Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups

Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., “prefer not to disclose”) may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 2020-04, Vol.27 (3), p.547-559
Hauptverfasser: Podlogar, Matthew C., Joiner, Thomas E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 559
container_issue 3
container_start_page 547
container_title Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
container_volume 27
creator Podlogar, Matthew C.
Joiner, Thomas E.
description Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., “prefer not to disclose”) may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This study investigated explicit nondisclosure in suicide risk screening among military service members and veterans (n = 135), men older than 50 years, (n = 187), and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young adults (n = 140); all higher risk and lower help-seeking populations. Results indicated that allowing for explicit nondisclosure minimally affected screening sensitivity and specificity. However, its selection was prevalent among higher risk participants, and was associated with experience of past unhelpful reactions and “avoidance of stigmatized consequences.” Allowing for nondisclosure creates potential psychometric and classification advantages, and may be a safe and effective way to encourage discussion of barriers, build trust, maximize patient autonomy, and ultimately facilitate accurate risk disclosure to improve assessment validity.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1073191119845495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229229827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1073191119845495</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2229229827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-59876fecce02b46a7086d5652b1e70d5a45d3dd5b650a3287383e627aa2c753b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmSPXlbzsZNkj6XYVigKfpyX7CZbU7ebmjSI_70prR4EYWAG3m8eMw-hS4JvCBHilmDBSEkIKWUBRQlHaEgAaM4KWR6nOcn5Th-gsxBWGBPgpTxFA0YwMMxgiPi469yn7ZdZ63z24HptQ9O5EL3JbJ_N7fIte462sdpkTza8ZzPv4iaco5NWdcFcHPoIvU7vXibzfPE4u5-MF3nDmNjmUErBW9M0BtO64EpgyTVwoDUxAmtQBWimNdQcsGJUCiaZ4VQoRRsBrGYjdL333Xj3EU3YVut0n-k61RsXQ0UpLVNJKhKK92jjXQjetNXG27XyXxXB1S6t6m9aaeXq4B7rtdG_Cz_xJCDfA0EtTbVy0ffp2_8NvwG5XG-E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229229827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Podlogar, Matthew C. ; Joiner, Thomas E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Podlogar, Matthew C. ; Joiner, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><description>Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., “prefer not to disclose”) may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This study investigated explicit nondisclosure in suicide risk screening among military service members and veterans (n = 135), men older than 50 years, (n = 187), and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young adults (n = 140); all higher risk and lower help-seeking populations. Results indicated that allowing for explicit nondisclosure minimally affected screening sensitivity and specificity. However, its selection was prevalent among higher risk participants, and was associated with experience of past unhelpful reactions and “avoidance of stigmatized consequences.” Allowing for nondisclosure creates potential psychometric and classification advantages, and may be a safe and effective way to encourage discussion of barriers, build trust, maximize patient autonomy, and ultimately facilitate accurate risk disclosure to improve assessment validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1073191119845495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31053035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2020-04, Vol.27 (3), p.547-559</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-59876fecce02b46a7086d5652b1e70d5a45d3dd5b650a3287383e627aa2c753b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-59876fecce02b46a7086d5652b1e70d5a45d3dd5b650a3287383e627aa2c753b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3464-7227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1073191119845495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191119845495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31053035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Podlogar, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><title>Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups</title><title>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><description>Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., “prefer not to disclose”) may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This study investigated explicit nondisclosure in suicide risk screening among military service members and veterans (n = 135), men older than 50 years, (n = 187), and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young adults (n = 140); all higher risk and lower help-seeking populations. Results indicated that allowing for explicit nondisclosure minimally affected screening sensitivity and specificity. However, its selection was prevalent among higher risk participants, and was associated with experience of past unhelpful reactions and “avoidance of stigmatized consequences.” Allowing for nondisclosure creates potential psychometric and classification advantages, and may be a safe and effective way to encourage discussion of barriers, build trust, maximize patient autonomy, and ultimately facilitate accurate risk disclosure to improve assessment validity.</description><issn>1073-1911</issn><issn>1552-3489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvnmSPXlbzsZNkj6XYVigKfpyX7CZbU7ebmjSI_70prR4EYWAG3m8eMw-hS4JvCBHilmDBSEkIKWUBRQlHaEgAaM4KWR6nOcn5Th-gsxBWGBPgpTxFA0YwMMxgiPi469yn7ZdZ63z24HptQ9O5EL3JbJ_N7fIte462sdpkTza8ZzPv4iaco5NWdcFcHPoIvU7vXibzfPE4u5-MF3nDmNjmUErBW9M0BtO64EpgyTVwoDUxAmtQBWimNdQcsGJUCiaZ4VQoRRsBrGYjdL333Xj3EU3YVut0n-k61RsXQ0UpLVNJKhKK92jjXQjetNXG27XyXxXB1S6t6m9aaeXq4B7rtdG_Cz_xJCDfA0EtTbVy0ffp2_8NvwG5XG-E</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Podlogar, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Joiner, Thomas E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups</title><author>Podlogar, Matthew C. ; Joiner, Thomas E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-59876fecce02b46a7086d5652b1e70d5a45d3dd5b650a3287383e627aa2c753b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Podlogar, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joiner, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Podlogar, Matthew C.</au><au>Joiner, Thomas E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups</atitle><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>559</epage><pages>547-559</pages><issn>1073-1911</issn><eissn>1552-3489</eissn><abstract>Inaccurate disclosure of information is a significant limitation when relying on self-report for suicide risk screening. However, allowing for an explicit nondisclosure response option in screening items (e.g., “prefer not to disclose”) may ultimately improve follow-up assessment validity. This study investigated explicit nondisclosure in suicide risk screening among military service members and veterans (n = 135), men older than 50 years, (n = 187), and LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer) young adults (n = 140); all higher risk and lower help-seeking populations. Results indicated that allowing for explicit nondisclosure minimally affected screening sensitivity and specificity. However, its selection was prevalent among higher risk participants, and was associated with experience of past unhelpful reactions and “avoidance of stigmatized consequences.” Allowing for nondisclosure creates potential psychometric and classification advantages, and may be a safe and effective way to encourage discussion of barriers, build trust, maximize patient autonomy, and ultimately facilitate accurate risk disclosure to improve assessment validity.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31053035</pmid><doi>10.1177/1073191119845495</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3464-7227</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-1911
ispartof Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2020-04, Vol.27 (3), p.547-559
issn 1073-1911
1552-3489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229229827
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Allowing for Nondisclosure in High Suicide Risk Groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Allowing%20for%20Nondisclosure%20in%20High%20Suicide%20Risk%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20(Odessa,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Podlogar,%20Matthew%20C.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=559&rft.pages=547-559&rft.issn=1073-1911&rft.eissn=1552-3489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1073191119845495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229229827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229229827&rft_id=info:pmid/31053035&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1073191119845495&rfr_iscdi=true