Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade
To explore the possibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) for the identification and diagnosis of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC), cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) and different levels of CSC. Seventy-six patients with newly diagnosed uterine cervical cancer (UCC) were studied...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance imaging 2019-09, Vol.61, p.9-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Meng, Nan Wang, Jing Sun, Jing Liu, Wenling Wang, Xuejia Yan, Minghuan Dwivedi, Akshay Zheng, Dandan Wang, Kaiyu Han, Dongming |
description | To explore the possibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) for the identification and diagnosis of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC), cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) and different levels of CSC.
Seventy-six patients with newly diagnosed uterine cervical cancer (UCC) were studied prior to treatment, including 20 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CSC, 23 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CSC, 17 with well-differentiated (Grade 1) CSC, and 16 with CA (13 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CA and 3 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CA). Differences in the magnetization transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were identified between CSC and CA and between high-level (Grade 3) CSC and low-level (Grade 2 and Grade 1) CSC, as well as among all three grades of CSC differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic thresholds and performance of the parameters. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and histological grade.
The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in CA was higher than that in CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in high-level CSC was higher than that in low-level CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was positively correlated with the grade of CSC differentiation (r = 0.498, P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in Grade 3 CSC was higher than that in Grade 2 and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.02/0.01). No significant difference in the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was found between Grade 2 CSC and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.173). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in distinguishing CSC and CA was 0.779, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 2.97%, 60.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The AUC for distinguishing high-/low-level CSC was 0.756, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 3.29%, 68.8% and 83.3%, respectively.
APTWI may be a useful technique for the identification and diagnosis of CSC, CA and different levels of CSC, which may have an important impact on clinical strategies for treating patients with UCC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231847338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X19300669</els_id><sourcerecordid>2231847338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-95a98b52aced6eec28d0330fcc5841d8cc99724013e4df334d3120f30dcc78473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gBvJ0k3rTdLYFlcivkBwo-AuxJtbydCHJunA_HszjLp0FRK-84VzGDsVUAoQlxfLcgi-lCDaEnQJoHfYQjS1KnTTVrtsAbWCopb67YAdxriETEil99mBElCLqhYLtn6NfvzgdvCO-GeY0jTyFOwYOwo8TTw_j8l3a44UVh5tz-PXbIdpjhxtQD9Og72wGZr-rtyOjtPK9rNNxH2K3Pku6zYim3z-4CPkxDHb62wf6eTnPGKvd7cvNw_F0_P94831U4GVaFPRats271paJHdJhLJxoBR0iLqphGsQ27aWFQhFleuUqpwSEjoFDrFuqlodsfOtN7f7mikmM_iI1Pd2pFzDSKnEhlNNRsUWxTDFGKgzn8EPNqyNALNZ3CxNXtxsFjegTd4zZ85-9PP7QO4v8TtxBq62AOWSK0_BRPQ05jo-ECbjJv-P_hu0kpQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2231847338</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meng, Nan ; Wang, Jing ; Sun, Jing ; Liu, Wenling ; Wang, Xuejia ; Yan, Minghuan ; Dwivedi, Akshay ; Zheng, Dandan ; Wang, Kaiyu ; Han, Dongming</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Nan ; Wang, Jing ; Sun, Jing ; Liu, Wenling ; Wang, Xuejia ; Yan, Minghuan ; Dwivedi, Akshay ; Zheng, Dandan ; Wang, Kaiyu ; Han, Dongming</creatorcontrib><description>To explore the possibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) for the identification and diagnosis of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC), cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) and different levels of CSC.
Seventy-six patients with newly diagnosed uterine cervical cancer (UCC) were studied prior to treatment, including 20 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CSC, 23 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CSC, 17 with well-differentiated (Grade 1) CSC, and 16 with CA (13 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CA and 3 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CA). Differences in the magnetization transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were identified between CSC and CA and between high-level (Grade 3) CSC and low-level (Grade 2 and Grade 1) CSC, as well as among all three grades of CSC differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic thresholds and performance of the parameters. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and histological grade.
The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in CA was higher than that in CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in high-level CSC was higher than that in low-level CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was positively correlated with the grade of CSC differentiation (r = 0.498, P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in Grade 3 CSC was higher than that in Grade 2 and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.02/0.01). No significant difference in the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was found between Grade 2 CSC and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.173). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in distinguishing CSC and CA was 0.779, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 2.97%, 60.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The AUC for distinguishing high-/low-level CSC was 0.756, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 3.29%, 68.8% and 83.3%, respectively.
APTWI may be a useful technique for the identification and diagnosis of CSC, CA and different levels of CSC, which may have an important impact on clinical strategies for treating patients with UCC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31071471</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) ; Amides ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) ; Cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC) ; Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging ; Cervix Uteri - pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Protons ; ROC Curve ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-09, Vol.61, p.9-15</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-95a98b52aced6eec28d0330fcc5841d8cc99724013e4df334d3120f30dcc78473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-95a98b52aced6eec28d0330fcc5841d8cc99724013e4df334d3120f30dcc78473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31071471$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Minghuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dongming</creatorcontrib><title>Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>To explore the possibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) for the identification and diagnosis of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC), cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) and different levels of CSC.
Seventy-six patients with newly diagnosed uterine cervical cancer (UCC) were studied prior to treatment, including 20 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CSC, 23 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CSC, 17 with well-differentiated (Grade 1) CSC, and 16 with CA (13 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CA and 3 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CA). Differences in the magnetization transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were identified between CSC and CA and between high-level (Grade 3) CSC and low-level (Grade 2 and Grade 1) CSC, as well as among all three grades of CSC differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic thresholds and performance of the parameters. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and histological grade.
The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in CA was higher than that in CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in high-level CSC was higher than that in low-level CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was positively correlated with the grade of CSC differentiation (r = 0.498, P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in Grade 3 CSC was higher than that in Grade 2 and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.02/0.01). No significant difference in the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was found between Grade 2 CSC and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.173). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in distinguishing CSC and CA was 0.779, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 2.97%, 60.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The AUC for distinguishing high-/low-level CSC was 0.756, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 3.29%, 68.8% and 83.3%, respectively.
APTWI may be a useful technique for the identification and diagnosis of CSC, CA and different levels of CSC, which may have an important impact on clinical strategies for treating patients with UCC.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI)</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Cervical adenocarcinoma (CA)</subject><subject>Cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC)</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gBvJ0k3rTdLYFlcivkBwo-AuxJtbydCHJunA_HszjLp0FRK-84VzGDsVUAoQlxfLcgi-lCDaEnQJoHfYQjS1KnTTVrtsAbWCopb67YAdxriETEil99mBElCLqhYLtn6NfvzgdvCO-GeY0jTyFOwYOwo8TTw_j8l3a44UVh5tz-PXbIdpjhxtQD9Og72wGZr-rtyOjtPK9rNNxH2K3Pku6zYim3z-4CPkxDHb62wf6eTnPGKvd7cvNw_F0_P94831U4GVaFPRats271paJHdJhLJxoBR0iLqphGsQ27aWFQhFleuUqpwSEjoFDrFuqlodsfOtN7f7mikmM_iI1Pd2pFzDSKnEhlNNRsUWxTDFGKgzn8EPNqyNALNZ3CxNXtxsFjegTd4zZ85-9PP7QO4v8TtxBq62AOWSK0_BRPQ05jo-ECbjJv-P_hu0kpQs</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Meng, Nan</creator><creator>Wang, Jing</creator><creator>Sun, Jing</creator><creator>Liu, Wenling</creator><creator>Wang, Xuejia</creator><creator>Yan, Minghuan</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Akshay</creator><creator>Zheng, Dandan</creator><creator>Wang, Kaiyu</creator><creator>Han, Dongming</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade</title><author>Meng, Nan ; Wang, Jing ; Sun, Jing ; Liu, Wenling ; Wang, Xuejia ; Yan, Minghuan ; Dwivedi, Akshay ; Zheng, Dandan ; Wang, Kaiyu ; Han, Dongming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-95a98b52aced6eec28d0330fcc5841d8cc99724013e4df334d3120f30dcc78473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI)</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Cervical adenocarcinoma (CA)</topic><topic>Cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC)</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wenling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuejia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Minghuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Akshay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Dandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dongming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Nan</au><au>Wang, Jing</au><au>Sun, Jing</au><au>Liu, Wenling</au><au>Wang, Xuejia</au><au>Yan, Minghuan</au><au>Dwivedi, Akshay</au><au>Zheng, Dandan</au><au>Wang, Kaiyu</au><au>Han, Dongming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>9</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>9-15</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><abstract>To explore the possibility of using amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) for the identification and diagnosis of cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC), cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) and different levels of CSC.
Seventy-six patients with newly diagnosed uterine cervical cancer (UCC) were studied prior to treatment, including 20 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CSC, 23 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CSC, 17 with well-differentiated (Grade 1) CSC, and 16 with CA (13 with poorly differentiated (Grade 3) CA and 3 with moderately differentiated (Grade 2) CA). Differences in the magnetization transfer ratio at 3.5 ppm (MTRasym (3.5 ppm)) were identified between CSC and CA and between high-level (Grade 3) CSC and low-level (Grade 2 and Grade 1) CSC, as well as among all three grades of CSC differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic thresholds and performance of the parameters. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) and histological grade.
The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in CA was higher than that in CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in high-level CSC was higher than that in low-level CSC (P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was positively correlated with the grade of CSC differentiation (r = 0.498, P = 0.001). The MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in Grade 3 CSC was higher than that in Grade 2 and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.02/0.01). No significant difference in the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) was found between Grade 2 CSC and Grade 1 CSC (P = 0.173). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the MTRasym (3.5 ppm) in distinguishing CSC and CA was 0.779, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 2.97%, 60.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The AUC for distinguishing high-/low-level CSC was 0.756, with a cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity of 3.29%, 68.8% and 83.3%, respectively.
APTWI may be a useful technique for the identification and diagnosis of CSC, CA and different levels of CSC, which may have an important impact on clinical strategies for treating patients with UCC.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31071471</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-725X |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-09, Vol.61, p.9-15 |
issn | 0730-725X 1873-5894 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2231847338 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging Adenocarcinoma - pathology Aged Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) Amides Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Cervical adenocarcinoma (CA) Cervical squamous carcinoma (CSC) Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging Cervix Uteri - pathology Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Protons ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology |
title | Using amide proton transfer to identify cervical squamous carcinoma/adenocarcinoma and evaluate its differentiation grade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A34%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20amide%20proton%20transfer%20to%20identify%20cervical%20squamous%20carcinoma/adenocarcinoma%20and%20evaluate%20its%20differentiation%20grade&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Meng,%20Nan&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=9-15&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2231847338%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2231847338&rft_id=info:pmid/31071471&rft_els_id=S0730725X19300669&rfr_iscdi=true |