Effects of Muscarinic Acetylcholine m1 and m4 Receptor Blockade on Dyskinesia in the Hemi-Parkinsonian Rat

Standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) is L-DOPA, but with chronic administration the majority of patients develop L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). Emerging evidence implicates the cholinergic system in PD and LID. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) are known to modulate moveme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience 2019-06, Vol.409, p.180-194
Hauptverfasser: Chambers, Nicole E., Meadows, Samantha M., Taylor, Anne, Sheena, Eitan, Lanza, Kathryn, Conti, Melissa M., Bishop, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) is L-DOPA, but with chronic administration the majority of patients develop L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). Emerging evidence implicates the cholinergic system in PD and LID. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) are known to modulate movement and of late have been implicated as possible targets for LID. Therefore the current study investigated the role of M1 and M4 mAChRs in LID, on motor performance following L-DOPA treatment, and sought to identify brain sites through which these receptors were acting. We first administered M1R-preferring antagonist trihexyphenidyl (0, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or the M4R-preferring antagonist tropicamide (0, 10, and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) before L-DOPA, after which LID and motor performance were evaluated. Both compounds worsened and extended the time course of LID, while M1R blockade improved motor performance. We then evaluated the effects of tropicamide and trihexyphenidyl on dyskinesia induced by D1R agonist SKF81297 or D2R agonist quinpirole. Surprisingly, both M1R and M4R antagonists reduced D1R agonist-induced dyskinesia but not D2R agonist-induced dyskinesia, suggesting that mAChR blockade differentially affects MSN firing in the absence of postsynaptic DA. Finally, we evaluated effects of striatum- or PPN-targeted tropicamide microinfusion on LID and motor performance. Despite prior evidence, M4R blockade in either site alone did not affect the severity of LID via local striatal or PPN infusions. Taken together, these data suggest M4R as a promising therapeutic target for reducing LID using more selective compounds. •Muscarinic M1R or M4R antagonists modulate LID and DA-agonist-induced dyskinesia.•L-DOPA's motor efficacy is enhanced by M1R but not M4R blockade.•Exacerbation of LID by mAChR blockade may be conferred by both pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms.
ISSN:0306-4522
1873-7544
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.04.008