Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI
An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psycholinguistic research 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 946 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 921 |
container_title | Journal of psycholinguistic research |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Rombough, Kelly Thornton, Rosalind |
description | An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1221459</ericid><sourcerecordid>2203137905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqXwAkigSCwMBK7t2InHqipQVImhMFuJY9NUaVLshJ-Nd-ANeRJcUkBiYLKs79zrzwehQwznGCC-cBgE5SFgEYLgEYR0C_Uxi2nIGWPbqA8gIOQCWA_tObcAf08SvIt6FETEIKJ9dDZrs4VWzcfb-7B9CSbVk7auqKugqILRvChzq6vguWjmwWw62Uc7Ji2dPticA3R_Ob4bXYfT26vJaDgNFY2SJiRKZYplJspoxBVRhMc0TRJDDSacEGYoNjGYnAnfNYIsZ0YB4ULw2CQ5jukAnXZ7V7Z-bLVr5LJwSpdlWum6dZIQoJjG_mMePfmDLurWVr7dmiKcJ4yDp0hHKVs7Z7WRK1ssU_sqMci1S9m5lN6l_HIpqR863qxus6XOf0a-5XngqAO0LdRPPL7BhOCICZ_TLnc-qx60_e32z7OfEpeF_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2202668560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</creator><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><description>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30945043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Auxiliary verbs ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child ; Child Language ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clauses ; Cognitive Psychology ; Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; Female ; Form Classes (Languages) ; Grammar ; Grammatical subject ; Humans ; Language disorders ; Language Impairments ; Learning ; Linguistic Input ; Male ; Mean length of utterance ; Phrase Structure ; Preschool Children ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Questions ; Specific Language Disorder ; Specific language impairment ; Verbs ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Psycholinguistic Research is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1221459$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30945043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</description><subject>Auxiliary verbs</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clauses</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Classes (Languages)</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical subject</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language disorders</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mean length of utterance</subject><subject>Phrase Structure</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Specific Language Disorder</subject><subject>Specific language impairment</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EoqXwAkigSCwMBK7t2InHqipQVImhMFuJY9NUaVLshJ-Nd-ANeRJcUkBiYLKs79zrzwehQwznGCC-cBgE5SFgEYLgEYR0C_Uxi2nIGWPbqA8gIOQCWA_tObcAf08SvIt6FETEIKJ9dDZrs4VWzcfb-7B9CSbVk7auqKugqILRvChzq6vguWjmwWw62Uc7Ji2dPticA3R_Ob4bXYfT26vJaDgNFY2SJiRKZYplJspoxBVRhMc0TRJDDSacEGYoNjGYnAnfNYIsZ0YB4ULw2CQ5jukAnXZ7V7Z-bLVr5LJwSpdlWum6dZIQoJjG_mMePfmDLurWVr7dmiKcJ4yDp0hHKVs7Z7WRK1ssU_sqMci1S9m5lN6l_HIpqR863qxus6XOf0a-5XngqAO0LdRPPL7BhOCICZ_TLnc-qx60_e32z7OfEpeF_A</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Rombough, Kelly</creator><creator>Thornton, Rosalind</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</title><author>Rombough, Kelly ; Thornton, Rosalind</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-2ccbc5bf4b346c2c2673a88f3f126225f31f70fd5957340bd5fc0269967f8d173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Auxiliary verbs</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clauses</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Classes (Languages)</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical subject</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language disorders</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mean length of utterance</topic><topic>Phrase Structure</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Specific Language Disorder</topic><topic>Specific language impairment</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rombough, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Rosalind</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rombough, Kelly</au><au>Thornton, Rosalind</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1221459</ericid><atitle>Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>921-946</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>An elicited production study investigated subject–aux inversion in 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 2 control groups, typically-developing 5-year-old children and 3-year-old children matched by mean length of utterance. The experimental findings showed that children with specific language impairment produced subject–aux inversion in yes/no questions significantly less often than either of the control groups. However, the fact that lack of inversion is reflected in the input led to the proposal that children with specific language impairment choose the most economical grammatical option. For main clause wh-questions, children with SLI carried out subject–aux inversion at a rate that was not significantly different from the control groups. This finding suggests that these children have access to hierarchical phrase structure representations for questions and the relevant movement operations. In embedded wh-questions, where subject–aux inversion is not permitted, children with SLI implemented SAI more frequently than the control groups. Our interpretation of this finding is that once children with SLI acquire the subject–aux inversion rule, that they are slower to learn that embedded clauses present an exception to the rule.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30945043</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-6905 |
ispartof | Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2019-08, Vol.48 (4), p.921-946 |
issn | 0090-6905 1573-6555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2203137905 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Auxiliary verbs Behavioral Science and Psychology Child Child Language Child, Preschool Children Clauses Cognitive Psychology Comparative Analysis Control Groups Female Form Classes (Languages) Grammar Grammatical subject Humans Language disorders Language Impairments Learning Linguistic Input Male Mean length of utterance Phrase Structure Preschool Children Psycholinguistics Psychology Questions Specific Language Disorder Specific language impairment Verbs Young Children |
title | Subject–Aux Inversion in Children with SLI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A08%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subject%E2%80%93Aux%20Inversion%20in%20Children%20with%20SLI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Rombough,%20Kelly&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=921-946&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-019-09640-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2203137905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2202668560&rft_id=info:pmid/30945043&rft_ericid=EJ1221459&rfr_iscdi=true |