Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography
Fluorescence optical tomography (FOT) is a well-known imaging technique, where fluorescent biological markers are injected to tag targeted tissues (tumors, proteins), and the absorption coefficient of fluorophore is reconstructed to provide contrast-enhanced images. Conventional FOT is known to have...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied optics (2004) 2019-04, Vol.58 (12), p.3116-3127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3116 |
container_title | Applied optics (2004) |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Pandey, Prabodh Kumar Gottam, Omprakash Naik, Naren Pradhan, Asima |
description | Fluorescence optical tomography (FOT) is a well-known imaging technique, where fluorescent biological markers are injected to tag targeted tissues (tumors, proteins), and the absorption coefficient of fluorophore is reconstructed to provide contrast-enhanced images. Conventional FOT is known to have lack of stability to noise and shallow imaging depth due to strong optical scattering in biological tissue. Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has been previously proposed to combine with FOT to resolve this issue. We propose a fully nonlinear one-step reconstruction in a diffuse-approximation modeled fluorescence photoacoustic tomographic (FPAT) setting, where the absorption coefficient of exogenous fluorophore is recovered directly from the photoacoustic data. Computational validations in two dimensions in single- and dual-grid reconstruction settings using full as well as partial data have been provided in support of the proposed algorithm. One-step schemes are particularly useful with respect to dual representations of field (optical and pressure) variables and optical parameters, especially in limited-data settings, which effectively help in constraining the optimization search space. We have compared the results of one- and two-step FPAT schemes and concluded that the one-step reconstructions are superior as compared with the corresponding two-step reconstructions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first comparisons of one-step and two-step reconstructions in FPAT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1364/AO.58.003116 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2219000160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2219000160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5f5537322eb98147aa23daccee9b5a4d1cac2ac8f5b397e3951fecb04508d3523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurN88S8OLB1P1MssdS_IJCLwpeJGw2E5uSZOPuRum_d0uqB08zAw_Dy4vQJcFzwhJ-t1jPRTbHmBGSHKEpJULEjCTiGE3DKmNCs7cJOnNuG4zgMj1FE0Yw56nMpuh9adpeWeXrL4icH8pdZKrIdBA7D32kujLy32Y8PgfV-dqPtmoGY8Fp6DRE_cZ4o7QZnK915E1rPqzqN7tzdFKpxsHFYc7Q68P9y_IpXq0fn5eLVawZkT4WlRAsZZRCITPCU6UoK5XWALIQipdEK02VzipRMJkCk4JUoAvMBc5KJiiboZvxb2_N5wDO520dojWN6iCEyiklEmNMEhzo9T-6NYPtQrq94jIRCeNB3Y5KW-OchSrvbd0qu8sJzve154t1LrJ8rD3wq8PToWih_MO_PbMfH6R-eQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2214965634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar ; Gottam, Omprakash ; Naik, Naren ; Pradhan, Asima</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar ; Gottam, Omprakash ; Naik, Naren ; Pradhan, Asima</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence optical tomography (FOT) is a well-known imaging technique, where fluorescent biological markers are injected to tag targeted tissues (tumors, proteins), and the absorption coefficient of fluorophore is reconstructed to provide contrast-enhanced images. Conventional FOT is known to have lack of stability to noise and shallow imaging depth due to strong optical scattering in biological tissue. Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has been previously proposed to combine with FOT to resolve this issue. We propose a fully nonlinear one-step reconstruction in a diffuse-approximation modeled fluorescence photoacoustic tomographic (FPAT) setting, where the absorption coefficient of exogenous fluorophore is recovered directly from the photoacoustic data. Computational validations in two dimensions in single- and dual-grid reconstruction settings using full as well as partial data have been provided in support of the proposed algorithm. One-step schemes are particularly useful with respect to dual representations of field (optical and pressure) variables and optical parameters, especially in limited-data settings, which effectively help in constraining the optimization search space. We have compared the results of one- and two-step FPAT schemes and concluded that the one-step reconstructions are superior as compared with the corresponding two-step reconstructions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first comparisons of one-step and two-step reconstructions in FPAT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-4522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/AO.58.003116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31044798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><subject>Absorptivity ; Algorithms ; Biomarkers ; Comparative studies ; Fluorescence ; Image contrast ; Image enhancement ; Image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; Optimization ; Photoacoustic effect ; Proteins ; Tissues ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Applied optics (2004), 2019-04, Vol.58 (12), p.3116-3127</ispartof><rights>Copyright Optical Society of America Apr 20, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5f5537322eb98147aa23daccee9b5a4d1cac2ac8f5b397e3951fecb04508d3523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5f5537322eb98147aa23daccee9b5a4d1cac2ac8f5b397e3951fecb04508d3523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3949-6747 ; 0000-0002-8962-2580 ; 0000-0003-2726-3399 ; 0000-0002-3351-0141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3259,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottam, Omprakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Naren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Asima</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography</title><title>Applied optics (2004)</title><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><description>Fluorescence optical tomography (FOT) is a well-known imaging technique, where fluorescent biological markers are injected to tag targeted tissues (tumors, proteins), and the absorption coefficient of fluorophore is reconstructed to provide contrast-enhanced images. Conventional FOT is known to have lack of stability to noise and shallow imaging depth due to strong optical scattering in biological tissue. Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has been previously proposed to combine with FOT to resolve this issue. We propose a fully nonlinear one-step reconstruction in a diffuse-approximation modeled fluorescence photoacoustic tomographic (FPAT) setting, where the absorption coefficient of exogenous fluorophore is recovered directly from the photoacoustic data. Computational validations in two dimensions in single- and dual-grid reconstruction settings using full as well as partial data have been provided in support of the proposed algorithm. One-step schemes are particularly useful with respect to dual representations of field (optical and pressure) variables and optical parameters, especially in limited-data settings, which effectively help in constraining the optimization search space. We have compared the results of one- and two-step FPAT schemes and concluded that the one-step reconstructions are superior as compared with the corresponding two-step reconstructions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first comparisons of one-step and two-step reconstructions in FPAT.</description><subject>Absorptivity</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image enhancement</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Photoacoustic effect</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><issn>1539-4522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0E1Lw0AQBuBFFFurN88S8OLB1P1MssdS_IJCLwpeJGw2E5uSZOPuRum_d0uqB08zAw_Dy4vQJcFzwhJ-t1jPRTbHmBGSHKEpJULEjCTiGE3DKmNCs7cJOnNuG4zgMj1FE0Yw56nMpuh9adpeWeXrL4icH8pdZKrIdBA7D32kujLy32Y8PgfV-dqPtmoGY8Fp6DRE_cZ4o7QZnK915E1rPqzqN7tzdFKpxsHFYc7Q68P9y_IpXq0fn5eLVawZkT4WlRAsZZRCITPCU6UoK5XWALIQipdEK02VzipRMJkCk4JUoAvMBc5KJiiboZvxb2_N5wDO520dojWN6iCEyiklEmNMEhzo9T-6NYPtQrq94jIRCeNB3Y5KW-OchSrvbd0qu8sJzve154t1LrJ8rD3wq8PToWih_MO_PbMfH6R-eQ</recordid><startdate>20190420</startdate><enddate>20190420</enddate><creator>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar</creator><creator>Gottam, Omprakash</creator><creator>Naik, Naren</creator><creator>Pradhan, Asima</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-6747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-2580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2726-3399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-0141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190420</creationdate><title>Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography</title><author>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar ; Gottam, Omprakash ; Naik, Naren ; Pradhan, Asima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-5f5537322eb98147aa23daccee9b5a4d1cac2ac8f5b397e3951fecb04508d3523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Absorptivity</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image enhancement</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Photoacoustic effect</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gottam, Omprakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naik, Naren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pradhan, Asima</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandey, Prabodh Kumar</au><au>Gottam, Omprakash</au><au>Naik, Naren</au><au>Pradhan, Asima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography</atitle><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Opt</addtitle><date>2019-04-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3116</spage><epage>3127</epage><pages>3116-3127</pages><issn>1559-128X</issn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><eissn>1539-4522</eissn><abstract>Fluorescence optical tomography (FOT) is a well-known imaging technique, where fluorescent biological markers are injected to tag targeted tissues (tumors, proteins), and the absorption coefficient of fluorophore is reconstructed to provide contrast-enhanced images. Conventional FOT is known to have lack of stability to noise and shallow imaging depth due to strong optical scattering in biological tissue. Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) has been previously proposed to combine with FOT to resolve this issue. We propose a fully nonlinear one-step reconstruction in a diffuse-approximation modeled fluorescence photoacoustic tomographic (FPAT) setting, where the absorption coefficient of exogenous fluorophore is recovered directly from the photoacoustic data. Computational validations in two dimensions in single- and dual-grid reconstruction settings using full as well as partial data have been provided in support of the proposed algorithm. One-step schemes are particularly useful with respect to dual representations of field (optical and pressure) variables and optical parameters, especially in limited-data settings, which effectively help in constraining the optimization search space. We have compared the results of one- and two-step FPAT schemes and concluded that the one-step reconstructions are superior as compared with the corresponding two-step reconstructions. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first comparisons of one-step and two-step reconstructions in FPAT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><pmid>31044798</pmid><doi>10.1364/AO.58.003116</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3949-6747</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-2580</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2726-3399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-0141</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-128X |
ispartof | Applied optics (2004), 2019-04, Vol.58 (12), p.3116-3127 |
issn | 1559-128X 2155-3165 1539-4522 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2219000160 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; Optica Publishing Group Journals |
subjects | Absorptivity Algorithms Biomarkers Comparative studies Fluorescence Image contrast Image enhancement Image reconstruction Medical imaging Optimization Photoacoustic effect Proteins Tissues Tomography |
title | Comparative study of one-step and two-step quantitative fluorescence photoacoustic tomography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20one-step%20and%20two-step%20quantitative%20fluorescence%20photoacoustic%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Applied%20optics%20(2004)&rft.au=Pandey,%20Prabodh%20Kumar&rft.date=2019-04-20&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3116&rft.epage=3127&rft.pages=3116-3127&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/AO.58.003116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2219000160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2214965634&rft_id=info:pmid/31044798&rfr_iscdi=true |