Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs

Abstract Purpose In Australia, radiology services are provided as full 24-hour services, 24-hour urgent out-of-hours (on-call) services, and business hours-only service. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether out-of-hours (11 PM–7 AM) chest x-ray (CXR) referrals are consistent wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences 2011-06, Vol.42 (2), p.52-58
Hauptverfasser: Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons), Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD, Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD, Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc, Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 58
container_issue 2
container_start_page 52
container_title Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
container_volume 42
creator Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons)
Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD
Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD
Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc
Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD
description Abstract Purpose In Australia, radiology services are provided as full 24-hour services, 24-hour urgent out-of-hours (on-call) services, and business hours-only service. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether out-of-hours (11 PM–7 AM) chest x-ray (CXR) referrals are consistent with out-of-hours service expectations associated with the cost and inconvenience of calling staff in from home. A secondary objective was to determine whether the mobile chest plain film examinations are consistent with expectations of a patient's increased degree of infirmary. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken over 6 contiguous months for patients referred from the emergency department for CXRs out-of-hours and within standard hours (in-hours). The study population included 436 out-of-hours patients recruited into the investigation cohort and a matched cohort of 438 CXR examinations performed in-hours. The key information gleaned from the study was concordance or discordance between the clinical details relating to the actual referral and the findings of the CXR. Results The total sample comprised 414 females (47.4%) and 460 males (52.6%). The mean age was 55.3 years, median was 56.5 years, with a range of 0–97 years. The examination type performed was 8.9% mobile compared with 91.1% departmental for the sample. It was found that there was 43.5% prevalence of abnormalities, 27.0% significant abnormalities, and 8.7% clinically significant abnormality. The predictors found for clinically significant abnormalities were increasing patient age ( P < .001) and the need for mobile examination ( P < .001). Performing the examination out-of-hours did not predict a clinically significant abnormality ( P = .491) and similarly, gender did not predict clinically significant abnormality ( P = .152). Conclusion The results suggest that similar approaches to referrals for CXRs are applied in-hours and during the out-of-hours period which are inconsistent with the “urgent” philosophy that should accompany an out-of-hours service. Only increasing patient age and the need for a mobile CXR offered predictors of a clinical significant abnormality and this offers an insight into the potential approach to the development of referral guidelines for out-of-hours procedures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmir.2011.02.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229228207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1939865411000191</els_id><sourcerecordid>2229228207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-820d2e33d07f80f8388822f80a459d081876bb043b642465e3fa9d4f886b7d7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFPwzAQhS0EoqXwBxhQRpaE8zlNbAkhoQooEhIS0NlyYoc6pE2xE6T-exy1MDAw3Q3vvbv7jpBzCgkFml3VSb2yLkGgNAFMANIDMqY8z-JccDwMvWAi5tk0HZET72uADPNcHJMRozClPBVjgrPGrm2pmmjR2cZ226itoue-i9sqnre989FsaXwXvSht23enNkt_So4q1Xhztq8Tsri_e5vN46fnh8fZ7VNcsgy7mCNoNIxpyCsOFWecc8TQqnQqNPBh0aKAlBVZimk2NaxSQqcV51mR61yxCbnc5W5c-9mHJeTK-tI0jVqbtvcSEQViGJMHKe6kpWu9d6aSG2dXym0lBTmwkrUcWMmBlQSUgVUwXezz-2Jl9K_lB04QXO8EJlz5ZY2TvrRmXRptnSk7qVv7f_7NH3u5Z_1htsbXge468JNU-mCQr8O3hmdRCgBUUPYNH9-M7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229228207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons) ; Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD ; Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD ; Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc ; Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons) ; Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD ; Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD ; Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc ; Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose In Australia, radiology services are provided as full 24-hour services, 24-hour urgent out-of-hours (on-call) services, and business hours-only service. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether out-of-hours (11 PM–7 AM) chest x-ray (CXR) referrals are consistent with out-of-hours service expectations associated with the cost and inconvenience of calling staff in from home. A secondary objective was to determine whether the mobile chest plain film examinations are consistent with expectations of a patient's increased degree of infirmary. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken over 6 contiguous months for patients referred from the emergency department for CXRs out-of-hours and within standard hours (in-hours). The study population included 436 out-of-hours patients recruited into the investigation cohort and a matched cohort of 438 CXR examinations performed in-hours. The key information gleaned from the study was concordance or discordance between the clinical details relating to the actual referral and the findings of the CXR. Results The total sample comprised 414 females (47.4%) and 460 males (52.6%). The mean age was 55.3 years, median was 56.5 years, with a range of 0–97 years. The examination type performed was 8.9% mobile compared with 91.1% departmental for the sample. It was found that there was 43.5% prevalence of abnormalities, 27.0% significant abnormalities, and 8.7% clinically significant abnormality. The predictors found for clinically significant abnormalities were increasing patient age ( P &lt; .001) and the need for mobile examination ( P &lt; .001). Performing the examination out-of-hours did not predict a clinically significant abnormality ( P = .491) and similarly, gender did not predict clinically significant abnormality ( P = .152). Conclusion The results suggest that similar approaches to referrals for CXRs are applied in-hours and during the out-of-hours period which are inconsistent with the “urgent” philosophy that should accompany an out-of-hours service. Only increasing patient age and the need for a mobile CXR offered predictors of a clinical significant abnormality and this offers an insight into the potential approach to the development of referral guidelines for out-of-hours procedures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-8654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-7982</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2011.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31051849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Radiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 2011-06, Vol.42 (2), p.52-58</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-820d2e33d07f80f8388822f80a459d081876bb043b642465e3fa9d4f886b7d7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865411000191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31051849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs</title><title>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</title><addtitle>J Med Imaging Radiat Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose In Australia, radiology services are provided as full 24-hour services, 24-hour urgent out-of-hours (on-call) services, and business hours-only service. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether out-of-hours (11 PM–7 AM) chest x-ray (CXR) referrals are consistent with out-of-hours service expectations associated with the cost and inconvenience of calling staff in from home. A secondary objective was to determine whether the mobile chest plain film examinations are consistent with expectations of a patient's increased degree of infirmary. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken over 6 contiguous months for patients referred from the emergency department for CXRs out-of-hours and within standard hours (in-hours). The study population included 436 out-of-hours patients recruited into the investigation cohort and a matched cohort of 438 CXR examinations performed in-hours. The key information gleaned from the study was concordance or discordance between the clinical details relating to the actual referral and the findings of the CXR. Results The total sample comprised 414 females (47.4%) and 460 males (52.6%). The mean age was 55.3 years, median was 56.5 years, with a range of 0–97 years. The examination type performed was 8.9% mobile compared with 91.1% departmental for the sample. It was found that there was 43.5% prevalence of abnormalities, 27.0% significant abnormalities, and 8.7% clinically significant abnormality. The predictors found for clinically significant abnormalities were increasing patient age ( P &lt; .001) and the need for mobile examination ( P &lt; .001). Performing the examination out-of-hours did not predict a clinically significant abnormality ( P = .491) and similarly, gender did not predict clinically significant abnormality ( P = .152). Conclusion The results suggest that similar approaches to referrals for CXRs are applied in-hours and during the out-of-hours period which are inconsistent with the “urgent” philosophy that should accompany an out-of-hours service. Only increasing patient age and the need for a mobile CXR offered predictors of a clinical significant abnormality and this offers an insight into the potential approach to the development of referral guidelines for out-of-hours procedures.</description><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>1939-8654</issn><issn>1876-7982</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTFPwzAQhS0EoqXwBxhQRpaE8zlNbAkhoQooEhIS0NlyYoc6pE2xE6T-exy1MDAw3Q3vvbv7jpBzCgkFml3VSb2yLkGgNAFMANIDMqY8z-JccDwMvWAi5tk0HZET72uADPNcHJMRozClPBVjgrPGrm2pmmjR2cZ226itoue-i9sqnre989FsaXwXvSht23enNkt_So4q1Xhztq8Tsri_e5vN46fnh8fZ7VNcsgy7mCNoNIxpyCsOFWecc8TQqnQqNPBh0aKAlBVZimk2NaxSQqcV51mR61yxCbnc5W5c-9mHJeTK-tI0jVqbtvcSEQViGJMHKe6kpWu9d6aSG2dXym0lBTmwkrUcWMmBlQSUgVUwXezz-2Jl9K_lB04QXO8EJlz5ZY2TvrRmXRptnSk7qVv7f_7NH3u5Z_1htsbXge468JNU-mCQr8O3hmdRCgBUUPYNH9-M7w</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons)</creator><creator>Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD</creator><creator>Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD</creator><creator>Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc</creator><creator>Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs</title><author>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons) ; Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD ; Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD ; Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc ; Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-820d2e33d07f80f8388822f80a459d081876bb043b642465e3fa9d4f886b7d7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manning, Ben, BMedRadSc, BHlthSc(hons)</au><au>Currie, Geoffrey M., MMedRadSc, MAppMngt, MBA, PhD</au><au>Davidson, Rob, BBus, MAppSc(MI), PhD</au><au>Wheat, Janelle M., BAppSci(RT), MMedRadSc(NM), MHlthSc(HM), DHlthSc</au><au>Aziz, Aamer, MBBS, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Imaging Radiat Sci</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>52-58</pages><issn>1939-8654</issn><eissn>1876-7982</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose In Australia, radiology services are provided as full 24-hour services, 24-hour urgent out-of-hours (on-call) services, and business hours-only service. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether out-of-hours (11 PM–7 AM) chest x-ray (CXR) referrals are consistent with out-of-hours service expectations associated with the cost and inconvenience of calling staff in from home. A secondary objective was to determine whether the mobile chest plain film examinations are consistent with expectations of a patient's increased degree of infirmary. Method A retrospective analysis was undertaken over 6 contiguous months for patients referred from the emergency department for CXRs out-of-hours and within standard hours (in-hours). The study population included 436 out-of-hours patients recruited into the investigation cohort and a matched cohort of 438 CXR examinations performed in-hours. The key information gleaned from the study was concordance or discordance between the clinical details relating to the actual referral and the findings of the CXR. Results The total sample comprised 414 females (47.4%) and 460 males (52.6%). The mean age was 55.3 years, median was 56.5 years, with a range of 0–97 years. The examination type performed was 8.9% mobile compared with 91.1% departmental for the sample. It was found that there was 43.5% prevalence of abnormalities, 27.0% significant abnormalities, and 8.7% clinically significant abnormality. The predictors found for clinically significant abnormalities were increasing patient age ( P &lt; .001) and the need for mobile examination ( P &lt; .001). Performing the examination out-of-hours did not predict a clinically significant abnormality ( P = .491) and similarly, gender did not predict clinically significant abnormality ( P = .152). Conclusion The results suggest that similar approaches to referrals for CXRs are applied in-hours and during the out-of-hours period which are inconsistent with the “urgent” philosophy that should accompany an out-of-hours service. Only increasing patient age and the need for a mobile CXR offered predictors of a clinical significant abnormality and this offers an insight into the potential approach to the development of referral guidelines for out-of-hours procedures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31051849</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmir.2011.02.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-8654
ispartof Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences, 2011-06, Vol.42 (2), p.52-58
issn 1939-8654
1876-7982
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229228207
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Radiology
title Clinical Utility of Out-of-Hours Chest Radiographs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Utility%20of%20Out-of-Hours%20Chest%20Radiographs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20imaging%20and%20radiation%20sciences&rft.au=Manning,%20Ben,%20BMedRadSc,%20BHlthSc(hons)&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=52-58&rft.issn=1939-8654&rft.eissn=1876-7982&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229228207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229228207&rft_id=info:pmid/31051849&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1939865411000191&rfr_iscdi=true