Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?
There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological psychiatry (1969) 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1082 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1074 |
container_title | Biological psychiatry (1969) |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Lonsdorf, Tina B. Merz, Christian J. Fullana, Miquel A. |
description | There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006322319301131</els_id><sourcerecordid>2212720488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMobk7_wuijL62XpG1aX1TGpoWBIBMfQ5peWebWzqQT9-9N2earEC6547sc9xEyphBRoOndKipNu3V7vYwY0DwCFgGlZ2RIM8FDFgM7J0MASEPOGB-QK-dWPhWM0Usy4BQg8dCQJDNUNpj-dKbRnWmb4A07bPrXfVC4oOiCj6XyAYPF0jSffaFwD9fkolZrhzfHe0TeZ9PF5CWcvz4Xk6d5qHmadWGiq9wfUaqkzgXD1IdSKdQ0YzQuBWQprWMGSCuRJlokWFZY54oLlYDQmo_I7eHfrW2_dug6uTFO43qtGmx3TvptmGAQZ5lH0wOqbeucxVpurdkou5cUZK9MruRJmeyVSWDSK_ON4-OMXbnB6q_t5MgDjwcA_abfBq102mCjsTIWdSer1vw34xe-Sn5N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2212720488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><description>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31005240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological Psychiatry - methods ; Biological Psychiatry - standards ; Conditioning, Classical ; Extinction recall index ; Extinction retention index ; Extinction, Psychological ; Fear - psychology ; Fear conditioning ; Humans ; Meta-research ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Research Design - standards ; Retrieval index ; Systematic literature search</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry (1969), 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082</ispartof><rights>2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31005240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><title>Biological psychiatry (1969)</title><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</description><subject>Biological Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Biological Psychiatry - standards</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>Extinction recall index</subject><subject>Extinction retention index</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Fear - psychology</subject><subject>Fear conditioning</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-research</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Retrieval index</subject><subject>Systematic literature search</subject><issn>0006-3223</issn><issn>1873-2402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMobk7_wuijL62XpG1aX1TGpoWBIBMfQ5peWebWzqQT9-9N2earEC6547sc9xEyphBRoOndKipNu3V7vYwY0DwCFgGlZ2RIM8FDFgM7J0MASEPOGB-QK-dWPhWM0Usy4BQg8dCQJDNUNpj-dKbRnWmb4A07bPrXfVC4oOiCj6XyAYPF0jSffaFwD9fkolZrhzfHe0TeZ9PF5CWcvz4Xk6d5qHmadWGiq9wfUaqkzgXD1IdSKdQ0YzQuBWQprWMGSCuRJlokWFZY54oLlYDQmo_I7eHfrW2_dug6uTFO43qtGmx3TvptmGAQZ5lH0wOqbeucxVpurdkou5cUZK9MruRJmeyVSWDSK_ON4-OMXbnB6q_t5MgDjwcA_abfBq102mCjsTIWdSer1vw34xe-Sn5N</recordid><startdate>20190615</startdate><enddate>20190615</enddate><creator>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creator><creator>Merz, Christian J.</creator><creator>Fullana, Miquel A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190615</creationdate><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><author>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biological Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Biological Psychiatry - standards</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>Extinction recall index</topic><topic>Extinction retention index</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Fear - psychology</topic><topic>Fear conditioning</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-research</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Retrieval index</topic><topic>Systematic literature search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</au><au>Merz, Christian J.</au><au>Fullana, Miquel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2019-06-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1082</epage><pages>1074-1082</pages><issn>0006-3223</issn><eissn>1873-2402</eissn><abstract>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31005240</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3223 |
ispartof | Biological psychiatry (1969), 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082 |
issn | 0006-3223 1873-2402 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720488 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biological Psychiatry - methods Biological Psychiatry - standards Conditioning, Classical Extinction recall index Extinction retention index Extinction, Psychological Fear - psychology Fear conditioning Humans Meta-research Neuropsychological Tests Research Design - standards Retrieval index Systematic literature search |
title | Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A33%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fear%20Extinction%20Retention:%20Is%20It%20What%20We%20Think%20It%20Is?&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20(1969)&rft.au=Lonsdorf,%20Tina%20B.&rft.date=2019-06-15&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1082&rft.pages=1074-1082&rft.issn=0006-3223&rft.eissn=1873-2402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2212720488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2212720488&rft_id=info:pmid/31005240&rft_els_id=S0006322319301131&rfr_iscdi=true |