Development of Functional Requirements for Ex Vivo Pathology Applications of In Vivo Microscopy Systems: A Proposal From the In Vivo Microscopy Committee of the College of American Pathologists

In vivo microscopy (IVM) allows direct, real-time visualization of tissue histology in living patients without the need for tissue removal, processing, or staining. The IVM technologies in clinical use include confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. These technologies also show promise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2019-09, Vol.143 (9), p.1052-1057
Hauptverfasser: Mathur, Sharad C, Fitzmaurice, Maryann, Reder, Nicholas P, Krishnamurthy, Savitri, Kennedy, Mary, Tearney, Guillermo J, Shevchuk-Chaban, Maria M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In vivo microscopy (IVM) allows direct, real-time visualization of tissue histology in living patients without the need for tissue removal, processing, or staining. The IVM technologies in clinical use include confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. These technologies also show promise for use with pathology specimens (ex vivo microscopy [EVM]). However, few systems designed for EVM are commercially available, at least in part because of the lack of defined minimal functional requirements (FRs). To develop minimal FRs for likely high-volume pathology applications of EVM. The IVM Committee of the College of American Pathologists identified potential EVM pathology applications based on the published literature. A subcommittee of IVM and EVM early adopters and experts then defined FRs for the most likely EVM applications. Potential EVM applications include assessment of margins, adequacy of needle biopsies and aspirates for diagnosis, and transplant tissues; selection of tissue for molecular studies or biorepository; and guidance in block selection from gross specimens. The first 3 applications were selected for development of FRs. The FRs were identified based on existing laboratory practices and guidelines and input from experts in the field and included device footprint and portability, specimen preparation, imaging time, field of view or resolution, morphologic diagnostic capability, yield, accuracy, ease of use, safety, and cost. Consensus was achieved on FRs that would accommodate the selected EVM applications. Publication and dissemination of those FRs will provide guidance to engineers, researchers, and vendors on how to optimally adapt IVM technologies for EVM for widespread adoption by pathologists.
ISSN:0003-9985
1543-2165
1543-2165
DOI:10.5858/arpa.2018-0482-OA