Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems

Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786
Hauptverfasser: Fenelon, Christopher, Murphy, Evelyn P., Baig, Muhammad N., Kearns, Stephen R., Murphy, Colin G., Curtin, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1786
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1783
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 34
creator Fenelon, Christopher
Murphy, Evelyn P.
Baig, Muhammad N.
Kearns, Stephen R.
Murphy, Colin G.
Curtin, William
description Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation. A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern. Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%). Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216289720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540319303079</els_id><sourcerecordid>2216289720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUha2qqAToH-gCednNDL527HGqbkJoKBJSK1HWlrHvFId5pLYHKf--DoEuu7oPnXt0z0fIJ2A1MFAXm9rG_FhzBouaiZpJeEdmIAWv9Jyp92TGtBaVnDNxTE5S2jAGIOX8AzkWwHijpZqR3WVE-xSG3_TS-i90SVdjv7XR5vCM9AqTi2H70i8H2-1SSHRs6U8s2zim_Ig5OLqO1uUpYqLLOE6DpyvsccjoqS3D_eDexjX2Y7QdvcvYpzNy1Nou4cfXekru199-rb5Xtz-ub1bL28oJqXIlODjO1QLQQTMHLoTUSreSY6tbJ5sHUOgV9w3ohRQeGNMovPagnGyZkOKUfD74lo__TJiy6UNy2HV2wHFKhnNQXC8azoqUH6SuhEsRW7ONobdxZ4CZPXKzMXvkZo_cMGEK8nJ0_uo_PfTo_528MS6CrwcBlpTPAaNJLmCh4kNEl40fw__8_wLUbJJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216289720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation. A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern. Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%). Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31027856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cemented ; fracture ; pattern ; periprosthetic ; uncemented</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6246-1529 ; 0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540319303079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baig, Muhammad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation. A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern. Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%). Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</description><subject>cemented</subject><subject>fracture</subject><subject>pattern</subject><subject>periprosthetic</subject><subject>uncemented</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUha2qqAToH-gCednNDL527HGqbkJoKBJSK1HWlrHvFId5pLYHKf--DoEuu7oPnXt0z0fIJ2A1MFAXm9rG_FhzBouaiZpJeEdmIAWv9Jyp92TGtBaVnDNxTE5S2jAGIOX8AzkWwHijpZqR3WVE-xSG3_TS-i90SVdjv7XR5vCM9AqTi2H70i8H2-1SSHRs6U8s2zim_Ig5OLqO1uUpYqLLOE6DpyvsccjoqS3D_eDexjX2Y7QdvcvYpzNy1Nou4cfXekru199-rb5Xtz-ub1bL28oJqXIlODjO1QLQQTMHLoTUSreSY6tbJ5sHUOgV9w3ohRQeGNMovPagnGyZkOKUfD74lo__TJiy6UNy2HV2wHFKhnNQXC8azoqUH6SuhEsRW7ONobdxZ4CZPXKzMXvkZo_cMGEK8nJ0_uo_PfTo_528MS6CrwcBlpTPAaNJLmCh4kNEl40fw__8_wLUbJJl</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Fenelon, Christopher</creator><creator>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creator><creator>Baig, Muhammad N.</creator><creator>Kearns, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Murphy, Colin G.</creator><creator>Curtin, William</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><author>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cemented</topic><topic>fracture</topic><topic>pattern</topic><topic>periprosthetic</topic><topic>uncemented</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baig, Muhammad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fenelon, Christopher</au><au>Murphy, Evelyn P.</au><au>Baig, Muhammad N.</au><au>Kearns, Stephen R.</au><au>Murphy, Colin G.</au><au>Curtin, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1783</spage><epage>1786</epage><pages>1783-1786</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation. A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern. Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%). Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31027856</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216289720
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects cemented
fracture
pattern
periprosthetic
uncemented
title Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T03%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breaking%20Bad:%20A%20Comparative%20Descriptive%20Analysis%20of%20Periprosthetic%20Fractures%20Around%20Cemented%20and%20Uncemented%20Femoral%20Stems&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Fenelon,%20Christopher&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1783&rft.epage=1786&rft.pages=1783-1786&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216289720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216289720&rft_id=info:pmid/31027856&rft_els_id=S0883540319303079&rfr_iscdi=true