Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems
Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1786 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1783 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Fenelon, Christopher Murphy, Evelyn P. Baig, Muhammad N. Kearns, Stephen R. Murphy, Colin G. Curtin, William |
description | Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation.
A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern.
Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%).
Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216289720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540319303079</els_id><sourcerecordid>2216289720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUha2qqAToH-gCednNDL527HGqbkJoKBJSK1HWlrHvFId5pLYHKf--DoEuu7oPnXt0z0fIJ2A1MFAXm9rG_FhzBouaiZpJeEdmIAWv9Jyp92TGtBaVnDNxTE5S2jAGIOX8AzkWwHijpZqR3WVE-xSG3_TS-i90SVdjv7XR5vCM9AqTi2H70i8H2-1SSHRs6U8s2zim_Ig5OLqO1uUpYqLLOE6DpyvsccjoqS3D_eDexjX2Y7QdvcvYpzNy1Nou4cfXekru199-rb5Xtz-ub1bL28oJqXIlODjO1QLQQTMHLoTUSreSY6tbJ5sHUOgV9w3ohRQeGNMovPagnGyZkOKUfD74lo__TJiy6UNy2HV2wHFKhnNQXC8azoqUH6SuhEsRW7ONobdxZ4CZPXKzMXvkZo_cMGEK8nJ0_uo_PfTo_528MS6CrwcBlpTPAaNJLmCh4kNEl40fw__8_wLUbJJl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216289720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation.
A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern.
Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%).
Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31027856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cemented ; fracture ; pattern ; periprosthetic ; uncemented</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6246-1529 ; 0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540319303079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baig, Muhammad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation.
A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern.
Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%).
Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</description><subject>cemented</subject><subject>fracture</subject><subject>pattern</subject><subject>periprosthetic</subject><subject>uncemented</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPGzEUha2qqAToH-gCednNDL527HGqbkJoKBJSK1HWlrHvFId5pLYHKf--DoEuu7oPnXt0z0fIJ2A1MFAXm9rG_FhzBouaiZpJeEdmIAWv9Jyp92TGtBaVnDNxTE5S2jAGIOX8AzkWwHijpZqR3WVE-xSG3_TS-i90SVdjv7XR5vCM9AqTi2H70i8H2-1SSHRs6U8s2zim_Ig5OLqO1uUpYqLLOE6DpyvsccjoqS3D_eDexjX2Y7QdvcvYpzNy1Nou4cfXekru199-rb5Xtz-ub1bL28oJqXIlODjO1QLQQTMHLoTUSreSY6tbJ5sHUOgV9w3ohRQeGNMovPagnGyZkOKUfD74lo__TJiy6UNy2HV2wHFKhnNQXC8azoqUH6SuhEsRW7ONobdxZ4CZPXKzMXvkZo_cMGEK8nJ0_uo_PfTo_528MS6CrwcBlpTPAaNJLmCh4kNEl40fw__8_wLUbJJl</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Fenelon, Christopher</creator><creator>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creator><creator>Baig, Muhammad N.</creator><creator>Kearns, Stephen R.</creator><creator>Murphy, Colin G.</creator><creator>Curtin, William</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</title><author>Fenelon, Christopher ; Murphy, Evelyn P. ; Baig, Muhammad N. ; Kearns, Stephen R. ; Murphy, Colin G. ; Curtin, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-321c22691ec17412335868f52ef8fc57b16ed62d718953d1008e3d8d16c5f0353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cemented</topic><topic>fracture</topic><topic>pattern</topic><topic>periprosthetic</topic><topic>uncemented</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fenelon, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Evelyn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baig, Muhammad N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearns, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Colin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtin, William</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fenelon, Christopher</au><au>Murphy, Evelyn P.</au><au>Baig, Muhammad N.</au><au>Kearns, Stephen R.</au><au>Murphy, Colin G.</au><au>Curtin, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1783</spage><epage>1786</epage><pages>1783-1786</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic fractures are most commonly classified according to the Vancouver classification system and more recently the Unified Classification System. The aim of this study is to provide a descriptive analysis of fracture patterns in femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) by femoral stem fixation.
A retrospective observational study of all femoral PPFs over a 10-year period at our institution was conducted. Presenting radiographs were examined to assess the fracture pattern.
Over the 10-year period, 138 femoral PPFs that underwent operative treatment were examined. Mean age of patients was 78 years with 45.7% male and median American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade 3. The femoral stem fixation was cemented in 83 patients and uncemented in 55 patients. Uncemented femoral stems most commonly caused a simple oblique fracture pattern (69.1%) with a more comminuted pattern seen in cemented fixation (59%).
Fracture patterns differ according to femoral stem fixation. A simple “sickle-like” oblique fracture pattern was more commonly seen in uncemented stems while cemented tapered stems resulted in a comminuted “axe splitting” pattern.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31027856</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6246-1529</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-225X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1783-1786 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2216289720 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | cemented fracture pattern periprosthetic uncemented |
title | Breaking Bad: A Comparative Descriptive Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures Around Cemented and Uncemented Femoral Stems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T03%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breaking%20Bad:%20A%20Comparative%20Descriptive%20Analysis%20of%20Periprosthetic%20Fractures%20Around%20Cemented%20and%20Uncemented%20Femoral%20Stems&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Fenelon,%20Christopher&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1783&rft.epage=1786&rft.pages=1783-1786&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2216289720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216289720&rft_id=info:pmid/31027856&rft_els_id=S0883540319303079&rfr_iscdi=true |