Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method Sixt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of audiology 2019-06, Vol.28 (2), p.322-332
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Aurora J, DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J, Ries, Dennis T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 332
container_issue 2
container_start_page 322
container_title American journal of audiology
container_volume 28
creator Weaver, Aurora J
DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J
Ries, Dennis T
description Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method Sixty-six individuals, young children (ages 10-12 years, n = 22), older children (ages 13-15 years, n = 23), and adults (ages 18-33 years, n = 21), were recruited and assigned to subgroups based on reported duration (years) of instrumental music instruction. Additional background information was collected in order to assess if the pitch temporal processing and patterning span developed, the Pspan, was sensitive to individual differences across participants. Results The evaluation of the Pspan task as a scale indicated good parallel reliability across runs assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and scores were normally distributed. Between-subjects analysis of variance indicated main effects for both age groups and music groups recruited for the study. A multiple regression analysis with the Pspan scores as the dependent variable found that 3 measures of music instruction, age in years, and paternal education were predictive of enhanced temporal processing and patterning capacity for pitch input. Conclusions The outcomes suggest that the Pspan task is a time-efficient data collection tool that is sensitive to the duration of instrumental music instruction, maturation, and paternal education. In addition, results indicate that the task is sensitive to age-related auditory temporal processing and patterning performance changes during adolescence when children are 10-15 years old.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232024779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A595353236</galeid><sourcerecordid>A595353236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-a921e8b943443493b6c615531320bc96db89b14455c69cac5117a2a1c197a4ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdtrFDEUxoNY7EXffZKAIH2Zmvskvg1L64WiK6zPIZPNdFNmkjHJIP3vzdKtWikJ5CT5fR_n8AHwGqMLjBh7TxBWuvvSNVg2COP2GTjBnMtGYdo-rzXiqkFSqmNwmvMtQpgoSV6AY4qRZLyVJ-D7Os8mfIAd_Op-wU2MIxxigl3OLmcfbuDaF7uDGzfNMZkRrlO0hx8TtnBtSnEp7K8rMxvry91LcDSYMbtXh_MM_Li63Kw-NdffPn5eddeNZYSXxiiCnewVo6xuRXthRe2dYkpQb5XY9lL1mDHOrVDWWF7HM8Rgi1VrmHP0DJzf-84p_lxcLnry2bpxNMHFJWtCqhNhbasq-vY_9DYuKdTuKtWKlgohyF_qxoxO-zDEkozdm-qOK045JVRU6uIJqq6tm7yNwQ2-vj8SvPtHsHNmLLscx6X4GPJjEN2DNsWckxv0nPxk0p3GSO_j1g9xayz1Pu4qeXMYbOknt_0jeMiX_ga3n6Bh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2276736662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weaver, Aurora J ; DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J ; Ries, Dennis T</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Aurora J ; DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J ; Ries, Dennis T</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method Sixty-six individuals, young children (ages 10-12 years, n = 22), older children (ages 13-15 years, n = 23), and adults (ages 18-33 years, n = 21), were recruited and assigned to subgroups based on reported duration (years) of instrumental music instruction. Additional background information was collected in order to assess if the pitch temporal processing and patterning span developed, the Pspan, was sensitive to individual differences across participants. Results The evaluation of the Pspan task as a scale indicated good parallel reliability across runs assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and scores were normally distributed. Between-subjects analysis of variance indicated main effects for both age groups and music groups recruited for the study. A multiple regression analysis with the Pspan scores as the dependent variable found that 3 measures of music instruction, age in years, and paternal education were predictive of enhanced temporal processing and patterning capacity for pitch input. Conclusions The outcomes suggest that the Pspan task is a time-efficient data collection tool that is sensitive to the duration of instrumental music instruction, maturation, and paternal education. In addition, results indicate that the task is sensitive to age-related auditory temporal processing and patterning performance changes during adolescence when children are 10-15 years old.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31084578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Adolescence ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory Perception ; Between-subjects design ; Child ; Children ; Computational linguistics ; Data collection ; Education ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Instrumental music ; Language processing ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Music ; Music education ; Music in education ; Musical performances ; Musicians &amp; conductors ; Natural language interfaces ; Neurosciences ; Parent educational background ; Phonology ; Pitch Perception - physiology ; Psychoacoustics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Teaching ; Temporal processing ; Time Factors ; Young Adult ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2019-06, Vol.28 (2), p.322-332</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-a921e8b943443493b6c615531320bc96db89b14455c69cac5117a2a1c197a4ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-a921e8b943443493b6c615531320bc96db89b14455c69cac5117a2a1c197a4ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31084578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Aurora J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, Dennis T</creatorcontrib><title>Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method Sixty-six individuals, young children (ages 10-12 years, n = 22), older children (ages 13-15 years, n = 23), and adults (ages 18-33 years, n = 21), were recruited and assigned to subgroups based on reported duration (years) of instrumental music instruction. Additional background information was collected in order to assess if the pitch temporal processing and patterning span developed, the Pspan, was sensitive to individual differences across participants. Results The evaluation of the Pspan task as a scale indicated good parallel reliability across runs assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and scores were normally distributed. Between-subjects analysis of variance indicated main effects for both age groups and music groups recruited for the study. A multiple regression analysis with the Pspan scores as the dependent variable found that 3 measures of music instruction, age in years, and paternal education were predictive of enhanced temporal processing and patterning capacity for pitch input. Conclusions The outcomes suggest that the Pspan task is a time-efficient data collection tool that is sensitive to the duration of instrumental music instruction, maturation, and paternal education. In addition, results indicate that the task is sensitive to age-related auditory temporal processing and patterning performance changes during adolescence when children are 10-15 years old.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adolescence</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Between-subjects design</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Computational linguistics</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Instrumental music</subject><subject>Language processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music education</subject><subject>Music in education</subject><subject>Musical performances</subject><subject>Musicians &amp; conductors</subject><subject>Natural language interfaces</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Parent educational background</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Pitch Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Temporal processing</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdtrFDEUxoNY7EXffZKAIH2Zmvskvg1L64WiK6zPIZPNdFNmkjHJIP3vzdKtWikJ5CT5fR_n8AHwGqMLjBh7TxBWuvvSNVg2COP2GTjBnMtGYdo-rzXiqkFSqmNwmvMtQpgoSV6AY4qRZLyVJ-D7Os8mfIAd_Op-wU2MIxxigl3OLmcfbuDaF7uDGzfNMZkRrlO0hx8TtnBtSnEp7K8rMxvry91LcDSYMbtXh_MM_Li63Kw-NdffPn5eddeNZYSXxiiCnewVo6xuRXthRe2dYkpQb5XY9lL1mDHOrVDWWF7HM8Rgi1VrmHP0DJzf-84p_lxcLnry2bpxNMHFJWtCqhNhbasq-vY_9DYuKdTuKtWKlgohyF_qxoxO-zDEkozdm-qOK045JVRU6uIJqq6tm7yNwQ2-vj8SvPtHsHNmLLscx6X4GPJjEN2DNsWckxv0nPxk0p3GSO_j1g9xayz1Pu4qeXMYbOknt_0jeMiX_ga3n6Bh</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Weaver, Aurora J</creator><creator>DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J</creator><creator>Ries, Dennis T</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity</title><author>Weaver, Aurora J ; DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J ; Ries, Dennis T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-a921e8b943443493b6c615531320bc96db89b14455c69cac5117a2a1c197a4ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adolescence</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Between-subjects design</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Computational linguistics</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Instrumental music</topic><topic>Language processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music education</topic><topic>Music in education</topic><topic>Musical performances</topic><topic>Musicians &amp; conductors</topic><topic>Natural language interfaces</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Parent educational background</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Pitch Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Temporal processing</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Aurora J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, Dennis T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Aurora J</au><au>DiGiovanni, Jeffrey J</au><au>Ries, Dennis T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>322-332</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether merging the clinical pitch pattern test procedure with psychoacoustic adaptive methods would create a new tool feasible to capture individual differences in pitch temporal processing and patterning capacity of children and adults. Method Sixty-six individuals, young children (ages 10-12 years, n = 22), older children (ages 13-15 years, n = 23), and adults (ages 18-33 years, n = 21), were recruited and assigned to subgroups based on reported duration (years) of instrumental music instruction. Additional background information was collected in order to assess if the pitch temporal processing and patterning span developed, the Pspan, was sensitive to individual differences across participants. Results The evaluation of the Pspan task as a scale indicated good parallel reliability across runs assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and scores were normally distributed. Between-subjects analysis of variance indicated main effects for both age groups and music groups recruited for the study. A multiple regression analysis with the Pspan scores as the dependent variable found that 3 measures of music instruction, age in years, and paternal education were predictive of enhanced temporal processing and patterning capacity for pitch input. Conclusions The outcomes suggest that the Pspan task is a time-efficient data collection tool that is sensitive to the duration of instrumental music instruction, maturation, and paternal education. In addition, results indicate that the task is sensitive to age-related auditory temporal processing and patterning performance changes during adolescence when children are 10-15 years old.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>31084578</pmid><doi>10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0117</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0889
ispartof American journal of audiology, 2019-06, Vol.28 (2), p.322-332
issn 1059-0889
1558-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2232024779
source MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustics
Adolescence
Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Perception
Between-subjects design
Child
Children
Computational linguistics
Data collection
Education
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Individual differences
Instrumental music
Language processing
Male
Memory
Mental Recall - physiology
Multiple Regression Analysis
Music
Music education
Music in education
Musical performances
Musicians & conductors
Natural language interfaces
Neurosciences
Parent educational background
Phonology
Pitch Perception - physiology
Psychoacoustics
Reproducibility of Results
Teaching
Temporal processing
Time Factors
Young Adult
Young Children
title Pspan: A New Tool for Assessing Pitch Temporal Processing and Patterning Capacity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pspan:%20A%20New%20Tool%20for%20Assessing%20Pitch%20Temporal%20Processing%20and%20Patterning%20Capacity&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Weaver,%20Aurora%20J&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=322-332&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0117&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA595353236%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2276736662&rft_id=info:pmid/31084578&rft_galeid=A595353236&rfr_iscdi=true