Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness
Background The reliability and validity of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) are unknown in a population of outpatients with severe mental illness. The prevalence of mild or borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID); an umbrella term for people with borderline intellec...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities 2019-09, Vol.32 (5), p.1096-1102 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1102 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1096 |
| container_title | Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L. Smits, Hedwig J. H. Penterman, Berry J. M. Noorthoorn, Eric O. Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G. Nijman, Henk L. I. |
| description | Background
The reliability and validity of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) are unknown in a population of outpatients with severe mental illness. The prevalence of mild or borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID); an umbrella term for people with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) in this population is also unknown.
Methods
A total of 625 patients were screened with the SCIL, 201 of which also had IQ test results.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha of the SCIL was 0.73. The AUC value for detecting MBID was 0.81, and also 0.81 for detecting MID, with percentages of correctly classified subjects (when using the advised cut‐off scores) being 73% and 79%, respectively. The SCIL results suggested that 40% of the patients were suspected of MBID and 20% of MID.
Conclusion
The SCIL seems to be an appropriate screening tool for MBID. It is important to screen for MBID because a substantial proportion of outpatients with severe mental illness appear to be functioning at this level. It is necessary to adapt treatment for these patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jar.12599 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216775598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1223925</ericid><sourcerecordid>2267584773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3759-4e10480113c7b8a073189fdb420cdb1e5376421e191b8343617cb167a000cac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtP3TAQhS0E4tkFP6CVpW7oIuCxk9hZIkpbEFKlPtaR48wFX_k6Fzsp4t93IBcWSFiy_Difzox9GDsGcQo0zpY2nYKsmmaL7UNZm0JBabZpr2pRSCXlHjvIeSmEMFDpXbanQCiacp_l3y4hRh9v-WJI3McRQ0A3Tjbw3mfb-eBHj5nb2PNuSD2m4CNuQH-L0T0d-NdpdHd8mMa1JTyOmT_48Y5n_IcJ-YpuyNCHEDHnI7azsCHjh816yP5-u_xz8aO4-fn96uL8pnBKV01RIojSCADldGes0ApMs-i7UgrXd4CV0nUpAaGBzqhS1aBdB7W29E5nnVCH7GT2XafhfsI8tiufHbVtIw5TbqUkWldVYwj9_AZdDlOK1B1Rta5MqbUi6stMuTTknHDRrpNf2fTYgmifkmgpifY5CWI_bRynboX9K_ny9QR8nAFM3r3Kl9cgpWpkRfrZrD_4gI_vV2qvz3_NJf8Do3WcAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267584773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L. ; Smits, Hedwig J. H. ; Penterman, Berry J. M. ; Noorthoorn, Eric O. ; Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G. ; Nijman, Henk L. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L. ; Smits, Hedwig J. H. ; Penterman, Berry J. M. ; Noorthoorn, Eric O. ; Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G. ; Nijman, Henk L. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The reliability and validity of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) are unknown in a population of outpatients with severe mental illness. The prevalence of mild or borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID); an umbrella term for people with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) in this population is also unknown.
Methods
A total of 625 patients were screened with the SCIL, 201 of which also had IQ test results.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha of the SCIL was 0.73. The AUC value for detecting MBID was 0.81, and also 0.81 for detecting MID, with percentages of correctly classified subjects (when using the advised cut‐off scores) being 73% and 79%, respectively. The SCIL results suggested that 40% of the patients were suspected of MBID and 20% of MID.
Conclusion
The SCIL seems to be an appropriate screening tool for MBID. It is important to screen for MBID because a substantial proportion of outpatients with severe mental illness appear to be functioning at this level. It is necessary to adapt treatment for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jar.12599</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31033102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Comorbidity ; Disability Identification ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Humans ; Incidence ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability - diagnosis ; Intellectual Disability - epidemiology ; Intelligence Tests ; Learning Disabilities - diagnosis ; Learning Disabilities - epidemiology ; Male ; MBID ; Medical screening ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Disorders - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Mild Intellectual Disability ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Neuropsychological Tests - standards ; Outpatients - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; screening ; Screening Tests ; Severe Disabilities ; severe mental illness ; Severity (of Disability) ; Severity of Illness Index ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Validity ; Wechsler Scales ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 2019-09, Vol.32 (5), p.1096-1102</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3759-4e10480113c7b8a073189fdb420cdb1e5376421e191b8343617cb167a000cac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3759-4e10480113c7b8a073189fdb420cdb1e5376421e191b8343617cb167a000cac03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4922-8869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjar.12599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjar.12599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1223925$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31033102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Hedwig J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penterman, Berry J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorthoorn, Eric O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijman, Henk L. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness</title><title>Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities</title><addtitle>J Appl Res Intellect Disabil</addtitle><description>Background
The reliability and validity of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) are unknown in a population of outpatients with severe mental illness. The prevalence of mild or borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID); an umbrella term for people with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) in this population is also unknown.
Methods
A total of 625 patients were screened with the SCIL, 201 of which also had IQ test results.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha of the SCIL was 0.73. The AUC value for detecting MBID was 0.81, and also 0.81 for detecting MID, with percentages of correctly classified subjects (when using the advised cut‐off scores) being 73% and 79%, respectively. The SCIL results suggested that 40% of the patients were suspected of MBID and 20% of MID.
Conclusion
The SCIL seems to be an appropriate screening tool for MBID. It is important to screen for MBID because a substantial proportion of outpatients with severe mental illness appear to be functioning at this level. It is necessary to adapt treatment for these patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MBID</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mild Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</subject><subject>Outpatients - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Severe Disabilities</subject><subject>severe mental illness</subject><subject>Severity (of Disability)</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wechsler Scales</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1360-2322</issn><issn>1468-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtP3TAQhS0E4tkFP6CVpW7oIuCxk9hZIkpbEFKlPtaR48wFX_k6Fzsp4t93IBcWSFiy_Difzox9GDsGcQo0zpY2nYKsmmaL7UNZm0JBabZpr2pRSCXlHjvIeSmEMFDpXbanQCiacp_l3y4hRh9v-WJI3McRQ0A3Tjbw3mfb-eBHj5nb2PNuSD2m4CNuQH-L0T0d-NdpdHd8mMa1JTyOmT_48Y5n_IcJ-YpuyNCHEDHnI7azsCHjh816yP5-u_xz8aO4-fn96uL8pnBKV01RIojSCADldGes0ApMs-i7UgrXd4CV0nUpAaGBzqhS1aBdB7W29E5nnVCH7GT2XafhfsI8tiufHbVtIw5TbqUkWldVYwj9_AZdDlOK1B1Rta5MqbUi6stMuTTknHDRrpNf2fTYgmifkmgpifY5CWI_bRynboX9K_ny9QR8nAFM3r3Kl9cgpWpkRfrZrD_4gI_vV2qvz3_NJf8Do3WcAg</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L.</creator><creator>Smits, Hedwig J. H.</creator><creator>Penterman, Berry J. M.</creator><creator>Noorthoorn, Eric O.</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G.</creator><creator>Nijman, Henk L. I.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-8869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness</title><author>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L. ; Smits, Hedwig J. H. ; Penterman, Berry J. M. ; Noorthoorn, Eric O. ; Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G. ; Nijman, Henk L. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3759-4e10480113c7b8a073189fdb420cdb1e5376421e191b8343617cb167a000cac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MBID</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mild Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - standards</topic><topic>Outpatients - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Severe Disabilities</topic><topic>severe mental illness</topic><topic>Severity (of Disability)</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wechsler Scales</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smits, Hedwig J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penterman, Berry J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorthoorn, Eric O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nijman, Henk L. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seelen‐de Lang, Birgit L.</au><au>Smits, Hedwig J. H.</au><au>Penterman, Berry J. M.</au><au>Noorthoorn, Eric O.</au><au>Nieuwenhuis, Jeanet G.</au><au>Nijman, Henk L. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1223925</ericid><atitle>Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Res Intellect Disabil</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1096</spage><epage>1102</epage><pages>1096-1102</pages><issn>1360-2322</issn><eissn>1468-3148</eissn><abstract>Background
The reliability and validity of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disabilities (SCIL) are unknown in a population of outpatients with severe mental illness. The prevalence of mild or borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID); an umbrella term for people with borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mild intellectual disability (MID) in this population is also unknown.
Methods
A total of 625 patients were screened with the SCIL, 201 of which also had IQ test results.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha of the SCIL was 0.73. The AUC value for detecting MBID was 0.81, and also 0.81 for detecting MID, with percentages of correctly classified subjects (when using the advised cut‐off scores) being 73% and 79%, respectively. The SCIL results suggested that 40% of the patients were suspected of MBID and 20% of MID.
Conclusion
The SCIL seems to be an appropriate screening tool for MBID. It is important to screen for MBID because a substantial proportion of outpatients with severe mental illness appear to be functioning at this level. It is necessary to adapt treatment for these patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>31033102</pmid><doi>10.1111/jar.12599</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-8869</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1360-2322 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities, 2019-09, Vol.32 (5), p.1096-1102 |
| issn | 1360-2322 1468-3148 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216775598 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Education Source |
| subjects | Adult Aged Comorbidity Disability Identification Female Foreign Countries Humans Incidence Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability - diagnosis Intellectual Disability - epidemiology Intelligence Tests Learning Disabilities - diagnosis Learning Disabilities - epidemiology Male MBID Medical screening Mental Disorders Mental Disorders - epidemiology Middle Aged Mild Intellectual Disability Netherlands - epidemiology Neuropsychological Tests - standards Outpatients - statistics & numerical data Patients Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results screening Screening Tests Severe Disabilities severe mental illness Severity (of Disability) Severity of Illness Index Test Reliability Test Validity Validity Wechsler Scales Young Adult |
| title | Screening for intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence in Dutch outpatients with severe mental illness |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A30%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Screening%20for%20intellectual%20disabilities%20and%20borderline%20intelligence%20in%20Dutch%20outpatients%20with%20severe%20mental%20illness&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20research%20in%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.au=Seelen%E2%80%90de%20Lang,%20Birgit%20L.&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1096&rft.epage=1102&rft.pages=1096-1102&rft.issn=1360-2322&rft.eissn=1468-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jar.12599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2267584773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267584773&rft_id=info:pmid/31033102&rft_ericid=EJ1223925&rfr_iscdi=true |