A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

Diverging guideline definitions for the quantitative assessment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) reflect the lacking link of the sMR spectrum to mortality and has introduced a source of uncertainty and continuing debate. The current study aimed to define improved risk-thresholds specif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019-05, Vol.73 (20), p.2506-2517
Hauptverfasser: Bartko, Philipp E., Arfsten, Henrike, Heitzinger, Gregor, Pavo, Noemi, Toma, Aurel, Strunk, Guido, Hengstenberg, Christian, Hülsmann, Martin, Goliasch, Georg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2517
container_issue 20
container_start_page 2506
container_title Journal of the American College of Cardiology
container_volume 73
creator Bartko, Philipp E.
Arfsten, Henrike
Heitzinger, Gregor
Pavo, Noemi
Toma, Aurel
Strunk, Guido
Hengstenberg, Christian
Hülsmann, Martin
Goliasch, Georg
description Diverging guideline definitions for the quantitative assessment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) reflect the lacking link of the sMR spectrum to mortality and has introduced a source of uncertainty and continuing debate. The current study aimed to define improved risk-thresholds specifically tailored to the complex nature of sMR that provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline-controversy. This study enrolled 423 heart failure patients under guideline-directed medical therapy and assessed sMR by effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFrac). Measures of sMR severity were consistently associated with 5-year mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.42 for a 1-SD increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.63; p < 0.001) for EROA, 1.37 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.56; p < 0.001) for RegVol, and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.73; p < 0.001) for RegFrac. Results remained statistically significant after bootstrap- or clinical confounder-based adjustment. Spline-curve analyses showed a linearly increasing risk enabling the ability to stratify into low-risk (EROA 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232100255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735109719347175</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232100255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e0c0368d4ffdb23357a16a9eb6a6788b840d3ff1cae75dd48b6c168f8f44d1bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtuFDEURS0EIk1gAwxQSUyYVOFPueySmLRa4SMFIT5harns58albruxXZGym6wlK8NNBwYMGL3JuVf3HYSeE9wRTIbXczdrYzqKydhh2mHBH6AV4Vy2jI_iIVphwXhL8CjO0JOcZ4zxIMn4GJ0xQogkfb9C39fNVfDuxodts4nBwKE0Lqam_IDm86JD8UUXfw13t-ucIec9hNJE13wFE4PV6ebu9qMvSe-aL7Bd0vY3HsNT9MjpXYZn9_ccXb29-LZ5315-evdhs75sDZN9aQEbzAZpe-fsRBnjQpNBjzANehBSTrLHljlHjAbBre3lNBgySCdd31syGXaOXp16Dyn-XCAXtffZwG6nA8QlK0oZJRhTziv68h90jksKdV2lqBCjwHKsFD1RJsWcEzh1SH5f_1QEq6N1NaujdXW0rjBV1XoNvbivXqY92L-RP5or8OYEQHVx7SGpbDxU29YnMEXZ6P_X_ws7OpUD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2227797089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bartko, Philipp E. ; Arfsten, Henrike ; Heitzinger, Gregor ; Pavo, Noemi ; Toma, Aurel ; Strunk, Guido ; Hengstenberg, Christian ; Hülsmann, Martin ; Goliasch, Georg</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartko, Philipp E. ; Arfsten, Henrike ; Heitzinger, Gregor ; Pavo, Noemi ; Toma, Aurel ; Strunk, Guido ; Hengstenberg, Christian ; Hülsmann, Martin ; Goliasch, Georg</creatorcontrib><description>Diverging guideline definitions for the quantitative assessment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) reflect the lacking link of the sMR spectrum to mortality and has introduced a source of uncertainty and continuing debate. The current study aimed to define improved risk-thresholds specifically tailored to the complex nature of sMR that provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline-controversy. This study enrolled 423 heart failure patients under guideline-directed medical therapy and assessed sMR by effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFrac). Measures of sMR severity were consistently associated with 5-year mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.42 for a 1-SD increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.63; p &lt; 0.001) for EROA, 1.37 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.56; p &lt; 0.001) for RegVol, and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.73; p &lt; 0.001) for RegFrac. Results remained statistically significant after bootstrap- or clinical confounder-based adjustment. Spline-curve analyses showed a linearly increasing risk enabling the ability to stratify into low-risk (EROA &lt;20 mm2 and RegVol &lt;30 ml), intermediate-risk (EROA 20 to 29 mm2 and RegVol 30 to 44 ml), and high-risk (EROA ≥30 mm2 and RegVol ≥45 ml) groups. In the intermediate-risk group, a RegFrac ≥50% as indicator for hemodynamic severe sMR was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.017). A unifying concept based on combined assessment of the EROA, the RegVol, and the RegFrac showed a significantly better discrimination compared with the currently established algorithms. Risk-based thresholds tailored to the pathophysiological concept of sMR provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline controversy. An algorithm based on the combined assessment of the unifying cutoffs for EROA, RegVol, and RegFrac improves risk prediction compared with currently established grading. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-1097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-3597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31118144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Beta blockers ; Cardiology ; Confidence intervals ; Congestive heart failure ; Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods ; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods ; effective regurgitant orifice area ; Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - diagnosis ; Heart Failure - etiology ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Integrated approach ; Laboratories ; Male ; Middle Aged ; mitral insufficiency ; Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Mortality ; Orifices ; proximal isovelocity surface area ; Pulmonary arteries ; regurgitant fraction ; regurgitant volume ; Regurgitation ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Risk groups ; secondary mitral regurgitation ; Severity of Illness Index ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Stroke Volume ; Thoracic surgery ; Thresholds ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2019-05, Vol.73 (20), p.2506-2517</ispartof><rights>2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e0c0368d4ffdb23357a16a9eb6a6788b840d3ff1cae75dd48b6c168f8f44d1bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e0c0368d4ffdb23357a16a9eb6a6788b840d3ff1cae75dd48b6c168f8f44d1bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109719347175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31118144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartko, Philipp E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arfsten, Henrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzinger, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavo, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Aurel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strunk, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hengstenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goliasch, Georg</creatorcontrib><title>A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation</title><title>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><description>Diverging guideline definitions for the quantitative assessment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) reflect the lacking link of the sMR spectrum to mortality and has introduced a source of uncertainty and continuing debate. The current study aimed to define improved risk-thresholds specifically tailored to the complex nature of sMR that provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline-controversy. This study enrolled 423 heart failure patients under guideline-directed medical therapy and assessed sMR by effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFrac). Measures of sMR severity were consistently associated with 5-year mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.42 for a 1-SD increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.63; p &lt; 0.001) for EROA, 1.37 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.56; p &lt; 0.001) for RegVol, and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.73; p &lt; 0.001) for RegFrac. Results remained statistically significant after bootstrap- or clinical confounder-based adjustment. Spline-curve analyses showed a linearly increasing risk enabling the ability to stratify into low-risk (EROA &lt;20 mm2 and RegVol &lt;30 ml), intermediate-risk (EROA 20 to 29 mm2 and RegVol 30 to 44 ml), and high-risk (EROA ≥30 mm2 and RegVol ≥45 ml) groups. In the intermediate-risk group, a RegFrac ≥50% as indicator for hemodynamic severe sMR was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.017). A unifying concept based on combined assessment of the EROA, the RegVol, and the RegFrac showed a significantly better discrimination compared with the currently established algorithms. Risk-based thresholds tailored to the pathophysiological concept of sMR provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline controversy. An algorithm based on the combined assessment of the unifying cutoffs for EROA, RegVol, and RegFrac improves risk prediction compared with currently established grading. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Beta blockers</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>effective regurgitant orifice area</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Failure - etiology</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>heart failure with reduced ejection fraction</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mitral insufficiency</subject><subject>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Orifices</subject><subject>proximal isovelocity surface area</subject><subject>Pulmonary arteries</subject><subject>regurgitant fraction</subject><subject>regurgitant volume</subject><subject>Regurgitation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>secondary mitral regurgitation</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Thoracic surgery</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>0735-1097</issn><issn>1558-3597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtuFDEURS0EIk1gAwxQSUyYVOFPueySmLRa4SMFIT5harns58albruxXZGym6wlK8NNBwYMGL3JuVf3HYSeE9wRTIbXczdrYzqKydhh2mHBH6AV4Vy2jI_iIVphwXhL8CjO0JOcZ4zxIMn4GJ0xQogkfb9C39fNVfDuxodts4nBwKE0Lqam_IDm86JD8UUXfw13t-ucIec9hNJE13wFE4PV6ebu9qMvSe-aL7Bd0vY3HsNT9MjpXYZn9_ccXb29-LZ5315-evdhs75sDZN9aQEbzAZpe-fsRBnjQpNBjzANehBSTrLHljlHjAbBre3lNBgySCdd31syGXaOXp16Dyn-XCAXtffZwG6nA8QlK0oZJRhTziv68h90jksKdV2lqBCjwHKsFD1RJsWcEzh1SH5f_1QEq6N1NaujdXW0rjBV1XoNvbivXqY92L-RP5or8OYEQHVx7SGpbDxU29YnMEXZ6P_X_ws7OpUD</recordid><startdate>20190528</startdate><enddate>20190528</enddate><creator>Bartko, Philipp E.</creator><creator>Arfsten, Henrike</creator><creator>Heitzinger, Gregor</creator><creator>Pavo, Noemi</creator><creator>Toma, Aurel</creator><creator>Strunk, Guido</creator><creator>Hengstenberg, Christian</creator><creator>Hülsmann, Martin</creator><creator>Goliasch, Georg</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190528</creationdate><title>A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation</title><author>Bartko, Philipp E. ; Arfsten, Henrike ; Heitzinger, Gregor ; Pavo, Noemi ; Toma, Aurel ; Strunk, Guido ; Hengstenberg, Christian ; Hülsmann, Martin ; Goliasch, Georg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e0c0368d4ffdb23357a16a9eb6a6788b840d3ff1cae75dd48b6c168f8f44d1bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Beta blockers</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>effective regurgitant orifice area</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Failure - etiology</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>heart failure with reduced ejection fraction</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mitral insufficiency</topic><topic>Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Orifices</topic><topic>proximal isovelocity surface area</topic><topic>Pulmonary arteries</topic><topic>regurgitant fraction</topic><topic>regurgitant volume</topic><topic>Regurgitation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>secondary mitral regurgitation</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Thoracic surgery</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartko, Philipp E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arfsten, Henrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzinger, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavo, Noemi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toma, Aurel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strunk, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hengstenberg, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsmann, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goliasch, Georg</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartko, Philipp E.</au><au>Arfsten, Henrike</au><au>Heitzinger, Gregor</au><au>Pavo, Noemi</au><au>Toma, Aurel</au><au>Strunk, Guido</au><au>Hengstenberg, Christian</au><au>Hülsmann, Martin</au><au>Goliasch, Georg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Cardiol</addtitle><date>2019-05-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>2506</spage><epage>2517</epage><pages>2506-2517</pages><issn>0735-1097</issn><eissn>1558-3597</eissn><abstract>Diverging guideline definitions for the quantitative assessment of severe secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) reflect the lacking link of the sMR spectrum to mortality and has introduced a source of uncertainty and continuing debate. The current study aimed to define improved risk-thresholds specifically tailored to the complex nature of sMR that provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline-controversy. This study enrolled 423 heart failure patients under guideline-directed medical therapy and assessed sMR by effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA), regurgitant volume (RegVol), and regurgitant fraction (RegFrac). Measures of sMR severity were consistently associated with 5-year mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.42 for a 1-SD increase (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25 to 1.63; p &lt; 0.001) for EROA, 1.37 (95% CI: 1.20 to 1.56; p &lt; 0.001) for RegVol, and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.73; p &lt; 0.001) for RegFrac. Results remained statistically significant after bootstrap- or clinical confounder-based adjustment. Spline-curve analyses showed a linearly increasing risk enabling the ability to stratify into low-risk (EROA &lt;20 mm2 and RegVol &lt;30 ml), intermediate-risk (EROA 20 to 29 mm2 and RegVol 30 to 44 ml), and high-risk (EROA ≥30 mm2 and RegVol ≥45 ml) groups. In the intermediate-risk group, a RegFrac ≥50% as indicator for hemodynamic severe sMR was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.017). A unifying concept based on combined assessment of the EROA, the RegVol, and the RegFrac showed a significantly better discrimination compared with the currently established algorithms. Risk-based thresholds tailored to the pathophysiological concept of sMR provide a unifying solution to the ongoing guideline controversy. An algorithm based on the combined assessment of the unifying cutoffs for EROA, RegVol, and RegFrac improves risk prediction compared with currently established grading. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31118144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.075</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-1097
ispartof Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2019-05, Vol.73 (20), p.2506-2517
issn 0735-1097
1558-3597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232100255
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Beta blockers
Cardiology
Confidence intervals
Congestive heart failure
Echocardiography, Doppler, Color - methods
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional - methods
effective regurgitant orifice area
Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart
Heart failure
Heart Failure - diagnosis
Heart Failure - etiology
Heart Failure - physiopathology
heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Hemodynamics
Humans
Integrated approach
Laboratories
Male
Middle Aged
mitral insufficiency
Mitral Valve - diagnostic imaging
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - complications
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis
Mitral Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Mortality
Orifices
proximal isovelocity surface area
Pulmonary arteries
regurgitant fraction
regurgitant volume
Regurgitation
Risk assessment
Risk Factors
Risk groups
secondary mitral regurgitation
Severity of Illness Index
Software
Statistical analysis
Stroke Volume
Thoracic surgery
Thresholds
Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
title A Unifying Concept for the Quantitative Assessment of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Unifying%20Concept%20for%20the%20Quantitative%C2%A0Assessment%20of%20Secondary%C2%A0Mitral%20Regurgitation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Cardiology&rft.au=Bartko,%20Philipp%20E.&rft.date=2019-05-28&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=2506&rft.epage=2517&rft.pages=2506-2517&rft.issn=0735-1097&rft.eissn=1558-3597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232100255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2227797089&rft_id=info:pmid/31118144&rft_els_id=S0735109719347175&rfr_iscdi=true