The MITO CERV-2 trial: A randomized phase II study of cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

Cervical cancer cells often express Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Cetuximab (CET), an anti-EGFR antibody, can be safely combined with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P), a standard treatment for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer (ARCC) patients. ARCC patients, ECOG PS ≤ 1, were randomize...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2019-06, Vol.153 (3), p.535-540
Hauptverfasser: Pignata, Sandro, Scambia, Giovanni, Lorusso, Domenica, De Giorgi, Ugo, Nicoletto, Maria Ornella, Lauria, Rossella, Mosconi, Anna Maria, Sacco, Cosimo, Omarini, Claudia, Tagliaferri, Pierosandro, Ferrandina, Gabriella, Cinieri, Saverio, Savarese, Antonella, Valabrega, Giorgio, Pisano, Carmela, Salutari, Vanda, Raspagliesi, Francesco, Kopf, Barbara, Cecere, Sabrina Chiara, Amadio, Giulia, Maltese, Giuseppa, Di Napoli, Marilena, Greggi, Stefano, Signoriello, Simona, Daniele, Gennaro, Sacco, Alessandra, Losito, Simona, Normanno, Nicola, Perrone, Francesco, Gallo, Ciro, Piccirillo, Maria Carmela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cervical cancer cells often express Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR). Cetuximab (CET), an anti-EGFR antibody, can be safely combined with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P), a standard treatment for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer (ARCC) patients. ARCC patients, ECOG PS ≤ 1, were randomized to CP for 6 cycles with or without CET (400 mg/m2 one week before starting CP, then 250 mg/m2 weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary endpoint. With a 4.5 months expected median EFS and a 6.4 months predicted EFS (HR 0.70), 0.20 one-tailed α and 80% power, 89 events were required for the final intent-to-treat analysis. 108 patients were assigned to CP (n = 53) or CP-CET (n = 55). Median age was 50, 69% were PS0, 76% had recurrent disease, 91% had distant metastasis and 57% had received previous chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 102 patients had an event, 97 progressed and 61 died. Median EFS was 4.7 and 6.0 months (one-tail P = 0.43), median PFS was 5.2 and 7.6 months (one-tail P = 0.20) and median OS was 17.7 and 17 months (one-tail P = 0.27), with CP and CP-CET, respectively. There was no difference in the occurrence of severe adverse events, except for skin toxicity. Biomarker analysis, in a small subgroup of patients, suggests that PIK3CA mutation might be predictive of CET resistance. CP-CET was not more active than CP alone in unselected ARCC patients. •Cervical cancer cells often express the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).•However, the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy did not produce benefit for advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients.•The presence of PIK3CA mutations may be associated with resistance to cetuximab treatment.
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.260