Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate

Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology 2019-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e007336-e007336
Hauptverfasser: Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet, Barkagan, Michael, Rottmann, Markus, Sroubek, Jakub, Tugal, Derin, Carlozzi, Michael A, McConville, James W, Buxton, Alfred E, Anter, Elad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e007336
container_issue 6
container_start_page e007336
container_title Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
container_volume 12
creator Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet
Barkagan, Michael
Rottmann, Markus
Sroubek, Jakub
Tugal, Derin
Carlozzi, Michael A
McConville, James W
Buxton, Alfred E
Anter, Elad
description Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep ventricular tissue. Methods This study included 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular premature complexes refractory to ablation with irrigated catheters. After a failed response to radiofrequency ablation, impedance was modulated by adding or repositioning return patches in an attempt to decrease the circuit impedance. Ablation was repeated at a similar location and power settings, and the effect on arrhythmia suppression and adverse effects were evaluated. Results Six patients with idiopathic ventricular premature complexes originating from the left ventricular summit (n=4) or papillary muscles (n=2), 6 patients with noninfarct related ventricular tachycardia and 4 patients with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia had unsuccessful response to radiofrequency ablation at critical sites (number of applications: 10.4±3.1, power: 42.3±2.9 W, duration: 55.3±25.5 seconds, impedance reduction: 14.6±3.5 Ω, low-ionic solution was used in 81.25%). Modulating the return patches resulted in reduced baseline impedance (111.7±8.2 versus 134.7±6.6 Ω, P
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007336
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232084373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232084373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1042-5d387073c84fe7238253ab2e456173bae9d01bff39b13defe83fad47b5cd41163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrFkctOwzAQRQ0SoqX0A9ggL9mk2HGe7EooEKkVqBS2kWOPqavEKXGCKF-PK8o3sJo7uvPSHIQuKJlQGtHrLF9ms2en0wkhMWPRMRrSNKAeI0kwQGfWbgiJaEKjUzRglFLmM394NF40sq94p8077taAb7mFShvAeb0FyY2AGzw1eCo3vRGd_gS8ArE2-qMHrJoWL_iXrvX3vn3JpW5UC84yYofnYHVj8J2uweyVxdplAFvMjcS56Vpe9y2v8Bs4rYW7osUvfWmd0f3T1nN0onhlYXyII_R6P1tlj9786SHPpnNPUBL4XihZErsniyRQEPss8UPGSx-CMKIxKzmkktBSKZaWlElQkDDFZRCXoZCBo8VG6Op37rZt3OG2K2ptBVQVN9D0tvAdG4eNOY4jdHko7csaZLFtdc3bXfGHkP0Au2qjLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232084373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet ; Barkagan, Michael ; Rottmann, Markus ; Sroubek, Jakub ; Tugal, Derin ; Carlozzi, Michael A ; McConville, James W ; Buxton, Alfred E ; Anter, Elad</creator><creatorcontrib>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet ; Barkagan, Michael ; Rottmann, Markus ; Sroubek, Jakub ; Tugal, Derin ; Carlozzi, Michael A ; McConville, James W ; Buxton, Alfred E ; Anter, Elad</creatorcontrib><description>Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep ventricular tissue. Methods This study included 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular premature complexes refractory to ablation with irrigated catheters. After a failed response to radiofrequency ablation, impedance was modulated by adding or repositioning return patches in an attempt to decrease the circuit impedance. Ablation was repeated at a similar location and power settings, and the effect on arrhythmia suppression and adverse effects were evaluated. Results Six patients with idiopathic ventricular premature complexes originating from the left ventricular summit (n=4) or papillary muscles (n=2), 6 patients with noninfarct related ventricular tachycardia and 4 patients with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia had unsuccessful response to radiofrequency ablation at critical sites (number of applications: 10.4±3.1, power: 42.3±2.9 W, duration: 55.3±25.5 seconds, impedance reduction: 14.6±3.5 Ω, low-ionic solution was used in 81.25%). Modulating the return patches resulted in reduced baseline impedance (111.7±8.2 versus 134.7±6.6 Ω, P&lt;0.0001), increased current output (0.6±0.02 versus 0.56±0.02 Amp; P&lt;0.0001) and greater impedance drop (16.8±3.0 Ω, P&lt;0.001). Repeat ablation at similar locations had a successful effect in 12 out of 16 (75.0%) patients. During a follow-up duration of 13±5 months, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence. The frequency of steam pops was similar between the higher and lower baseline impedance settings (7.1 versus 8.2%; P=0.74). Conclusions In patients with deep ventricular substrate, reducing the baseline impedance is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the effect of radiofrequency ablation. However, its combination with low-ionic solutions may increase the risk for steam pops and neurological events.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1941-3084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31113232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Aged ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Catheter Ablation - instrumentation ; Electric Impedance ; Female ; Heart Rate ; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology ; Heart Ventricles - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Progression-Free Survival ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - surgery ; Time Factors ; Ventricular Premature Complexes - diagnosis ; Ventricular Premature Complexes - physiopathology ; Ventricular Premature Complexes - surgery</subject><ispartof>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2019-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e007336-e007336</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1042-5d387073c84fe7238253ab2e456173bae9d01bff39b13defe83fad47b5cd41163</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31113232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkagan, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rottmann, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sroubek, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugal, Derin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlozzi, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConville, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Alfred E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anter, Elad</creatorcontrib><title>Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate</title><title>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep ventricular tissue. Methods This study included 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular premature complexes refractory to ablation with irrigated catheters. After a failed response to radiofrequency ablation, impedance was modulated by adding or repositioning return patches in an attempt to decrease the circuit impedance. Ablation was repeated at a similar location and power settings, and the effect on arrhythmia suppression and adverse effects were evaluated. Results Six patients with idiopathic ventricular premature complexes originating from the left ventricular summit (n=4) or papillary muscles (n=2), 6 patients with noninfarct related ventricular tachycardia and 4 patients with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia had unsuccessful response to radiofrequency ablation at critical sites (number of applications: 10.4±3.1, power: 42.3±2.9 W, duration: 55.3±25.5 seconds, impedance reduction: 14.6±3.5 Ω, low-ionic solution was used in 81.25%). Modulating the return patches resulted in reduced baseline impedance (111.7±8.2 versus 134.7±6.6 Ω, P&lt;0.0001), increased current output (0.6±0.02 versus 0.56±0.02 Amp; P&lt;0.0001) and greater impedance drop (16.8±3.0 Ω, P&lt;0.001). Repeat ablation at similar locations had a successful effect in 12 out of 16 (75.0%) patients. During a follow-up duration of 13±5 months, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence. The frequency of steam pops was similar between the higher and lower baseline impedance settings (7.1 versus 8.2%; P=0.74). Conclusions In patients with deep ventricular substrate, reducing the baseline impedance is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the effect of radiofrequency ablation. However, its combination with low-ionic solutions may increase the risk for steam pops and neurological events.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Progression-Free Survival</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventricular Premature Complexes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ventricular Premature Complexes - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Premature Complexes - surgery</subject><issn>1941-3084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNrFkctOwzAQRQ0SoqX0A9ggL9mk2HGe7EooEKkVqBS2kWOPqavEKXGCKF-PK8o3sJo7uvPSHIQuKJlQGtHrLF9ms2en0wkhMWPRMRrSNKAeI0kwQGfWbgiJaEKjUzRglFLmM394NF40sq94p8077taAb7mFShvAeb0FyY2AGzw1eCo3vRGd_gS8ArE2-qMHrJoWL_iXrvX3vn3JpW5UC84yYofnYHVj8J2uweyVxdplAFvMjcS56Vpe9y2v8Bs4rYW7osUvfWmd0f3T1nN0onhlYXyII_R6P1tlj9786SHPpnNPUBL4XihZErsniyRQEPss8UPGSx-CMKIxKzmkktBSKZaWlElQkDDFZRCXoZCBo8VG6Op37rZt3OG2K2ptBVQVN9D0tvAdG4eNOY4jdHko7csaZLFtdc3bXfGHkP0Au2qjLw</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet</creator><creator>Barkagan, Michael</creator><creator>Rottmann, Markus</creator><creator>Sroubek, Jakub</creator><creator>Tugal, Derin</creator><creator>Carlozzi, Michael A</creator><creator>McConville, James W</creator><creator>Buxton, Alfred E</creator><creator>Anter, Elad</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate</title><author>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet ; Barkagan, Michael ; Rottmann, Markus ; Sroubek, Jakub ; Tugal, Derin ; Carlozzi, Michael A ; McConville, James W ; Buxton, Alfred E ; Anter, Elad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1042-5d387073c84fe7238253ab2e456173bae9d01bff39b13defe83fad47b5cd41163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Progression-Free Survival</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventricular Premature Complexes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ventricular Premature Complexes - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Premature Complexes - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkagan, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rottmann, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sroubek, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugal, Derin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlozzi, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConville, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Alfred E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anter, Elad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet</au><au>Barkagan, Michael</au><au>Rottmann, Markus</au><au>Sroubek, Jakub</au><au>Tugal, Derin</au><au>Carlozzi, Michael A</au><au>McConville, James W</au><au>Buxton, Alfred E</au><au>Anter, Elad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e007336</spage><epage>e007336</epage><pages>e007336-e007336</pages><eissn>1941-3084</eissn><abstract>Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep ventricular tissue. Methods This study included 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular premature complexes refractory to ablation with irrigated catheters. After a failed response to radiofrequency ablation, impedance was modulated by adding or repositioning return patches in an attempt to decrease the circuit impedance. Ablation was repeated at a similar location and power settings, and the effect on arrhythmia suppression and adverse effects were evaluated. Results Six patients with idiopathic ventricular premature complexes originating from the left ventricular summit (n=4) or papillary muscles (n=2), 6 patients with noninfarct related ventricular tachycardia and 4 patients with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia had unsuccessful response to radiofrequency ablation at critical sites (number of applications: 10.4±3.1, power: 42.3±2.9 W, duration: 55.3±25.5 seconds, impedance reduction: 14.6±3.5 Ω, low-ionic solution was used in 81.25%). Modulating the return patches resulted in reduced baseline impedance (111.7±8.2 versus 134.7±6.6 Ω, P&lt;0.0001), increased current output (0.6±0.02 versus 0.56±0.02 Amp; P&lt;0.0001) and greater impedance drop (16.8±3.0 Ω, P&lt;0.001). Repeat ablation at similar locations had a successful effect in 12 out of 16 (75.0%) patients. During a follow-up duration of 13±5 months, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence. The frequency of steam pops was similar between the higher and lower baseline impedance settings (7.1 versus 8.2%; P=0.74). Conclusions In patients with deep ventricular substrate, reducing the baseline impedance is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the effect of radiofrequency ablation. However, its combination with low-ionic solutions may increase the risk for steam pops and neurological events.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31113232</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007336</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1941-3084
ispartof Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2019-06, Vol.12 (6), p.e007336-e007336
issn 1941-3084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232084373
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Action Potentials
Aged
Catheter Ablation - adverse effects
Catheter Ablation - instrumentation
Electric Impedance
Female
Heart Rate
Heart Ventricles - physiopathology
Heart Ventricles - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Progression-Free Survival
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Tachycardia, Ventricular - diagnosis
Tachycardia, Ventricular - physiopathology
Tachycardia, Ventricular - surgery
Time Factors
Ventricular Premature Complexes - diagnosis
Ventricular Premature Complexes - physiopathology
Ventricular Premature Complexes - surgery
title Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A24%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modulating%20the%20Baseline%20Impedance:%20An%20Adjunctive%20Technique%20for%20Maximizing%20Radiofrequency%20Lesion%20Dimensions%20in%20Deep%20and%20Intramural%20Ventricular%20Substrate:%20An%20Adjunctive%20Technique%20for%20Maximizing%20Radiofrequency%20Lesion%20Dimensions%20in%20Deep%20and%20Intramural%20Ventricular%20Substrate&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Arrhythmia%20and%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Shapira-Daniels,%20Ayelet&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e007336&rft.epage=e007336&rft.pages=e007336-e007336&rft.eissn=1941-3084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232084373%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232084373&rft_id=info:pmid/31113232&rfr_iscdi=true