Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine

The objectives of this study were to determine whether the distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae within the diaphragm of infected swine was the same throughout five anatomically identifiable portions, and to assess the tenability of the Poisson model to describe the probability of detecting la...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food protection 1988-09, Vol.51 (9), p.691-695
Hauptverfasser: KOTULA, A. W, ROTHENBERG, P. J, BURGE, J. R, SOLOMON, M. B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 695
container_issue 9
container_start_page 691
container_title Journal of food protection
container_volume 51
creator KOTULA, A. W
ROTHENBERG, P. J
BURGE, J. R
SOLOMON, M. B
description The objectives of this study were to determine whether the distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae within the diaphragm of infected swine was the same throughout five anatomically identifiable portions, and to assess the tenability of the Poisson model to describe the probability of detecting larvae in samples of digested tissue. To examine differences in levels of infection among the regions of the diaphragm, sixteen 2-month-old and fourteen 6-month-old swine were infected with approximately 300 T. spiralis larvae per animal. Since the infective dose was not adjusted for age (weight), higher infection rates resulted in the younger hogs. Because of this higher infection rate, the occurrence of positive samples judged to be free of larvae (false negatives), was lower for the younger hogs (0.9% vs 14.6%). Pooling over both age groups and across all five anatomical regions yielded the directional difference in false negative rates one would expect between 1 g and 5 g samples (viz., 12.3% for 1 g vs 2.6% for 5 g). In both age groups, levels of infection were significantly different among the five anatomical regions of the diaphragm (p=.06 at 2 mo; p=.0002 at 6 mo). The Crus muscle consistently yielded more larvae/g than the lumbocostal arch, the dorsal and ventral Pars costalis, and the Pars sternalis. Accordingly, the false negative rates were found to be lowest in the Crus muscle (5 of 59 or 8.5% in 1 g samples and 0 of 58 in the 5 g samples). We conclude that sampling from Crus muscle increases the ability to detect T. spiralis larvae in the diaphragm of infected pork carcasses. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Poisson model (random or "homogenous distribution" of larvae) grossly underestimates the observed false negative rates while predictions based on the negative binomial model provide close agreement.
doi_str_mv 10.4315/0362-028X-51.9.691
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2210961984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210961984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-832d8a7722eb6771d2a907efa897a325bd1d1e8aca795c6f07fd4c581eb509273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAYRS0EoqXwBxhQBgaWFD_iOB5ReUqVWApisxz7MzVKk2Angv57ErV0usu5V1cHoUuC5xkj_BaznKaYFh8pJ3M5zyU5QlMisyyVWIpjND0AE3QW4xfGmEqan6IJw1ISzsUUvd_72AVf9p1v6qRxySp4s_Y1VJVOYuuDrnxMfJ10a0is1-066M_NCMJvC8FvoO50VW0HxIHpwCbxZ2ifoxOnqwgX-5yht8eH1eI5Xb4-vSzulqlhOO_SglFbaCEohTIXgliqJRbgdCGFZpSXllgChTZaSG5yh4WzmeEFgZJjSQWboZvdbhua7x5ipzY-mvF8DU0fFaUEy5zIIhtQukNNaGIM4FQ73NdhqwhWo0816lKjLsWJkmrwOZSu9vt9uQF7qPwLHIDrPaCj0ZULujY-HjhRUMyYYH82kH5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210961984</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KOTULA, A. W ; ROTHENBERG, P. J ; BURGE, J. R ; SOLOMON, M. B</creator><creatorcontrib>KOTULA, A. W ; ROTHENBERG, P. J ; BURGE, J. R ; SOLOMON, M. B</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to determine whether the distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae within the diaphragm of infected swine was the same throughout five anatomically identifiable portions, and to assess the tenability of the Poisson model to describe the probability of detecting larvae in samples of digested tissue. To examine differences in levels of infection among the regions of the diaphragm, sixteen 2-month-old and fourteen 6-month-old swine were infected with approximately 300 T. spiralis larvae per animal. Since the infective dose was not adjusted for age (weight), higher infection rates resulted in the younger hogs. Because of this higher infection rate, the occurrence of positive samples judged to be free of larvae (false negatives), was lower for the younger hogs (0.9% vs 14.6%). Pooling over both age groups and across all five anatomical regions yielded the directional difference in false negative rates one would expect between 1 g and 5 g samples (viz., 12.3% for 1 g vs 2.6% for 5 g). In both age groups, levels of infection were significantly different among the five anatomical regions of the diaphragm (p=.06 at 2 mo; p=.0002 at 6 mo). The Crus muscle consistently yielded more larvae/g than the lumbocostal arch, the dorsal and ventral Pars costalis, and the Pars sternalis. Accordingly, the false negative rates were found to be lowest in the Crus muscle (5 of 59 or 8.5% in 1 g samples and 0 of 58 in the 5 g samples). We conclude that sampling from Crus muscle increases the ability to detect T. spiralis larvae in the diaphragm of infected pork carcasses. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Poisson model (random or "homogenous distribution" of larvae) grossly underestimates the observed false negative rates while predictions based on the negative binomial model provide close agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-51.9.691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30991557</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPRDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines, IA: International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meat and meat product industries</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 1988-09, Vol.51 (9), p.691-695</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-832d8a7722eb6771d2a907efa897a325bd1d1e8aca795c6f07fd4c581eb509273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,64368</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7820337$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30991557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KOTULA, A. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, P. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOLOMON, M. B</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to determine whether the distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae within the diaphragm of infected swine was the same throughout five anatomically identifiable portions, and to assess the tenability of the Poisson model to describe the probability of detecting larvae in samples of digested tissue. To examine differences in levels of infection among the regions of the diaphragm, sixteen 2-month-old and fourteen 6-month-old swine were infected with approximately 300 T. spiralis larvae per animal. Since the infective dose was not adjusted for age (weight), higher infection rates resulted in the younger hogs. Because of this higher infection rate, the occurrence of positive samples judged to be free of larvae (false negatives), was lower for the younger hogs (0.9% vs 14.6%). Pooling over both age groups and across all five anatomical regions yielded the directional difference in false negative rates one would expect between 1 g and 5 g samples (viz., 12.3% for 1 g vs 2.6% for 5 g). In both age groups, levels of infection were significantly different among the five anatomical regions of the diaphragm (p=.06 at 2 mo; p=.0002 at 6 mo). The Crus muscle consistently yielded more larvae/g than the lumbocostal arch, the dorsal and ventral Pars costalis, and the Pars sternalis. Accordingly, the false negative rates were found to be lowest in the Crus muscle (5 of 59 or 8.5% in 1 g samples and 0 of 58 in the 5 g samples). We conclude that sampling from Crus muscle increases the ability to detect T. spiralis larvae in the diaphragm of infected pork carcasses. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Poisson model (random or "homogenous distribution" of larvae) grossly underestimates the observed false negative rates while predictions based on the negative binomial model provide close agreement.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAYRS0EoqXwBxhQBgaWFD_iOB5ReUqVWApisxz7MzVKk2Angv57ErV0usu5V1cHoUuC5xkj_BaznKaYFh8pJ3M5zyU5QlMisyyVWIpjND0AE3QW4xfGmEqan6IJw1ISzsUUvd_72AVf9p1v6qRxySp4s_Y1VJVOYuuDrnxMfJ10a0is1-066M_NCMJvC8FvoO50VW0HxIHpwCbxZ2ifoxOnqwgX-5yht8eH1eI5Xb4-vSzulqlhOO_SglFbaCEohTIXgliqJRbgdCGFZpSXllgChTZaSG5yh4WzmeEFgZJjSQWboZvdbhua7x5ipzY-mvF8DU0fFaUEy5zIIhtQukNNaGIM4FQ73NdhqwhWo0816lKjLsWJkmrwOZSu9vt9uQF7qPwLHIDrPaCj0ZULujY-HjhRUMyYYH82kH5U</recordid><startdate>19880901</startdate><enddate>19880901</enddate><creator>KOTULA, A. W</creator><creator>ROTHENBERG, P. J</creator><creator>BURGE, J. R</creator><creator>SOLOMON, M. B</creator><general>International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880901</creationdate><title>Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine</title><author>KOTULA, A. W ; ROTHENBERG, P. J ; BURGE, J. R ; SOLOMON, M. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-832d8a7722eb6771d2a907efa897a325bd1d1e8aca795c6f07fd4c581eb509273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KOTULA, A. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROTHENBERG, P. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURGE, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOLOMON, M. B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KOTULA, A. W</au><au>ROTHENBERG, P. J</au><au>BURGE, J. R</au><au>SOLOMON, M. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>1988-09-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>691-695</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><coden>JFPRDR</coden><abstract>The objectives of this study were to determine whether the distribution of Trichinella spiralis larvae within the diaphragm of infected swine was the same throughout five anatomically identifiable portions, and to assess the tenability of the Poisson model to describe the probability of detecting larvae in samples of digested tissue. To examine differences in levels of infection among the regions of the diaphragm, sixteen 2-month-old and fourteen 6-month-old swine were infected with approximately 300 T. spiralis larvae per animal. Since the infective dose was not adjusted for age (weight), higher infection rates resulted in the younger hogs. Because of this higher infection rate, the occurrence of positive samples judged to be free of larvae (false negatives), was lower for the younger hogs (0.9% vs 14.6%). Pooling over both age groups and across all five anatomical regions yielded the directional difference in false negative rates one would expect between 1 g and 5 g samples (viz., 12.3% for 1 g vs 2.6% for 5 g). In both age groups, levels of infection were significantly different among the five anatomical regions of the diaphragm (p=.06 at 2 mo; p=.0002 at 6 mo). The Crus muscle consistently yielded more larvae/g than the lumbocostal arch, the dorsal and ventral Pars costalis, and the Pars sternalis. Accordingly, the false negative rates were found to be lowest in the Crus muscle (5 of 59 or 8.5% in 1 g samples and 0 of 58 in the 5 g samples). We conclude that sampling from Crus muscle increases the ability to detect T. spiralis larvae in the diaphragm of infected pork carcasses. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Poisson model (random or "homogenous distribution" of larvae) grossly underestimates the observed false negative rates while predictions based on the negative binomial model provide close agreement.</abstract><cop>Des Moines, IA</cop><pub>International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</pub><pmid>30991557</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X-51.9.691</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-028X
ispartof Journal of food protection, 1988-09, Vol.51 (9), p.691-695
issn 0362-028X
1944-9097
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2210961984
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Meat and meat product industries
title Distribution of Trichinella spiralis in the diaphragm of experimentally infected swine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A04%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20Trichinella%20spiralis%20in%20the%20diaphragm%20of%20experimentally%20infected%20swine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=KOTULA,%20A.%20W&rft.date=1988-09-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=691-695&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft.coden=JFPRDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X-51.9.691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210961984%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210961984&rft_id=info:pmid/30991557&rfr_iscdi=true