Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2019-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e007577-e007577
Hauptverfasser: Modi, Bhavik N, Sankaran, Sethuraman, Kim, Hyun Jin, Ellis, Howard, Rogers, Campbell, Taylor, Charles A, Rajani, Ronak, Perera, Divaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e007577
container_issue 2
container_start_page e007577
container_title Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 12
creator Modi, Bhavik N
Sankaran, Sethuraman
Kim, Hyun Jin
Ellis, Howard
Rogers, Campbell
Taylor, Charles A
Rajani, Ronak
Perera, Divaka
description Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using invasive FFR pullback and the noninvasive equivalent, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography (FFR ). We subsequently describe and test the accuracy of a novel noninvasive FFR -derived percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning tool (FFR ) in predicting the true significance of individual stenoses. Patients with angiographic serial coronary artery disease scheduled for PCI were enrolled and underwent prospective coronary CT angiography with conventional FFR -derived post hoc for each vessel and stenosis (FFR ). Before PCI, the invasive hyperemic pressure-wire pullback was performed to derive the apparent FFR contribution of each stenosis (FFR ). The true FFR attributable to individual lesions (FFR ) was then measured following PCI of one of the lesions. The predictive accuracy of FFR , FFR , and the novel technique (FFR ) was then assessed against FFR . From the 24 patients undergoing the protocol, 19 vessels had post hoc FFR and FFR calculation. When assessing the distal effect of all lesions, FFR correlated moderately well with invasive FFR ( R=0.71; P
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229081228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2229081228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2357-5151d62ca87ce02997f71fae43aba03c1f0682ba0a1cf121617b920557b27fec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMgbk7_guTBB186k9u1aR9HrVoY29imryVNky2SNTNphfnrDahP93DPx-Xcg9A9JVNKU_pYVJuiWu7KzXu53FWr5TassykhLGHsAo1pPqMRS2MYoWvvPwgJMoUrNIoJA0izbIzqtZOtFr3u9rg_SLw-nL22xu614AaXSknRY6vwRn5xLwbDnf7mvbYd1h3eSqe5MWf8pL3kXra4sM523J3x3PXBlP4GXSpuvLz9mxP09lzuitdosXqpivkiEhAnLEpoQtsUBM-YkATynClGFZezmDecxIIqkmYQJKdCUQi_syYHkiSsARYyxhP08Hv35OznIH1fH7UX0hjeSTv4GgByklGALKB3f-jQHGVbn5w-hsj1fynxD4pWZnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2229081228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Modi, Bhavik N ; Sankaran, Sethuraman ; Kim, Hyun Jin ; Ellis, Howard ; Rogers, Campbell ; Taylor, Charles A ; Rajani, Ronak ; Perera, Divaka</creator><creatorcontrib>Modi, Bhavik N ; Sankaran, Sethuraman ; Kim, Hyun Jin ; Ellis, Howard ; Rogers, Campbell ; Taylor, Charles A ; Rajani, Ronak ; Perera, Divaka</creatorcontrib><description>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using invasive FFR pullback and the noninvasive equivalent, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography (FFR ). We subsequently describe and test the accuracy of a novel noninvasive FFR -derived percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning tool (FFR ) in predicting the true significance of individual stenoses. Patients with angiographic serial coronary artery disease scheduled for PCI were enrolled and underwent prospective coronary CT angiography with conventional FFR -derived post hoc for each vessel and stenosis (FFR ). Before PCI, the invasive hyperemic pressure-wire pullback was performed to derive the apparent FFR contribution of each stenosis (FFR ). The true FFR attributable to individual lesions (FFR ) was then measured following PCI of one of the lesions. The predictive accuracy of FFR , FFR , and the novel technique (FFR ) was then assessed against FFR . From the 24 patients undergoing the protocol, 19 vessels had post hoc FFR and FFR calculation. When assessing the distal effect of all lesions, FFR correlated moderately well with invasive FFR ( R=0.71; P&lt;0.001). For lesion-specific assessment, there was significant underestimation of FFR using FFR (mean discrepancy, 0.06±0.05; P&lt;0.001, representing a 42% error) and conventional trans-lesional FFR (0.05±0.06; P&lt;0.001, 37% error). Using FFR , stenosis underestimation was significantly reduced to a 7% error (0.01±0.05; P&lt;0.001). FFR pullback and conventional FFR significantly underestimate true stenosis contribution in serial coronary artery disease. A novel noninvasive FFR -based PCI planner tool more accurately predicts the true FFR contribution of each stenosis in serial coronary artery disease.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30722688</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Catheterization ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology ; Coronary Stenosis - therapy ; Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels - physiopathology ; Female ; Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Patient-Specific Modeling ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2019-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e007577-e007577</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2357-5151d62ca87ce02997f71fae43aba03c1f0682ba0a1cf121617b920557b27fec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30722688$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Modi, Bhavik N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankaran, Sethuraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Charles A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Ronak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Divaka</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries</title><title>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using invasive FFR pullback and the noninvasive equivalent, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography (FFR ). We subsequently describe and test the accuracy of a novel noninvasive FFR -derived percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning tool (FFR ) in predicting the true significance of individual stenoses. Patients with angiographic serial coronary artery disease scheduled for PCI were enrolled and underwent prospective coronary CT angiography with conventional FFR -derived post hoc for each vessel and stenosis (FFR ). Before PCI, the invasive hyperemic pressure-wire pullback was performed to derive the apparent FFR contribution of each stenosis (FFR ). The true FFR attributable to individual lesions (FFR ) was then measured following PCI of one of the lesions. The predictive accuracy of FFR , FFR , and the novel technique (FFR ) was then assessed against FFR . From the 24 patients undergoing the protocol, 19 vessels had post hoc FFR and FFR calculation. When assessing the distal effect of all lesions, FFR correlated moderately well with invasive FFR ( R=0.71; P&lt;0.001). For lesion-specific assessment, there was significant underestimation of FFR using FFR (mean discrepancy, 0.06±0.05; P&lt;0.001, representing a 42% error) and conventional trans-lesional FFR (0.05±0.06; P&lt;0.001, 37% error). Using FFR , stenosis underestimation was significantly reduced to a 7% error (0.01±0.05; P&lt;0.001). FFR pullback and conventional FFR significantly underestimate true stenosis contribution in serial coronary artery disease. A novel noninvasive FFR -based PCI planner tool more accurately predicts the true FFR contribution of each stenosis in serial coronary artery disease.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Patient-Specific Modeling</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1941-7632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kFFLwzAUhYMgbk7_guTBB186k9u1aR9HrVoY29imryVNky2SNTNphfnrDahP93DPx-Xcg9A9JVNKU_pYVJuiWu7KzXu53FWr5TassykhLGHsAo1pPqMRS2MYoWvvPwgJMoUrNIoJA0izbIzqtZOtFr3u9rg_SLw-nL22xu614AaXSknRY6vwRn5xLwbDnf7mvbYd1h3eSqe5MWf8pL3kXra4sM523J3x3PXBlP4GXSpuvLz9mxP09lzuitdosXqpivkiEhAnLEpoQtsUBM-YkATynClGFZezmDecxIIqkmYQJKdCUQi_syYHkiSsARYyxhP08Hv35OznIH1fH7UX0hjeSTv4GgByklGALKB3f-jQHGVbn5w-hsj1fynxD4pWZnA</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Modi, Bhavik N</creator><creator>Sankaran, Sethuraman</creator><creator>Kim, Hyun Jin</creator><creator>Ellis, Howard</creator><creator>Rogers, Campbell</creator><creator>Taylor, Charles A</creator><creator>Rajani, Ronak</creator><creator>Perera, Divaka</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries</title><author>Modi, Bhavik N ; Sankaran, Sethuraman ; Kim, Hyun Jin ; Ellis, Howard ; Rogers, Campbell ; Taylor, Charles A ; Rajani, Ronak ; Perera, Divaka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2357-5151d62ca87ce02997f71fae43aba03c1f0682ba0a1cf121617b920557b27fec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Patient-Specific Modeling</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Modi, Bhavik N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankaran, Sethuraman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyun Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Charles A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajani, Ronak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Divaka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Modi, Bhavik N</au><au>Sankaran, Sethuraman</au><au>Kim, Hyun Jin</au><au>Ellis, Howard</au><au>Rogers, Campbell</au><au>Taylor, Charles A</au><au>Rajani, Ronak</au><au>Perera, Divaka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e007577</spage><epage>e007577</epage><pages>e007577-e007577</pages><eissn>1941-7632</eissn><abstract>Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery disease but is theoretically limited in evaluating individual stenoses in serially diseased vessels. We sought to characterize the accuracy of assessing individual stenoses in serial disease using invasive FFR pullback and the noninvasive equivalent, fractional flow reserve by computed tomography (FFR ). We subsequently describe and test the accuracy of a novel noninvasive FFR -derived percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) planning tool (FFR ) in predicting the true significance of individual stenoses. Patients with angiographic serial coronary artery disease scheduled for PCI were enrolled and underwent prospective coronary CT angiography with conventional FFR -derived post hoc for each vessel and stenosis (FFR ). Before PCI, the invasive hyperemic pressure-wire pullback was performed to derive the apparent FFR contribution of each stenosis (FFR ). The true FFR attributable to individual lesions (FFR ) was then measured following PCI of one of the lesions. The predictive accuracy of FFR , FFR , and the novel technique (FFR ) was then assessed against FFR . From the 24 patients undergoing the protocol, 19 vessels had post hoc FFR and FFR calculation. When assessing the distal effect of all lesions, FFR correlated moderately well with invasive FFR ( R=0.71; P&lt;0.001). For lesion-specific assessment, there was significant underestimation of FFR using FFR (mean discrepancy, 0.06±0.05; P&lt;0.001, representing a 42% error) and conventional trans-lesional FFR (0.05±0.06; P&lt;0.001, 37% error). Using FFR , stenosis underestimation was significantly reduced to a 7% error (0.01±0.05; P&lt;0.001). FFR pullback and conventional FFR significantly underestimate true stenosis contribution in serial coronary artery disease. A novel noninvasive FFR -based PCI planner tool more accurately predicts the true FFR contribution of each stenosis in serial coronary artery disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30722688</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1941-7632
ispartof Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2019-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e007577-e007577
issn 1941-7632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2229081228
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Cardiac Catheterization
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography - methods
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Coronary Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Stenosis - physiopathology
Coronary Stenosis - therapy
Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels - physiopathology
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Cardiovascular
Patient-Specific Modeling
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Treatment Outcome
title Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20the%20Physiological%20Effect%20of%20Revascularization%20in%20Serially%20Diseased%20Coronary%20Arteries&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Modi,%20Bhavik%20N&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e007577&rft.epage=e007577&rft.pages=e007577-e007577&rft.eissn=1941-7632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007577&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2229081228%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2229081228&rft_id=info:pmid/30722688&rfr_iscdi=true