RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety

Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study pres...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychosomatic research 2019-07, Vol.122, p.104-111
Hauptverfasser: Petersen, Marie Weinreich, Schröder, Andreas, Jørgensen, Torben, Ørnbøl, Eva, Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz, Eliasen, Marie, Fink, Per
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue
container_start_page 104
container_title Journal of psychosomatic research
container_volume 122
creator Petersen, Marie Weinreich
Schröder, Andreas
Jørgensen, Torben
Ørnbøl, Eva
Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz
Eliasen, Marie
Fink, Per
description Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study presents and describes the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders (RIFD) and provides first data regarding RIFD's ability to identify cases with functional somatic disorders and health anxiety in a two-phase design following self-reported symptom questionnaires. Methods: RIFD was performed by phone by trained family physicians on a stratified subsample of 1590 adults from a Danish general population cohort (n = 7493). Criterion validity was tested in a small preliminary test including 25 RIFD participants using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), performed by a specialist in functional somatic disorders, as gold standard. Interrater reliability between interviewers was tested in 15 participants. Results: Compared with the comprehensive SCAN, preparation and conduction of RIFD were feasible and prompt. RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees. RIFD identified cases with significantly more impairment than identified non-cases. Based on small preliminary tests, RIFD showed promising psychometric properties. Conclusion: RIFD was a feasible, well-accepted and promising instrument for use in large epidemiological studies. However, larger studies investigating its psychometric properties are needed. •RIFD assesses functional somatic disorders and health anxiety.•RIFD was feasible and affordable to perform in a large population-based study.•RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees.•RIFD clearly identified cases with poorer health and quality of life than non-cases.•RIFD showed promising psychometric properties, but larger studies are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.04.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2205413920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022399919300455</els_id><sourcerecordid>2240141857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-510f504416427777a711bd9847bd412afa20f7e500d7a394182e9bde95a52113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZAlLlwSZhx7sz6WQqFSJSTUu3HsidZRNl7sBNgb78Ab9knq1RaQuDCXmcM3_2j-nzGOUCPg-s1QD_t8cNuYKNcCUNcgawB8xFa4aXWFzRoesxWAEFWjtT5jz3IeAGCthXrKzhrQSmlsVuzL5-urd_zu5y9-wbsUqOduDFNwduRFm2xyWx6mmdK3QN95HxPvl8nNIU6FyHFn5-C4DzkmTylzO3m-JTvO2zL-CDQfnrMnvR0zvXjo5-z26v3t5cfq5tOH68uLm8pJJeZKIfQKpMS1FG0p2yJ2Xm9k23mJwvZWQN-SAvCtbbTEjSDdedLKKoHYnLPXJ9l9il8XyrPZhexoHO1EcclGCFASGy2goK_-QYe4pPLPkZKARVu1hdqcKJdizol6s09hZ9PBIJhjCGYwf0MwxxAMSFNCKKsvHw4s3Y78n8Xfrhfg7QmgYkgxNpnsAk2OfEjkZuNj-P-Ve30AnUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2240141857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Petersen, Marie Weinreich ; Schröder, Andreas ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz ; Eliasen, Marie ; Fink, Per</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Marie Weinreich ; Schröder, Andreas ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz ; Eliasen, Marie ; Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><description>Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study presents and describes the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders (RIFD) and provides first data regarding RIFD's ability to identify cases with functional somatic disorders and health anxiety in a two-phase design following self-reported symptom questionnaires. Methods: RIFD was performed by phone by trained family physicians on a stratified subsample of 1590 adults from a Danish general population cohort (n = 7493). Criterion validity was tested in a small preliminary test including 25 RIFD participants using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), performed by a specialist in functional somatic disorders, as gold standard. Interrater reliability between interviewers was tested in 15 participants. Results: Compared with the comprehensive SCAN, preparation and conduction of RIFD were feasible and prompt. RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees. RIFD identified cases with significantly more impairment than identified non-cases. Based on small preliminary tests, RIFD showed promising psychometric properties. Conclusion: RIFD was a feasible, well-accepted and promising instrument for use in large epidemiological studies. However, larger studies investigating its psychometric properties are needed. •RIFD assesses functional somatic disorders and health anxiety.•RIFD was feasible and affordable to perform in a large population-based study.•RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees.•RIFD clearly identified cases with poorer health and quality of life than non-cases.•RIFD showed promising psychometric properties, but larger studies are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.04.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30955913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Anxiety - psychology ; Anxiety disorders ; Bodily distress ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Clinical assessment ; Clinical research ; Conduction ; Epidemiology ; Family physicians ; Fatigue ; Female ; Fibromyalgia ; Functional somatic disorders ; Functional somatic syndromes ; Health anxiety ; Health status ; Humans ; Illness anxiety ; Interrater reliability ; Interviews ; Intestine ; Irritable bowel syndrome ; Male ; Medically Unexplained Symptoms ; Middle Aged ; Physicians ; Psychiatry ; Psychological distress ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schedules of clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychosomatic research, 2019-07, Vol.122, p.104-111</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-510f504416427777a711bd9847bd412afa20f7e500d7a394182e9bde95a52113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-510f504416427777a711bd9847bd412afa20f7e500d7a394182e9bde95a52113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399919300455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30955913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Marie Weinreich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliasen, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><title>RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety</title><title>Journal of psychosomatic research</title><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><description>Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study presents and describes the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders (RIFD) and provides first data regarding RIFD's ability to identify cases with functional somatic disorders and health anxiety in a two-phase design following self-reported symptom questionnaires. Methods: RIFD was performed by phone by trained family physicians on a stratified subsample of 1590 adults from a Danish general population cohort (n = 7493). Criterion validity was tested in a small preliminary test including 25 RIFD participants using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), performed by a specialist in functional somatic disorders, as gold standard. Interrater reliability between interviewers was tested in 15 participants. Results: Compared with the comprehensive SCAN, preparation and conduction of RIFD were feasible and prompt. RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees. RIFD identified cases with significantly more impairment than identified non-cases. Based on small preliminary tests, RIFD showed promising psychometric properties. Conclusion: RIFD was a feasible, well-accepted and promising instrument for use in large epidemiological studies. However, larger studies investigating its psychometric properties are needed. •RIFD assesses functional somatic disorders and health anxiety.•RIFD was feasible and affordable to perform in a large population-based study.•RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees.•RIFD clearly identified cases with poorer health and quality of life than non-cases.•RIFD showed promising psychometric properties, but larger studies are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Bodily distress</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Conduction</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibromyalgia</subject><subject>Functional somatic disorders</subject><subject>Functional somatic syndromes</subject><subject>Health anxiety</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illness anxiety</subject><subject>Interrater reliability</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Irritable bowel syndrome</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medically Unexplained Symptoms</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schedules of clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0022-3999</issn><issn>1879-1360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFZAlLlwSZhx7sz6WQqFSJSTUu3HsidZRNl7sBNgb78Ab9knq1RaQuDCXmcM3_2j-nzGOUCPg-s1QD_t8cNuYKNcCUNcgawB8xFa4aXWFzRoesxWAEFWjtT5jz3IeAGCthXrKzhrQSmlsVuzL5-urd_zu5y9-wbsUqOduDFNwduRFm2xyWx6mmdK3QN95HxPvl8nNIU6FyHFn5-C4DzkmTylzO3m-JTvO2zL-CDQfnrMnvR0zvXjo5-z26v3t5cfq5tOH68uLm8pJJeZKIfQKpMS1FG0p2yJ2Xm9k23mJwvZWQN-SAvCtbbTEjSDdedLKKoHYnLPXJ9l9il8XyrPZhexoHO1EcclGCFASGy2goK_-QYe4pPLPkZKARVu1hdqcKJdizol6s09hZ9PBIJhjCGYwf0MwxxAMSFNCKKsvHw4s3Y78n8Xfrhfg7QmgYkgxNpnsAk2OfEjkZuNj-P-Ve30AnUE</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Petersen, Marie Weinreich</creator><creator>Schröder, Andreas</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Torben</creator><creator>Ørnbøl, Eva</creator><creator>Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz</creator><creator>Eliasen, Marie</creator><creator>Fink, Per</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety</title><author>Petersen, Marie Weinreich ; Schröder, Andreas ; Jørgensen, Torben ; Ørnbøl, Eva ; Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz ; Eliasen, Marie ; Fink, Per</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-510f504416427777a711bd9847bd412afa20f7e500d7a394182e9bde95a52113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Bodily distress</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Conduction</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibromyalgia</topic><topic>Functional somatic disorders</topic><topic>Functional somatic syndromes</topic><topic>Health anxiety</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illness anxiety</topic><topic>Interrater reliability</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Irritable bowel syndrome</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medically Unexplained Symptoms</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schedules of clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Marie Weinreich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Torben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ørnbøl, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliasen, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Per</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Marie Weinreich</au><au>Schröder, Andreas</au><au>Jørgensen, Torben</au><au>Ørnbøl, Eva</au><au>Dantoft, Thomas Meinertz</au><au>Eliasen, Marie</au><au>Fink, Per</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychosomatic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychosom Res</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>122</volume><spage>104</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>104-111</pages><issn>0022-3999</issn><eissn>1879-1360</eissn><abstract>Epidemiological research in functional somatic disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and bodily distress syndrome and related conditions such as health (illness) anxiety is often based on self-reported questionnaires or layman interviews. This study presents and describes the Research Interview for Functional somatic Disorders (RIFD) and provides first data regarding RIFD's ability to identify cases with functional somatic disorders and health anxiety in a two-phase design following self-reported symptom questionnaires. Methods: RIFD was performed by phone by trained family physicians on a stratified subsample of 1590 adults from a Danish general population cohort (n = 7493). Criterion validity was tested in a small preliminary test including 25 RIFD participants using Schedules of Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN), performed by a specialist in functional somatic disorders, as gold standard. Interrater reliability between interviewers was tested in 15 participants. Results: Compared with the comprehensive SCAN, preparation and conduction of RIFD were feasible and prompt. RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees. RIFD identified cases with significantly more impairment than identified non-cases. Based on small preliminary tests, RIFD showed promising psychometric properties. Conclusion: RIFD was a feasible, well-accepted and promising instrument for use in large epidemiological studies. However, larger studies investigating its psychometric properties are needed. •RIFD assesses functional somatic disorders and health anxiety.•RIFD was feasible and affordable to perform in a large population-based study.•RIFD was well accepted by both interviewers and interviewees.•RIFD clearly identified cases with poorer health and quality of life than non-cases.•RIFD showed promising psychometric properties, but larger studies are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30955913</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.04.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3999
ispartof Journal of psychosomatic research, 2019-07, Vol.122, p.104-111
issn 0022-3999
1879-1360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2205413920
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Anxiety
Anxiety - psychology
Anxiety disorders
Bodily distress
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Clinical assessment
Clinical research
Conduction
Epidemiology
Family physicians
Fatigue
Female
Fibromyalgia
Functional somatic disorders
Functional somatic syndromes
Health anxiety
Health status
Humans
Illness anxiety
Interrater reliability
Interviews
Intestine
Irritable bowel syndrome
Male
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
Middle Aged
Physicians
Psychiatry
Psychological distress
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Schedules of clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
title RIFD – A brief clinical research interview for functional somatic disorders and health anxiety
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T02%3A44%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RIFD%20%E2%80%93%20A%20brief%20clinical%20research%20interview%20for%20functional%20somatic%20disorders%20and%20health%20anxiety&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychosomatic%20research&rft.au=Petersen,%20Marie%20Weinreich&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=122&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=104-111&rft.issn=0022-3999&rft.eissn=1879-1360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.04.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2240141857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2240141857&rft_id=info:pmid/30955913&rft_els_id=S0022399919300455&rfr_iscdi=true