The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory

Introduction: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) bioc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rural and remote health 2019-04, Vol.19 (2), p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Blattner, Katharina, Beazley, Catherine J, Nixon, Garry, Herd, Geoffrey, Wigglesworth, John, Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title Rural and remote health
container_volume 19
creator Blattner, Katharina
Beazley, Catherine J
Nixon, Garry
Herd, Geoffrey
Wigglesworth, John
Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace
description Introduction: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010 but there is no onsite laboratory. This study looked at the impact of introducing a POC haematology benchtop analyser at Hokianga Hospital. Methods: This was a mixed methods study conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. Quantitative and qualitative components and a cost-benefit analysis were combined using an integrative process. Part I: Doctors working at Hokianga Hospital completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. Part II: Focus group interviews were conducted with Hokianga Hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part III: An analysis of cost versus tangible benefits was conducted. Results: Part I: A total of 97 POC haematology tests were included in the study. Of these, 97% were undertaken in the setting of the acute clinical presentation and 72% were performed out of hours. The average number of differential diagnoses reduced from 2.43 pre-test to 1.7 post-test, ('X' tests 'p' < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients transferred and an increase in the number of patients discharged home ('X'2 tests 'p' < 0.05). Part II: Three main themes were identified: impact on patient management, challenges and the commitment to 'make it work'. POC haematology had a positive impact on patient management and clinician confidence mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. The main challenges related to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance program in a remote-from-laboratory setting. Part III: Tangible cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost saving to the health system as a whole. Conclusions: This is the first published study evaluating the impact of haematology POC testing on acute clinical care in a rural hospital with no onsite laboratory. Timely access to a full blood count POC improves clinical care and addresses inequity. There was an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The study highlighted the hidden costs of implementing POC systems and their associated quality assurance programs in a
doi_str_mv 10.22605/RRH4934
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217480022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.143865189711014</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2217480022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7c7b98659defbef45a7094c0835287b026cd21772e46814d21d622d469f6bb3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhiNERUtB4gmQJTZsQn2LnSxRVShSRaVq2LCxHNtpPHJygu2omh2Pjmc6UNSVz-U7v-3_VNU7gj9RKnBzcXd3zTvGX1RnhPOmFqzhL_-LT6vXKW0xphK39FV1yghmjZT4rPq9GR3y06JNRjCgvM_mHMGuJnuY9zWNFii1Goba6OjQqN2kMwS43yE967BLLpahwn13D-in00HPFsU16oBGSIvPJXjweUQzIJiTzw4F3UMsInH3pjoZdEju7fE8r358udpcXtc3t1-_XX6-qQ2nNNfSyL5rRdNZN_Ru4I2WuOMGt6yhrewxFcZSIiV1XLSEl9gKSi0X3SD6nll2Xn181F0i_FpdymryybhQHutgTYqWad4Wi2hBPzxDt7DG8tNCCdmIpi2ePgmaCClFN6gl-knHnSJYHbaijlsp6Puj4NpPzv4D_66hAJtHIE4-KwMhuIP9aatzUsnpaEbl5wEOfYj3yoLf38MYEU8NwlmxiLSdJASX5A8APKSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2675658635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Blattner, Katharina ; Beazley, Catherine J ; Nixon, Garry ; Herd, Geoffrey ; Wigglesworth, John ; Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina ; Beazley, Catherine J ; Nixon, Garry ; Herd, Geoffrey ; Wigglesworth, John ; Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010 but there is no onsite laboratory. This study looked at the impact of introducing a POC haematology benchtop analyser at Hokianga Hospital. Methods: This was a mixed methods study conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. Quantitative and qualitative components and a cost-benefit analysis were combined using an integrative process. Part I: Doctors working at Hokianga Hospital completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. Part II: Focus group interviews were conducted with Hokianga Hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part III: An analysis of cost versus tangible benefits was conducted. Results: Part I: A total of 97 POC haematology tests were included in the study. Of these, 97% were undertaken in the setting of the acute clinical presentation and 72% were performed out of hours. The average number of differential diagnoses reduced from 2.43 pre-test to 1.7 post-test, ('X' tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients transferred and an increase in the number of patients discharged home ('X'2 tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). Part II: Three main themes were identified: impact on patient management, challenges and the commitment to 'make it work'. POC haematology had a positive impact on patient management and clinician confidence mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. The main challenges related to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance program in a remote-from-laboratory setting. Part III: Tangible cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost saving to the health system as a whole. Conclusions: This is the first published study evaluating the impact of haematology POC testing on acute clinical care in a rural hospital with no onsite laboratory. Timely access to a full blood count POC improves clinical care and addresses inequity. There was an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The study highlighted the hidden costs of implementing POC systems and their associated quality assurance programs in a remote-from-laboratory context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-6354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-6354</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22605/RRH4934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31035770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Townsville QLD: James Cook University</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biochemistry ; Blood ; Blood Chemical Analysis - economics ; Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation ; Blood tests ; Cost control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diagnosis, Laboratory ; Emergency Medical Services ; Equipment and supplies ; Ethics ; Evaluation ; Financial analysis ; Focus Groups ; Health and hygiene ; Health care ; Health services ; Hematologic Tests - economics ; Hematologic Tests - instrumentation ; Hematology ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Rural - economics ; Humans ; Interviews ; Māori (New Zealand people) ; Medical laboratories ; Medical personnel ; New Zealand ; Nursing ; Outpatient services ; Patients ; Physicians ; Point of care testing ; Point-of-Care Systems - economics ; Quality assurance ; Quality of Health Care ; Rural areas ; Rural health care ; Rural hospitals ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Rural and remote health, 2019-04, Vol.19 (2), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7c7b98659defbef45a7094c0835287b026cd21772e46814d21d622d469f6bb3d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31035770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beazley, Catherine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herd, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigglesworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory</title><title>Rural and remote health</title><addtitle>Rural Remote Health</addtitle><description>Introduction: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010 but there is no onsite laboratory. This study looked at the impact of introducing a POC haematology benchtop analyser at Hokianga Hospital. Methods: This was a mixed methods study conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. Quantitative and qualitative components and a cost-benefit analysis were combined using an integrative process. Part I: Doctors working at Hokianga Hospital completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. Part II: Focus group interviews were conducted with Hokianga Hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part III: An analysis of cost versus tangible benefits was conducted. Results: Part I: A total of 97 POC haematology tests were included in the study. Of these, 97% were undertaken in the setting of the acute clinical presentation and 72% were performed out of hours. The average number of differential diagnoses reduced from 2.43 pre-test to 1.7 post-test, ('X' tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients transferred and an increase in the number of patients discharged home ('X'2 tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). Part II: Three main themes were identified: impact on patient management, challenges and the commitment to 'make it work'. POC haematology had a positive impact on patient management and clinician confidence mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. The main challenges related to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance program in a remote-from-laboratory setting. Part III: Tangible cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost saving to the health system as a whole. Conclusions: This is the first published study evaluating the impact of haematology POC testing on acute clinical care in a rural hospital with no onsite laboratory. Timely access to a full blood count POC improves clinical care and addresses inequity. There was an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The study highlighted the hidden costs of implementing POC systems and their associated quality assurance programs in a remote-from-laboratory context.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Laboratory</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health and hygiene</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - economics</subject><subject>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Rural - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Māori (New Zealand people)</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Outpatient services</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Point of care testing</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - economics</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Rural hospitals</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1445-6354</issn><issn>1445-6354</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhiNERUtB4gmQJTZsQn2LnSxRVShSRaVq2LCxHNtpPHJygu2omh2Pjmc6UNSVz-U7v-3_VNU7gj9RKnBzcXd3zTvGX1RnhPOmFqzhL_-LT6vXKW0xphK39FV1yghmjZT4rPq9GR3y06JNRjCgvM_mHMGuJnuY9zWNFii1Goba6OjQqN2kMwS43yE967BLLpahwn13D-in00HPFsU16oBGSIvPJXjweUQzIJiTzw4F3UMsInH3pjoZdEju7fE8r358udpcXtc3t1-_XX6-qQ2nNNfSyL5rRdNZN_Ru4I2WuOMGt6yhrewxFcZSIiV1XLSEl9gKSi0X3SD6nll2Xn181F0i_FpdymryybhQHutgTYqWad4Wi2hBPzxDt7DG8tNCCdmIpi2ePgmaCClFN6gl-knHnSJYHbaijlsp6Puj4NpPzv4D_66hAJtHIE4-KwMhuIP9aatzUsnpaEbl5wEOfYj3yoLf38MYEU8NwlmxiLSdJASX5A8APKSg</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Blattner, Katharina</creator><creator>Beazley, Catherine J</creator><creator>Nixon, Garry</creator><creator>Herd, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Wigglesworth, John</creator><creator>Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</creator><general>James Cook University</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory</title><author>Blattner, Katharina ; Beazley, Catherine J ; Nixon, Garry ; Herd, Geoffrey ; Wigglesworth, John ; Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7c7b98659defbef45a7094c0835287b026cd21772e46814d21d622d469f6bb3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Laboratory</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health and hygiene</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - economics</topic><topic>Hematologic Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Rural - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Māori (New Zealand people)</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Outpatient services</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Point of care testing</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - economics</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Rural hospitals</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beazley, Catherine J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herd, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wigglesworth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rural and remote health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blattner, Katharina</au><au>Beazley, Catherine J</au><au>Nixon, Garry</au><au>Herd, Geoffrey</au><au>Wigglesworth, John</au><au>Rogers-Koroheke, Marara Grace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Rural and remote health</jtitle><addtitle>Rural Remote Health</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1445-6354</issn><eissn>1445-6354</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Hokianga Hospital is a small rural hospital in the far north of New Zealand serving a predominantly Maori population of 6500. The hospital, an integral part of a comprehensive primary healthcare service, provides continuous acute in-hospital and emergency care. Point-of-care (POC) biochemistry has been available at the hospital since 2010 but there is no onsite laboratory. This study looked at the impact of introducing a POC haematology benchtop analyser at Hokianga Hospital. Methods: This was a mixed methods study conducted at Hokianga Hospital over 4 months in 2016. Quantitative and qualitative components and a cost-benefit analysis were combined using an integrative process. Part I: Doctors working at Hokianga Hospital completed a form before and after POC haematology testing, recording test indication, differential diagnosis, planned patient disposition and impact on patient treatment. Part II: Focus group interviews were conducted with Hokianga Hospital doctors, nurses and a cultural advisor. Part III: An analysis of cost versus tangible benefits was conducted. Results: Part I: A total of 97 POC haematology tests were included in the study. Of these, 97% were undertaken in the setting of the acute clinical presentation and 72% were performed out of hours. The average number of differential diagnoses reduced from 2.43 pre-test to 1.7 post-test, ('X' tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the number of patients transferred and an increase in the number of patients discharged home ('X'2 tests 'p' &lt; 0.05). Part II: Three main themes were identified: impact on patient management, challenges and the commitment to 'make it work'. POC haematology had a positive impact on patient management and clinician confidence mainly by increasing diagnostic certainty. The main challenges related to the hidden costs of implementing the analyser and its associated quality assurance program in a remote-from-laboratory setting. Part III: Tangible cost-benefit analysis showed a clear cost saving to the health system as a whole. Conclusions: This is the first published study evaluating the impact of haematology POC testing on acute clinical care in a rural hospital with no onsite laboratory. Timely access to a full blood count POC improves clinical care and addresses inequity. There was an overall reduction in healthcare costs. The study highlighted the hidden costs of implementing POC systems and their associated quality assurance programs in a remote-from-laboratory context.</abstract><cop>Townsville QLD</cop><pub>James Cook University</pub><pmid>31035770</pmid><doi>10.22605/RRH4934</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-6354
ispartof Rural and remote health, 2019-04, Vol.19 (2), p.1-8
issn 1445-6354
1445-6354
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217480022
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Analysis
Biochemistry
Blood
Blood Chemical Analysis - economics
Blood Chemical Analysis - instrumentation
Blood tests
Cost control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diagnosis, Laboratory
Emergency Medical Services
Equipment and supplies
Ethics
Evaluation
Financial analysis
Focus Groups
Health and hygiene
Health care
Health services
Hematologic Tests - economics
Hematologic Tests - instrumentation
Hematology
Hospitals
Hospitals, Rural - economics
Humans
Interviews
Māori (New Zealand people)
Medical laboratories
Medical personnel
New Zealand
Nursing
Outpatient services
Patients
Physicians
Point of care testing
Point-of-Care Systems - economics
Quality assurance
Quality of Health Care
Rural areas
Rural health care
Rural hospitals
Surveys and Questionnaires
title The impact of the introduction of a point-of-care haematology analyser in a New Zealand rural hospital with no onsite laboratory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A32%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20introduction%20of%20a%20point-of-care%20haematology%20analyser%20in%20a%20New%20Zealand%20rural%20hospital%20with%20no%20onsite%20laboratory&rft.jtitle=Rural%20and%20remote%20health&rft.au=Blattner,%20Katharina&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1445-6354&rft.eissn=1445-6354&rft_id=info:doi/10.22605/RRH4934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2217480022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2675658635&rft_id=info:pmid/31035770&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.143865189711014&rfr_iscdi=true