Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: The optimization of long-term outcomes is an important goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Offering subsequent preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) to patients who responded to acute cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence. Method: Theref...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.521-529
Hauptverfasser: de Jonge, Margo, Bockting, Claudi L. H, Kikkert, Martijn J, van Dijk, Maarten K, van Schaik, Digna J. F, Peen, Jaap, Hollon, Steven D, Dekker, Jack J. M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 529
container_issue 6
container_start_page 521
container_title Journal of consulting and clinical psychology
container_volume 87
creator de Jonge, Margo
Bockting, Claudi L. H
Kikkert, Martijn J
van Dijk, Maarten K
van Schaik, Digna J. F
Peen, Jaap
Hollon, Steven D
Dekker, Jack J. M
description Objective: The optimization of long-term outcomes is an important goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Offering subsequent preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) to patients who responded to acute cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence. Method: Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the addition of eight weekly sessions of PCT to care as usual (CAU) versus CAU alone in patients with a history of depression in remission following treatment with CBT. A total of 214 recurrently depressed patients who remitted following treatment with CBT were randomized to PCT (n = 107) or CAU (n = 107). Primary outcome was time to relapse/recurrence over 15 months and was assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and number and severity of relapses/recurrences measured by the SCID-I. Results: Over the 15-month follow-up, the addition of PCT significantly delayed time to relapse/recurrence relative to CAU alone, hazard ratio = 1.807 (number needed to treat = 8.1), p = .02, 95% CI [1.029, 3.174]. No significant differences were found between the conditions on number or severity of relapses/recurrences and residual symptoms. Conclusion: Adding PCT was significantly more effective than CAU alone in delaying time to relapse/recurrence of depression over a period of 15 months among CBT responders. After response on CBT, therapists should consider providing PCT to recurrently depressed patients. What is the public health significance of this article? This study shows that preventive cognitive therapy reduces the risk of relapse/recurrence in remitted patients who suffer from recurrent depression and have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. Based on this study, we advise therapists to consider providing preventive cognitive therapy to remitted recurrently depressed patients, who have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/ccp0000395
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2212720085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-df24152aa53ec0e719bb25c2c5d69f6ed101c2b8c645208e47a220d97b24924d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_Agir1WX_wDZMEXUVYnk01217d6-AsKSrmKbyGbzNmUvc022T24-s-b81oVH8xLhvCZYciXsSccXnEQ9WtrR8hHtPIeW_BWtCVyXt9nCwDEEkB9O2LHKV1lwxXIh-xIcIBGCblgP75E2tIw-S0Vy_B98L-q1SVFM-6KrxTTnIqliVSYVFyk2fSFH_6Sb-nSbH2I-f2u6ZzSGAaXW98Up8W5GVzY-BtyuWuYYuj7XK6iN_0j9mBt-kSPb-8TdvH-3Wr5sTz7_OHT8vSsNKJup9KtseISjZGCLFDN265DadFKp9q1IseBW-waqyqJ0FBVG0Rwbd1h1WLlxAl7fpg7xnA9U5r0xidLfW8GCnPSiBxrzD8iM332D70KcxzydllJkA0ICf9XHFE1jdqrFwdlY0gp0lqP0W9M3GkOeh-c_hNcxk9vR87dhtxvepdUBi8PwIxGj2lnTZy87SnZOcYc4H6YbmqttEQufgLofKHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2212268860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>de Jonge, Margo ; Bockting, Claudi L. H ; Kikkert, Martijn J ; van Dijk, Maarten K ; van Schaik, Digna J. F ; Peen, Jaap ; Hollon, Steven D ; Dekker, Jack J. M</creator><contributor>Davila, Joanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Margo ; Bockting, Claudi L. H ; Kikkert, Martijn J ; van Dijk, Maarten K ; van Schaik, Digna J. F ; Peen, Jaap ; Hollon, Steven D ; Dekker, Jack J. M ; Davila, Joanne</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The optimization of long-term outcomes is an important goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Offering subsequent preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) to patients who responded to acute cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence. Method: Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the addition of eight weekly sessions of PCT to care as usual (CAU) versus CAU alone in patients with a history of depression in remission following treatment with CBT. A total of 214 recurrently depressed patients who remitted following treatment with CBT were randomized to PCT (n = 107) or CAU (n = 107). Primary outcome was time to relapse/recurrence over 15 months and was assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and number and severity of relapses/recurrences measured by the SCID-I. Results: Over the 15-month follow-up, the addition of PCT significantly delayed time to relapse/recurrence relative to CAU alone, hazard ratio = 1.807 (number needed to treat = 8.1), p = .02, 95% CI [1.029, 3.174]. No significant differences were found between the conditions on number or severity of relapses/recurrences and residual symptoms. Conclusion: Adding PCT was significantly more effective than CAU alone in delaying time to relapse/recurrence of depression over a period of 15 months among CBT responders. After response on CBT, therapists should consider providing PCT to recurrently depressed patients. What is the public health significance of this article? This study shows that preventive cognitive therapy reduces the risk of relapse/recurrence in remitted patients who suffer from recurrent depression and have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. Based on this study, we advise therapists to consider providing preventive cognitive therapy to remitted recurrently depressed patients, who have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-006X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000395</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31008635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Clinical interviews ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive Behavior Therapy ; Cognitive behavioral therapy ; Cognitive Therapy ; Delayed ; Depressive personality disorders ; Female ; Human ; Major Depression ; Male ; Mental depression ; Number needed to treat ; Optimization ; Patient History ; Prevention ; Preventive medicine ; Recurrence ; Relapse ; Relapse (Disorders) ; Remission (Medicine) ; Residual symptoms ; Risk reduction ; Severity ; Therapists ; Treatment Outcomes</subject><ispartof>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.521-529</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-df24152aa53ec0e719bb25c2c5d69f6ed101c2b8c645208e47a220d97b24924d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-5144-1119</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,30980</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Davila, Joanne</contributor><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bockting, Claudi L. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, Martijn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Maarten K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Digna J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peen, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollon, Steven D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekker, Jack J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: The optimization of long-term outcomes is an important goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Offering subsequent preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) to patients who responded to acute cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence. Method: Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the addition of eight weekly sessions of PCT to care as usual (CAU) versus CAU alone in patients with a history of depression in remission following treatment with CBT. A total of 214 recurrently depressed patients who remitted following treatment with CBT were randomized to PCT (n = 107) or CAU (n = 107). Primary outcome was time to relapse/recurrence over 15 months and was assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and number and severity of relapses/recurrences measured by the SCID-I. Results: Over the 15-month follow-up, the addition of PCT significantly delayed time to relapse/recurrence relative to CAU alone, hazard ratio = 1.807 (number needed to treat = 8.1), p = .02, 95% CI [1.029, 3.174]. No significant differences were found between the conditions on number or severity of relapses/recurrences and residual symptoms. Conclusion: Adding PCT was significantly more effective than CAU alone in delaying time to relapse/recurrence of depression over a period of 15 months among CBT responders. After response on CBT, therapists should consider providing PCT to recurrently depressed patients. What is the public health significance of this article? This study shows that preventive cognitive therapy reduces the risk of relapse/recurrence in remitted patients who suffer from recurrent depression and have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. Based on this study, we advise therapists to consider providing preventive cognitive therapy to remitted recurrently depressed patients, who have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Clinical interviews</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive behavioral therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive Therapy</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Depressive personality disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Major Depression</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Number needed to treat</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Patient History</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Relapse (Disorders)</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Residual symptoms</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Severity</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Treatment Outcomes</subject><issn>0022-006X</issn><issn>1939-2117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d9rFDEQB_Agir1WX_wDZMEXUVYnk01217d6-AsKSrmKbyGbzNmUvc022T24-s-b81oVH8xLhvCZYciXsSccXnEQ9WtrR8hHtPIeW_BWtCVyXt9nCwDEEkB9O2LHKV1lwxXIh-xIcIBGCblgP75E2tIw-S0Vy_B98L-q1SVFM-6KrxTTnIqliVSYVFyk2fSFH_6Sb-nSbH2I-f2u6ZzSGAaXW98Up8W5GVzY-BtyuWuYYuj7XK6iN_0j9mBt-kSPb-8TdvH-3Wr5sTz7_OHT8vSsNKJup9KtseISjZGCLFDN265DadFKp9q1IseBW-waqyqJ0FBVG0Rwbd1h1WLlxAl7fpg7xnA9U5r0xidLfW8GCnPSiBxrzD8iM332D70KcxzydllJkA0ICf9XHFE1jdqrFwdlY0gp0lqP0W9M3GkOeh-c_hNcxk9vR87dhtxvepdUBi8PwIxGj2lnTZy87SnZOcYc4H6YbmqttEQufgLofKHo</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>de Jonge, Margo</creator><creator>Bockting, Claudi L. H</creator><creator>Kikkert, Martijn J</creator><creator>van Dijk, Maarten K</creator><creator>van Schaik, Digna J. F</creator><creator>Peen, Jaap</creator><creator>Hollon, Steven D</creator><creator>Dekker, Jack J. M</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-1119</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>de Jonge, Margo ; Bockting, Claudi L. H ; Kikkert, Martijn J ; van Dijk, Maarten K ; van Schaik, Digna J. F ; Peen, Jaap ; Hollon, Steven D ; Dekker, Jack J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-df24152aa53ec0e719bb25c2c5d69f6ed101c2b8c645208e47a220d97b24924d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Clinical interviews</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive behavioral therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive Therapy</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Depressive personality disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Major Depression</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Number needed to treat</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Patient History</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Relapse (Disorders)</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Residual symptoms</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Severity</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Treatment Outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Margo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bockting, Claudi L. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, Martijn J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Maarten K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Digna J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peen, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollon, Steven D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekker, Jack J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Jonge, Margo</au><au>Bockting, Claudi L. H</au><au>Kikkert, Martijn J</au><au>van Dijk, Maarten K</au><au>van Schaik, Digna J. F</au><au>Peen, Jaap</au><au>Hollon, Steven D</au><au>Dekker, Jack J. M</au><au>Davila, Joanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Consult Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>529</epage><pages>521-529</pages><issn>0022-006X</issn><eissn>1939-2117</eissn><abstract>Objective: The optimization of long-term outcomes is an important goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Offering subsequent preventive cognitive therapy (PCT) to patients who responded to acute cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence. Method: Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing the addition of eight weekly sessions of PCT to care as usual (CAU) versus CAU alone in patients with a history of depression in remission following treatment with CBT. A total of 214 recurrently depressed patients who remitted following treatment with CBT were randomized to PCT (n = 107) or CAU (n = 107). Primary outcome was time to relapse/recurrence over 15 months and was assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms measured by the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report and number and severity of relapses/recurrences measured by the SCID-I. Results: Over the 15-month follow-up, the addition of PCT significantly delayed time to relapse/recurrence relative to CAU alone, hazard ratio = 1.807 (number needed to treat = 8.1), p = .02, 95% CI [1.029, 3.174]. No significant differences were found between the conditions on number or severity of relapses/recurrences and residual symptoms. Conclusion: Adding PCT was significantly more effective than CAU alone in delaying time to relapse/recurrence of depression over a period of 15 months among CBT responders. After response on CBT, therapists should consider providing PCT to recurrently depressed patients. What is the public health significance of this article? This study shows that preventive cognitive therapy reduces the risk of relapse/recurrence in remitted patients who suffer from recurrent depression and have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. Based on this study, we advise therapists to consider providing preventive cognitive therapy to remitted recurrently depressed patients, who have previously been treated with cognitive behavioral therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31008635</pmid><doi>10.1037/ccp0000395</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-1119</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-006X
ispartof Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019-06, Vol.87 (6), p.521-529
issn 0022-006X
1939-2117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2212720085
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Behavior modification
Clinical interviews
Clinical trials
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive Therapy
Delayed
Depressive personality disorders
Female
Human
Major Depression
Male
Mental depression
Number needed to treat
Optimization
Patient History
Prevention
Preventive medicine
Recurrence
Relapse
Relapse (Disorders)
Remission (Medicine)
Residual symptoms
Risk reduction
Severity
Therapists
Treatment Outcomes
title Preventive Cognitive Therapy Versus Care as Usual in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T02%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventive%20Cognitive%20Therapy%20Versus%20Care%20as%20Usual%20in%20Cognitive%20Behavioral%20Therapy%20Responders:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consulting%20and%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=de%20Jonge,%20Margo&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=529&rft.pages=521-529&rft.issn=0022-006X&rft.eissn=1939-2117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/ccp0000395&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2212720085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2212268860&rft_id=info:pmid/31008635&rfr_iscdi=true