Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust

Aim This study study aimed to investigate the effects of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities and the mediating role of trust among registered nurses at Korean hospitals. Background Decision‐making abilities comprise a key area of nursing practice and link nurse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International nursing review 2019-06, Vol.66 (2), p.234-241
Hauptverfasser: Yoo, K.H., Zhang, Y.A., Yun, E.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 241
container_issue 2
container_start_page 234
container_title International nursing review
container_volume 66
creator Yoo, K.H.
Zhang, Y.A.
Yun, E.K.
description Aim This study study aimed to investigate the effects of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities and the mediating role of trust among registered nurses at Korean hospitals. Background Decision‐making abilities comprise a key area of nursing practice and link nurses’ perceptions with behaviours. Introduction Tacit knowledge is embedded within an individual and cannot be expressed or transmitted to other people in a specific form. Over time, new nurses gradually gain experience and tacit knowledge and become experts. Trust, an organizational characteristic, may serve as a potential mediator in the association between knowledge sharing and decision‐making abilities among nurses. However, few studies have investigated the mediatory role of trust in this association. Method The data were collected from 210 nurses selected via random sampling. The research instrument in the model included Knowledge‐Sharing Behavior, Trust, and Clinical Decision‐Making in Nursing Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the collected data. Findings The study findings showed that explicit knowledge sharing directly affects decision‐making abilities, whereas tacit knowledge sharing is only associated with decision‐making abilities when trust plays a mediating role. Discussion A higher level of organizational trust can improve clinical decision‐making abilities via tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion This study demonstrated that unlike explicit knowledge, which is shared more easily, tacit knowledge sharing does not directly lead to clinical decision‐making abilities. A higher level of organizational trust leads to a stronger beneficial effect of tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities. Implications for nursing and health policy These findings concerning the mediatory role of trust on the association between knowledge sharing and clinical decision‐making abilities provide new knowledge that will allow nurses, managers, and researchers to support the clinical decision‐making abilities of nurses.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/inr.12488
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229093635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229093635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-247520f08177f84d60377fc931ea07558f94a2d84a402b45a9f58f4f30b8cd603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi1UBMvSQ1-gstQLHLKM_yR2ekOotEhokVb0HHmTyWLI2tROhOiJR-DK6-2T1OlSDpWYy4w-_fTNaD5CPjGYsVQn1oUZ41LrHTJhsigyVeTqA5kAcMg0E3yfHMR4CwAMSr1H9gUoCYVSE-IWuLKxx4ANnQ8hYqRHi3k83jy90DvnHzpsVkjjjQnWrahxDW2wttF6t3l6Xpu7pH6l_Q3SNTbW9CMUfIfUt9SHlXH2dxK9Mx3twxD7Q7Lbmi7ix9c-JT_Pv12f_cgur75fnJ1eZrXIhc64VDmHFjRTqtWyKUCkoS4FQwMqz3VbSsMbLY0EvpS5KdukyVbAUtcjPSVHW9_74H8NGPtqbWONXWcc-iFWnPMSSlGkbVPy5T_01g8hXTxSAnguQY_U8Zaqg48xYFvdB7s24bFiUI0hVCmE6m8Iif386jgs01veyH9fT8DJFniwHT6-71RdzBdbyz-D7pHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230254085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yoo, K.H. ; Zhang, Y.A. ; Yun, E.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoo, K.H. ; Zhang, Y.A. ; Yun, E.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim This study study aimed to investigate the effects of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities and the mediating role of trust among registered nurses at Korean hospitals. Background Decision‐making abilities comprise a key area of nursing practice and link nurses’ perceptions with behaviours. Introduction Tacit knowledge is embedded within an individual and cannot be expressed or transmitted to other people in a specific form. Over time, new nurses gradually gain experience and tacit knowledge and become experts. Trust, an organizational characteristic, may serve as a potential mediator in the association between knowledge sharing and decision‐making abilities among nurses. However, few studies have investigated the mediatory role of trust in this association. Method The data were collected from 210 nurses selected via random sampling. The research instrument in the model included Knowledge‐Sharing Behavior, Trust, and Clinical Decision‐Making in Nursing Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the collected data. Findings The study findings showed that explicit knowledge sharing directly affects decision‐making abilities, whereas tacit knowledge sharing is only associated with decision‐making abilities when trust plays a mediating role. Discussion A higher level of organizational trust can improve clinical decision‐making abilities via tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion This study demonstrated that unlike explicit knowledge, which is shared more easily, tacit knowledge sharing does not directly lead to clinical decision‐making abilities. A higher level of organizational trust leads to a stronger beneficial effect of tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities. Implications for nursing and health policy These findings concerning the mediatory role of trust on the association between knowledge sharing and clinical decision‐making abilities provide new knowledge that will allow nurses, managers, and researchers to support the clinical decision‐making abilities of nurses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-7657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/inr.12488</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30740677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ability ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Capacity Building ; Clinical Decision‐Making ; Clinical nursing ; Cooperative Behavior ; Decision making ; Evidence-based nursing ; Experts ; Explicit knowledge ; Health care policy ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interpersonal ; Interprofessional Relations ; Knowledge Management ; Knowledge sharing ; Nurse managers ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology ; Organisational Behaviour Nursing ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational Culture ; Professional practice ; Random sampling ; Research nurses ; Tacit knowledge ; Trust - psychology ; Work Engagement</subject><ispartof>International nursing review, 2019-06, Vol.66 (2), p.234-241</ispartof><rights>2019 International Council of Nurses</rights><rights>2019 International Council of Nurses.</rights><rights>International Nursing Review © 2019 International Council of Nurses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-247520f08177f84d60377fc931ea07558f94a2d84a402b45a9f58f4f30b8cd603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-247520f08177f84d60377fc931ea07558f94a2d84a402b45a9f58f4f30b8cd603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Finr.12488$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Finr.12488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30740677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoo, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, E.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust</title><title>International nursing review</title><addtitle>Int Nurs Rev</addtitle><description>Aim This study study aimed to investigate the effects of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities and the mediating role of trust among registered nurses at Korean hospitals. Background Decision‐making abilities comprise a key area of nursing practice and link nurses’ perceptions with behaviours. Introduction Tacit knowledge is embedded within an individual and cannot be expressed or transmitted to other people in a specific form. Over time, new nurses gradually gain experience and tacit knowledge and become experts. Trust, an organizational characteristic, may serve as a potential mediator in the association between knowledge sharing and decision‐making abilities among nurses. However, few studies have investigated the mediatory role of trust in this association. Method The data were collected from 210 nurses selected via random sampling. The research instrument in the model included Knowledge‐Sharing Behavior, Trust, and Clinical Decision‐Making in Nursing Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the collected data. Findings The study findings showed that explicit knowledge sharing directly affects decision‐making abilities, whereas tacit knowledge sharing is only associated with decision‐making abilities when trust plays a mediating role. Discussion A higher level of organizational trust can improve clinical decision‐making abilities via tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion This study demonstrated that unlike explicit knowledge, which is shared more easily, tacit knowledge sharing does not directly lead to clinical decision‐making abilities. A higher level of organizational trust leads to a stronger beneficial effect of tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities. Implications for nursing and health policy These findings concerning the mediatory role of trust on the association between knowledge sharing and clinical decision‐making abilities provide new knowledge that will allow nurses, managers, and researchers to support the clinical decision‐making abilities of nurses.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Capacity Building</subject><subject>Clinical Decision‐Making</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Explicit knowledge</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal</subject><subject>Interprofessional Relations</subject><subject>Knowledge Management</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Nurse managers</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Organisational Behaviour Nursing</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Research nurses</subject><subject>Tacit knowledge</subject><subject>Trust - psychology</subject><subject>Work Engagement</subject><issn>0020-8132</issn><issn>1466-7657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9O3DAQxi1UBMvSQ1-gstQLHLKM_yR2ekOotEhokVb0HHmTyWLI2tROhOiJR-DK6-2T1OlSDpWYy4w-_fTNaD5CPjGYsVQn1oUZ41LrHTJhsigyVeTqA5kAcMg0E3yfHMR4CwAMSr1H9gUoCYVSE-IWuLKxx4ANnQ8hYqRHi3k83jy90DvnHzpsVkjjjQnWrahxDW2wttF6t3l6Xpu7pH6l_Q3SNTbW9CMUfIfUt9SHlXH2dxK9Mx3twxD7Q7Lbmi7ix9c-JT_Pv12f_cgur75fnJ1eZrXIhc64VDmHFjRTqtWyKUCkoS4FQwMqz3VbSsMbLY0EvpS5KdukyVbAUtcjPSVHW9_74H8NGPtqbWONXWcc-iFWnPMSSlGkbVPy5T_01g8hXTxSAnguQY_U8Zaqg48xYFvdB7s24bFiUI0hVCmE6m8Iif386jgs01veyH9fT8DJFniwHT6-71RdzBdbyz-D7pHU</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Yoo, K.H.</creator><creator>Zhang, Y.A.</creator><creator>Yun, E.K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust</title><author>Yoo, K.H. ; Zhang, Y.A. ; Yun, E.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-247520f08177f84d60377fc931ea07558f94a2d84a402b45a9f58f4f30b8cd603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Capacity Building</topic><topic>Clinical Decision‐Making</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Explicit knowledge</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal</topic><topic>Interprofessional Relations</topic><topic>Knowledge Management</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Nurse managers</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Organisational Behaviour Nursing</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Research nurses</topic><topic>Tacit knowledge</topic><topic>Trust - psychology</topic><topic>Work Engagement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoo, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, E.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International nursing review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoo, K.H.</au><au>Zhang, Y.A.</au><au>Yun, E.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust</atitle><jtitle>International nursing review</jtitle><addtitle>Int Nurs Rev</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>234</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>234-241</pages><issn>0020-8132</issn><eissn>1466-7657</eissn><abstract>Aim This study study aimed to investigate the effects of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities and the mediating role of trust among registered nurses at Korean hospitals. Background Decision‐making abilities comprise a key area of nursing practice and link nurses’ perceptions with behaviours. Introduction Tacit knowledge is embedded within an individual and cannot be expressed or transmitted to other people in a specific form. Over time, new nurses gradually gain experience and tacit knowledge and become experts. Trust, an organizational characteristic, may serve as a potential mediator in the association between knowledge sharing and decision‐making abilities among nurses. However, few studies have investigated the mediatory role of trust in this association. Method The data were collected from 210 nurses selected via random sampling. The research instrument in the model included Knowledge‐Sharing Behavior, Trust, and Clinical Decision‐Making in Nursing Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the collected data. Findings The study findings showed that explicit knowledge sharing directly affects decision‐making abilities, whereas tacit knowledge sharing is only associated with decision‐making abilities when trust plays a mediating role. Discussion A higher level of organizational trust can improve clinical decision‐making abilities via tacit knowledge sharing. Conclusion This study demonstrated that unlike explicit knowledge, which is shared more easily, tacit knowledge sharing does not directly lead to clinical decision‐making abilities. A higher level of organizational trust leads to a stronger beneficial effect of tacit knowledge sharing on clinical decision‐making abilities. Implications for nursing and health policy These findings concerning the mediatory role of trust on the association between knowledge sharing and clinical decision‐making abilities provide new knowledge that will allow nurses, managers, and researchers to support the clinical decision‐making abilities of nurses.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30740677</pmid><doi>10.1111/inr.12488</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-8132
ispartof International nursing review, 2019-06, Vol.66 (2), p.234-241
issn 0020-8132
1466-7657
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229093635
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Ability
Attitude of Health Personnel
Capacity Building
Clinical Decision‐Making
Clinical nursing
Cooperative Behavior
Decision making
Evidence-based nursing
Experts
Explicit knowledge
Health care policy
Hospitals
Humans
Interpersonal
Interprofessional Relations
Knowledge Management
Knowledge sharing
Nurse managers
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Staff, Hospital - organization & administration
Nursing Staff, Hospital - psychology
Organisational Behaviour Nursing
Organizational behavior
Organizational Culture
Professional practice
Random sampling
Research nurses
Tacit knowledge
Trust - psychology
Work Engagement
title Registered Nurses (RNs)’ knowledge sharing and decision‐making: the mediating role of organizational trust
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Registered%20Nurses%20(RNs)%E2%80%99%20knowledge%20sharing%20and%20decision%E2%80%90making:%20the%20mediating%20role%20of%20organizational%20trust&rft.jtitle=International%20nursing%20review&rft.au=Yoo,%20K.H.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=234&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=234-241&rft.issn=0020-8132&rft.eissn=1466-7657&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/inr.12488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2229093635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230254085&rft_id=info:pmid/30740677&rfr_iscdi=true