routine component of the bariatric surgery process, the goals commonly identified for bariatric psychological evaluations have not been realized. This brief report describes a revised bariatric psychological evaluation designed to repurpose the evaluation towards more achievable and equally valuable goals. Changes include revisions to the evaluation contents and administration methods. The revised evaluation: (1) includes pre- and post-bariatric psychological assessments to capture important surgery-related changes in psychosocial status, physical functioning, and quality of life; (2) incorporates measures of functional capacity, treatment adherence, and patient-centered goals; (3) improves clinical utility by using the post-surgery assessment data to identify patients who may benefit from psychosocial interventions; (4) expands opportunities for bariatric psychology research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-7715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31127435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bariatric Surgery - psychology ; Bariatrics ; Brief Report ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical research ; Family Medicine ; Female ; Functional impairment ; Functional status ; Gastric restriction surgery ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; General Practice ; Health Psychology ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - psychology ; Objectives ; Patient-centered care ; Patients ; Perioperative care ; Physical ability ; Postoperative care ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological assessment ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Psychosocial factors ; Psychosocial functioning ; Psychosocial intervention ; Quality of Life ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020-08, Vol.43 (4), p.660-665</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-4819b92dbb3cf8ec72f1b1f354dc7b1e21d58f1df32f8dbb226731dbc04a27943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-4819b92dbb3cf8ec72f1b1f354dc7b1e21d58f1df32f8dbb226731dbc04a27943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6048-2302</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27903,27904,30978,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31127435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jenna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Amanda S.</creatorcontrib><title>Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility</title><title>Journal of behavioral medicine</title><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><description>Although psychological evaluations are a routine component of the bariatric surgery process, the goals commonly identified for bariatric psychological evaluations have not been realized. This brief report describes a revised bariatric psychological evaluation designed to repurpose the evaluation towards more achievable and equally valuable goals. Changes include revisions to the evaluation contents and administration methods. The revised evaluation: (1) includes pre- and post-bariatric psychological assessments to capture important surgery-related changes in psychosocial status, physical functioning, and quality of life; (2) incorporates measures of functional capacity, treatment adherence, and patient-centered goals; (3) improves clinical utility by using the post-surgery assessment data to identify patients who may benefit from psychosocial interventions; (4) expands opportunities for bariatric psychology research.</description><subject>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</subject><subject>Bariatrics</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Family Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional impairment</subject><subject>Functional status</subject><subject>Gastric restriction surgery</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>General Practice</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perioperative care</subject><subject>Physical ability</subject><subject>Postoperative care</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological assessment</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Psychosocial functioning</subject><subject>Psychosocial intervention</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0160-7715</issn><issn>1573-3521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpaDZp_0APxdBLL041km3ZxxDSphAolAR6E7I88irI0layF_bfV5tNGlqWooNg5nvDzHuEvAd6AZSKzwlo29Qlha6klDa0hFdkBbXgJa8ZvCYrCrkoBNSn5Cylhz3UVd0bcsoBmKh4vSI_f-DWJuvHYl5j0ato1RytLjZpp9fBhdFq5QrcKreo2QZfzKGw0yaGLRbaWf_YVn4oIiZUUa-LZbbOzru35MQol_Dd039O7r9c313dlLffv367urwtddXSuaxa6PqODX3PtWlRC2agB8PratCiB2Qw1K2BwXBm2kwx1ggOQ69ppZjoKn5OPh3m5p1-LZhmOdmk0TnlMSxJMsbZ3i1gGf34D_oQlujzdpliXZst7MQLNSqH0noT5qj0fqi8bFgn6ko0PFPlEWpEj1G54NHYXP6LvzjC5zfgZPVRATsIdAwpRTRyE-2k4k4ClfuD5CF-meOXj_FLyKIPTxcu_YTDH8lz3hngByDllh8xvljwn7G_AQrHuTs</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Rutledge, Thomas</creator><creator>Ellison, Jenna K.</creator><creator>Phillips, Amanda S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-2302</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility</title><author>Rutledge, Thomas ; Ellison, Jenna K. ; Phillips, Amanda S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-4819b92dbb3cf8ec72f1b1f354dc7b1e21d58f1df32f8dbb226731dbc04a27943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</topic><topic>Bariatrics</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Family Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional impairment</topic><topic>Functional status</topic><topic>Gastric restriction surgery</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>General Practice</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perioperative care</topic><topic>Physical ability</topic><topic>Postoperative care</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological assessment</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Psychosocial functioning</topic><topic>Psychosocial intervention</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutledge, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Jenna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Amanda S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutledge, Thomas</au><au>Ellison, Jenna K.</au><au>Phillips, Amanda S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral medicine</jtitle><stitle>J Behav Med</stitle><addtitle>J Behav Med</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>660-665</pages><issn>0160-7715</issn><eissn>1573-3521</eissn><abstract>Although psychological evaluations are a routine component of the bariatric surgery process, the goals commonly identified for bariatric psychological evaluations have not been realized. This brief report describes a revised bariatric psychological evaluation designed to repurpose the evaluation towards more achievable and equally valuable goals. Changes include revisions to the evaluation contents and administration methods. The revised evaluation: (1) includes pre- and post-bariatric psychological assessments to capture important surgery-related changes in psychosocial status, physical functioning, and quality of life; (2) incorporates measures of functional capacity, treatment adherence, and patient-centered goals; (3) improves clinical utility by using the post-surgery assessment data to identify patients who may benefit from psychosocial interventions; (4) expands opportunities for bariatric psychology research.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31127435</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6048-2302</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0160-7715 |
| ispartof | Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020-08, Vol.43 (4), p.660-665 |
| issn | 0160-7715 1573-3521 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232100712 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Bariatric Surgery - psychology Bariatrics Brief Report Clinical assessment Clinical research Family Medicine Female Functional impairment Functional status Gastric restriction surgery Gastrointestinal surgery General Practice Health Psychology Hospital patients Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Obesity Obesity, Morbid - psychology Objectives Patient-centered care Patients Perioperative care Physical ability Postoperative care Psychological aspects Psychological assessment Psychological tests Psychology Psychosocial factors Psychosocial functioning Psychosocial intervention Quality of Life Surgery |
| title | Revising the bariatric psychological evaluation to improve clinical and research utility |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A40%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revising%20the%20bariatric%20psychological%20evaluation%20to%20improve%20clinical%20and%20research%20utility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20medicine&rft.au=Rutledge,%20Thomas&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=660-665&rft.issn=0160-7715&rft.eissn=1573-3521&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10865-019-00060-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629754763%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229806097&rft_id=info:pmid/31127435&rft_galeid=A629754763&rfr_iscdi=true |