Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study
The aim of this work is to describe the "Muscular System Game," created to assist in the teaching-learning process concerning the physiology of the muscular system, and to evaluate its effect on the learning of university students. Participating in this study were first-year undergraduate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in physiology education 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.149-154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 149 |
container_title | Advances in physiology education |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião Cardozo, Lais Tono Marcondes, Fernanda Klein |
description | The aim of this work is to describe the "Muscular System Game," created to assist in the teaching-learning process concerning the physiology of the muscular system, and to evaluate its effect on the learning of university students. Participating in this study were first-year undergraduate students of the pharmacy course (game group, n = 21, 5 men and 16 women, age 23.57 ± 4.92 yr) and the nursing course (control group, n = 22, 2 men and 20 women, age 22.90 ± 4.93 yr), who had the same level of preparation. After theoretical classes concerning the physiology of the muscular system, all students were instructed to study the topic. In the next week, the students of the game group performed the activity with the board game, and the students of the control group undertook a guided study activity, which contained a list of exercises with the same questions used in the game, to be answered by groups. In the week following these activities, all of the students answered evaluation questions about the topic. The scores obtained for the two groups in the evaluation were compared using student's "t"-test for unpaired samples, considering a significance level of 0.05. The score obtained for the control group (5.78 ± 0.38) was significantly lower than the score for the game group (7.50 ± 0.47; P < 0.05). The results obtained indicating that the use of an educational board game about the physiology of muscle contraction resulted in significantly improved learning, compared with the use of guided study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/advan.00165.2018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2202203990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1217731</ericid><sourcerecordid>2202203990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-eebc61469adf07406c280d3259ac9d848d67a98c85aedc3baea094002a96db343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFr2zAUh8XoWLp29146BLvs4vRJshXr2IUsa8looetZPEtK62BbmWRv-L-v0qQ5FAT6IX3vx-Mj5ILBlLGCX6H9h90UgMliyoGVH8hpeuYZ41ydpAy5yHLI5YR8jnEDALO8FJ_IRIASohDylOibzgSH0Vm6chi6unui1Ugf4y788BgsXWLrqO_o7yGaocFAH8bYu5beP4-x9o1_Gunct1sMqeN_3T_T5VDblB_6wY7n5OMam-i-HO4z8vhz8Wf-K1vdLW_m16vMCMX6zLnKSJZLhXadlgRpeAlW8EKhUbbMSytnqEpTFuisERU6BJUDcFTSViIXZ-T7vncb_N_BxV63dTSuabBzfoiac0hHKAUJ_fYO3fghdGm7RBVKSMlEmSjYUyb4GINb622oWwyjZqB38vWrfP0qX-_kp5Gvh-Khap09DrzZTsDlHnChNsfvxS3jbDYTTLwAxo2JXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259366138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study</title><source>American Physiological Society Paid</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião ; Cardozo, Lais Tono ; Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</creator><creatorcontrib>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião ; Cardozo, Lais Tono ; Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this work is to describe the "Muscular System Game," created to assist in the teaching-learning process concerning the physiology of the muscular system, and to evaluate its effect on the learning of university students. Participating in this study were first-year undergraduate students of the pharmacy course (game group, n = 21, 5 men and 16 women, age 23.57 ± 4.92 yr) and the nursing course (control group, n = 22, 2 men and 20 women, age 22.90 ± 4.93 yr), who had the same level of preparation. After theoretical classes concerning the physiology of the muscular system, all students were instructed to study the topic. In the next week, the students of the game group performed the activity with the board game, and the students of the control group undertook a guided study activity, which contained a list of exercises with the same questions used in the game, to be answered by groups. In the week following these activities, all of the students answered evaluation questions about the topic. The scores obtained for the two groups in the evaluation were compared using student's "t"-test for unpaired samples, considering a significance level of 0.05. The score obtained for the control group (5.78 ± 0.38) was significantly lower than the score for the game group (7.50 ± 0.47; P < 0.05). The results obtained indicating that the use of an educational board game about the physiology of muscle contraction resulted in significantly improved learning, compared with the use of guided study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/advan.00165.2018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30933536</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; College students ; Control Groups ; Educational Games ; Games ; Human Body ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Muscle contraction ; Muscular system ; Nursing ; Nursing Education ; Pharmaceutical Education ; Physiology ; Program Effectiveness ; Teaching aids & devices ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Advances in physiology education, 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.149-154</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-eebc61469adf07406c280d3259ac9d848d67a98c85aedc3baea094002a96db343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-eebc61469adf07406c280d3259ac9d848d67a98c85aedc3baea094002a96db343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1217731$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30933536$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Lais Tono</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</creatorcontrib><title>Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study</title><title>Advances in physiology education</title><addtitle>Adv Physiol Educ</addtitle><description>The aim of this work is to describe the "Muscular System Game," created to assist in the teaching-learning process concerning the physiology of the muscular system, and to evaluate its effect on the learning of university students. Participating in this study were first-year undergraduate students of the pharmacy course (game group, n = 21, 5 men and 16 women, age 23.57 ± 4.92 yr) and the nursing course (control group, n = 22, 2 men and 20 women, age 22.90 ± 4.93 yr), who had the same level of preparation. After theoretical classes concerning the physiology of the muscular system, all students were instructed to study the topic. In the next week, the students of the game group performed the activity with the board game, and the students of the control group undertook a guided study activity, which contained a list of exercises with the same questions used in the game, to be answered by groups. In the week following these activities, all of the students answered evaluation questions about the topic. The scores obtained for the two groups in the evaluation were compared using student's "t"-test for unpaired samples, considering a significance level of 0.05. The score obtained for the control group (5.78 ± 0.38) was significantly lower than the score for the game group (7.50 ± 0.47; P < 0.05). The results obtained indicating that the use of an educational board game about the physiology of muscle contraction resulted in significantly improved learning, compared with the use of guided study.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Educational Games</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscular system</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Education</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Education</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teaching aids & devices</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1043-4046</issn><issn>1522-1229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFr2zAUh8XoWLp29146BLvs4vRJshXr2IUsa8looetZPEtK62BbmWRv-L-v0qQ5FAT6IX3vx-Mj5ILBlLGCX6H9h90UgMliyoGVH8hpeuYZ41ydpAy5yHLI5YR8jnEDALO8FJ_IRIASohDylOibzgSH0Vm6chi6unui1Ugf4y788BgsXWLrqO_o7yGaocFAH8bYu5beP4-x9o1_Gunct1sMqeN_3T_T5VDblB_6wY7n5OMam-i-HO4z8vhz8Wf-K1vdLW_m16vMCMX6zLnKSJZLhXadlgRpeAlW8EKhUbbMSytnqEpTFuisERU6BJUDcFTSViIXZ-T7vncb_N_BxV63dTSuabBzfoiac0hHKAUJ_fYO3fghdGm7RBVKSMlEmSjYUyb4GINb622oWwyjZqB38vWrfP0qX-_kp5Gvh-Khap09DrzZTsDlHnChNsfvxS3jbDYTTLwAxo2JXA</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião</creator><creator>Cardozo, Lais Tono</creator><creator>Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study</title><author>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião ; Cardozo, Lais Tono ; Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-eebc61469adf07406c280d3259ac9d848d67a98c85aedc3baea094002a96db343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Educational Games</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscular system</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Education</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Education</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teaching aids & devices</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Lais Tono</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in physiology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luchi, Kelly Cristina Gavião</au><au>Cardozo, Lais Tono</au><au>Marcondes, Fernanda Klein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1217731</ericid><atitle>Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study</atitle><jtitle>Advances in physiology education</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Physiol Educ</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>149-154</pages><issn>1043-4046</issn><eissn>1522-1229</eissn><abstract>The aim of this work is to describe the "Muscular System Game," created to assist in the teaching-learning process concerning the physiology of the muscular system, and to evaluate its effect on the learning of university students. Participating in this study were first-year undergraduate students of the pharmacy course (game group, n = 21, 5 men and 16 women, age 23.57 ± 4.92 yr) and the nursing course (control group, n = 22, 2 men and 20 women, age 22.90 ± 4.93 yr), who had the same level of preparation. After theoretical classes concerning the physiology of the muscular system, all students were instructed to study the topic. In the next week, the students of the game group performed the activity with the board game, and the students of the control group undertook a guided study activity, which contained a list of exercises with the same questions used in the game, to be answered by groups. In the week following these activities, all of the students answered evaluation questions about the topic. The scores obtained for the two groups in the evaluation were compared using student's "t"-test for unpaired samples, considering a significance level of 0.05. The score obtained for the control group (5.78 ± 0.38) was significantly lower than the score for the game group (7.50 ± 0.47; P < 0.05). The results obtained indicating that the use of an educational board game about the physiology of muscle contraction resulted in significantly improved learning, compared with the use of guided study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>30933536</pmid><doi>10.1152/advan.00165.2018</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-4046 |
ispartof | Advances in physiology education, 2019-06, Vol.43 (2), p.149-154 |
issn | 1043-4046 1522-1229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2202203990 |
source | American Physiological Society Paid; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anatomy College students Control Groups Educational Games Games Human Body Learning Learning Processes Muscle contraction Muscular system Nursing Nursing Education Pharmaceutical Education Physiology Program Effectiveness Teaching aids & devices Teaching Methods Undergraduate Students |
title | Increased Learning by Using Board Game on Muscular System Physiology Compared with Guided Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20Learning%20by%20Using%20Board%20Game%20on%20Muscular%20System%20Physiology%20Compared%20with%20Guided%20Study&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20physiology%20education&rft.au=Luchi,%20Kelly%20Cristina%20Gavi%C3%A3o&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=149-154&rft.issn=1043-4046&rft.eissn=1522-1229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/advan.00165.2018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2202203990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259366138&rft_id=info:pmid/30933536&rft_ericid=EJ1217731&rfr_iscdi=true |