Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing

The purpose of this study was to quantify the cost of resources required to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for high- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Comparisons were made for three and five fractions of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brachytherapy 2019-07, Vol.18 (4), p.445-452
Hauptverfasser: Ning, Matthew S., Klopp, Ann H., Jhingran, Anuja, Lin, Lilie L., Eifel, Patricia J., Vedam, Sastry, Lawyer, Ann A., Olivieri, Nicholas D., Guzman, Alexis B., Incalcaterra, James R., Mesko, Shane M., Pezzi, Todd A., Boyce-Fappiano, David R., Shaitelman, Simona F., Frank, Steven J., Thaker, Nikhil G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 452
container_issue 4
container_start_page 445
container_title Brachytherapy
container_volume 18
creator Ning, Matthew S.
Klopp, Ann H.
Jhingran, Anuja
Lin, Lilie L.
Eifel, Patricia J.
Vedam, Sastry
Lawyer, Ann A.
Olivieri, Nicholas D.
Guzman, Alexis B.
Incalcaterra, James R.
Mesko, Shane M.
Pezzi, Todd A.
Boyce-Fappiano, David R.
Shaitelman, Simona F.
Frank, Steven J.
Thaker, Nikhil G.
description The purpose of this study was to quantify the cost of resources required to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for high- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Comparisons were made for three and five fractions of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB), 28 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and combined modality RT (25-fraction IMRT followed by 2-fraction VCB). Process maps were developed representing each phase of care. Salary and equipment costs were obtained to derive capacity cost rates, which were multiplied by process times and summed to calculate total costs. Costs were compared with 2018 Medicare physician fee schedule reimbursement. Full cycle costs for 5-fraction VCB, IMRT, and combined modality RT were 42%, 61%, and 93% higher, respectively, than for 3-fraction VCB. Differences were attributable to course duration and number of fractions/visits. Accumulation of cost throughout the cycle was steeper for VCB, rising rapidly within a shorter time frame. Personnel cost was the greatest driver for all modalities, constituting 76% and 71% of costs for IMRT and VCB, respectively, with VCB requiring 74% more physicist time. Total reimbursement for 5-fraction VCB was 40% higher than for 3-fractions. Professional reimbursement for IMRT was 31% higher than for 5-fraction VCB, vs. IMRT requiring 43% more physician TDABC than 5-fraction VCB. TDABC is a feasible methodology to quantify the cost of resources required for delivery of adjuvant IMRT and brachytherapy and produces directionally accurate costing data as compared with reimbursement calculations. Such data can inform institution-specific financial analyses, resource allocation, and operational workflows.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2210961739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1538472119301205</els_id><sourcerecordid>2210961739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-a169dbaafaecc00e85f43e5f5035c79ec82f35979e8ea35eb827f4f2177dd6063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuKFTEQbURxxtE_EMnSTbdJp58bQQYfAwMi6DpUJ5WZunQn1yR9of0qP9FcesblrKoozqOqTlG8FbwSXHQfDtUUQN9vVc3FWHFZcS6fFZdi6GUpmmZ8nvtWDmXT1-KieBXjgWfaKOXL4kLycazF0F4Wf3-s4BLZjdwdIxcTpTWRdzCzgNGvQSPLg5n-wHnMvGVgDuspk9jun-4xwHFj4EwWSOgipa1cvFlnSGhYAEM79xFpfWDojF8wBcpGGpzGwE4ELNGCpQl0QsdAJzqdtSaIWUf7vJy7e128sDBHfPNQr4pfXz7_vP5W3n7_enP96bbUsqtTCflUMwFYQK05x6G1jcTWtly2uh9RD7WV7Zi7AUG2OA11bxtbi743puOdvCre77rH4H-vGJNaKGqcZ3Do16jqWvCxE70cM7TZoTr4GANadQy0QNiU4OqclTqo_VfqnJXiUuWsMu3dg8M6LWj-kx7DyYCPOwDznSfCoKImzL8yFFAnZTw97fAPcuaufg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210961739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ning, Matthew S. ; Klopp, Ann H. ; Jhingran, Anuja ; Lin, Lilie L. ; Eifel, Patricia J. ; Vedam, Sastry ; Lawyer, Ann A. ; Olivieri, Nicholas D. ; Guzman, Alexis B. ; Incalcaterra, James R. ; Mesko, Shane M. ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; Boyce-Fappiano, David R. ; Shaitelman, Simona F. ; Frank, Steven J. ; Thaker, Nikhil G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ning, Matthew S. ; Klopp, Ann H. ; Jhingran, Anuja ; Lin, Lilie L. ; Eifel, Patricia J. ; Vedam, Sastry ; Lawyer, Ann A. ; Olivieri, Nicholas D. ; Guzman, Alexis B. ; Incalcaterra, James R. ; Mesko, Shane M. ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; Boyce-Fappiano, David R. ; Shaitelman, Simona F. ; Frank, Steven J. ; Thaker, Nikhil G.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to quantify the cost of resources required to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for high- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Comparisons were made for three and five fractions of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB), 28 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and combined modality RT (25-fraction IMRT followed by 2-fraction VCB). Process maps were developed representing each phase of care. Salary and equipment costs were obtained to derive capacity cost rates, which were multiplied by process times and summed to calculate total costs. Costs were compared with 2018 Medicare physician fee schedule reimbursement. Full cycle costs for 5-fraction VCB, IMRT, and combined modality RT were 42%, 61%, and 93% higher, respectively, than for 3-fraction VCB. Differences were attributable to course duration and number of fractions/visits. Accumulation of cost throughout the cycle was steeper for VCB, rising rapidly within a shorter time frame. Personnel cost was the greatest driver for all modalities, constituting 76% and 71% of costs for IMRT and VCB, respectively, with VCB requiring 74% more physicist time. Total reimbursement for 5-fraction VCB was 40% higher than for 3-fractions. Professional reimbursement for IMRT was 31% higher than for 5-fraction VCB, vs. IMRT requiring 43% more physician TDABC than 5-fraction VCB. TDABC is a feasible methodology to quantify the cost of resources required for delivery of adjuvant IMRT and brachytherapy and produces directionally accurate costing data as compared with reimbursement calculations. Such data can inform institution-specific financial analyses, resource allocation, and operational workflows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-4721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30992185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Brachytherapy - economics ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Brachytherapy - statistics & numerical data ; Dose Fractionation, Radiation ; Endometrial Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Equipment and Supplies - economics ; Female ; HDR brachytherapy ; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Health care value ; Health Facilities - economics ; Health Resources - economics ; Health Resources - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - statistics & numerical data ; Medicare - economics ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - economics ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - methods ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - statistics & numerical data ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - economics ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - statistics & numerical data ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits - economics ; TDABC ; United States ; Vaginal cuff brachytherapy]]></subject><ispartof>Brachytherapy, 2019-07, Vol.18 (4), p.445-452</ispartof><rights>2019 American Brachytherapy Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-a169dbaafaecc00e85f43e5f5035c79ec82f35979e8ea35eb827f4f2177dd6063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-a169dbaafaecc00e85f43e5f5035c79ec82f35979e8ea35eb827f4f2177dd6063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1538472119301205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ning, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopp, Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhingran, Anuja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Lilie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eifel, Patricia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedam, Sastry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawyer, Ann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Nicholas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Alexis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incalcaterra, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesko, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzi, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyce-Fappiano, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaitelman, Simona F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Nikhil G.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing</title><title>Brachytherapy</title><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to quantify the cost of resources required to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for high- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Comparisons were made for three and five fractions of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB), 28 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and combined modality RT (25-fraction IMRT followed by 2-fraction VCB). Process maps were developed representing each phase of care. Salary and equipment costs were obtained to derive capacity cost rates, which were multiplied by process times and summed to calculate total costs. Costs were compared with 2018 Medicare physician fee schedule reimbursement. Full cycle costs for 5-fraction VCB, IMRT, and combined modality RT were 42%, 61%, and 93% higher, respectively, than for 3-fraction VCB. Differences were attributable to course duration and number of fractions/visits. Accumulation of cost throughout the cycle was steeper for VCB, rising rapidly within a shorter time frame. Personnel cost was the greatest driver for all modalities, constituting 76% and 71% of costs for IMRT and VCB, respectively, with VCB requiring 74% more physicist time. Total reimbursement for 5-fraction VCB was 40% higher than for 3-fractions. Professional reimbursement for IMRT was 31% higher than for 5-fraction VCB, vs. IMRT requiring 43% more physician TDABC than 5-fraction VCB. TDABC is a feasible methodology to quantify the cost of resources required for delivery of adjuvant IMRT and brachytherapy and produces directionally accurate costing data as compared with reimbursement calculations. Such data can inform institution-specific financial analyses, resource allocation, and operational workflows.</description><subject>Brachytherapy - economics</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HDR brachytherapy</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health care value</subject><subject>Health Facilities - economics</subject><subject>Health Resources - economics</subject><subject>Health Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - economics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - economics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - economics</subject><subject>TDABC</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaginal cuff brachytherapy</subject><issn>1538-4721</issn><issn>1873-1449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuKFTEQbURxxtE_EMnSTbdJp58bQQYfAwMi6DpUJ5WZunQn1yR9of0qP9FcesblrKoozqOqTlG8FbwSXHQfDtUUQN9vVc3FWHFZcS6fFZdi6GUpmmZ8nvtWDmXT1-KieBXjgWfaKOXL4kLycazF0F4Wf3-s4BLZjdwdIxcTpTWRdzCzgNGvQSPLg5n-wHnMvGVgDuspk9jun-4xwHFj4EwWSOgipa1cvFlnSGhYAEM79xFpfWDojF8wBcpGGpzGwE4ELNGCpQl0QsdAJzqdtSaIWUf7vJy7e128sDBHfPNQr4pfXz7_vP5W3n7_enP96bbUsqtTCflUMwFYQK05x6G1jcTWtly2uh9RD7WV7Zi7AUG2OA11bxtbi743puOdvCre77rH4H-vGJNaKGqcZ3Do16jqWvCxE70cM7TZoTr4GANadQy0QNiU4OqclTqo_VfqnJXiUuWsMu3dg8M6LWj-kx7DyYCPOwDznSfCoKImzL8yFFAnZTw97fAPcuaufg</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Ning, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Klopp, Ann H.</creator><creator>Jhingran, Anuja</creator><creator>Lin, Lilie L.</creator><creator>Eifel, Patricia J.</creator><creator>Vedam, Sastry</creator><creator>Lawyer, Ann A.</creator><creator>Olivieri, Nicholas D.</creator><creator>Guzman, Alexis B.</creator><creator>Incalcaterra, James R.</creator><creator>Mesko, Shane M.</creator><creator>Pezzi, Todd A.</creator><creator>Boyce-Fappiano, David R.</creator><creator>Shaitelman, Simona F.</creator><creator>Frank, Steven J.</creator><creator>Thaker, Nikhil G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing</title><author>Ning, Matthew S. ; Klopp, Ann H. ; Jhingran, Anuja ; Lin, Lilie L. ; Eifel, Patricia J. ; Vedam, Sastry ; Lawyer, Ann A. ; Olivieri, Nicholas D. ; Guzman, Alexis B. ; Incalcaterra, James R. ; Mesko, Shane M. ; Pezzi, Todd A. ; Boyce-Fappiano, David R. ; Shaitelman, Simona F. ; Frank, Steven J. ; Thaker, Nikhil G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-a169dbaafaecc00e85f43e5f5035c79ec82f35979e8ea35eb827f4f2177dd6063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brachytherapy - economics</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation, Radiation</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HDR brachytherapy</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health care value</topic><topic>Health Facilities - economics</topic><topic>Health Resources - economics</topic><topic>Health Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - economics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - economics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Salaries and Fringe Benefits - economics</topic><topic>TDABC</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaginal cuff brachytherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ning, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopp, Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhingran, Anuja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Lilie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eifel, Patricia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vedam, Sastry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawyer, Ann A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivieri, Nicholas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Alexis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incalcaterra, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mesko, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzi, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyce-Fappiano, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaitelman, Simona F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thaker, Nikhil G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ning, Matthew S.</au><au>Klopp, Ann H.</au><au>Jhingran, Anuja</au><au>Lin, Lilie L.</au><au>Eifel, Patricia J.</au><au>Vedam, Sastry</au><au>Lawyer, Ann A.</au><au>Olivieri, Nicholas D.</au><au>Guzman, Alexis B.</au><au>Incalcaterra, James R.</au><au>Mesko, Shane M.</au><au>Pezzi, Todd A.</au><au>Boyce-Fappiano, David R.</au><au>Shaitelman, Simona F.</au><au>Frank, Steven J.</au><au>Thaker, Nikhil G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing</atitle><jtitle>Brachytherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Brachytherapy</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>445-452</pages><issn>1538-4721</issn><eissn>1873-1449</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to quantify the cost of resources required to deliver adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for high- to intermediate-risk endometrial cancer using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC). Comparisons were made for three and five fractions of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB), 28 fractions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and combined modality RT (25-fraction IMRT followed by 2-fraction VCB). Process maps were developed representing each phase of care. Salary and equipment costs were obtained to derive capacity cost rates, which were multiplied by process times and summed to calculate total costs. Costs were compared with 2018 Medicare physician fee schedule reimbursement. Full cycle costs for 5-fraction VCB, IMRT, and combined modality RT were 42%, 61%, and 93% higher, respectively, than for 3-fraction VCB. Differences were attributable to course duration and number of fractions/visits. Accumulation of cost throughout the cycle was steeper for VCB, rising rapidly within a shorter time frame. Personnel cost was the greatest driver for all modalities, constituting 76% and 71% of costs for IMRT and VCB, respectively, with VCB requiring 74% more physicist time. Total reimbursement for 5-fraction VCB was 40% higher than for 3-fractions. Professional reimbursement for IMRT was 31% higher than for 5-fraction VCB, vs. IMRT requiring 43% more physician TDABC than 5-fraction VCB. TDABC is a feasible methodology to quantify the cost of resources required for delivery of adjuvant IMRT and brachytherapy and produces directionally accurate costing data as compared with reimbursement calculations. Such data can inform institution-specific financial analyses, resource allocation, and operational workflows.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30992185</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-4721
ispartof Brachytherapy, 2019-07, Vol.18 (4), p.445-452
issn 1538-4721
1873-1449
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2210961739
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Brachytherapy - economics
Brachytherapy - methods
Brachytherapy - statistics & numerical data
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Endometrial Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Equipment and Supplies - economics
Female
HDR brachytherapy
Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data
Health care value
Health Facilities - economics
Health Resources - economics
Health Resources - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement - statistics & numerical data
Medicare - economics
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - economics
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - methods
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant - statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - economics
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - statistics & numerical data
Salaries and Fringe Benefits - economics
TDABC
United States
Vaginal cuff brachytherapy
title Quantifying institutional resource utilization of adjuvant brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for endometrial cancer via time-driven activity-based costing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T22%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20institutional%20resource%20utilization%20of%20adjuvant%20brachytherapy%20and%20intensity-modulated%20radiation%20therapy%20for%20endometrial%20cancer%20via%20time-driven%20activity-based%20costing&rft.jtitle=Brachytherapy&rft.au=Ning,%20Matthew%20S.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=445-452&rft.issn=1538-4721&rft.eissn=1873-1449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210961739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210961739&rft_id=info:pmid/30992185&rft_els_id=S1538472119301205&rfr_iscdi=true