Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial

Objective Pulmonary dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing heart surgery. Current clinical practice does not include any specific strategy for lung protection. To compare the anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐frequency ventilation (LFV), as measured by nuclear factor κ‐light‐chai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiac surgery 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.385-399
Hauptverfasser: Fiorentino, Francesca, Jaaly, Emad Al, Durham, Andrew L., Adcock, Ian M., Lockwood, Geoffrey, Rogers, Chris, Ascione, Raimondo, Reeves, Barney C., Angelini, Gianni D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue 6
container_start_page 385
container_title Journal of cardiac surgery
container_volume 34
creator Fiorentino, Francesca
Jaaly, Emad Al
Durham, Andrew L.
Adcock, Ian M.
Lockwood, Geoffrey
Rogers, Chris
Ascione, Raimondo
Reeves, Barney C.
Angelini, Gianni D.
description Objective Pulmonary dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing heart surgery. Current clinical practice does not include any specific strategy for lung protection. To compare the anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐frequency ventilation (LFV), as measured by nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) p65 pathway activation, for the entire cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vs both lungs left collapsed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Two groups parallel randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was inflammation measured by NF‐κB p65 activation in pre‐ and post‐CPB lung biopsies. Secondary outcomes were additional inflammatory markers in both biopsy tissue and blood. Results Thirty‐seven patients were randomly allocated to LFV (18) and to both lungs left collapsed (19). The mean concentration of NF‐κB p65 in the biopsies before chest closure (adjusted for pre‐CPB concentration) was higher in the LFV group compared to both lungs left collapsed group but this was not significant (0.102, 95% confidence interval, −0.022 to 0.226, P = 0.104). There were no significant differences between groups in the other inflammatory markers measured in tissue and blood. Conclusions In patients undergoing elective CABG, the use of LFV during CPB when compared to both lungs left collapsed does not seem to reduce inflammation in lung biopsies and blood.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocs.14044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2219002126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2219002126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-c3c14b5214639895354f95c586888dd3fb964c5de413961144cbe9aa951710c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Frd-ACGpTFp5c7ACO5M42-adKGuJwzDGBpmqDBjM658BJ_RJ5Ha6lIWQC6HL_cehI6BTCCu84VTYQKUULqDhsAoGXMQsIuGhPNsHMtkgA5CWBCSJDQl-2iQAqEs4WKI7Mytvj4-K69fO92oHr_ppjVWtsY1uOy8aV6wkr40btnZ2jXS97jolzIEXDmPbRffl961Wq1_XOIr7GVTutq86xIr17TeWRuvrTfSHqK9Stqgj7bnCD3fXD9N78az-e399Go2VmnGaNwV0IIlQLNUcMFSRivBFOMZ57ws06oQGVWs1BRSkQFQqgotpBQMLoAokY7Q6SY3dhbHCm1em6C0tbLRrgt5koCIMiDJInq2QZV3IXhd5Utv6jhlDiRf283XdvMfuxE-2eZ2Ra3LP_RXZwRgA6yM1f0_UfnDfPq4Cf0Gi96HHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2219002126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fiorentino, Francesca ; Jaaly, Emad Al ; Durham, Andrew L. ; Adcock, Ian M. ; Lockwood, Geoffrey ; Rogers, Chris ; Ascione, Raimondo ; Reeves, Barney C. ; Angelini, Gianni D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fiorentino, Francesca ; Jaaly, Emad Al ; Durham, Andrew L. ; Adcock, Ian M. ; Lockwood, Geoffrey ; Rogers, Chris ; Ascione, Raimondo ; Reeves, Barney C. ; Angelini, Gianni D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Pulmonary dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing heart surgery. Current clinical practice does not include any specific strategy for lung protection. To compare the anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐frequency ventilation (LFV), as measured by nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) p65 pathway activation, for the entire cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vs both lungs left collapsed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Two groups parallel randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was inflammation measured by NF‐κB p65 activation in pre‐ and post‐CPB lung biopsies. Secondary outcomes were additional inflammatory markers in both biopsy tissue and blood. Results Thirty‐seven patients were randomly allocated to LFV (18) and to both lungs left collapsed (19). The mean concentration of NF‐κB p65 in the biopsies before chest closure (adjusted for pre‐CPB concentration) was higher in the LFV group compared to both lungs left collapsed group but this was not significant (0.102, 95% confidence interval, −0.022 to 0.226, P = 0.104). There were no significant differences between groups in the other inflammatory markers measured in tissue and blood. Conclusions In patients undergoing elective CABG, the use of LFV during CPB when compared to both lungs left collapsed does not seem to reduce inflammation in lung biopsies and blood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-0440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31045289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biomarkers - metabolism ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Coronary Artery Bypass ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation - diagnosis ; Intraoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Intraoperative Complications - pathology ; Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; low‐frequency ventilation ; Lung - metabolism ; Lung - pathology ; lung biopsy ; lung protection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells ; Pulmonary Atelectasis - diagnosis ; Pulmonary Atelectasis - pathology ; Pulmonary Atelectasis - prevention &amp; control ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Transcription Factor RelA - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiac surgery, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.385-399</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-c3c14b5214639895354f95c586888dd3fb964c5de413961144cbe9aa951710c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-c3c14b5214639895354f95c586888dd3fb964c5de413961144cbe9aa951710c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1753-3730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocs.14044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocs.14044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31045289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fiorentino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaaly, Emad Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adcock, Ian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascione, Raimondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Barney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelini, Gianni D.</creatorcontrib><title>Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of cardiac surgery</title><addtitle>J Card Surg</addtitle><description>Objective Pulmonary dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing heart surgery. Current clinical practice does not include any specific strategy for lung protection. To compare the anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐frequency ventilation (LFV), as measured by nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) p65 pathway activation, for the entire cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vs both lungs left collapsed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Two groups parallel randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was inflammation measured by NF‐κB p65 activation in pre‐ and post‐CPB lung biopsies. Secondary outcomes were additional inflammatory markers in both biopsy tissue and blood. Results Thirty‐seven patients were randomly allocated to LFV (18) and to both lungs left collapsed (19). The mean concentration of NF‐κB p65 in the biopsies before chest closure (adjusted for pre‐CPB concentration) was higher in the LFV group compared to both lungs left collapsed group but this was not significant (0.102, 95% confidence interval, −0.022 to 0.226, P = 0.104). There were no significant differences between groups in the other inflammatory markers measured in tissue and blood. Conclusions In patients undergoing elective CABG, the use of LFV during CPB when compared to both lungs left collapsed does not seem to reduce inflammation in lung biopsies and blood.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Bypass</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>low‐frequency ventilation</subject><subject>Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>lung biopsy</subject><subject>lung protection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells</subject><subject>Pulmonary Atelectasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary Atelectasis - pathology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Atelectasis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Transcription Factor RelA - metabolism</subject><issn>0886-0440</issn><issn>1540-8191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEURonR2Frd-ACGpTFp5c7ACO5M42-adKGuJwzDGBpmqDBjM658BJ_RJ5Ha6lIWQC6HL_cehI6BTCCu84VTYQKUULqDhsAoGXMQsIuGhPNsHMtkgA5CWBCSJDQl-2iQAqEs4WKI7Mytvj4-K69fO92oHr_ppjVWtsY1uOy8aV6wkr40btnZ2jXS97jolzIEXDmPbRffl961Wq1_XOIr7GVTutq86xIr17TeWRuvrTfSHqK9Stqgj7bnCD3fXD9N78az-e399Go2VmnGaNwV0IIlQLNUcMFSRivBFOMZ57ws06oQGVWs1BRSkQFQqgotpBQMLoAokY7Q6SY3dhbHCm1em6C0tbLRrgt5koCIMiDJInq2QZV3IXhd5Utv6jhlDiRf283XdvMfuxE-2eZ2Ra3LP_RXZwRgA6yM1f0_UfnDfPq4Cf0Gi96HHw</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Fiorentino, Francesca</creator><creator>Jaaly, Emad Al</creator><creator>Durham, Andrew L.</creator><creator>Adcock, Ian M.</creator><creator>Lockwood, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Rogers, Chris</creator><creator>Ascione, Raimondo</creator><creator>Reeves, Barney C.</creator><creator>Angelini, Gianni D.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-3730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>Fiorentino, Francesca ; Jaaly, Emad Al ; Durham, Andrew L. ; Adcock, Ian M. ; Lockwood, Geoffrey ; Rogers, Chris ; Ascione, Raimondo ; Reeves, Barney C. ; Angelini, Gianni D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-c3c14b5214639895354f95c586888dd3fb964c5de413961144cbe9aa951710c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Bypass</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>low‐frequency ventilation</topic><topic>Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>lung biopsy</topic><topic>lung protection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells</topic><topic>Pulmonary Atelectasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary Atelectasis - pathology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Atelectasis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Transcription Factor RelA - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fiorentino, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaaly, Emad Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durham, Andrew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adcock, Ian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascione, Raimondo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Barney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angelini, Gianni D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fiorentino, Francesca</au><au>Jaaly, Emad Al</au><au>Durham, Andrew L.</au><au>Adcock, Ian M.</au><au>Lockwood, Geoffrey</au><au>Rogers, Chris</au><au>Ascione, Raimondo</au><au>Reeves, Barney C.</au><au>Angelini, Gianni D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Card Surg</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>385-399</pages><issn>0886-0440</issn><eissn>1540-8191</eissn><abstract>Objective Pulmonary dysfunction is a common complication in patients undergoing heart surgery. Current clinical practice does not include any specific strategy for lung protection. To compare the anti‐inflammatory effects of low‐frequency ventilation (LFV), as measured by nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) p65 pathway activation, for the entire cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vs both lungs left collapsed in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Two groups parallel randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was inflammation measured by NF‐κB p65 activation in pre‐ and post‐CPB lung biopsies. Secondary outcomes were additional inflammatory markers in both biopsy tissue and blood. Results Thirty‐seven patients were randomly allocated to LFV (18) and to both lungs left collapsed (19). The mean concentration of NF‐κB p65 in the biopsies before chest closure (adjusted for pre‐CPB concentration) was higher in the LFV group compared to both lungs left collapsed group but this was not significant (0.102, 95% confidence interval, −0.022 to 0.226, P = 0.104). There were no significant differences between groups in the other inflammatory markers measured in tissue and blood. Conclusions In patients undergoing elective CABG, the use of LFV during CPB when compared to both lungs left collapsed does not seem to reduce inflammation in lung biopsies and blood.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31045289</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocs.14044</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-3730</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-0440
ispartof Journal of cardiac surgery, 2019-06, Vol.34 (6), p.385-399
issn 0886-0440
1540-8191
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2219002126
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Biomarkers - metabolism
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Coronary Artery Bypass
Female
Humans
Inflammation - diagnosis
Intraoperative Complications - diagnosis
Intraoperative Complications - pathology
Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control
low‐frequency ventilation
Lung - metabolism
Lung - pathology
lung biopsy
lung protection
Male
Middle Aged
nuclear factor κ‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells
Pulmonary Atelectasis - diagnosis
Pulmonary Atelectasis - pathology
Pulmonary Atelectasis - prevention & control
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Transcription Factor RelA - metabolism
title Low‐frequency ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass for lung protection: A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A38%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%E2%80%90frequency%20ventilation%20during%20cardiopulmonary%20bypass%20for%20lung%20protection:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.au=Fiorentino,%20Francesca&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=385-399&rft.issn=0886-0440&rft.eissn=1540-8191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocs.14044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2219002126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2219002126&rft_id=info:pmid/31045289&rfr_iscdi=true