Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease

End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Liver transplantation 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796
Hauptverfasser: Fricker, Zachary P., Serper, Marina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 796
container_issue 5
container_start_page 787
container_title Liver transplantation
container_volume 25
creator Fricker, Zachary P.
Serper, Marina
description End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lt.25434
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204689885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210387283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AQgBdRtFbBJ5AFLx6M7l-SzVGr1WJBwd7DJjtbIpuk7iaKNx_BZ_RJ3FqtIHiaYeabj2EGoQNKTikh7Mx2pywWXGygAY1ZGiUi5ZvrPIl30K73j4RQGmdkG-1wksYyI3SA-lHvHDQdvm3aFwt6Dif4QjlXgfO4a_GkXlioA6C6qm1OsGo0Hvdd7wBfVg7KZdXjqsH3ytoqQM-ARyp0TevwVaM_3t4fOjUHPA0dF2Y8KA97aMso62H_Ow7RbHw1G91E07vryeh8GpVcZCISJgEtpBIskSVnhiakSAqdEm0o12AyRShhmpVFLEtBDc1SJpgpRRhMi5gP0fFKu3DtUw--y-vKl2CtaqDtfc4YEYnMpFyiR3_Qx7Z3TVguUJRwmTLJf4Wla713YPKFq2rlXnNK8uUnctvlX58I6OG3sC9q0Gvw5_QBiFbAS2Xh9V9RPp2thJ-AeZHB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210387283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</creator><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><description>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-6465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-6473</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lt.25434</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30758901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</publisher><subject>Hospice care ; Liver diseases ; Liver transplantation ; Morbidity ; Palliation ; Palliative care ; Patient satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Liver transplantation, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><rights>2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flt.25434$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flt.25434$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30758901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><title>Liver transplantation</title><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><description>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</description><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><issn>1527-6465</issn><issn>1527-6473</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1Kw0AQgBdRtFbBJ5AFLx6M7l-SzVGr1WJBwd7DJjtbIpuk7iaKNx_BZ_RJ3FqtIHiaYeabj2EGoQNKTikh7Mx2pywWXGygAY1ZGiUi5ZvrPIl30K73j4RQGmdkG-1wksYyI3SA-lHvHDQdvm3aFwt6Dif4QjlXgfO4a_GkXlioA6C6qm1OsGo0Hvdd7wBfVg7KZdXjqsH3ytoqQM-ARyp0TevwVaM_3t4fOjUHPA0dF2Y8KA97aMso62H_Ow7RbHw1G91E07vryeh8GpVcZCISJgEtpBIskSVnhiakSAqdEm0o12AyRShhmpVFLEtBDc1SJpgpRRhMi5gP0fFKu3DtUw--y-vKl2CtaqDtfc4YEYnMpFyiR3_Qx7Z3TVguUJRwmTLJf4Wla713YPKFq2rlXnNK8uUnctvlX58I6OG3sC9q0Gvw5_QBiFbAS2Xh9V9RPp2thJ-AeZHB</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Fricker, Zachary P.</creator><creator>Serper, Marina</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</title><author>Fricker, Zachary P. ; Serper, Marina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-4f6ed48a4268c32f160b6bd70df13def9a0102d2cb58c41f197242fc44f67b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fricker, Zachary P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serper, Marina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fricker, Zachary P.</au><au>Serper, Marina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease</atitle><jtitle>Liver transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Liver Transpl</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>787-796</pages><issn>1527-6465</issn><eissn>1527-6473</eissn><abstract>End‐stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders’ perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</pub><pmid>30758901</pmid><doi>10.1002/lt.25434</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-6465
ispartof Liver transplantation, 2019-05, Vol.25 (5), p.787-796
issn 1527-6465
1527-6473
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204689885
source Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Hospice care
Liver diseases
Liver transplantation
Morbidity
Palliation
Palliative care
Patient satisfaction
title Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End‐Stage Liver Disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Knowledge,%20Barriers%20to%20Implementation,%20and%20Future%20Directions%20in%20Palliative%20Care%20for%20End%E2%80%90Stage%20Liver%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Liver%20transplantation&rft.au=Fricker,%20Zachary%20P.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=787-796&rft.issn=1527-6465&rft.eissn=1527-6473&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lt.25434&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210387283%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210387283&rft_id=info:pmid/30758901&rfr_iscdi=true