I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity

What characteristics of an individual signal trustworthiness to other people? I propose that individuals who care about contentious social issues signal to observers that they have integrity and thus can be trusted. Critically, this signal conveys trustworthiness whether or not the target and the ob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 2019-06, Vol.30 (6), p.880-892
1. Verfasser: Zlatev, Julian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 892
container_issue 6
container_start_page 880
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 30
creator Zlatev, Julian J.
description What characteristics of an individual signal trustworthiness to other people? I propose that individuals who care about contentious social issues signal to observers that they have integrity and thus can be trusted. Critically, this signal conveys trustworthiness whether or not the target and the observer hold the same view on the issue. Five studies (N = 3,817) demonstrated the predicted effect of caring on integrity-based trust (Studies 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4)—even in cases of strong disagreement—across a variety of issues (Study 1) and when behavioral outcomes with real stakes were used (Studies 3a and 3b). This effect largely results from a perception of low-caring targets as particularly untrustworthy (Study 2). Additionally, participants trusted targets with staunchly opposing views about an issue even though they simultaneously disliked them (Study 4). These findings have important implications for how people form impressions of others and speak to potential interventions to help mitigate the growing ideological divide.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0956797619837948
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217482358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26957267</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0956797619837948</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26957267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2e9fc6daf67daec596979268c0c649670811ca8e91c5d197a92922d223872f513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvXpSAFwVXk8luJjmW4keh6qUinpY0m60tbbcmu4f-9-6ytUIPzmVg5vfeDI-Qc87uOEe8ZzqRqFFyrQTqWB2QLo8lRhoUOyTdZh01-w45CWHO6kIhj0lHcCZiIaBLbob0xWzoa1HS_tQ7Rz9m5Rf9LKpbOqlKOqRjX4WyGZySo9wsgjvb9h55f3wYD56j0dvTcNAfRVYoLCNwOrcyM7nEzDibaKlRg1SWWRlriUxxbo1ymtsk4xqNBg2QAdRqyBMueuS69V374rtyoUyXs2DdYmFWrqhCCsAxViASVaNXe-i8qPyq_q6mBCqGoBuKtZT1RQje5enaz5bGb1LO0ibGdD_GWnK5Na4mS5ftBL-51UDUAsFM3d_VfwwvWn4eysLv_EDqBEGi-AFimH6H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2237807298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Zlatev, Julian J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zlatev, Julian J.</creatorcontrib><description>What characteristics of an individual signal trustworthiness to other people? I propose that individuals who care about contentious social issues signal to observers that they have integrity and thus can be trusted. Critically, this signal conveys trustworthiness whether or not the target and the observer hold the same view on the issue. Five studies (N = 3,817) demonstrated the predicted effect of caring on integrity-based trust (Studies 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4)—even in cases of strong disagreement—across a variety of issues (Study 1) and when behavioral outcomes with real stakes were used (Studies 3a and 3b). This effect largely results from a perception of low-caring targets as particularly untrustworthy (Study 2). Additionally, participants trusted targets with staunchly opposing views about an issue even though they simultaneously disliked them (Study 4). These findings have important implications for how people form impressions of others and speak to potential interventions to help mitigate the growing ideological divide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0956797619837948</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31034332</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Caregiving ; Credibility ; Impressions ; Morality ; Research Article ; Social issues ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2019-06, Vol.30 (6), p.880-892</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2e9fc6daf67daec596979268c0c649670811ca8e91c5d197a92922d223872f513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2e9fc6daf67daec596979268c0c649670811ca8e91c5d197a92922d223872f513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9427-9887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797619837948$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797619837948$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31034332$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zlatev, Julian J.</creatorcontrib><title>I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>What characteristics of an individual signal trustworthiness to other people? I propose that individuals who care about contentious social issues signal to observers that they have integrity and thus can be trusted. Critically, this signal conveys trustworthiness whether or not the target and the observer hold the same view on the issue. Five studies (N = 3,817) demonstrated the predicted effect of caring on integrity-based trust (Studies 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4)—even in cases of strong disagreement—across a variety of issues (Study 1) and when behavioral outcomes with real stakes were used (Studies 3a and 3b). This effect largely results from a perception of low-caring targets as particularly untrustworthy (Study 2). Additionally, participants trusted targets with staunchly opposing views about an issue even though they simultaneously disliked them (Study 4). These findings have important implications for how people form impressions of others and speak to potential interventions to help mitigate the growing ideological divide.</description><subject>Caregiving</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Impressions</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Social issues</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMotlbvXpSAFwVXk8luJjmW4keh6qUinpY0m60tbbcmu4f-9-6ytUIPzmVg5vfeDI-Qc87uOEe8ZzqRqFFyrQTqWB2QLo8lRhoUOyTdZh01-w45CWHO6kIhj0lHcCZiIaBLbob0xWzoa1HS_tQ7Rz9m5Rf9LKpbOqlKOqRjX4WyGZySo9wsgjvb9h55f3wYD56j0dvTcNAfRVYoLCNwOrcyM7nEzDibaKlRg1SWWRlriUxxbo1ymtsk4xqNBg2QAdRqyBMueuS69V374rtyoUyXs2DdYmFWrqhCCsAxViASVaNXe-i8qPyq_q6mBCqGoBuKtZT1RQje5enaz5bGb1LO0ibGdD_GWnK5Na4mS5ftBL-51UDUAsFM3d_VfwwvWn4eysLv_EDqBEGi-AFimH6H</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Zlatev, Julian J.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9427-9887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You</title><author>Zlatev, Julian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-2e9fc6daf67daec596979268c0c649670811ca8e91c5d197a92922d223872f513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Caregiving</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Impressions</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Social issues</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zlatev, Julian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zlatev, Julian J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>880</spage><epage>892</epage><pages>880-892</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>What characteristics of an individual signal trustworthiness to other people? I propose that individuals who care about contentious social issues signal to observers that they have integrity and thus can be trusted. Critically, this signal conveys trustworthiness whether or not the target and the observer hold the same view on the issue. Five studies (N = 3,817) demonstrated the predicted effect of caring on integrity-based trust (Studies 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4)—even in cases of strong disagreement—across a variety of issues (Study 1) and when behavioral outcomes with real stakes were used (Studies 3a and 3b). This effect largely results from a perception of low-caring targets as particularly untrustworthy (Study 2). Additionally, participants trusted targets with staunchly opposing views about an issue even though they simultaneously disliked them (Study 4). These findings have important implications for how people form impressions of others and speak to potential interventions to help mitigate the growing ideological divide.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><pmid>31034332</pmid><doi>10.1177/0956797619837948</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9427-9887</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 2019-06, Vol.30 (6), p.880-892
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217482358
source SAGE Complete
subjects Caregiving
Credibility
Impressions
Morality
Research Article
Social issues
Studies
title I May Not Agree With You, but I Trust You: Caring About Social Issues Signals Integrity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A14%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I%20May%20Not%20Agree%20With%20You,%20but%20I%20Trust%20You:%20Caring%20About%20Social%20Issues%20Signals%20Integrity&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Zlatev,%20Julian%20J.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=880&rft.epage=892&rft.pages=880-892&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0956797619837948&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26957267%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2237807298&rft_id=info:pmid/31034332&rft_jstor_id=26957267&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0956797619837948&rfr_iscdi=true