Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes
Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive. We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 k...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1656-1661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1661 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1656 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Jeon, Sang-Woo Kim, Kang-Il Song, Sang Jun |
description | Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.
We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.
There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.
Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217479829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540319303390</els_id><sourcerecordid>2217479829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e55db6db57ad5eb84918ebae3ee20ec6fed745e8bd2b5990a61675809d1d834f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtv2zAURomiReMm_QMdCo5dpF6KpEQBWQz3FdRIgMCZCT6uUxqS6JB0gPz7yHCSsROX8x1cHkK-MKgZsPb7rjap_KsbYH0Nogbo3pEFk7yplID2PVmAUrySAvgZ-ZTzDoAxKcVHcsYZ8FZIWBB7G20s1TLnkAt6uonFDPTvhEiXszzF_WByeaI_ImZ6HQu9GvcpPiJdx-m-2mAa6WoIU3Dzykye3hof4hDvg6M3h-LiiPmCfNiaIePnl_ec3P36uVn9qdY3v69Wy3XluGxLhVJ623orO-MlWiV6ptAa5IgNoGu36DshUVnfWNn3YFrWdlJB75lXXGz5Ofl28s4HPhwwFz2G7HAYzITxkHXTsE50vWr6GW1OqEsx54RbvU9hNOlJM9DHtnqnj231sa0Goee28-jri_9gR_Rvk9eYM3B5AnD-5WPApLMLODn0IaEr2sfwP_8zm8iLmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2217479829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Jeon, Sang-Woo ; Kim, Kang-Il ; Song, Sang Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Sang-Woo ; Kim, Kang-Il ; Song, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><description>Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.
We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.
There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.
Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31036450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; conventional ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Knee Joint - surgery ; long term ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; outcomes ; Patient Satisfaction ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; robot assisted ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Survivors ; Tibia - surgery ; total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1656-1661</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e55db6db57ad5eb84918ebae3ee20ec6fed745e8bd2b5990a61675809d1d834f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e55db6db57ad5eb84918ebae3ee20ec6fed745e8bd2b5990a61675809d1d834f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4010-1063 ; 0000-0003-4440-9791 ; 0000-0002-1414-8175</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Sang-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.
We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.
There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.
Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>conventional</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>long term</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robot assisted</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtv2zAURomiReMm_QMdCo5dpF6KpEQBWQz3FdRIgMCZCT6uUxqS6JB0gPz7yHCSsROX8x1cHkK-MKgZsPb7rjap_KsbYH0Nogbo3pEFk7yplID2PVmAUrySAvgZ-ZTzDoAxKcVHcsYZ8FZIWBB7G20s1TLnkAt6uonFDPTvhEiXszzF_WByeaI_ImZ6HQu9GvcpPiJdx-m-2mAa6WoIU3Dzykye3hof4hDvg6M3h-LiiPmCfNiaIePnl_ec3P36uVn9qdY3v69Wy3XluGxLhVJ623orO-MlWiV6ptAa5IgNoGu36DshUVnfWNn3YFrWdlJB75lXXGz5Ofl28s4HPhwwFz2G7HAYzITxkHXTsE50vWr6GW1OqEsx54RbvU9hNOlJM9DHtnqnj231sa0Goee28-jri_9gR_Rvk9eYM3B5AnD-5WPApLMLODn0IaEr2sfwP_8zm8iLmw</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Jeon, Sang-Woo</creator><creator>Kim, Kang-Il</creator><creator>Song, Sang Jun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-1063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-9791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-8175</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes</title><author>Jeon, Sang-Woo ; Kim, Kang-Il ; Song, Sang Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e55db6db57ad5eb84918ebae3ee20ec6fed745e8bd2b5990a61675809d1d834f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>conventional</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>long term</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robot assisted</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Sang-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kang-Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Sang Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeon, Sang-Woo</au><au>Kim, Kang-Il</au><au>Song, Sang Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1656</spage><epage>1661</epage><pages>1656-1661</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of radiographic alignment leading to improved patient satisfaction and implant survivorship in the long term has thus far been inconclusive.
We retrospectively compared the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of 84 knees that had undergone robot-assisted TKA using ROBODOC vs 79 knees that had undergone conventional TKA. The mean duration of the follow-up period was 129.1 months (range: 108-147 months). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Knee Society Score and 36-item Short Form Survey, as well as by assessing the range of motion, operation time, and complications. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by assessing the hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal and sagittal alignments of the femoral and tibial components, and any radiologic abnormalities such as loosening or osteolysis.
There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups. The prevalence of an outlier for the hip-knee-ankle angle in the robot-assisted group was 10.7%, whereas it was 16.5% in the conventional group (P = .172). The other component alignments (α°, β°, γ°, δ°) revealed a tendency toward a lower rate of outliers in the robot-assisted group, but without statistical significance (P > .05). In addition, there was no significant difference in complications, including revision surgery, between both groups.
Robot-assisted TKA does not improve long-term clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with conventional TKA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31036450</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-1063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-9791</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-8175</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1656-1661 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2217479829 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods conventional Female Femur - surgery Humans Knee Joint - surgery long term Male Middle Aged Operative Time Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery outcomes Patient Satisfaction Range of Motion, Articular Reoperation Retrospective Studies robot assisted Robotic Surgical Procedures Severity of Illness Index Surgery, Computer-Assisted Surveys and Questionnaires Survivors Tibia - surgery total knee arthroplasty |
title | Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T14%3A57%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot-Assisted%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasty%20Does%20Not%20Improve%20Long-Term%20Clinical%20and%20Radiologic%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Jeon,%20Sang-Woo&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1656&rft.epage=1661&rft.pages=1656-1661&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2217479829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2217479829&rft_id=info:pmid/31036450&rft_els_id=S0883540319303390&rfr_iscdi=true |