Rathke’s cleft cysts: a 6-year experience of surgery vs. observation with comparative volumetric analysis

Background Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) are common sellar lesions. Their management remains controversial, particularly when small or asymptomatic. Herein we review a consecutive series of RCC patients managed with surgery or observation. Methods All patients with a new diagnosis of presumed RCC, bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pituitary 2019-08, Vol.22 (4), p.362-371
Hauptverfasser: Barkhoudarian, Garni, Palejwala, Sheri K., Ansari, Shaheryar, Eisenberg, Amalia A., Huang, Xiang, Griffiths, Chester F., Cohan, Pejman, Rettinger, Sarah, Lavin, Norman, Kelly, Daniel F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) are common sellar lesions. Their management remains controversial, particularly when small or asymptomatic. Herein we review a consecutive series of RCC patients managed with surgery or observation. Methods All patients with a new diagnosis of presumed RCC, based on MRI, from February 2012–March 2018 were retrospectively divided into observational and surgical cohorts based on an intent-to-treat model. The cohorts were compared for clinical presentation, and cyst volume. The observational cohort was followed for change in cyst size. The surgical cohort was followed for changes in endocrinopathy, visual symptoms, headache and recurrence. Results Of 90 patients (mean age 36.7 ± 19.4 years; 68% female), 60% (n = 54) were in the observational cohort and 40% (n = 36) in the surgical cohort. Average follow-up was 13 ± 23 months in the observational cohort and 24 ± 19 months in the surgical group. In comparing the cohorts, mean ages were similar with more women in the surgical group (81% vs. 56%, p = 0.04). Most patients in the observational cohort had incidentally-discovered RCCs (n = 50, 88%) as opposed to the surgical cohort (n = 6, 17%). The surgical cohort had higher rates of headache (89% vs 26%, p 
ISSN:1386-341X
1573-7403
DOI:10.1007/s11102-019-00962-y