Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test

A field test was conducted at a uranium in situ recovery (solution mining) site to evaluate postmining uranium natural attenuation downgradient of an ore zone. Approximately 1 million liters of water from a previously mined ore zone was injected into an unmined ore zone that served as a proxy for a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2019-07, Vol.53 (13), p.7483-7493
Hauptverfasser: Reimus, Paul W, Dangelmayr, Martin A, Clay, James T, Chamberlain, Kevin R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7493
container_issue 13
container_start_page 7483
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 53
creator Reimus, Paul W
Dangelmayr, Martin A
Clay, James T
Chamberlain, Kevin R
description A field test was conducted at a uranium in situ recovery (solution mining) site to evaluate postmining uranium natural attenuation downgradient of an ore zone. Approximately 1 million liters of water from a previously mined ore zone was injected into an unmined ore zone that served as a proxy for a downgradient aquifer, while a well located approximately 23 m away was pumped. After 1 year of pumping, only about 39% of the injected U­(VI) was recovered, whereas essentially 100% of coinjected chloride was recovered. A geochemical/transport model was used to simultaneously match the chloride and uranium concentrations at the pumping well while also qualitatively matching aqueous 238U/235U ratios, which reflect uranium removal from solution by reduction. It was concluded that ∼50% of the injected U­(VI) was reduced to U­(IV), although the reduction capacity in the flow pathways between the injection and production wells was estimated to be nearly exhausted by the end of the test. Estimating the reduction capacity of the downgradient aquifer can inform restoration strategy and offer a useful metric for regulatory decisions concerning the adequacy of restoration. U­(VI) reduction should be effectively irreversible in these anoxic environments, which differ greatly from shallow oxic environments where U­(IV) is readily reoxidized.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.9b01572
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232096728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232096728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-ebe58b613100cef27b9d1e77a1b3d2bff5f3a5e95678414d1920b180880dabdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVJabZpz70FQS6B4o1GWtnyMWyaJpA2kCbQm5GsUdFiS4lkp-TfV8tucyj0NJfvvTczj5BPwJbAOJzpPi8xT8vWMJANf0MWIDmrpJJwQBaMgahaUf88JO9z3jDGuGDqHTkUAIJzCQuyeUg6-Hmk3_U0Jz3Q82nCMOvJx0Av4u_wK2nrMUw0OqoD9YH-8NNM77CPz5he6DcfkF4HhymhpS7FkWq6TjHn6ioOSC89DpbelyU_kLdODxk_7ucRebj8cr--qm5uv16vz28qLVo1VWhQKlODAMZ6dLwxrQVsGg1GWG6ck05oia2sG7WClYWWMwOKKcWsNtaJI3K6831M8Wkuwd3oc4_DoAPGOXecC87auuGqoCf_oJs4p1C2K5QUalXLpi7U2Y7qt2cldN1j8qNOLx2wbltDV2rotup9DUVxvPedzYj2lf_79wJ83gFb5Wvm_-z-ALWzkok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253846576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Reimus, Paul W ; Dangelmayr, Martin A ; Clay, James T ; Chamberlain, Kevin R</creator><creatorcontrib>Reimus, Paul W ; Dangelmayr, Martin A ; Clay, James T ; Chamberlain, Kevin R</creatorcontrib><description>A field test was conducted at a uranium in situ recovery (solution mining) site to evaluate postmining uranium natural attenuation downgradient of an ore zone. Approximately 1 million liters of water from a previously mined ore zone was injected into an unmined ore zone that served as a proxy for a downgradient aquifer, while a well located approximately 23 m away was pumped. After 1 year of pumping, only about 39% of the injected U­(VI) was recovered, whereas essentially 100% of coinjected chloride was recovered. A geochemical/transport model was used to simultaneously match the chloride and uranium concentrations at the pumping well while also qualitatively matching aqueous 238U/235U ratios, which reflect uranium removal from solution by reduction. It was concluded that ∼50% of the injected U­(VI) was reduced to U­(IV), although the reduction capacity in the flow pathways between the injection and production wells was estimated to be nearly exhausted by the end of the test. Estimating the reduction capacity of the downgradient aquifer can inform restoration strategy and offer a useful metric for regulatory decisions concerning the adequacy of restoration. U­(VI) reduction should be effectively irreversible in these anoxic environments, which differ greatly from shallow oxic environments where U­(IV) is readily reoxidized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01572</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31132251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Adequacy ; Aquifers ; Attenuation ; Chlorides ; Coinjection ; Field tests ; In situ leaching ; Mining ; Natural attenuation ; Pumping ; Recovery ; Reduction ; Restoration strategies ; Uranium</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2019-07, Vol.53 (13), p.7483-7493</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jul 2, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-ebe58b613100cef27b9d1e77a1b3d2bff5f3a5e95678414d1920b180880dabdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-ebe58b613100cef27b9d1e77a1b3d2bff5f3a5e95678414d1920b180880dabdf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7422-9540</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b01572$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b01572$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2752,27057,27905,27906,56719,56769</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31132251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reimus, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangelmayr, Martin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Kevin R</creatorcontrib><title>Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>A field test was conducted at a uranium in situ recovery (solution mining) site to evaluate postmining uranium natural attenuation downgradient of an ore zone. Approximately 1 million liters of water from a previously mined ore zone was injected into an unmined ore zone that served as a proxy for a downgradient aquifer, while a well located approximately 23 m away was pumped. After 1 year of pumping, only about 39% of the injected U­(VI) was recovered, whereas essentially 100% of coinjected chloride was recovered. A geochemical/transport model was used to simultaneously match the chloride and uranium concentrations at the pumping well while also qualitatively matching aqueous 238U/235U ratios, which reflect uranium removal from solution by reduction. It was concluded that ∼50% of the injected U­(VI) was reduced to U­(IV), although the reduction capacity in the flow pathways between the injection and production wells was estimated to be nearly exhausted by the end of the test. Estimating the reduction capacity of the downgradient aquifer can inform restoration strategy and offer a useful metric for regulatory decisions concerning the adequacy of restoration. U­(VI) reduction should be effectively irreversible in these anoxic environments, which differ greatly from shallow oxic environments where U­(IV) is readily reoxidized.</description><subject>Adequacy</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Chlorides</subject><subject>Coinjection</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>In situ leaching</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Natural attenuation</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Restoration strategies</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVJabZpz70FQS6B4o1GWtnyMWyaJpA2kCbQm5GsUdFiS4lkp-TfV8tucyj0NJfvvTczj5BPwJbAOJzpPi8xT8vWMJANf0MWIDmrpJJwQBaMgahaUf88JO9z3jDGuGDqHTkUAIJzCQuyeUg6-Hmk3_U0Jz3Q82nCMOvJx0Av4u_wK2nrMUw0OqoD9YH-8NNM77CPz5he6DcfkF4HhymhpS7FkWq6TjHn6ioOSC89DpbelyU_kLdODxk_7ucRebj8cr--qm5uv16vz28qLVo1VWhQKlODAMZ6dLwxrQVsGg1GWG6ck05oia2sG7WClYWWMwOKKcWsNtaJI3K6831M8Wkuwd3oc4_DoAPGOXecC87auuGqoCf_oJs4p1C2K5QUalXLpi7U2Y7qt2cldN1j8qNOLx2wbltDV2rotup9DUVxvPedzYj2lf_79wJ83gFb5Wvm_-z-ALWzkok</recordid><startdate>20190702</startdate><enddate>20190702</enddate><creator>Reimus, Paul W</creator><creator>Dangelmayr, Martin A</creator><creator>Clay, James T</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Kevin R</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-9540</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190702</creationdate><title>Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test</title><author>Reimus, Paul W ; Dangelmayr, Martin A ; Clay, James T ; Chamberlain, Kevin R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-ebe58b613100cef27b9d1e77a1b3d2bff5f3a5e95678414d1920b180880dabdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adequacy</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Chlorides</topic><topic>Coinjection</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>In situ leaching</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Natural attenuation</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Restoration strategies</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reimus, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangelmayr, Martin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Kevin R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reimus, Paul W</au><au>Dangelmayr, Martin A</au><au>Clay, James T</au><au>Chamberlain, Kevin R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-07-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>7483</spage><epage>7493</epage><pages>7483-7493</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>A field test was conducted at a uranium in situ recovery (solution mining) site to evaluate postmining uranium natural attenuation downgradient of an ore zone. Approximately 1 million liters of water from a previously mined ore zone was injected into an unmined ore zone that served as a proxy for a downgradient aquifer, while a well located approximately 23 m away was pumped. After 1 year of pumping, only about 39% of the injected U­(VI) was recovered, whereas essentially 100% of coinjected chloride was recovered. A geochemical/transport model was used to simultaneously match the chloride and uranium concentrations at the pumping well while also qualitatively matching aqueous 238U/235U ratios, which reflect uranium removal from solution by reduction. It was concluded that ∼50% of the injected U­(VI) was reduced to U­(IV), although the reduction capacity in the flow pathways between the injection and production wells was estimated to be nearly exhausted by the end of the test. Estimating the reduction capacity of the downgradient aquifer can inform restoration strategy and offer a useful metric for regulatory decisions concerning the adequacy of restoration. U­(VI) reduction should be effectively irreversible in these anoxic environments, which differ greatly from shallow oxic environments where U­(IV) is readily reoxidized.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31132251</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b01572</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-9540</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2019-07, Vol.53 (13), p.7483-7493
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232096728
source ACS Publications
subjects Adequacy
Aquifers
Attenuation
Chlorides
Coinjection
Field tests
In situ leaching
Mining
Natural attenuation
Pumping
Recovery
Reduction
Restoration strategies
Uranium
title Uranium Natural Attenuation Downgradient of an in Situ Recovery Mine Inferred from a Cross-Hole Field Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uranium%20Natural%20Attenuation%20Downgradient%20of%20an%20in%20Situ%20Recovery%20Mine%20Inferred%20from%20a%20Cross-Hole%20Field%20Test&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Reimus,%20Paul%20W&rft.date=2019-07-02&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=7483&rft.epage=7493&rft.pages=7483-7493&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b01572&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232096728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253846576&rft_id=info:pmid/31132251&rfr_iscdi=true