Procedure-specific Training for Robot-assisted Distal Pancreatectomy

MINICohort study (n = 237) describing a training program to teach robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy to surgeons at an academic institution and assess its impact on outcomes. After training, perioperative blood loss and length of stay improved, while complication rates remained unchanged. Propensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2021-07, Vol.274 (1), p.e18-e27
Hauptverfasser: Klompmaker, Sjors, van der Vliet, Walderik J., Thoolen, Stijn J., Ore, Ana Sofia, Verkoulen, Koen, Solis-Velasco, Monica, Canacari, Elena G., Kruskal, Jonathan B., Khwaja, Khalid O., Tseng, Jennifer F., Callery, Mark P., Kent, Tara S., Moser, A. James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:MINICohort study (n = 237) describing a training program to teach robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy to surgeons at an academic institution and assess its impact on outcomes. After training, perioperative blood loss and length of stay improved, while complication rates remained unchanged. Propensity-score matching confirmed a 2-day reduction in length of stay after RADP. OBJECTIVE:To train practicing surgeons in robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RADP) and assess the impact on 5 domains of healthcare quality. BACKGROUND:RADP may reduce the treatment burden compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), but studies on institutional training and implementation programs are scarce. METHODS:A retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluating surgical performance during a procedure-specific training program for RADP (January 2006 to September 2017). Baseline and unadjusted outcomes were compared “before training” (ODP only; June 2012). Exclusion criteria were neoadjuvant therapy, vascular- and unrelated organ resection. Run charts evaluated index length of stay (LOS) and 90-day comprehensive complication index. Cumulative sum charts of operating time (OT) assessed institutional learning. Adjusted outcomes after RADP versus ODP were compared using a secondary propensity-score-matched (1:1) analysis to determine clinical efficacy. RESULTS:After screening, 237 patients were included in the before-training (133 ODP) and after-training (24 ODP, 80 RADP) groups. After initiation of training, mean perioperative blood loss decreased (−255 mL, P0.05). Over time, there were nonrandom (P < 0.05) downward shifts in LOS, while comprehensive complication index was unaffected. We observed 3 learning curve phases in OTaccumulation (65 cases). Propensity-score-matching confirmed reductions in index and 90-day LOS and blood loss with similar morbidity between RADP and ODP. CONCLUSION:Supervised procedure-specific training enabled successful implementation of RADP by practicing surgeons with immediate improvements in length of stay, without adverse effects on safety.
ISSN:0003-4932
1528-1140
DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003291