Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam

•64.1% of multi-drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.•Only one gradient diffusion test was acceptable as an alternative to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing.•Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant MDR/XDR P. aerugi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of antimicrobial agents 2019-08, Vol.54 (2), p.255-260
Hauptverfasser: Schaumburg, Frieder, Bletz, Stefan, Mellmann, Alexander, Becker, Karsten, Idelevich, Evgeny A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
container_title International journal of antimicrobial agents
container_volume 54
creator Schaumburg, Frieder
Bletz, Stefan
Mellmann, Alexander
Becker, Karsten
Idelevich, Evgeny A.
description •64.1% of multi-drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.•Only one gradient diffusion test was acceptable as an alternative to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing.•Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa mainly belong to blaIMP-positive ST235. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with promising properties as avibactam can inhibit a broad range of β-lactamases (e.g. blaKPC, blaOXA-48). The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess CZA susceptibility rates; (ii) to compare gradient and disk diffusion tests with broth microdilution (BMD) for CZA susceptibility testing; and (iii) to study the clonal structure and antimicrobial resistance genes in multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Isolates (n=192) from routine diagnostics (Germany, 2013–2018) were tested by BMD reference method, gradient diffusion test (Etest, bioMérieux and MIC Test Strip, Liofilchem) and disk diffusion test (MAST and Oxoid). All isolates were whole-genome sequenced to screen for metallo-β-lactamases and to assess the clonal structure using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing. In total, 64.1% of isolates (n=123) were susceptible to CZA (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms 8 mg/L, minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms >256 mg/L, range 0.5–>256 mg/L). Susceptibility rates were higher in MDR (85.0%) than in XDR (49.1%) P. aeruginosa. Among commercial susceptibility testing methods, Etest showed highest accuracy in comparison to BMD (essential agreement 94.8%, categorical agreement 94.3%). CZA-resistant isolates (n=69) mainly belonged to ST235 (n=29, blaIMP-positive). In conclusion, CZA is a promising treatment option for infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. CZA-resistant P. aeruginosa mainly belong to the pandemic ST235 high-risk clone. Etest can be considered as an alternative to BMD.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231903515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924857919301086</els_id><sourcerecordid>2231903515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-fadbc57c516cb5f07db273e82796b36a02c9f8e5d65be605c1e830e1b47d2a2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAURS1ERacDfwGFHZtk_BHHyRJNoVQqoqpAYme92C_Fozie2k6l6a8noymIZVdvc969uoeQD4xWjLJms6vcDqbsvDNwX3HKuorKilL2iqxYq3ipOiZekxXteF22UnXn5CKl3QJIUcs35FwwqljdyBV52Aa_h-hSmIowFB7z72BTkUMBE4yHhEWak8F9dr0bXT4coSuMHqbi2-Xd5tflXXGbcLbBhwlSARjnezeFBMcIg0OGJ2edxw08uh5MBv-WnA0wJnz3fNfk55fPP7Zfy5vvV9fbTzelqXmbywFsb6QykjWmlwNVtudKYMtV1_SiAcpNN7QobSN7bKg0DFtBkfW1shy4FWvy8ZS7j-FhxpS1d8uScYQJw5w054J1VMjFyZp0J9TEkFLEQe-j8xAPmlF9NK53-j_j-mhcU6kXocvv--eaufdo_33-VbwA2xOAy9hHh1En43AyaF1Ek7UN7gU1fwBI7ZpI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2231903515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Schaumburg, Frieder ; Bletz, Stefan ; Mellmann, Alexander ; Becker, Karsten ; Idelevich, Evgeny A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaumburg, Frieder ; Bletz, Stefan ; Mellmann, Alexander ; Becker, Karsten ; Idelevich, Evgeny A.</creatorcontrib><description>•64.1% of multi-drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.•Only one gradient diffusion test was acceptable as an alternative to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing.•Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa mainly belong to blaIMP-positive ST235. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with promising properties as avibactam can inhibit a broad range of β-lactamases (e.g. blaKPC, blaOXA-48). The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess CZA susceptibility rates; (ii) to compare gradient and disk diffusion tests with broth microdilution (BMD) for CZA susceptibility testing; and (iii) to study the clonal structure and antimicrobial resistance genes in multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Isolates (n=192) from routine diagnostics (Germany, 2013–2018) were tested by BMD reference method, gradient diffusion test (Etest, bioMérieux and MIC Test Strip, Liofilchem) and disk diffusion test (MAST and Oxoid). All isolates were whole-genome sequenced to screen for metallo-β-lactamases and to assess the clonal structure using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing. In total, 64.1% of isolates (n=123) were susceptible to CZA (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms 8 mg/L, minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms &gt;256 mg/L, range 0.5–&gt;256 mg/L). Susceptibility rates were higher in MDR (85.0%) than in XDR (49.1%) P. aeruginosa. Among commercial susceptibility testing methods, Etest showed highest accuracy in comparison to BMD (essential agreement 94.8%, categorical agreement 94.3%). CZA-resistant isolates (n=69) mainly belonged to ST235 (n=29, blaIMP-positive). In conclusion, CZA is a promising treatment option for infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. CZA-resistant P. aeruginosa mainly belong to the pandemic ST235 high-risk clone. Etest can be considered as an alternative to BMD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-8579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31071465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing ; Ceftazidime/avibactam ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Resistance ; Whole-genome sequencing</subject><ispartof>International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2019-08, Vol.54 (2), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-fadbc57c516cb5f07db273e82796b36a02c9f8e5d65be605c1e830e1b47d2a2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-fadbc57c516cb5f07db273e82796b36a02c9f8e5d65be605c1e830e1b47d2a2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9168-9290 ; 0000-0002-6391-1341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31071465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaumburg, Frieder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bletz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idelevich, Evgeny A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam</title><title>International journal of antimicrobial agents</title><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><description>•64.1% of multi-drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.•Only one gradient diffusion test was acceptable as an alternative to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing.•Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa mainly belong to blaIMP-positive ST235. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with promising properties as avibactam can inhibit a broad range of β-lactamases (e.g. blaKPC, blaOXA-48). The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess CZA susceptibility rates; (ii) to compare gradient and disk diffusion tests with broth microdilution (BMD) for CZA susceptibility testing; and (iii) to study the clonal structure and antimicrobial resistance genes in multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Isolates (n=192) from routine diagnostics (Germany, 2013–2018) were tested by BMD reference method, gradient diffusion test (Etest, bioMérieux and MIC Test Strip, Liofilchem) and disk diffusion test (MAST and Oxoid). All isolates were whole-genome sequenced to screen for metallo-β-lactamases and to assess the clonal structure using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing. In total, 64.1% of isolates (n=123) were susceptible to CZA (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms 8 mg/L, minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms &gt;256 mg/L, range 0.5–&gt;256 mg/L). Susceptibility rates were higher in MDR (85.0%) than in XDR (49.1%) P. aeruginosa. Among commercial susceptibility testing methods, Etest showed highest accuracy in comparison to BMD (essential agreement 94.8%, categorical agreement 94.3%). CZA-resistant isolates (n=69) mainly belonged to ST235 (n=29, blaIMP-positive). In conclusion, CZA is a promising treatment option for infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. CZA-resistant P. aeruginosa mainly belong to the pandemic ST235 high-risk clone. Etest can be considered as an alternative to BMD.</description><subject>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing</subject><subject>Ceftazidime/avibactam</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Whole-genome sequencing</subject><issn>0924-8579</issn><issn>1872-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAURS1ERacDfwGFHZtk_BHHyRJNoVQqoqpAYme92C_Fozie2k6l6a8noymIZVdvc969uoeQD4xWjLJms6vcDqbsvDNwX3HKuorKilL2iqxYq3ipOiZekxXteF22UnXn5CKl3QJIUcs35FwwqljdyBV52Aa_h-hSmIowFB7z72BTkUMBE4yHhEWak8F9dr0bXT4coSuMHqbi2-Xd5tflXXGbcLbBhwlSARjnezeFBMcIg0OGJ2edxw08uh5MBv-WnA0wJnz3fNfk55fPP7Zfy5vvV9fbTzelqXmbywFsb6QykjWmlwNVtudKYMtV1_SiAcpNN7QobSN7bKg0DFtBkfW1shy4FWvy8ZS7j-FhxpS1d8uScYQJw5w054J1VMjFyZp0J9TEkFLEQe-j8xAPmlF9NK53-j_j-mhcU6kXocvv--eaufdo_33-VbwA2xOAy9hHh1En43AyaF1Ek7UN7gU1fwBI7ZpI</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Schaumburg, Frieder</creator><creator>Bletz, Stefan</creator><creator>Mellmann, Alexander</creator><creator>Becker, Karsten</creator><creator>Idelevich, Evgeny A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-9290</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam</title><author>Schaumburg, Frieder ; Bletz, Stefan ; Mellmann, Alexander ; Becker, Karsten ; Idelevich, Evgeny A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-fadbc57c516cb5f07db273e82796b36a02c9f8e5d65be605c1e830e1b47d2a2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antimicrobial susceptibility testing</topic><topic>Ceftazidime/avibactam</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Whole-genome sequencing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaumburg, Frieder</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bletz, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellmann, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idelevich, Evgeny A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaumburg, Frieder</au><au>Bletz, Stefan</au><au>Mellmann, Alexander</au><au>Becker, Karsten</au><au>Idelevich, Evgeny A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam</atitle><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0924-8579</issn><eissn>1872-7913</eissn><abstract>•64.1% of multi-drug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.•Only one gradient diffusion test was acceptable as an alternative to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing.•Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa mainly belong to blaIMP-positive ST235. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with promising properties as avibactam can inhibit a broad range of β-lactamases (e.g. blaKPC, blaOXA-48). The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess CZA susceptibility rates; (ii) to compare gradient and disk diffusion tests with broth microdilution (BMD) for CZA susceptibility testing; and (iii) to study the clonal structure and antimicrobial resistance genes in multi-drug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Isolates (n=192) from routine diagnostics (Germany, 2013–2018) were tested by BMD reference method, gradient diffusion test (Etest, bioMérieux and MIC Test Strip, Liofilchem) and disk diffusion test (MAST and Oxoid). All isolates were whole-genome sequenced to screen for metallo-β-lactamases and to assess the clonal structure using core-genome multi-locus sequence typing. In total, 64.1% of isolates (n=123) were susceptible to CZA (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms 8 mg/L, minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms &gt;256 mg/L, range 0.5–&gt;256 mg/L). Susceptibility rates were higher in MDR (85.0%) than in XDR (49.1%) P. aeruginosa. Among commercial susceptibility testing methods, Etest showed highest accuracy in comparison to BMD (essential agreement 94.8%, categorical agreement 94.3%). CZA-resistant isolates (n=69) mainly belonged to ST235 (n=29, blaIMP-positive). In conclusion, CZA is a promising treatment option for infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. CZA-resistant P. aeruginosa mainly belong to the pandemic ST235 high-risk clone. Etest can be considered as an alternative to BMD.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31071465</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-9290</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-1341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-8579
ispartof International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2019-08, Vol.54 (2), p.255-260
issn 0924-8579
1872-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231903515
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Ceftazidime/avibactam
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Resistance
Whole-genome sequencing
title Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20methods%20to%20analyse%20susceptibility%20of%20German%20MDR/XDR%20Pseudomonas%20aeruginosa%20to%20ceftazidime/avibactam&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20agents&rft.au=Schaumburg,%20Frieder&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0924-8579&rft.eissn=1872-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2231903515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2231903515&rft_id=info:pmid/31071465&rft_els_id=S0924857919301086&rfr_iscdi=true