Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI

An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psycholinguistic research 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946
Hauptverfasser: Rombough, Kelly, Thornton, Rosalind
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 946
container_issue 4
container_start_page 921
container_title Journal of psycholinguistic research
container_volume 48
creator Rombough, Kelly
Thornton, Rosalind
description An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1221459</ericid><sourcerecordid>2203137905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqXwAkigSCwMBK7t2InHqipQVImhMFuJY9NUaVLshJ-Nd-ANeRJcUkBiYLKs79zrzwehQwznGCC-cBgE5SFgEYLgEYR0C_Uxi2nIGWPbqA8gIOQCWA_tObcAf08SvIt6FETEIKJ9dDZrs4VWzcfb-7B9CSbVk7auqKugqILRvChzq6vguWjmwWw62Uc7Ji2dPticA3R_Ob4bXYfT26vJaDgNFY2SJiRKZYplJspoxBVRhMc0TRJDDSacEGYoNjGYnAnfNYIsZ0YB4ULw2CQ5jukAnXZ7V7Z-bLVr5LJwSpdlWum6dZIQoJjG_mMePfmDLurWVr7dmiKcJ4yDp0hHKVs7Z7WRK1ssU_sqMci1S9m5lN6l_HIpqR863qxus6XOf0a-5XngqAO0LdRPPL7BhOCICZ_TLnc-qx60_e32z7OfEpeF_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202668560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</creator><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><description>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30945043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Auxiliary verbs ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clauses ; Cognitive Psychology ; Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; Female ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Grammar ; Grammatical subject ; Humans ; Language disorders ; Language Impairments ; Learning ; Linguistic Input ; Male ; Mean length of utterance ; Phrase Structure ; Preschool Children ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Questions ; Specific Language Disorder ; Specific language impairment ; Verbs ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Psycholinguistic Research is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1221459$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</description><subject>Auxiliary verbs</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical subject</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language disorders</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mean length of utterance</subject><subject>Phrase Structure</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Specific Language Disorder</subject><subject>Specific language impairment</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqXwAkigSCwMBK7t2InHqipQVImhMFuJY9NUaVLshJ-Nd-ANeRJcUkBiYLKs79zrzwehQwznGCC-cBgE5SFgEYLgEYR0C_Uxi2nIGWPbqA8gIOQCWA_tObcAf08SvIt6FETEIKJ9dDZrs4VWzcfb-7B9CSbVk7auqKugqILRvChzq6vguWjmwWw62Uc7Ji2dPticA3R_Ob4bXYfT26vJaDgNFY2SJiRKZYplJspoxBVRhMc0TRJDDSacEGYoNjGYnAnfNYIsZ0YB4ULw2CQ5jukAnXZ7V7Z-bLVr5LJwSpdlWum6dZIQoJjG_mMePfmDLurWVr7dmiKcJ4yDp0hHKVs7Z7WRK1ssU_sqMci1S9m5lN6l_HIpqR863qxus6XOf0a-5XngqAO0LdRPPL7BhOCICZ_TLnc-qx60_e32z7OfEpeF_A</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Rombough, Kelly</creator><creator>Thornton, Rosalind</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><author>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Auxiliary verbs</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical subject</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language disorders</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mean length of utterance</topic><topic>Phrase Structure</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Specific Language Disorder</topic><topic>Specific language impairment</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rombough, Kelly</au><au>Thornton, Rosalind</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1221459</ericid><atitle>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>921-946</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30945043</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-6905
ispartof Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946
issn 0090-6905
1573-6555
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137905
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Auxiliary verbs
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Child
Child Language
Child, Preschool
Children
Clauses
Cognitive Psychology
Comparative Analysis
Control Groups
Female
Form Classes (Languages)
Grammar
Grammatical subject
Humans
Language disorders
Language Impairments
Learning
Linguistic Input
Male
Mean length of utterance
Phrase Structure
Preschool Children
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Questions
Specific Language Disorder
Specific language impairment
Verbs
Young Children
title Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A08%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subject%E2%80%93Aux%20Inversion%20in%20Children%20with%20SLI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Rombough,%20Kelly&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=921-946&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2203137905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202668560&rft_id=info:pmid/30945043&rft_ericid=EJ1221459&rfr_iscdi=true