Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry

Rationale Successful coupling of a multi‐ionization automated platform with commercially available mass spectrometers provides improved coverage of compounds in complex mixtures through implementation of new and traditional ionization methods. The versatility of the automated platform is demonstrate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2021-01, Vol.35 (S1), p.e8449-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Karki, Santosh, Meher, Anil K., Inutan, Ellen D., Pophristic, Milan, Marshall, Darrell D., Rackers, Kevin, Trimpin, Sarah, McEwen, Charles N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S1
container_start_page e8449
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 35
creator Karki, Santosh
Meher, Anil K.
Inutan, Ellen D.
Pophristic, Milan
Marshall, Darrell D.
Rackers, Kevin
Trimpin, Sarah
McEwen, Charles N.
description Rationale Successful coupling of a multi‐ionization automated platform with commercially available mass spectrometers provides improved coverage of compounds in complex mixtures through implementation of new and traditional ionization methods. The versatility of the automated platform is demonstrated through coupling with mass spectrometers from two different vendors. Standards and complex biological samples were acquired using electrospray ionization (ESI), solvent‐assisted ionization (SAI) and matrix‐assisted ionization (MAI). Methods The MS™ prototype automated platform samples from 96‐ or 384‐well plates as well as surfaces. The platform interfaces with Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometers by replacement of the IonMax source, and on Waters mass spectrometers with additional minor source inlet modifications. The sample is transferred to the ionization region using a fused‐silica or metal capillary which is cleaned between acquisitions using solvents. For ESI and SAI, typically 1 μL of sample solution is drawn into the capillary tube and for ESI slowly dispensed near the inlet of the mass spectrometer with voltage placed on the delivering syringe barrel to which the tubing is attached, while for SAI the sample delivery tubing inserts into the inlet without the need for high voltage. For MAI, typically, 0.2 μL of matrix solution is drawn into the syringe before drawing 0.1 μL of the sample solution and dispensing to dry before insertion into the inlet. Results A comparison study of a mixture of angiotensin I, verapamil, crystal violet, and atrazine representative of peptides, drugs, dyes, and herbicides using SAI, MAI, and ESI shows large differences in ionization efficiency of the various components. Solutions of a mixture of erythromycin and azithromycin in wells of a 384‐microtiter well plate were mass analyzed at the rate of ca 1 min per sample using MAI and ESI. In addition, we report the analysis of bacterial extracts using automated MAI and ESI methods. Finally, the ability to perform surface analysis with the automated platform is also demonstrated by directly analyzing dyes separated on a thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) plate and compounds extracted from the surface of a beef liver tissue section. Conclusions The prototype multi‐ionization automated platform offers solid matrix introduction used with MAI, as well as solution introduction using either ESI or SAI. The combination of ionization methods extends the types of compounds which are
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcm.8449
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204687587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470706363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-c4d91d74977540e5efb248b503b3e42444d459371d1dbd897db44b9a6cefa6053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQQIMo7uwq-AUS8OKlx0qnutM5yqirsCKIcw7pTjX00Jm0Sdpl9uQn-I1-yfY4o4LgpepQj0fxGHsmYC0Aylex8-sGUT9gKwFaFVBK8ZCtQFeiQKGbC3aZ0g5AiKqEx-xCLhcQ0KzY9g19ozFMnvaZh55bHkMb8tAlPo029yF6vgxu5xy8zeS4n8c8_Pz-Ywj74c7mZXFvU-Jpoi7H4CnHwxP2qLdjoqfnfcW2795-2bwvbj5df9i8vik6iVoXHTotnEKtVIVAFfVtiU1bgWwlYYmIDistlXDCta7RyrWIrbZ1R72toZJX7OXJO8XwdaaUjR9SR-No9xTmZMoSsG5U1agFffEPugtz3C_fmRIVKKhlLf8KuxhSitSbKQ7exoMRYI6pzZLaHFMv6POzcG49uT_g77YLUJyA22Gkw39F5vPm4y_hPUx0iLY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470706363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Karki, Santosh ; Meher, Anil K. ; Inutan, Ellen D. ; Pophristic, Milan ; Marshall, Darrell D. ; Rackers, Kevin ; Trimpin, Sarah ; McEwen, Charles N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Karki, Santosh ; Meher, Anil K. ; Inutan, Ellen D. ; Pophristic, Milan ; Marshall, Darrell D. ; Rackers, Kevin ; Trimpin, Sarah ; McEwen, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Successful coupling of a multi‐ionization automated platform with commercially available mass spectrometers provides improved coverage of compounds in complex mixtures through implementation of new and traditional ionization methods. The versatility of the automated platform is demonstrated through coupling with mass spectrometers from two different vendors. Standards and complex biological samples were acquired using electrospray ionization (ESI), solvent‐assisted ionization (SAI) and matrix‐assisted ionization (MAI). Methods The MS™ prototype automated platform samples from 96‐ or 384‐well plates as well as surfaces. The platform interfaces with Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometers by replacement of the IonMax source, and on Waters mass spectrometers with additional minor source inlet modifications. The sample is transferred to the ionization region using a fused‐silica or metal capillary which is cleaned between acquisitions using solvents. For ESI and SAI, typically 1 μL of sample solution is drawn into the capillary tube and for ESI slowly dispensed near the inlet of the mass spectrometer with voltage placed on the delivering syringe barrel to which the tubing is attached, while for SAI the sample delivery tubing inserts into the inlet without the need for high voltage. For MAI, typically, 0.2 μL of matrix solution is drawn into the syringe before drawing 0.1 μL of the sample solution and dispensing to dry before insertion into the inlet. Results A comparison study of a mixture of angiotensin I, verapamil, crystal violet, and atrazine representative of peptides, drugs, dyes, and herbicides using SAI, MAI, and ESI shows large differences in ionization efficiency of the various components. Solutions of a mixture of erythromycin and azithromycin in wells of a 384‐microtiter well plate were mass analyzed at the rate of ca 1 min per sample using MAI and ESI. In addition, we report the analysis of bacterial extracts using automated MAI and ESI methods. Finally, the ability to perform surface analysis with the automated platform is also demonstrated by directly analyzing dyes separated on a thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) plate and compounds extracted from the surface of a beef liver tissue section. Conclusions The prototype multi‐ionization automated platform offers solid matrix introduction used with MAI, as well as solution introduction using either ESI or SAI. The combination of ionization methods extends the types of compounds which are efficiently ionized and is especially valuable with complex mixtures as demonstrated for bacterial extracts. While coupling of the automated multi‐ionization platform to Thermo and Waters mass spectrometers is demonstrated, it should be possible to interface it with most commercial mass spectrometers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8449</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30950108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atrazine ; Automation ; Biological properties ; Capillary tubes ; Coupling (molecular) ; Dyes ; Erythromycin ; Herbicides ; Inserts ; Ionization ; Ions ; Mass spectrometers ; Mass spectrometry ; Peptides ; Prototypes ; Robotics ; Silicon dioxide ; Solvents ; Surface analysis (chemical) ; Syringes</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2021-01, Vol.35 (S1), p.e8449-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-c4d91d74977540e5efb248b503b3e42444d459371d1dbd897db44b9a6cefa6053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-c4d91d74977540e5efb248b503b3e42444d459371d1dbd897db44b9a6cefa6053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3703-2853 ; 0000-0002-3720-2269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.8449$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.8449$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karki, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meher, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inutan, Ellen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pophristic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Darrell D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rackers, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimpin, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Rationale Successful coupling of a multi‐ionization automated platform with commercially available mass spectrometers provides improved coverage of compounds in complex mixtures through implementation of new and traditional ionization methods. The versatility of the automated platform is demonstrated through coupling with mass spectrometers from two different vendors. Standards and complex biological samples were acquired using electrospray ionization (ESI), solvent‐assisted ionization (SAI) and matrix‐assisted ionization (MAI). Methods The MS™ prototype automated platform samples from 96‐ or 384‐well plates as well as surfaces. The platform interfaces with Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometers by replacement of the IonMax source, and on Waters mass spectrometers with additional minor source inlet modifications. The sample is transferred to the ionization region using a fused‐silica or metal capillary which is cleaned between acquisitions using solvents. For ESI and SAI, typically 1 μL of sample solution is drawn into the capillary tube and for ESI slowly dispensed near the inlet of the mass spectrometer with voltage placed on the delivering syringe barrel to which the tubing is attached, while for SAI the sample delivery tubing inserts into the inlet without the need for high voltage. For MAI, typically, 0.2 μL of matrix solution is drawn into the syringe before drawing 0.1 μL of the sample solution and dispensing to dry before insertion into the inlet. Results A comparison study of a mixture of angiotensin I, verapamil, crystal violet, and atrazine representative of peptides, drugs, dyes, and herbicides using SAI, MAI, and ESI shows large differences in ionization efficiency of the various components. Solutions of a mixture of erythromycin and azithromycin in wells of a 384‐microtiter well plate were mass analyzed at the rate of ca 1 min per sample using MAI and ESI. In addition, we report the analysis of bacterial extracts using automated MAI and ESI methods. Finally, the ability to perform surface analysis with the automated platform is also demonstrated by directly analyzing dyes separated on a thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) plate and compounds extracted from the surface of a beef liver tissue section. Conclusions The prototype multi‐ionization automated platform offers solid matrix introduction used with MAI, as well as solution introduction using either ESI or SAI. The combination of ionization methods extends the types of compounds which are efficiently ionized and is especially valuable with complex mixtures as demonstrated for bacterial extracts. While coupling of the automated multi‐ionization platform to Thermo and Waters mass spectrometers is demonstrated, it should be possible to interface it with most commercial mass spectrometers.</description><subject>Atrazine</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Biological properties</subject><subject>Capillary tubes</subject><subject>Coupling (molecular)</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Erythromycin</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Inserts</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Mass spectrometers</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Surface analysis (chemical)</subject><subject>Syringes</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQQIMo7uwq-AUS8OKlx0qnutM5yqirsCKIcw7pTjX00Jm0Sdpl9uQn-I1-yfY4o4LgpepQj0fxGHsmYC0Aylex8-sGUT9gKwFaFVBK8ZCtQFeiQKGbC3aZ0g5AiKqEx-xCLhcQ0KzY9g19ozFMnvaZh55bHkMb8tAlPo029yF6vgxu5xy8zeS4n8c8_Pz-Ywj74c7mZXFvU-Jpoi7H4CnHwxP2qLdjoqfnfcW2795-2bwvbj5df9i8vik6iVoXHTotnEKtVIVAFfVtiU1bgWwlYYmIDistlXDCta7RyrWIrbZ1R72toZJX7OXJO8XwdaaUjR9SR-No9xTmZMoSsG5U1agFffEPugtz3C_fmRIVKKhlLf8KuxhSitSbKQ7exoMRYI6pzZLaHFMv6POzcG49uT_g77YLUJyA22Gkw39F5vPm4y_hPUx0iLY</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Karki, Santosh</creator><creator>Meher, Anil K.</creator><creator>Inutan, Ellen D.</creator><creator>Pophristic, Milan</creator><creator>Marshall, Darrell D.</creator><creator>Rackers, Kevin</creator><creator>Trimpin, Sarah</creator><creator>McEwen, Charles N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-2853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-2269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry</title><author>Karki, Santosh ; Meher, Anil K. ; Inutan, Ellen D. ; Pophristic, Milan ; Marshall, Darrell D. ; Rackers, Kevin ; Trimpin, Sarah ; McEwen, Charles N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-c4d91d74977540e5efb248b503b3e42444d459371d1dbd897db44b9a6cefa6053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atrazine</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Biological properties</topic><topic>Capillary tubes</topic><topic>Coupling (molecular)</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Erythromycin</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Inserts</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Mass spectrometers</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Surface analysis (chemical)</topic><topic>Syringes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karki, Santosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meher, Anil K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inutan, Ellen D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pophristic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Darrell D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rackers, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trimpin, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Charles N.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karki, Santosh</au><au>Meher, Anil K.</au><au>Inutan, Ellen D.</au><au>Pophristic, Milan</au><au>Marshall, Darrell D.</au><au>Rackers, Kevin</au><au>Trimpin, Sarah</au><au>McEwen, Charles N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>e8449</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e8449-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale Successful coupling of a multi‐ionization automated platform with commercially available mass spectrometers provides improved coverage of compounds in complex mixtures through implementation of new and traditional ionization methods. The versatility of the automated platform is demonstrated through coupling with mass spectrometers from two different vendors. Standards and complex biological samples were acquired using electrospray ionization (ESI), solvent‐assisted ionization (SAI) and matrix‐assisted ionization (MAI). Methods The MS™ prototype automated platform samples from 96‐ or 384‐well plates as well as surfaces. The platform interfaces with Thermo Fisher Scientific mass spectrometers by replacement of the IonMax source, and on Waters mass spectrometers with additional minor source inlet modifications. The sample is transferred to the ionization region using a fused‐silica or metal capillary which is cleaned between acquisitions using solvents. For ESI and SAI, typically 1 μL of sample solution is drawn into the capillary tube and for ESI slowly dispensed near the inlet of the mass spectrometer with voltage placed on the delivering syringe barrel to which the tubing is attached, while for SAI the sample delivery tubing inserts into the inlet without the need for high voltage. For MAI, typically, 0.2 μL of matrix solution is drawn into the syringe before drawing 0.1 μL of the sample solution and dispensing to dry before insertion into the inlet. Results A comparison study of a mixture of angiotensin I, verapamil, crystal violet, and atrazine representative of peptides, drugs, dyes, and herbicides using SAI, MAI, and ESI shows large differences in ionization efficiency of the various components. Solutions of a mixture of erythromycin and azithromycin in wells of a 384‐microtiter well plate were mass analyzed at the rate of ca 1 min per sample using MAI and ESI. In addition, we report the analysis of bacterial extracts using automated MAI and ESI methods. Finally, the ability to perform surface analysis with the automated platform is also demonstrated by directly analyzing dyes separated on a thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) plate and compounds extracted from the surface of a beef liver tissue section. Conclusions The prototype multi‐ionization automated platform offers solid matrix introduction used with MAI, as well as solution introduction using either ESI or SAI. The combination of ionization methods extends the types of compounds which are efficiently ionized and is especially valuable with complex mixtures as demonstrated for bacterial extracts. While coupling of the automated multi‐ionization platform to Thermo and Waters mass spectrometers is demonstrated, it should be possible to interface it with most commercial mass spectrometers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30950108</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcm.8449</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-2853</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3720-2269</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2021-01, Vol.35 (S1), p.e8449-n/a
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2204687587
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Atrazine
Automation
Biological properties
Capillary tubes
Coupling (molecular)
Dyes
Erythromycin
Herbicides
Inserts
Ionization
Ions
Mass spectrometers
Mass spectrometry
Peptides
Prototypes
Robotics
Silicon dioxide
Solvents
Surface analysis (chemical)
Syringes
title Development of a robotics platform for automated multi‐ionization mass spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A46%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20robotics%20platform%20for%20automated%20multi%E2%80%90ionization%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Karki,%20Santosh&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=e8449&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e8449-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.8449&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2470706363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470706363&rft_id=info:pmid/30950108&rfr_iscdi=true