Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease
End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Liver transplantation 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | Liver transplantation |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Fricker, Zachary P. Serper, Marina |
description | End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lt.25434 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204689885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210387283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AQgBdRtFbBJ5AFLx6M7l-SzVGr1WJBwd7DJjtbIpuk7iaKNx_BZ_RJ3FqtIHiaYeabj2EGoQNKTikh7Mx2pywWXGygAY1ZGiUi5ZvrPIl30K73j4RQGmdkG-1wksYyI3SA-lHvHDQdvm3aFwt6Dif4QjlXgfO4a_GkXlioA6C6qm1OsGo0Hvdd7wBfVg7KZdXjqsH3ytoqQM-ARyp0TevwVaM_3t4fOjUHPA0dF2Y8KA97aMso62H_Ow7RbHw1G91E07vryeh8GpVcZCISJgEtpBIskSVnhiakSAqdEm0o12AyRShhmpVFLEtBDc1SJpgpRRhMi5gP0fFKu3DtUw--y-vKl2CtaqDtfc4YEYnMpFyiR3_Qx7Z3TVguUJRwmTLJf4Wla713YPKFq2rlXnNK8uUnctvlX58I6OG3sC9q0Gvw5_QBiFbAS2Xh9V9RPp2thJ-AeZHB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210387283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><description>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-6465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-6473</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lt.25434</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30758901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Hospice care ; Liver diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Morbidity ; Palliation ; Palliative care ; Patient satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Liver transplantation, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><rights>2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flt.25434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flt.25434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30758901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><title>Liver transplantation</title><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><description>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</description><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><issn>1527-6465</issn><issn>1527-6473</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AQgBdRtFbBJ5AFLx6M7l-SzVGr1WJBwd7DJjtbIpuk7iaKNx_BZ_RJ3FqtIHiaYeabj2EGoQNKTikh7Mx2pywWXGygAY1ZGiUi5ZvrPIl30K73j4RQGmdkG-1wksYyI3SA-lHvHDQdvm3aFwt6Dif4QjlXgfO4a_GkXlioA6C6qm1OsGo0Hvdd7wBfVg7KZdXjqsH3ytoqQM-ARyp0TevwVaM_3t4fOjUHPA0dF2Y8KA97aMso62H_Ow7RbHw1G91E07vryeh8GpVcZCISJgEtpBIskSVnhiakSAqdEm0o12AyRShhmpVFLEtBDc1SJpgpRRhMi5gP0fFKu3DtUw--y-vKl2CtaqDtfc4YEYnMpFyiR3_Qx7Z3TVguUJRwmTLJf4Wla713YPKFq2rlXnNK8uUnctvlX58I6OG3sC9q0Gvw5_QBiFbAS2Xh9V9RPp2thJ-AeZHB</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Fricker, Zachary P.</creator><creator>Serper, Marina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><author>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fricker, Zachary P.</au><au>Serper, Marina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</atitle><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>787-796</pages><issn>1527-6465</issn><eissn>1527-6473</eissn><abstract>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>30758901</pmid><doi>10.1002/lt.25434</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-6465 |
ispartof | Liver transplantation, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796 |
issn | 1527-6465 1527-6473 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204689885 |
source | Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Hospice care Liver diseases Liver transplantation Morbidity Palliation Palliative care Patient satisfaction |
title | Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Knowledge,%20Barriers%20to%20Implementation,%20and%20Future%20Directions%20in%20Palliative%20Care%20for%20End%E2%80%90Stage%20Liver%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Liver%20transplantation&rft.au=Fricker,%20Zachary%20P.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=787-796&rft.issn=1527-6465&rft.eissn=1527-6473&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lt.25434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210387283%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210387283&rft_id=info:pmid/30758901&rfr_iscdi=true |