Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology
Objective Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging. Materials and Methods Conventional (ZrC) and high‐translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air‐...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2019-07, Vol.31 (4), p.388-397 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 397 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 388 |
| container_title | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin Cesar, Paulo F. Henriques, Bruno Fredel, Márcio C. Özcan, Mutlu Volpato, Claudia A. M. |
| description | Objective
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
Materials and Methods
Conventional (ZrC) and high‐translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air‐borne particle abrasion with 50‐μm Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30‐μm silica modified Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐T and ZrT‐T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP‐containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross‐sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
Results
Roughness of the ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC‐AO and ZrC‐T groups compared to ZrT‐AO and ZrT‐T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
Conclusion
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high‐translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.
Clinical Significance
Mechanical surface treatment (air‐borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jerd.12490 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232049581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2232049581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-61a5212d2eb7f14b737ea078b3433075fc7d26bc4427d1f037c7c4e799512d753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqWw4QGQJTYVUop_4zG7qh3-VAkJwTpy7OuJR5l4sJPCdMUjsOEFeRKcprBggRfX1vV3jnV9EHpKyRkt6-UWkjujTGhyDx1TRVbViglyv5yFritBpTxCj3LeEkKl0uohOuKUaK2VOEY_z10HOcQBt9CZ6xATjh7bOFzDMJa26bEZHO7Cpvv1_ceYzJD7yZY7fBNSwYJ5hdfegx1nXZ6SNxZmvQuzPAwbvIOxiy7f-pjN3JnyXM2A4dseUtgVu_LOwsU-bg6P0QNv-gxP7vYT9Pn1-tPF2-rqw5t3F-dXlRVSk6qmRjLKHINWeSpaxRUYolYtF5wTJb1VjtWtFYIpRz3hyiorQGkti0pJfoJOF999il8myGOzC9lC35sB4pQbxjgjQssVLejzf9BtnFL5n5mqVc0ZF6RQLxbKpphzAt_sy3wmHRpKmjmsZg6ruQ2rwM_uLKd2B-4v-iedAtAF-Bp6OPzHqnm__ni5mP4GLiKiFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267632340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin ; Cesar, Paulo F. ; Henriques, Bruno ; Fredel, Márcio C. ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Volpato, Claudia A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin ; Cesar, Paulo F. ; Henriques, Bruno ; Fredel, Márcio C. ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Volpato, Claudia A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
Materials and Methods
Conventional (ZrC) and high‐translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air‐borne particle abrasion with 50‐μm Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30‐μm silica modified Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐T and ZrT‐T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP‐containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross‐sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
Results
Roughness of the ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC‐AO and ZrC‐T groups compared to ZrT‐AO and ZrT‐T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
Conclusion
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high‐translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.
Clinical Significance
Mechanical surface treatment (air‐borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1496-4155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12490</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31099974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; adhesive cementation ; Adhesives ; Aging ; Aluminum oxide ; Bond strength ; Ceramics ; Dental Bonding ; Dental cement ; Dental implants ; Dental Materials ; Dental restorative materials ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Experimental methods ; high‐translucent zirconia ; Materials Testing ; microtensile bond strength ; Production methods ; Resin Cements ; Resins ; Silica ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surface Properties ; Zirconia ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2019-07, Vol.31 (4), p.388-397</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-61a5212d2eb7f14b737ea078b3433075fc7d26bc4427d1f037c7c4e799512d753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-61a5212d2eb7f14b737ea078b3433075fc7d26bc4427d1f037c7c4e799512d753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0918-3678 ; 0000-0001-7385-5673 ; 0000-0002-9623-6098 ; 0000-0001-5834-105X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjerd.12490$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjerd.12490$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099974$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesar, Paulo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredel, Márcio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Claudia A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology</title><title>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><description>Objective
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
Materials and Methods
Conventional (ZrC) and high‐translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air‐borne particle abrasion with 50‐μm Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30‐μm silica modified Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐T and ZrT‐T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP‐containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross‐sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
Results
Roughness of the ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC‐AO and ZrC‐T groups compared to ZrT‐AO and ZrT‐T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
Conclusion
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high‐translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.
Clinical Significance
Mechanical surface treatment (air‐borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>adhesive cementation</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Experimental methods</subject><subject>high‐translucent zirconia</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>microtensile bond strength</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>1496-4155</issn><issn>1708-8240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqWw4QGQJTYVUop_4zG7qh3-VAkJwTpy7OuJR5l4sJPCdMUjsOEFeRKcprBggRfX1vV3jnV9EHpKyRkt6-UWkjujTGhyDx1TRVbViglyv5yFritBpTxCj3LeEkKl0uohOuKUaK2VOEY_z10HOcQBt9CZ6xATjh7bOFzDMJa26bEZHO7Cpvv1_ceYzJD7yZY7fBNSwYJ5hdfegx1nXZ6SNxZmvQuzPAwbvIOxiy7f-pjN3JnyXM2A4dseUtgVu_LOwsU-bg6P0QNv-gxP7vYT9Pn1-tPF2-rqw5t3F-dXlRVSk6qmRjLKHINWeSpaxRUYolYtF5wTJb1VjtWtFYIpRz3hyiorQGkti0pJfoJOF999il8myGOzC9lC35sB4pQbxjgjQssVLejzf9BtnFL5n5mqVc0ZF6RQLxbKpphzAt_sy3wmHRpKmjmsZg6ruQ2rwM_uLKd2B-4v-iedAtAF-Bp6OPzHqnm__ni5mP4GLiKiFA</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin</creator><creator>Cesar, Paulo F.</creator><creator>Henriques, Bruno</creator><creator>Fredel, Márcio C.</creator><creator>Özcan, Mutlu</creator><creator>Volpato, Claudia A. M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-5673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-6098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-105X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology</title><author>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin ; Cesar, Paulo F. ; Henriques, Bruno ; Fredel, Márcio C. ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Volpato, Claudia A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4590-61a5212d2eb7f14b737ea078b3433075fc7d26bc4427d1f037c7c4e799512d753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>adhesive cementation</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Experimental methods</topic><topic>high‐translucent zirconia</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>microtensile bond strength</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesar, Paulo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredel, Márcio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Claudia A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruales‐Carrera, Edwin</au><au>Cesar, Paulo F.</au><au>Henriques, Bruno</au><au>Fredel, Márcio C.</au><au>Özcan, Mutlu</au><au>Volpato, Claudia A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>388-397</pages><issn>1496-4155</issn><eissn>1708-8240</eissn><abstract>Objective
Evaluate the adhesive behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia after surface conditioning and hydrothermal aging.
Materials and Methods
Conventional (ZrC) and high‐translucent zirconia (ZrT) specimens were divided into six groups: without surface treatment (ZrC and ZrT), air‐borne particle abrasion with 50‐μm Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO), and tribochemical treatment with 30‐μm silica modified Al2O3 sized particles (ZrC‐T and ZrT‐T). Zirconia specimens were treated using an MDP‐containing universal adhesive and bonded to two resins blocks with an adhesive luting cement. Microbar specimens with cross‐sectioned areas of 1 mm2 were achieved. Half of the microbars were subjected to hydrothermal aging. Bond strength was evaluated by microtensile bond strength test and statistically evaluated by the Weibull analysis.
Results
Roughness of the ZrC‐AO and ZrT‐AO groups were statistically higher. Bond strength analysis revealed higher bond strength for ZrC‐AO and ZrC‐T groups compared to ZrT‐AO and ZrT‐T, respectively. Mixed failure was the most frequent for the mechanically treated groups, while no cohesive failures were obtained.
Conclusion
Lower values of bond strength were obtained for the mechanically treated high‐translucent zirconia groups when compared to their conventional zirconia counterparts. Mechanical surface treatment significantly improved the bond strength to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.
Clinical Significance
Mechanical surface treatment (air‐borne particle abrasion or tribochemical treatment) associated with the use of universal adhesives containing MDP could provide a durable bonding to conventional and high‐translucent zirconia.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31099974</pmid><doi>10.1111/jerd.12490</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-5673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9623-6098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-105X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1496-4155 |
| ispartof | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2019-07, Vol.31 (4), p.388-397 |
| issn | 1496-4155 1708-8240 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232049581 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Abrasion adhesive cementation Adhesives Aging Aluminum oxide Bond strength Ceramics Dental Bonding Dental cement Dental implants Dental Materials Dental restorative materials Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Experimental methods high‐translucent zirconia Materials Testing microtensile bond strength Production methods Resin Cements Resins Silica Stress, Mechanical Surface Properties Zirconia Zirconium |
| title | Adhesion behavior of conventional and high‐translucent zirconia: Effect of surface conditioning methods and aging using an experimental methodology |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T02%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adhesion%20behavior%20of%20conventional%20and%20high%E2%80%90translucent%20zirconia:%20Effect%20of%20surface%20conditioning%20methods%20and%20aging%20using%20an%20experimental%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20esthetic%20and%20restorative%20dentistry&rft.au=Ruales%E2%80%90Carrera,%20Edwin&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=388-397&rft.issn=1496-4155&rft.eissn=1708-8240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jerd.12490&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2232049581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267632340&rft_id=info:pmid/31099974&rfr_iscdi=true |