Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma

The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of hematology 2019-08, Vol.94 (8), p.853-861
Hauptverfasser: Alonso, Rafael, Cedena, María Teresa, Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo, Ríos, Rafael, Moraleda, José María, Cabañas, Valentín, Moreno, María José, López‐Jiménez, Javier, Martín, Fernando, Sanz, Alejandro, Valeri, Antonio, Jiménez, Ana, Sánchez, Ricardo, Lahuerta, Juan José, Martínez‐López, Joaquín
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 861
container_issue 8
container_start_page 853
container_title American journal of hematology
container_volume 94
creator Alonso, Rafael
Cedena, María Teresa
Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo
Ríos, Rafael
Moraleda, José María
Cabañas, Valentín
Moreno, María José
López‐Jiménez, Javier
Martín, Fernando
Sanz, Alejandro
Valeri, Antonio
Jiménez, Ana
Sánchez, Ricardo
Lahuerta, Juan José
Martínez‐López, Joaquín
description The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospectively analyzed the prediction of outcome with the combination of PET‐CT and MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM. We confirmed the benefit in terms of progression‐free survival (PFS), linked to the achievement of negativity by MFC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28‐0.98), and PET‐CT (HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09‐0.36) individually. By combining both techniques, patients who became MRD‐/PET‐, with a median of PFS 92 months, had significant prolonged median PFS (P
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajh.25507
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231955424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2231955424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-12859e4c9d178ac471dc8b20c5eb37d957b81d3fcf41f25d4002b931f1d8d3f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7vpx8A9IwIse1s1Hs02PIn6sCF70XNJkqlmatCatsv_erF09CEIgw8zDy8yD0Akll5QQNlert0smBMl30JSSYjGTC8F20ZTwBU01KSboIMYVIZRmkuyjCackzwjnU6SXTr1a_4qVN7hqPWCnQmg_sYoRYnTg-4it60L7kUbWW6caHCBaM6TC2AgqAu4CGKt723psPXZD09uuSfwamtapI7RXqybC8fY_RC-3N8_X97PHp7vl9dXjTHMp8xllUhSQ6cLQXCqd5dRoWTGiBVQ8N4XIK0kNr3Wd0ZoJk6XTq4LTmhqZ2hk_ROdjbtr2fYDYl85GDU2jPLRDLBnjtBAiYxv07A-6aofg03aJEukJmW-oi5HSoY0xQF12IQkI65KScmO-TObLb_OJPd0mDpUD80v-qE7AfAQ-bQPr_5PKq4f7MfILpjCNUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252255874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Alonso, Rafael ; Cedena, María Teresa ; Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo ; Ríos, Rafael ; Moraleda, José María ; Cabañas, Valentín ; Moreno, María José ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Martín, Fernando ; Sanz, Alejandro ; Valeri, Antonio ; Jiménez, Ana ; Sánchez, Ricardo ; Lahuerta, Juan José ; Martínez‐López, Joaquín</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Rafael ; Cedena, María Teresa ; Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo ; Ríos, Rafael ; Moraleda, José María ; Cabañas, Valentín ; Moreno, María José ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Martín, Fernando ; Sanz, Alejandro ; Valeri, Antonio ; Jiménez, Ana ; Sánchez, Ricardo ; Lahuerta, Juan José ; Martínez‐López, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><description>The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospectively analyzed the prediction of outcome with the combination of PET‐CT and MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM. We confirmed the benefit in terms of progression‐free survival (PFS), linked to the achievement of negativity by MFC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28‐0.98), and PET‐CT (HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09‐0.36) individually. By combining both techniques, patients who became MRD‐/PET‐, with a median of PFS 92 months, had significant prolonged median PFS (P &lt; .001). This is compared with MRD+/PET‐ and PET+ patients (median PFS of 45 and 28 months, respectively). We observed a significant difference (P = .003) in overall survival (OS) outcomes between MRD‐/PET‐ and MRD+/PET‐ patients (4‐year OS 94.2% and 100%, respectively), vs PET+ patients (4‐year OS 73.8%). All survival results were confirmed in a conditional landmark analysis. These findings support the potential complementarity between PET‐CT and MFC, and highlight their better predictive capability when improving sensitivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-8609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25507</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31074033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bone imaging ; Bone marrow ; Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Marrow - pathology ; Complementarity ; Computed tomography ; Flow Cytometry ; Hematology ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Medical prognosis ; Minimal residual disease ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging ; Multiple Myeloma - mortality ; Multiple Myeloma - pathology ; Multiple Myeloma - therapy ; Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm, Residual - mortality ; Neoplasm, Residual - pathology ; Neoplasm, Residual - therapy ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Progression-Free Survival ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival ; Whole Body Imaging</subject><ispartof>American journal of hematology, 2019-08, Vol.94 (8), p.853-861</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-12859e4c9d178ac471dc8b20c5eb37d957b81d3fcf41f25d4002b931f1d8d3f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-12859e4c9d178ac471dc8b20c5eb37d957b81d3fcf41f25d4002b931f1d8d3f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5904-0902 ; 0000-0002-6248-2549 ; 0000-0002-6383-0381 ; 0000-0001-5851-3720 ; 0000-0003-3774-118X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajh.25507$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajh.25507$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31074033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, María Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ríos, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraleda, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabañas, Valentín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valeri, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐López, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma</title><title>American journal of hematology</title><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><description>The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospectively analyzed the prediction of outcome with the combination of PET‐CT and MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM. We confirmed the benefit in terms of progression‐free survival (PFS), linked to the achievement of negativity by MFC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28‐0.98), and PET‐CT (HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09‐0.36) individually. By combining both techniques, patients who became MRD‐/PET‐, with a median of PFS 92 months, had significant prolonged median PFS (P &lt; .001). This is compared with MRD+/PET‐ and PET+ patients (median PFS of 45 and 28 months, respectively). We observed a significant difference (P = .003) in overall survival (OS) outcomes between MRD‐/PET‐ and MRD+/PET‐ patients (4‐year OS 94.2% and 100%, respectively), vs PET+ patients (4‐year OS 73.8%). All survival results were confirmed in a conditional landmark analysis. These findings support the potential complementarity between PET‐CT and MFC, and highlight their better predictive capability when improving sensitivity.</description><subject>Bone imaging</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - pathology</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Minimal residual disease</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Progression-Free Survival</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging</subject><issn>0361-8609</issn><issn>1096-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMo7vpx8A9IwIse1s1Hs02PIn6sCF70XNJkqlmatCatsv_erF09CEIgw8zDy8yD0Akll5QQNlert0smBMl30JSSYjGTC8F20ZTwBU01KSboIMYVIZRmkuyjCackzwjnU6SXTr1a_4qVN7hqPWCnQmg_sYoRYnTg-4it60L7kUbWW6caHCBaM6TC2AgqAu4CGKt723psPXZD09uuSfwamtapI7RXqybC8fY_RC-3N8_X97PHp7vl9dXjTHMp8xllUhSQ6cLQXCqd5dRoWTGiBVQ8N4XIK0kNr3Wd0ZoJk6XTq4LTmhqZ2hk_ROdjbtr2fYDYl85GDU2jPLRDLBnjtBAiYxv07A-6aofg03aJEukJmW-oi5HSoY0xQF12IQkI65KScmO-TObLb_OJPd0mDpUD80v-qE7AfAQ-bQPr_5PKq4f7MfILpjCNUA</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Alonso, Rafael</creator><creator>Cedena, María Teresa</creator><creator>Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo</creator><creator>Ríos, Rafael</creator><creator>Moraleda, José María</creator><creator>Cabañas, Valentín</creator><creator>Moreno, María José</creator><creator>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creator><creator>Martín, Fernando</creator><creator>Sanz, Alejandro</creator><creator>Valeri, Antonio</creator><creator>Jiménez, Ana</creator><creator>Sánchez, Ricardo</creator><creator>Lahuerta, Juan José</creator><creator>Martínez‐López, Joaquín</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-2549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-0381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-118X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma</title><author>Alonso, Rafael ; Cedena, María Teresa ; Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo ; Ríos, Rafael ; Moraleda, José María ; Cabañas, Valentín ; Moreno, María José ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Martín, Fernando ; Sanz, Alejandro ; Valeri, Antonio ; Jiménez, Ana ; Sánchez, Ricardo ; Lahuerta, Juan José ; Martínez‐López, Joaquín</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-12859e4c9d178ac471dc8b20c5eb37d957b81d3fcf41f25d4002b931f1d8d3f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bone imaging</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - pathology</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Minimal residual disease</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - mortality</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm, Residual - therapy</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Progression-Free Survival</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedena, María Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ríos, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraleda, José María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabañas, Valentín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, María José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valeri, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiménez, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahuerta, Juan José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐López, Joaquín</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso, Rafael</au><au>Cedena, María Teresa</au><au>Gómez‐Grande, Adolfo</au><au>Ríos, Rafael</au><au>Moraleda, José María</au><au>Cabañas, Valentín</au><au>Moreno, María José</au><au>López‐Jiménez, Javier</au><au>Martín, Fernando</au><au>Sanz, Alejandro</au><au>Valeri, Antonio</au><au>Jiménez, Ana</au><au>Sánchez, Ricardo</au><au>Lahuerta, Juan José</au><au>Martínez‐López, Joaquín</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma</atitle><jtitle>American journal of hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Hematol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>853</spage><epage>861</epage><pages>853-861</pages><issn>0361-8609</issn><eissn>1096-8652</eissn><abstract>The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospectively analyzed the prediction of outcome with the combination of PET‐CT and MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM. We confirmed the benefit in terms of progression‐free survival (PFS), linked to the achievement of negativity by MFC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28‐0.98), and PET‐CT (HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09‐0.36) individually. By combining both techniques, patients who became MRD‐/PET‐, with a median of PFS 92 months, had significant prolonged median PFS (P &lt; .001). This is compared with MRD+/PET‐ and PET+ patients (median PFS of 45 and 28 months, respectively). We observed a significant difference (P = .003) in overall survival (OS) outcomes between MRD‐/PET‐ and MRD+/PET‐ patients (4‐year OS 94.2% and 100%, respectively), vs PET+ patients (4‐year OS 73.8%). All survival results were confirmed in a conditional landmark analysis. These findings support the potential complementarity between PET‐CT and MFC, and highlight their better predictive capability when improving sensitivity.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31074033</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajh.25507</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-2549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-0381</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-118X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-8609
ispartof American journal of hematology, 2019-08, Vol.94 (8), p.853-861
issn 0361-8609
1096-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231955424
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bone imaging
Bone marrow
Bone Marrow - diagnostic imaging
Bone Marrow - pathology
Complementarity
Computed tomography
Flow Cytometry
Hematology
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Medical prognosis
Minimal residual disease
Multiple myeloma
Multiple Myeloma - diagnostic imaging
Multiple Myeloma - mortality
Multiple Myeloma - pathology
Multiple Myeloma - therapy
Neoplasm, Residual - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm, Residual - mortality
Neoplasm, Residual - pathology
Neoplasm, Residual - therapy
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Progression-Free Survival
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Survival
Whole Body Imaging
title Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20and%20bone%20marrow%20assessments%20improve%20minimal%20residual%20disease%20prediction%20in%20multiple%20myeloma&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20hematology&rft.au=Alonso,%20Rafael&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=853&rft.epage=861&rft.pages=853-861&rft.issn=0361-8609&rft.eissn=1096-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajh.25507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2231955424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252255874&rft_id=info:pmid/31074033&rfr_iscdi=true