The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy

Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy (FBx) is more accurate at detecting clinically significant prostate cancer than conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy. However, learning curves for attaining accuracy may limit the generalizability of published outcome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology oncology 2019-03, Vol.2 (2), p.135-140
Hauptverfasser: Kasabwala, Khushabu, Patel, Neal, Cricco-Lizza, Eliza, Shimpi, Adrian A., Weng, Stanley, Buchmann, Rose M., Motanagh, Samaneh, Wu, Yiyuan, Banerjee, Samprit, Khani, Francesca, Margolis, Daniel J., Robinson, Brian D., Hu, Jim C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy (FBx) is more accurate at detecting clinically significant prostate cancer than conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy. However, learning curves for attaining accuracy may limit the generalizability of published outcomes. To delineate and quantify the learning curve for FBx by assessing the targeted biopsy accuracy and pathological quality of systematic biopsy over time. We carried out a retrospective analysis of 173 consecutive men who underwent Artemis FBx with computer-template systematic sampling between July 2015 and May 2017. The accuracy of targeted biopsy was determined by calculating the distance between planned and actual core trajectories stored on Artemis. Systematic sampling proficiency was assessed via pathological analysis of fibromuscular tissue in all cores and then comparing pathology elements from individual cores from men in the first and last tertiles. Polynomial linear regression models, change-point analysis, and piecewise linear regression were used to quantify the learning curve. A significant improvement in targeted biopsy accuracy occurred up to 98 cases (p
ISSN:2588-9311
2588-9311
DOI:10.1016/j.euo.2018.07.005