Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists

Abstract The goal of radiographic imaging is to produce a diagnostically useful image while minimizing patient radiation dose. This study aimed to review variations in exposure factor selection by radiologic technologists for virtual patients with varying body mass index characteristics. Eleven tech...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences 2015-12, Vol.46 (4), p.372-379
Hauptverfasser: Darcy, Sarah, Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR), Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc, Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue 4
container_start_page 372
container_title Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
container_volume 46
creator Darcy, Sarah
Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR)
Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc
Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)
description Abstract The goal of radiographic imaging is to produce a diagnostically useful image while minimizing patient radiation dose. This study aimed to review variations in exposure factor selection by radiologic technologists for virtual patients with varying body mass index characteristics. Eleven technologists were asked to assign exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, source-to-image receptor distance, and grid use) to 10 computer-generated patient images for each of four radiographic examinations (anteroposterior [AP] shoulder; AP lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; AP portable chest). The virtual patients represented five body mass index categories–underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese, and superobese. As participants assigned exposures, their visual patterns were recorded by a Tobii TX300 eye-tracker. Significant ( P < .05) correlation was found between radiographer age/experience and assignment of mAs for AP shoulder and lumbar examinations. Greater age/experience correlated with higher mAs for the AP shoulder examination, but with lower values for lumbar examinations. Strong correlations also existed between times to first fixations on relevant anatomic areas, and kVp/mAs values existed for the AP portable chest examination. Exposure selection differences related to age/experience highlight inconsistencies in the practice of exposure parameter setting. The reason for these inconsistencies requires further investigation, and how to address deficiencies in practice requires consideration to optimize safe patient care. Because of the small sample size used, further research into the relationship between visual factors and individual examinations is suggested, after the findings regarding the AP portable chest examination.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229237929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1939865415002684</els_id><sourcerecordid>2229237929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cdbf47a46915a494282a0383aa92ccffb944966026f3e190c57409073668dbac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTigHLkkjP_EjiWEhEoLSEVItHA1jjMpTrPx1k4Q--1xdhcOHDjNjP3ek-Y3hDynUFGg8tVQDRsfKwa0rkBXAPwBOaWNkqXSDXuYe8112chanJAnKQ0AkimlH5MTTqFmlKpT8v0dOp98mIpP9s5Pt4WduuKbjd7O66Ofii-2Ow4Xv7YhLRGLS-vmEItrHNHtf9rdXhbGcOtdcYPux7Tv05yekke9HRM-O9Yz8vXy4ub8Q3n1-f3H87dXpROUzqXr2l4oK6SmtRVasIZZ4A23VjPn-r7VQmgpgcmeI9XgaiVAg-JSNl1rHT8jLw-52xjuF0yz2fjkcBzthGFJhjGmGVea6SxlB6mLIaWIvdlGv7FxZyiYlawZzErWrGQNaJPJZtOLY_7SbrD7a_mDMgteHwSYt_zpMZrkPE4OOx8zJtMF___8N__Y3egn7-x4hztMQ1jilPkZahIzYK7X266npTVkKI3gvwH7cZ7x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229237929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Darcy, Sarah ; Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR) ; Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc ; Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</creator><creatorcontrib>Darcy, Sarah ; Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR) ; Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc ; Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The goal of radiographic imaging is to produce a diagnostically useful image while minimizing patient radiation dose. This study aimed to review variations in exposure factor selection by radiologic technologists for virtual patients with varying body mass index characteristics. Eleven technologists were asked to assign exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, source-to-image receptor distance, and grid use) to 10 computer-generated patient images for each of four radiographic examinations (anteroposterior [AP] shoulder; AP lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; AP portable chest). The virtual patients represented five body mass index categories–underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese, and superobese. As participants assigned exposures, their visual patterns were recorded by a Tobii TX300 eye-tracker. Significant ( P &lt; .05) correlation was found between radiographer age/experience and assignment of mAs for AP shoulder and lumbar examinations. Greater age/experience correlated with higher mAs for the AP shoulder examination, but with lower values for lumbar examinations. Strong correlations also existed between times to first fixations on relevant anatomic areas, and kVp/mAs values existed for the AP portable chest examination. Exposure selection differences related to age/experience highlight inconsistencies in the practice of exposure parameter setting. The reason for these inconsistencies requires further investigation, and how to address deficiencies in practice requires consideration to optimize safe patient care. Because of the small sample size used, further research into the relationship between visual factors and individual examinations is suggested, after the findings regarding the AP portable chest examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-8654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-7982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31052117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>eye-tracking ; Image perception ; radiation dose ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 2015-12, Vol.46 (4), p.372-379</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cdbf47a46915a494282a0383aa92ccffb944966026f3e190c57409073668dbac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cdbf47a46915a494282a0383aa92ccffb944966026f3e190c57409073668dbac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31052117$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Darcy, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</creatorcontrib><title>Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists</title><title>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</title><addtitle>J Med Imaging Radiat Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract The goal of radiographic imaging is to produce a diagnostically useful image while minimizing patient radiation dose. This study aimed to review variations in exposure factor selection by radiologic technologists for virtual patients with varying body mass index characteristics. Eleven technologists were asked to assign exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, source-to-image receptor distance, and grid use) to 10 computer-generated patient images for each of four radiographic examinations (anteroposterior [AP] shoulder; AP lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; AP portable chest). The virtual patients represented five body mass index categories–underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese, and superobese. As participants assigned exposures, their visual patterns were recorded by a Tobii TX300 eye-tracker. Significant ( P &lt; .05) correlation was found between radiographer age/experience and assignment of mAs for AP shoulder and lumbar examinations. Greater age/experience correlated with higher mAs for the AP shoulder examination, but with lower values for lumbar examinations. Strong correlations also existed between times to first fixations on relevant anatomic areas, and kVp/mAs values existed for the AP portable chest examination. Exposure selection differences related to age/experience highlight inconsistencies in the practice of exposure parameter setting. The reason for these inconsistencies requires further investigation, and how to address deficiencies in practice requires consideration to optimize safe patient care. Because of the small sample size used, further research into the relationship between visual factors and individual examinations is suggested, after the findings regarding the AP portable chest examination.</description><subject>eye-tracking</subject><subject>Image perception</subject><subject>radiation dose</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>1939-8654</issn><issn>1876-7982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTigHLkkjP_EjiWEhEoLSEVItHA1jjMpTrPx1k4Q--1xdhcOHDjNjP3ek-Y3hDynUFGg8tVQDRsfKwa0rkBXAPwBOaWNkqXSDXuYe8112chanJAnKQ0AkimlH5MTTqFmlKpT8v0dOp98mIpP9s5Pt4WduuKbjd7O66Ofii-2Ow4Xv7YhLRGLS-vmEItrHNHtf9rdXhbGcOtdcYPux7Tv05yekke9HRM-O9Yz8vXy4ub8Q3n1-f3H87dXpROUzqXr2l4oK6SmtRVasIZZ4A23VjPn-r7VQmgpgcmeI9XgaiVAg-JSNl1rHT8jLw-52xjuF0yz2fjkcBzthGFJhjGmGVea6SxlB6mLIaWIvdlGv7FxZyiYlawZzErWrGQNaJPJZtOLY_7SbrD7a_mDMgteHwSYt_zpMZrkPE4OOx8zJtMF___8N__Y3egn7-x4hztMQ1jilPkZahIzYK7X266npTVkKI3gvwH7cZ7x</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Darcy, Sarah</creator><creator>Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR)</creator><creator>Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc</creator><creator>Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists</title><author>Darcy, Sarah ; Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR) ; Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc ; Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cdbf47a46915a494282a0383aa92ccffb944966026f3e190c57409073668dbac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>eye-tracking</topic><topic>Image perception</topic><topic>radiation dose</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Darcy, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Darcy, Sarah</au><au>Rainford, Louise, PhD (UCD), Dip RNI, Dip Rad (CoR), Dip Management (NCIR)</au><au>Kelly, Brendan, MB BCh BAO, BSc</au><au>Toomey, Rachel, PhD (UCD), BSc (Hons)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Imaging Radiat Sci</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>372-379</pages><issn>1939-8654</issn><eissn>1876-7982</eissn><abstract>Abstract The goal of radiographic imaging is to produce a diagnostically useful image while minimizing patient radiation dose. This study aimed to review variations in exposure factor selection by radiologic technologists for virtual patients with varying body mass index characteristics. Eleven technologists were asked to assign exposure parameters (kVp, mAs, source-to-image receptor distance, and grid use) to 10 computer-generated patient images for each of four radiographic examinations (anteroposterior [AP] shoulder; AP lumbar spine; lateral lumbar spine; AP portable chest). The virtual patients represented five body mass index categories–underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese, and superobese. As participants assigned exposures, their visual patterns were recorded by a Tobii TX300 eye-tracker. Significant ( P &lt; .05) correlation was found between radiographer age/experience and assignment of mAs for AP shoulder and lumbar examinations. Greater age/experience correlated with higher mAs for the AP shoulder examination, but with lower values for lumbar examinations. Strong correlations also existed between times to first fixations on relevant anatomic areas, and kVp/mAs values existed for the AP portable chest examination. Exposure selection differences related to age/experience highlight inconsistencies in the practice of exposure parameter setting. The reason for these inconsistencies requires further investigation, and how to address deficiencies in practice requires consideration to optimize safe patient care. Because of the small sample size used, further research into the relationship between visual factors and individual examinations is suggested, after the findings regarding the AP portable chest examination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31052117</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-8654
ispartof Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 2015-12, Vol.46 (4), p.372-379
issn 1939-8654
1876-7982
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229237929
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects eye-tracking
Image perception
radiation dose
Radiology
title Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A10%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20Making%20and%20Variation%20in%20Radiation%20Exposure%20Factor%20Selection%20by%20Radiologic%20Technologists&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20imaging%20and%20radiation%20sciences&rft.au=Darcy,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=372-379&rft.issn=1939-8654&rft.eissn=1876-7982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229237929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229237929&rft_id=info:pmid/31052117&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1939865415002684&rfr_iscdi=true