Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question

Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2019-04, Vol.35 (4), p.1160-1162
1. Verfasser: Cole, Brian J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1162
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1160
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 35
creator Cole, Brian J.
description Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instance, an acute traumatic tear and a degenerative tear of the meniscus are located on opposite ends of the spectrum of the meniscal pathology (which is comparable to focal chondral defects and osteoarthritis). For this reason, surgically addressing a non-obstructive degenerative meniscus does not always address the cause of the problem (inherent catabolic state) or the character of the symptoms (due to concomitant osteoarthritis or overload), and therefore, outcomes have been reported to be unpredictable. Of note, several recent randomized clinical trials allowed for a single-way crossover, which could act as a major confounder related to patient recruitment and expectation bias. Considering these thoughts along with the associated media coverage, there is a global trend to treat degenerative tears with a more conservative approach. Despite this, the most appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative tears for which a trial of conservative measures failed is yet to be determined.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2205408298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806318311964</els_id><sourcerecordid>2205408298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c3e495ad7b0a2fa44313940c570434dc31c7bfb6e82bccd2b879581eff9ba0143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2-gUiWbhLv_KTJuBCk-AeKCHU9TCY37ZQmU2dSwZ0P4RP6JE6pPztXFw7n3HPvR8gxhYwCHZ8tMu37uXcZA1pmlGVA5Q4Z0pyNU8443SVDKIRMSxjzATkIYQEAnJd8nww4yFxQkEPycFXb3nmrl8nEtS12vfZv58kDdjaYKE5R-5A4_6dczmw3-3z_mM51n9yFpJ9j8rTG0FvXHZK9Ri8DHn3PEXm-vppObtP7x5u7yeV9agSUfWo4CpnruqhAs0YLwSmXAkxegOCiNpyaomqqMZasMqZmVVnIvKTYNLLSQAUfkdPt3pV3L5tu1cbjcLnUHbp1UIxBHpuYLKNVbK3GuxA8NmrlbRufVBTUBqRaqC1ItQGpKFMRZIydfDesqxbr39APuWi42Bow_vlq0atgLHYGa-vR9Kp29v-GL__Nhss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2205408298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cole, Brian J.</creator><contributor>Chahla, Jorge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cole, Brian J. ; Chahla, Jorge</creatorcontrib><description>Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instance, an acute traumatic tear and a degenerative tear of the meniscus are located on opposite ends of the spectrum of the meniscal pathology (which is comparable to focal chondral defects and osteoarthritis). For this reason, surgically addressing a non-obstructive degenerative meniscus does not always address the cause of the problem (inherent catabolic state) or the character of the symptoms (due to concomitant osteoarthritis or overload), and therefore, outcomes have been reported to be unpredictable. Of note, several recent randomized clinical trials allowed for a single-way crossover, which could act as a major confounder related to patient recruitment and expectation bias. Considering these thoughts along with the associated media coverage, there is a global trend to treat degenerative tears with a more conservative approach. Despite this, the most appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative tears for which a trial of conservative measures failed is yet to be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30954109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aging ; Humans ; Meniscectomy ; Meniscus ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Surgeons ; Patients ; Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2019-04, Vol.35 (4), p.1160-1162</ispartof><rights>2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c3e495ad7b0a2fa44313940c570434dc31c7bfb6e82bccd2b879581eff9ba0143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c3e495ad7b0a2fa44313940c570434dc31c7bfb6e82bccd2b879581eff9ba0143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2435-4220 ; 0000-0002-9194-1150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806318311964$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30954109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chahla, Jorge</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cole, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><title>Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instance, an acute traumatic tear and a degenerative tear of the meniscus are located on opposite ends of the spectrum of the meniscal pathology (which is comparable to focal chondral defects and osteoarthritis). For this reason, surgically addressing a non-obstructive degenerative meniscus does not always address the cause of the problem (inherent catabolic state) or the character of the symptoms (due to concomitant osteoarthritis or overload), and therefore, outcomes have been reported to be unpredictable. Of note, several recent randomized clinical trials allowed for a single-way crossover, which could act as a major confounder related to patient recruitment and expectation bias. Considering these thoughts along with the associated media coverage, there is a global trend to treat degenerative tears with a more conservative approach. Despite this, the most appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative tears for which a trial of conservative measures failed is yet to be determined.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meniscectomy</subject><subject>Meniscus</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Surgeons</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2-gUiWbhLv_KTJuBCk-AeKCHU9TCY37ZQmU2dSwZ0P4RP6JE6pPztXFw7n3HPvR8gxhYwCHZ8tMu37uXcZA1pmlGVA5Q4Z0pyNU8443SVDKIRMSxjzATkIYQEAnJd8nww4yFxQkEPycFXb3nmrl8nEtS12vfZv58kDdjaYKE5R-5A4_6dczmw3-3z_mM51n9yFpJ9j8rTG0FvXHZK9Ri8DHn3PEXm-vppObtP7x5u7yeV9agSUfWo4CpnruqhAs0YLwSmXAkxegOCiNpyaomqqMZasMqZmVVnIvKTYNLLSQAUfkdPt3pV3L5tu1cbjcLnUHbp1UIxBHpuYLKNVbK3GuxA8NmrlbRufVBTUBqRaqC1ItQGpKFMRZIydfDesqxbr39APuWi42Bow_vlq0atgLHYGa-vR9Kp29v-GL__Nhss</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Cole, Brian J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-4220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-1150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question</title><author>Cole, Brian J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-c3e495ad7b0a2fa44313940c570434dc31c7bfb6e82bccd2b879581eff9ba0143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meniscectomy</topic><topic>Meniscus</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Surgeons</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Tibial Meniscus Injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cole, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cole, Brian J.</au><au>Chahla, Jorge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1160</spage><epage>1162</epage><pages>1160-1162</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>Meniscal tears constitute one of the most common pathologies in sports medicine. Although frequently grouped by shape, location, and size for didactic purposes, considering them according to their cause is probably the single most important factor to predict their behavior and prognosis. For instance, an acute traumatic tear and a degenerative tear of the meniscus are located on opposite ends of the spectrum of the meniscal pathology (which is comparable to focal chondral defects and osteoarthritis). For this reason, surgically addressing a non-obstructive degenerative meniscus does not always address the cause of the problem (inherent catabolic state) or the character of the symptoms (due to concomitant osteoarthritis or overload), and therefore, outcomes have been reported to be unpredictable. Of note, several recent randomized clinical trials allowed for a single-way crossover, which could act as a major confounder related to patient recruitment and expectation bias. Considering these thoughts along with the associated media coverage, there is a global trend to treat degenerative tears with a more conservative approach. Despite this, the most appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic degenerative tears for which a trial of conservative measures failed is yet to be determined.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30954109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.019</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-4220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-1150</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2019-04, Vol.35 (4), p.1160-1162
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2205408298
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aging
Humans
Meniscectomy
Meniscus
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Surgeons
Patients
Tibial Meniscus Injuries
title Editorial Commentary: Meniscal Tears or Meniscal Aging—That Is the Question
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial%20Commentary:%20Meniscal%20Tears%20or%20Meniscal%20Aging%E2%80%94That%20Is%20the%20Question&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Cole,%20Brian%20J.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1160&rft.epage=1162&rft.pages=1160-1162&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.12.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2205408298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2205408298&rft_id=info:pmid/30954109&rft_els_id=S0749806318311964&rfr_iscdi=true