Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?

There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychiatry (1969) 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082
Hauptverfasser: Lonsdorf, Tina B., Merz, Christian J., Fullana, Miquel A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1082
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1074
container_title Biological psychiatry (1969)
container_volume 85
creator Lonsdorf, Tina B.
Merz, Christian J.
Fullana, Miquel A.
description There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006322319301131</els_id><sourcerecordid>2212720488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMobk7_wuijL62XpG1aX1TGpoWBIBMfQ5peWebWzqQT9-9N2earEC6547sc9xEyphBRoOndKipNu3V7vYwY0DwCFgGlZ2RIM8FDFgM7J0MASEPOGB-QK-dWPhWM0Usy4BQg8dCQJDNUNpj-dKbRnWmb4A07bPrXfVC4oOiCj6XyAYPF0jSffaFwD9fkolZrhzfHe0TeZ9PF5CWcvz4Xk6d5qHmadWGiq9wfUaqkzgXD1IdSKdQ0YzQuBWQprWMGSCuRJlokWFZY54oLlYDQmo_I7eHfrW2_dug6uTFO43qtGmx3TvptmGAQZ5lH0wOqbeucxVpurdkou5cUZK9MruRJmeyVSWDSK_ON4-OMXbnB6q_t5MgDjwcA_abfBq102mCjsTIWdSer1vw34xe-Sn5N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2212720488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><description>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31005240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological Psychiatry - methods ; Biological Psychiatry - standards ; Conditioning, Classical ; Extinction recall index ; Extinction retention index ; Extinction, Psychological ; Fear - psychology ; Fear conditioning ; Humans ; Meta-research ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Research Design - standards ; Retrieval index ; Systematic literature search</subject><ispartof>Biological psychiatry (1969), 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082</ispartof><rights>2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31005240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><title>Biological psychiatry (1969)</title><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</description><subject>Biological Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Biological Psychiatry - standards</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical</subject><subject>Extinction recall index</subject><subject>Extinction retention index</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological</subject><subject>Fear - psychology</subject><subject>Fear conditioning</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-research</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Research Design - standards</subject><subject>Retrieval index</subject><subject>Systematic literature search</subject><issn>0006-3223</issn><issn>1873-2402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQgIMobk7_wuijL62XpG1aX1TGpoWBIBMfQ5peWebWzqQT9-9N2earEC6547sc9xEyphBRoOndKipNu3V7vYwY0DwCFgGlZ2RIM8FDFgM7J0MASEPOGB-QK-dWPhWM0Usy4BQg8dCQJDNUNpj-dKbRnWmb4A07bPrXfVC4oOiCj6XyAYPF0jSffaFwD9fkolZrhzfHe0TeZ9PF5CWcvz4Xk6d5qHmadWGiq9wfUaqkzgXD1IdSKdQ0YzQuBWQprWMGSCuRJlokWFZY54oLlYDQmo_I7eHfrW2_dug6uTFO43qtGmx3TvptmGAQZ5lH0wOqbeucxVpurdkou5cUZK9MruRJmeyVSWDSK_ON4-OMXbnB6q_t5MgDjwcA_abfBq102mCjsTIWdSer1vw34xe-Sn5N</recordid><startdate>20190615</startdate><enddate>20190615</enddate><creator>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creator><creator>Merz, Christian J.</creator><creator>Fullana, Miquel A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190615</creationdate><title>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</title><author>Lonsdorf, Tina B. ; Merz, Christian J. ; Fullana, Miquel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-5cd9cd97ba5f972e6972baaec18214b70861f420e1d765c75ebdef9a37a507cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biological Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Biological Psychiatry - standards</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical</topic><topic>Extinction recall index</topic><topic>Extinction retention index</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological</topic><topic>Fear - psychology</topic><topic>Fear conditioning</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-research</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Research Design - standards</topic><topic>Retrieval index</topic><topic>Systematic literature search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merz, Christian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullana, Miquel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lonsdorf, Tina B.</au><au>Merz, Christian J.</au><au>Fullana, Miquel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?</atitle><jtitle>Biological psychiatry (1969)</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2019-06-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1082</epage><pages>1074-1082</pages><issn>0006-3223</issn><eissn>1873-2402</eissn><abstract>There has been an explosion of research on fear extinction in humans in the past 2 decades. This has not only generated major insights, but also brought a new goal into focus: how to maintain extinction memory over time (i.e., extinction retention). We argue that there are still important conceptual and procedural challenges in human fear extinction research that hamper advancement in the field. We use extinction retention and the extinction retention index to exemplarily illustrate these challenges. Our systematic literature search identified 16 different operationalizations of the extinction retention index. Correlation coefficients among these different operationalizations as well as among measures of fear/anxiety show a wide range of variability in four independent datasets, with similar findings across datasets. Our results suggest that there is an urgent need for standardization in the field. We discuss the conceptual and empirical implications of these results and provide specific recommendations for future work.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31005240</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3223
ispartof Biological psychiatry (1969), 2019-06, Vol.85 (12), p.1074-1082
issn 0006-3223
1873-2402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720488
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biological Psychiatry - methods
Biological Psychiatry - standards
Conditioning, Classical
Extinction recall index
Extinction retention index
Extinction, Psychological
Fear - psychology
Fear conditioning
Humans
Meta-research
Neuropsychological Tests
Research Design - standards
Retrieval index
Systematic literature search
title Fear Extinction Retention: Is It What We Think It Is?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A33%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fear%20Extinction%20Retention:%20Is%20It%20What%20We%20Think%20It%20Is?&rft.jtitle=Biological%20psychiatry%20(1969)&rft.au=Lonsdorf,%20Tina%20B.&rft.date=2019-06-15&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1082&rft.pages=1074-1082&rft.issn=0006-3223&rft.eissn=1873-2402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.02.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2212720488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2212720488&rft_id=info:pmid/31005240&rft_els_id=S0006322319301131&rfr_iscdi=true