Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement
Objective The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of plasma treatment and (universal adhesives) UAs on the bonding properties of zirconia. Material and methods Zirconia specimens ( N = 744; n = 186/pretreatment) were prepared, highly polished, and pretreated: (i) plasma (oxygen plasma,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2019-11, Vol.23 (11), p.3941-3950 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3950 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 3941 |
| container_title | Clinical oral investigations |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Lümkemann, Nina Eichberger, Marlis Stawarczyk, Bogna |
| description | Objective
The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of plasma treatment and (universal adhesives) UAs on the bonding properties of zirconia.
Material and methods
Zirconia specimens (
N
= 744;
n
= 186/pretreatment) were prepared, highly polished, and pretreated: (i) plasma (oxygen plasma, 10s, 5 mm), (ii) airborne-particle abrasion (alumina, 50 μm, 0.05 MPa, 5 s, 10 mm), (iii) airborne-particle abrasion + plasma, and (iv) without pretreatment (highly polished surface). Surface roughness (
R
a
) and surface free energy (SFE) were measured (
n
= 6/pretreatment). Tensile bond strength (TBS) specimens (
n
= 180/pretreatment) were further divided (
n
= 18/conditioning): Clearfil Ceramic Primer (PCG), All-Bond Universal (ABU), Adhese Universal (AU), Clearfil Universal Bond (CUB), G-Premio Bond (GPB), Futurabond U (FBU), iBond Universal (IBU), One Coat 7 Universal (OCU), Scotchbond Universal (SBU), and no conditioning. PCG was luted with Panavia F2.0 and the remaining groups with DuoCem. After storage in distilled water (24 h; 37 °C) and thermocycling (5000×; 5 °C/55 °C), TBS was measured and fracture types (FTs) were determined. Data were analyzed using univariate ANOVA with a partial eta square (
ƞ
P
2
), the Kruskal–Wallis
H
, the Mann–Whitney
U
, and the Chi
2
test (
P
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229098752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229098752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-49c35c8de9672bcedad40f08e53c1d0b458980c2df2beaaf90a62ab01156289e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIg_4ARbIEhs2DX50t212KBBAisQmWVtuu5xxNG03tjuI-Qf-Oc5MACkLNi6X6tStK12EXlHyjhIi3pf2yL4jVHWESTZ0uyfomPZ87LgQ9On-z7pRSXqETkq5IYT2o-DP0REnYhippMfo96fgPWSIFZc1e2MBz8kFH6ypIcWCbZqnEMHhn6Fu8BrDLeRitti4DZTWlA-4bgCHeTG24hT33ZSiC_EaLzktkGuAgpPHu5BtisHgmu5ll1RCBZybTMQW5ubhBXrmzbbAy4d6iq7OP1-efe0uvn_5dvbxorNcDLXrleWDlQ7UKNhkwRnXE08kDNxSR6Z-kEoSy5xnExjjFTEjMxOhdBiZVMBP0duDbjP4Y4VS9RyKhe3WREhr0YwxRZQUA2vom0foTVpzbO40o0LKniouG8UOlM2plAxeLznMJv_SlOj7sPQhLN3C0vuw9K4tvX6QXqcZ3N-VP-k0gB-A0kbxGvK_2_-RvQMbzKNq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178841938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lümkemann, Nina ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</creator><creatorcontrib>Lümkemann, Nina ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of plasma treatment and (universal adhesives) UAs on the bonding properties of zirconia.
Material and methods
Zirconia specimens (
N
= 744;
n
= 186/pretreatment) were prepared, highly polished, and pretreated: (i) plasma (oxygen plasma, 10s, 5 mm), (ii) airborne-particle abrasion (alumina, 50 μm, 0.05 MPa, 5 s, 10 mm), (iii) airborne-particle abrasion + plasma, and (iv) without pretreatment (highly polished surface). Surface roughness (
R
a
) and surface free energy (SFE) were measured (
n
= 6/pretreatment). Tensile bond strength (TBS) specimens (
n
= 180/pretreatment) were further divided (
n
= 18/conditioning): Clearfil Ceramic Primer (PCG), All-Bond Universal (ABU), Adhese Universal (AU), Clearfil Universal Bond (CUB), G-Premio Bond (GPB), Futurabond U (FBU), iBond Universal (IBU), One Coat 7 Universal (OCU), Scotchbond Universal (SBU), and no conditioning. PCG was luted with Panavia F2.0 and the remaining groups with DuoCem. After storage in distilled water (24 h; 37 °C) and thermocycling (5000×; 5 °C/55 °C), TBS was measured and fracture types (FTs) were determined. Data were analyzed using univariate ANOVA with a partial eta square (
ƞ
P
2
), the Kruskal–Wallis
H
, the Mann–Whitney
U
, and the Chi
2
test (
P
< .05).
Results
Plasma treatment resulted in an increase of SFE but had no impact on
R
a
. Airborne-particle abrasion resulted in the highest
R
a
and a higher TBS when compared with plasma and non-treatment. SBU and AU obtained a higher TBS when compared with PCG. OCU, FBU, ABU, IBU, and GPB indicated comparable TBS to PCG. CUB revealed the lowest TBS.
Conclusions
Plasma treatment cannot substitute airborne-particle abrasion when bonding zirconia but MDP-containing adhesives are essential for successful clinical outcomes.
Clinical relevance
Airborne-particle abrasion with a low pressure (0.05 MPa) in combination with UAs promotes the clinical success of adhesively bonded zirconia restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30756181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Adhesives ; Aluminum oxide ; Bond strength ; Composite Resins ; Data processing ; Dental Bonding ; Dental cement ; Dental Cements ; Dental restorative materials ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Free energy ; Kruskal-Wallis test ; Materials Testing ; Medicine ; Original Article ; Plasma ; Resin Cements ; Surface Properties ; Tensile Strength ; Zirconia ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2019-11, Vol.23 (11), p.3941-3950</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Clinical Oral Investigations is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-49c35c8de9672bcedad40f08e53c1d0b458980c2df2beaaf90a62ab01156289e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-49c35c8de9672bcedad40f08e53c1d0b458980c2df2beaaf90a62ab01156289e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1732-3255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30756181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lümkemann, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichberger, Marlis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><title>Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objective
The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of plasma treatment and (universal adhesives) UAs on the bonding properties of zirconia.
Material and methods
Zirconia specimens (
N
= 744;
n
= 186/pretreatment) were prepared, highly polished, and pretreated: (i) plasma (oxygen plasma, 10s, 5 mm), (ii) airborne-particle abrasion (alumina, 50 μm, 0.05 MPa, 5 s, 10 mm), (iii) airborne-particle abrasion + plasma, and (iv) without pretreatment (highly polished surface). Surface roughness (
R
a
) and surface free energy (SFE) were measured (
n
= 6/pretreatment). Tensile bond strength (TBS) specimens (
n
= 180/pretreatment) were further divided (
n
= 18/conditioning): Clearfil Ceramic Primer (PCG), All-Bond Universal (ABU), Adhese Universal (AU), Clearfil Universal Bond (CUB), G-Premio Bond (GPB), Futurabond U (FBU), iBond Universal (IBU), One Coat 7 Universal (OCU), Scotchbond Universal (SBU), and no conditioning. PCG was luted with Panavia F2.0 and the remaining groups with DuoCem. After storage in distilled water (24 h; 37 °C) and thermocycling (5000×; 5 °C/55 °C), TBS was measured and fracture types (FTs) were determined. Data were analyzed using univariate ANOVA with a partial eta square (
ƞ
P
2
), the Kruskal–Wallis
H
, the Mann–Whitney
U
, and the Chi
2
test (
P
< .05).
Results
Plasma treatment resulted in an increase of SFE but had no impact on
R
a
. Airborne-particle abrasion resulted in the highest
R
a
and a higher TBS when compared with plasma and non-treatment. SBU and AU obtained a higher TBS when compared with PCG. OCU, FBU, ABU, IBU, and GPB indicated comparable TBS to PCG. CUB revealed the lowest TBS.
Conclusions
Plasma treatment cannot substitute airborne-particle abrasion when bonding zirconia but MDP-containing adhesives are essential for successful clinical outcomes.
Clinical relevance
Airborne-particle abrasion with a low pressure (0.05 MPa) in combination with UAs promotes the clinical success of adhesively bonded zirconia restorations.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental cement</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Kruskal-Wallis test</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIg_4ARbIEhs2DX50t212KBBAisQmWVtuu5xxNG03tjuI-Qf-Oc5MACkLNi6X6tStK12EXlHyjhIi3pf2yL4jVHWESTZ0uyfomPZ87LgQ9On-z7pRSXqETkq5IYT2o-DP0REnYhippMfo96fgPWSIFZc1e2MBz8kFH6ypIcWCbZqnEMHhn6Fu8BrDLeRitti4DZTWlA-4bgCHeTG24hT33ZSiC_EaLzktkGuAgpPHu5BtisHgmu5ll1RCBZybTMQW5ubhBXrmzbbAy4d6iq7OP1-efe0uvn_5dvbxorNcDLXrleWDlQ7UKNhkwRnXE08kDNxSR6Z-kEoSy5xnExjjFTEjMxOhdBiZVMBP0duDbjP4Y4VS9RyKhe3WREhr0YwxRZQUA2vom0foTVpzbO40o0LKniouG8UOlM2plAxeLznMJv_SlOj7sPQhLN3C0vuw9K4tvX6QXqcZ3N-VP-k0gB-A0kbxGvK_2_-RvQMbzKNq</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Lümkemann, Nina</creator><creator>Eichberger, Marlis</creator><creator>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-3255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement</title><author>Lümkemann, Nina ; Eichberger, Marlis ; Stawarczyk, Bogna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-49c35c8de9672bcedad40f08e53c1d0b458980c2df2beaaf90a62ab01156289e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental cement</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Kruskal-Wallis test</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lümkemann, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichberger, Marlis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawarczyk, Bogna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lümkemann, Nina</au><au>Eichberger, Marlis</au><au>Stawarczyk, Bogna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3941</spage><epage>3950</epage><pages>3941-3950</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objective
The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of plasma treatment and (universal adhesives) UAs on the bonding properties of zirconia.
Material and methods
Zirconia specimens (
N
= 744;
n
= 186/pretreatment) were prepared, highly polished, and pretreated: (i) plasma (oxygen plasma, 10s, 5 mm), (ii) airborne-particle abrasion (alumina, 50 μm, 0.05 MPa, 5 s, 10 mm), (iii) airborne-particle abrasion + plasma, and (iv) without pretreatment (highly polished surface). Surface roughness (
R
a
) and surface free energy (SFE) were measured (
n
= 6/pretreatment). Tensile bond strength (TBS) specimens (
n
= 180/pretreatment) were further divided (
n
= 18/conditioning): Clearfil Ceramic Primer (PCG), All-Bond Universal (ABU), Adhese Universal (AU), Clearfil Universal Bond (CUB), G-Premio Bond (GPB), Futurabond U (FBU), iBond Universal (IBU), One Coat 7 Universal (OCU), Scotchbond Universal (SBU), and no conditioning. PCG was luted with Panavia F2.0 and the remaining groups with DuoCem. After storage in distilled water (24 h; 37 °C) and thermocycling (5000×; 5 °C/55 °C), TBS was measured and fracture types (FTs) were determined. Data were analyzed using univariate ANOVA with a partial eta square (
ƞ
P
2
), the Kruskal–Wallis
H
, the Mann–Whitney
U
, and the Chi
2
test (
P
< .05).
Results
Plasma treatment resulted in an increase of SFE but had no impact on
R
a
. Airborne-particle abrasion resulted in the highest
R
a
and a higher TBS when compared with plasma and non-treatment. SBU and AU obtained a higher TBS when compared with PCG. OCU, FBU, ABU, IBU, and GPB indicated comparable TBS to PCG. CUB revealed the lowest TBS.
Conclusions
Plasma treatment cannot substitute airborne-particle abrasion when bonding zirconia but MDP-containing adhesives are essential for successful clinical outcomes.
Clinical relevance
Airborne-particle abrasion with a low pressure (0.05 MPa) in combination with UAs promotes the clinical success of adhesively bonded zirconia restorations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30756181</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1732-3255</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1432-6981 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral investigations, 2019-11, Vol.23 (11), p.3941-3950 |
| issn | 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229098752 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Abrasion Adhesives Aluminum oxide Bond strength Composite Resins Data processing Dental Bonding Dental cement Dental Cements Dental restorative materials Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Free energy Kruskal-Wallis test Materials Testing Medicine Original Article Plasma Resin Cements Surface Properties Tensile Strength Zirconia Zirconium |
| title | Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20surface%20modifications%20combined%20with%20universal%20adhesives:%20the%20impact%20on%20the%20bonding%20properties%20of%20zirconia%20to%20composite%20resin%20cement&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=L%C3%BCmkemann,%20Nina&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3941&rft.epage=3950&rft.pages=3941-3950&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229098752%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178841938&rft_id=info:pmid/30756181&rfr_iscdi=true |