Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl

This year's revision of the NWPA also allows on-site storage of nuclear waste outside power plants until Yucca Mountain or an interim dump site is ready. That interim dump may be on a Utah reservation (Skull Valley Goshute land.) The on-site storage authorization is handy for utilities who don&...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth first! (1991) 2000-03, Vol.20 (3), p.21
Hauptverfasser: LaDuke, Winona, Brown, Faye
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 21
container_title Earth first! (1991)
container_volume 20
creator LaDuke, Winona
Brown, Faye
description This year's revision of the NWPA also allows on-site storage of nuclear waste outside power plants until Yucca Mountain or an interim dump site is ready. That interim dump may be on a Utah reservation (Skull Valley Goshute land.) The on-site storage authorization is handy for utilities who don't want to have to fight citizen groups over turning their nuclear reactors into defacto nuclear waste lots. The bill also provides for the federal government (meaning taxpayers) to take ownership of the waste and liability for it. What this means is that the utilities, as might be expected, will be abdicating responsibility for waste they created over the past 30 years. Summarizing the legislation, [George Crocker] states that, "It's the latest in a long line of stop-gap measures by the industry to continue operations and accommodate the production of more nuclear waste - despite the fact that the industry doesn't know how to deal with the waste it has." The Shoshone are asking people to support Native land rights issues raised by the EIS. What is glossed over by decision makers and ignored in the EIS is the fact that Newe Sogobia, land guaranteed the Western Shoshone Nation by treaty, includes Yucca Mountain. Even study of the site is a violation of the treaty. The Shoshone want the DOE off their land and their mountain restored. Upholding the treaty can be an important tool for organizers to stop the dump, but the Shoshone face extreme geographic and political isolation and, without sufficient public support, fear their voice will not be heard. That isolation is reflected in a statement by representative Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who said "God made Yucca Mountain for the express purpose of storing high level nuclear waste. There's nothing within 100 miles of the place." Add racism to low level logic and you get a high level waste dump.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_221826538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>507319861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2218265383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDA11bUwMTTkYOAqLs4yMDA0MzC14GSQD87IL87Iz0tVcMtMzyhR8M1PysxJVXDOSC3Ky0-qzOFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azqbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfFGRoYWRmamxhbGxKsEAPCLL54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>221826538</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>LaDuke, Winona ; Brown, Faye</creator><creatorcontrib>LaDuke, Winona ; Brown, Faye</creatorcontrib><description>This year's revision of the NWPA also allows on-site storage of nuclear waste outside power plants until Yucca Mountain or an interim dump site is ready. That interim dump may be on a Utah reservation (Skull Valley Goshute land.) The on-site storage authorization is handy for utilities who don't want to have to fight citizen groups over turning their nuclear reactors into defacto nuclear waste lots. The bill also provides for the federal government (meaning taxpayers) to take ownership of the waste and liability for it. What this means is that the utilities, as might be expected, will be abdicating responsibility for waste they created over the past 30 years. Summarizing the legislation, [George Crocker] states that, "It's the latest in a long line of stop-gap measures by the industry to continue operations and accommodate the production of more nuclear waste - despite the fact that the industry doesn't know how to deal with the waste it has." The Shoshone are asking people to support Native land rights issues raised by the EIS. What is glossed over by decision makers and ignored in the EIS is the fact that Newe Sogobia, land guaranteed the Western Shoshone Nation by treaty, includes Yucca Mountain. Even study of the site is a violation of the treaty. The Shoshone want the DOE off their land and their mountain restored. Upholding the treaty can be an important tool for organizers to stop the dump, but the Shoshone face extreme geographic and political isolation and, without sufficient public support, fear their voice will not be heard. That isolation is reflected in a statement by representative Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who said "God made Yucca Mountain for the express purpose of storing high level nuclear waste. There's nothing within 100 miles of the place." Add racism to low level logic and you get a high level waste dump.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-8411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tucson: Daily Planet Publishing</publisher><subject>Environment ; Environmental impact ; Land rights ; Landfills ; Legislation ; Nuclear reactors ; Power plants ; Radioactive wastes</subject><ispartof>Earth first! (1991), 2000-03, Vol.20 (3), p.21</ispartof><rights>Copyright Daily Planet Publishing Mar 31, 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaDuke, Winona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Faye</creatorcontrib><title>Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl</title><title>Earth first! (1991)</title><description>This year's revision of the NWPA also allows on-site storage of nuclear waste outside power plants until Yucca Mountain or an interim dump site is ready. That interim dump may be on a Utah reservation (Skull Valley Goshute land.) The on-site storage authorization is handy for utilities who don't want to have to fight citizen groups over turning their nuclear reactors into defacto nuclear waste lots. The bill also provides for the federal government (meaning taxpayers) to take ownership of the waste and liability for it. What this means is that the utilities, as might be expected, will be abdicating responsibility for waste they created over the past 30 years. Summarizing the legislation, [George Crocker] states that, "It's the latest in a long line of stop-gap measures by the industry to continue operations and accommodate the production of more nuclear waste - despite the fact that the industry doesn't know how to deal with the waste it has." The Shoshone are asking people to support Native land rights issues raised by the EIS. What is glossed over by decision makers and ignored in the EIS is the fact that Newe Sogobia, land guaranteed the Western Shoshone Nation by treaty, includes Yucca Mountain. Even study of the site is a violation of the treaty. The Shoshone want the DOE off their land and their mountain restored. Upholding the treaty can be an important tool for organizers to stop the dump, but the Shoshone face extreme geographic and political isolation and, without sufficient public support, fear their voice will not be heard. That isolation is reflected in a statement by representative Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who said "God made Yucca Mountain for the express purpose of storing high level nuclear waste. There's nothing within 100 miles of the place." Add racism to low level logic and you get a high level waste dump.</description><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Land rights</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Radioactive wastes</subject><issn>1055-8411</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDA11bUwMTTkYOAqLs4yMDA0MzC14GSQD87IL87Iz0tVcMtMzyhR8M1PysxJVXDOSC3Ky0-qzOFhYE1LzClO5YXS3Azqbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxuZnFyak5OYl5qfmlxfFGRoYWRmamxhbGxKsEAPCLL54</recordid><startdate>20000331</startdate><enddate>20000331</enddate><creator>LaDuke, Winona</creator><creator>Brown, Faye</creator><general>Daily Planet Publishing</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>884</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0I</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000331</creationdate><title>Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl</title><author>LaDuke, Winona ; Brown, Faye</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_2218265383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Land rights</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Radioactive wastes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaDuke, Winona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Faye</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Alt-PressWatch</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>Earth first! (1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaDuke, Winona</au><au>Brown, Faye</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl</atitle><jtitle>Earth first! (1991)</jtitle><date>2000-03-31</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>21</spage><pages>21-</pages><issn>1055-8411</issn><abstract>This year's revision of the NWPA also allows on-site storage of nuclear waste outside power plants until Yucca Mountain or an interim dump site is ready. That interim dump may be on a Utah reservation (Skull Valley Goshute land.) The on-site storage authorization is handy for utilities who don't want to have to fight citizen groups over turning their nuclear reactors into defacto nuclear waste lots. The bill also provides for the federal government (meaning taxpayers) to take ownership of the waste and liability for it. What this means is that the utilities, as might be expected, will be abdicating responsibility for waste they created over the past 30 years. Summarizing the legislation, [George Crocker] states that, "It's the latest in a long line of stop-gap measures by the industry to continue operations and accommodate the production of more nuclear waste - despite the fact that the industry doesn't know how to deal with the waste it has." The Shoshone are asking people to support Native land rights issues raised by the EIS. What is glossed over by decision makers and ignored in the EIS is the fact that Newe Sogobia, land guaranteed the Western Shoshone Nation by treaty, includes Yucca Mountain. Even study of the site is a violation of the treaty. The Shoshone want the DOE off their land and their mountain restored. Upholding the treaty can be an important tool for organizers to stop the dump, but the Shoshone face extreme geographic and political isolation and, without sufficient public support, fear their voice will not be heard. That isolation is reflected in a statement by representative Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who said "God made Yucca Mountain for the express purpose of storing high level nuclear waste. There's nothing within 100 miles of the place." Add racism to low level logic and you get a high level waste dump.</abstract><cop>Tucson</cop><pub>Daily Planet Publishing</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-8411
ispartof Earth first! (1991), 2000-03, Vol.20 (3), p.21
issn 1055-8411
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_221826538
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Environment
Environmental impact
Land rights
Landfills
Legislation
Nuclear reactors
Power plants
Radioactive wastes
title Shoshone Fight Mobile Chernobyl
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shoshone%20Fight%20Mobile%20Chernobyl&rft.jtitle=Earth%20first!%20(1991)&rft.au=LaDuke,%20Winona&rft.date=2000-03-31&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=21&rft.pages=21-&rft.issn=1055-8411&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E507319861%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221826538&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true