Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time

Background While laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study’s purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.758-769
Hauptverfasser: Margulies, Samantha L., Vargas, Maria V., Denny, Kathryn, Sparks, Andrew D., Marfori, Cherie Q., Moawad, Gaby, Amdur, Richard L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 769
container_issue 2
container_start_page 758
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 34
creator Margulies, Samantha L.
Vargas, Maria V.
Denny, Kathryn
Sparks, Andrew D.
Marfori, Cherie Q.
Moawad, Gaby
Amdur, Richard L.
description Background While laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study’s purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy become inferior to a more expeditiously completed abdominal hysterectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2010 to 2016 by current procedural terminology code. Hysterectomy cases were stratified by approach and 60-min intervals. 30-day post-operative outcomes were analyzed by operative time and approach. Results 109,821 hysterectomies were included in our analysis, of which 66,560 (61%) were laparoscopic, and 43,261 (39%) were abdominal. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis comparing outcomes by surgical approach and operative time, there was no time combination in which patients who had a abdominal hysterectomy had significantly lower odds of the composite complications variable. This was true even in laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min compared to abdominal hysterectomies completed between 20 and 60 min. When compared to laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min, abdominal hysterectomies between 20 and 60 min had lower odds of sepsis and abdominal hysterectomies less than 180 min had lower odds of urinary tract infection. Conclusion Given that benefits persist even in prolonged cases, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to most patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Surgical efficiency should be prioritized for any surgical approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232057627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2226262055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-148c02867c77b6075e63310de5963bd12f7fb616c8d907537dd100c00f0caae23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRuDn9Ah5MEy9e0Bco0B7N4p8lS7zomVBKZ5e2VGgP_fYyNzXxYDgQwvP-4PcgdEnglgDIuwCQihQDyTGIjHKcHaE5SRnFlJLsGM0hZ4CpzNMZOgthC5HPCT9FM0YgzySwOVotXdtrX3ebpLBdvemSRsezC8b1tUl0Vya6KF1bd7pJ3qcwWG_N4NopceNgXGtDUkzJULf2HJ1Uugn24rAv0Nvjw-vyGa9fnlbL-zU2TPIBkzQzQDMhjZSFAMmtYPE7peW5YEVJaCWrQhBhsjKPt0yWZSxrACowWlvKFuhmn9t79zHaMKi2DsY2je6sG4OilFHgUlAZ0es_6NaNPjbZUVTEBZxHiu4pE2sHbyvV-7rVflIE1E602otWUbT6Eq2yOHR1iB6L1pY_I99mI8D2QOh3dq3_ffuf2E_Cr4ed</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2226262055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Margulies, Samantha L. ; Vargas, Maria V. ; Denny, Kathryn ; Sparks, Andrew D. ; Marfori, Cherie Q. ; Moawad, Gaby ; Amdur, Richard L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Samantha L. ; Vargas, Maria V. ; Denny, Kathryn ; Sparks, Andrew D. ; Marfori, Cherie Q. ; Moawad, Gaby ; Amdur, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background While laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study’s purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy become inferior to a more expeditiously completed abdominal hysterectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2010 to 2016 by current procedural terminology code. Hysterectomy cases were stratified by approach and 60-min intervals. 30-day post-operative outcomes were analyzed by operative time and approach. Results 109,821 hysterectomies were included in our analysis, of which 66,560 (61%) were laparoscopic, and 43,261 (39%) were abdominal. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis comparing outcomes by surgical approach and operative time, there was no time combination in which patients who had a abdominal hysterectomy had significantly lower odds of the composite complications variable. This was true even in laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min compared to abdominal hysterectomies completed between 20 and 60 min. When compared to laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min, abdominal hysterectomies between 20 and 60 min had lower odds of sepsis and abdominal hysterectomies less than 180 min had lower odds of urinary tract infection. Conclusion Given that benefits persist even in prolonged cases, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to most patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Surgical efficiency should be prioritized for any surgical approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31098703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal Surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hysterectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Proctology ; Surgery ; Terminology</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.758-769</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019. corrected publication 2019</rights><rights>Surgical Endoscopy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-148c02867c77b6075e63310de5963bd12f7fb616c8d907537dd100c00f0caae23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-148c02867c77b6075e63310de5963bd12f7fb616c8d907537dd100c00f0caae23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0971-7553</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31098703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Samantha L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Maria V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denny, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marfori, Cherie Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moawad, Gaby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amdur, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background While laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study’s purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy become inferior to a more expeditiously completed abdominal hysterectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2010 to 2016 by current procedural terminology code. Hysterectomy cases were stratified by approach and 60-min intervals. 30-day post-operative outcomes were analyzed by operative time and approach. Results 109,821 hysterectomies were included in our analysis, of which 66,560 (61%) were laparoscopic, and 43,261 (39%) were abdominal. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis comparing outcomes by surgical approach and operative time, there was no time combination in which patients who had a abdominal hysterectomy had significantly lower odds of the composite complications variable. This was true even in laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min compared to abdominal hysterectomies completed between 20 and 60 min. When compared to laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min, abdominal hysterectomies between 20 and 60 min had lower odds of sepsis and abdominal hysterectomies less than 180 min had lower odds of urinary tract infection. Conclusion Given that benefits persist even in prolonged cases, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to most patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Surgical efficiency should be prioritized for any surgical approach.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRuDn9Ah5MEy9e0Bco0B7N4p8lS7zomVBKZ5e2VGgP_fYyNzXxYDgQwvP-4PcgdEnglgDIuwCQihQDyTGIjHKcHaE5SRnFlJLsGM0hZ4CpzNMZOgthC5HPCT9FM0YgzySwOVotXdtrX3ebpLBdvemSRsezC8b1tUl0Vya6KF1bd7pJ3qcwWG_N4NopceNgXGtDUkzJULf2HJ1Uugn24rAv0Nvjw-vyGa9fnlbL-zU2TPIBkzQzQDMhjZSFAMmtYPE7peW5YEVJaCWrQhBhsjKPt0yWZSxrACowWlvKFuhmn9t79zHaMKi2DsY2je6sG4OilFHgUlAZ0es_6NaNPjbZUVTEBZxHiu4pE2sHbyvV-7rVflIE1E602otWUbT6Eq2yOHR1iB6L1pY_I99mI8D2QOh3dq3_ffuf2E_Cr4ed</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Margulies, Samantha L.</creator><creator>Vargas, Maria V.</creator><creator>Denny, Kathryn</creator><creator>Sparks, Andrew D.</creator><creator>Marfori, Cherie Q.</creator><creator>Moawad, Gaby</creator><creator>Amdur, Richard L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-7553</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time</title><author>Margulies, Samantha L. ; Vargas, Maria V. ; Denny, Kathryn ; Sparks, Andrew D. ; Marfori, Cherie Q. ; Moawad, Gaby ; Amdur, Richard L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-148c02867c77b6075e63310de5963bd12f7fb616c8d907537dd100c00f0caae23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Margulies, Samantha L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Maria V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denny, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marfori, Cherie Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moawad, Gaby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amdur, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Margulies, Samantha L.</au><au>Vargas, Maria V.</au><au>Denny, Kathryn</au><au>Sparks, Andrew D.</au><au>Marfori, Cherie Q.</au><au>Moawad, Gaby</au><au>Amdur, Richard L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>758</spage><epage>769</epage><pages>758-769</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background While laparoscopic hysterectomy has benefits compared to abdominal hysterectomy, the operative times are longer. Longer operative times have been associated with negative outcomes. This study’s purpose was to elucidate if there is an operative time at which 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy become inferior to a more expeditiously completed abdominal hysterectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2010 to 2016 by current procedural terminology code. Hysterectomy cases were stratified by approach and 60-min intervals. 30-day post-operative outcomes were analyzed by operative time and approach. Results 109,821 hysterectomies were included in our analysis, of which 66,560 (61%) were laparoscopic, and 43,261 (39%) were abdominal. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis comparing outcomes by surgical approach and operative time, there was no time combination in which patients who had a abdominal hysterectomy had significantly lower odds of the composite complications variable. This was true even in laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min compared to abdominal hysterectomies completed between 20 and 60 min. When compared to laparoscopic hysterectomies greater than 240 min, abdominal hysterectomies between 20 and 60 min had lower odds of sepsis and abdominal hysterectomies less than 180 min had lower odds of urinary tract infection. Conclusion Given that benefits persist even in prolonged cases, a laparoscopic approach should be offered to most patients undergoing benign hysterectomy. Surgical efficiency should be prioritized for any surgical approach.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31098703</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0971-7553</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.758-769
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232057627
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal Surgery
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Hysterectomy
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Proctology
Surgery
Terminology
title Comparing benign laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy outcomes by time
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A42%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20benign%20laparoscopic%20and%20abdominal%20hysterectomy%20outcomes%20by%20time&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Margulies,%20Samantha%20L.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=758&rft.epage=769&rft.pages=758-769&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-019-06825-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2226262055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2226262055&rft_id=info:pmid/31098703&rfr_iscdi=true