Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations

Urine culture and sensitivity (C&S) remains the gold standard diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTI). To reduce the use of inaccurate or broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials, rapid identification and quantification (IDQ) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with results within...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2019-08, Vol.94 (4), p.371-377
Hauptverfasser: Markowitz, Melissa A., Monti, Gabriel K., Kim, Ja-Hong, Haake, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 4
container_start_page 371
container_title Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease
container_volume 94
creator Markowitz, Melissa A.
Monti, Gabriel K.
Kim, Ja-Hong
Haake, David A.
description Urine culture and sensitivity (C&S) remains the gold standard diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTI). To reduce the use of inaccurate or broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials, rapid identification and quantification (IDQ) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with results within 30 and 150 min, respectively, are under development. To assess the impact of rapid diagnostics, five UTI vignettes were constructed, and ninety-one United States physicians were surveyed regarding their diagnostic, management, and antimicrobial choices before and after IDQ and AST results. Rapid diagnostics increased the postponement of antimicrobial therapy pending AST results from 16% to 38% and 5% to 54% in Vignettes 1 and 2 and reduced the use of ineffective antibiotics from 41% to 0% and 69% to 0% in Vignettes 2 and 4. Rapid diagnostics increased the use of narrow spectrum agents in the five vignettes, indicating its potential to revitalize physician responsibility in antimicrobial stewardship.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.02.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201715764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0732889319300197</els_id><sourcerecordid>2201715764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4a5b5d90a753bc309a096bfd8efc8762fcbfd4c7ea0c0da7cf45bd805d167c113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq0KBAvlL1QWJy5Jx_lywq2ifElIrRA9W47tLLPa2IvtReq_76wWKo6cXtl-ZsbzMHYuoBQguu-r0qJezmhiGDGUFYihhKqk-MIWopdDASDhgC1A1lXR90N9zE5SWgGIamjgiB3XMFS9kMOC6Ue9Qct3DX1IGQ3PjsIvOXqenx2ftddLNzufeZj4NqLX8S_PUZtMyORMxuAv-e-QCUG9Tlx7y9c4Y9a7p_SVHU507c7e8pT9ubl-urorHn7d3l_9eChM3UMuGt2OrR1Ay7YeDX1Qw9CNk-3dZHrZVZOhQ2Ok02DAammmph1tD60VnTRC1KfsYt93E8PLlpZQMybj1mvtXdgmVZEnKVrZNYRe7lEymFJ0k9pEnGkvJUDtFKuV-qhY7RQrqBQFFX97m7MdZ2f_l747JeDnHnC07Su6qJJB542zGEmXsgE_M-cfZuaWhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201715764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Markowitz, Melissa A. ; Monti, Gabriel K. ; Kim, Ja-Hong ; Haake, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Melissa A. ; Monti, Gabriel K. ; Kim, Ja-Hong ; Haake, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Urine culture and sensitivity (C&amp;S) remains the gold standard diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTI). To reduce the use of inaccurate or broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials, rapid identification and quantification (IDQ) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with results within 30 and 150 min, respectively, are under development. To assess the impact of rapid diagnostics, five UTI vignettes were constructed, and ninety-one United States physicians were surveyed regarding their diagnostic, management, and antimicrobial choices before and after IDQ and AST results. Rapid diagnostics increased the postponement of antimicrobial therapy pending AST results from 16% to 38% and 5% to 54% in Vignettes 1 and 2 and reduced the use of ineffective antibiotics from 41% to 0% and 69% to 0% in Vignettes 2 and 4. Rapid diagnostics increased the use of narrow spectrum agents in the five vignettes, indicating its potential to revitalize physician responsibility in antimicrobial stewardship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30928179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>antibiotic resistance ; body fluid analysis ; molecular diagnostics ; urinary traction infection</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2019-08, Vol.94 (4), p.371-377</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4a5b5d90a753bc309a096bfd8efc8762fcbfd4c7ea0c0da7cf45bd805d167c113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4a5b5d90a753bc309a096bfd8efc8762fcbfd4c7ea0c0da7cf45bd805d167c113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889319300197$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Gabriel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ja-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haake, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations</title><title>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</title><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Urine culture and sensitivity (C&amp;S) remains the gold standard diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTI). To reduce the use of inaccurate or broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials, rapid identification and quantification (IDQ) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with results within 30 and 150 min, respectively, are under development. To assess the impact of rapid diagnostics, five UTI vignettes were constructed, and ninety-one United States physicians were surveyed regarding their diagnostic, management, and antimicrobial choices before and after IDQ and AST results. Rapid diagnostics increased the postponement of antimicrobial therapy pending AST results from 16% to 38% and 5% to 54% in Vignettes 1 and 2 and reduced the use of ineffective antibiotics from 41% to 0% and 69% to 0% in Vignettes 2 and 4. Rapid diagnostics increased the use of narrow spectrum agents in the five vignettes, indicating its potential to revitalize physician responsibility in antimicrobial stewardship.</description><subject>antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>body fluid analysis</subject><subject>molecular diagnostics</subject><subject>urinary traction infection</subject><issn>0732-8893</issn><issn>1879-0070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1P3DAQhq0KBAvlL1QWJy5Jx_lywq2ifElIrRA9W47tLLPa2IvtReq_76wWKo6cXtl-ZsbzMHYuoBQguu-r0qJezmhiGDGUFYihhKqk-MIWopdDASDhgC1A1lXR90N9zE5SWgGIamjgiB3XMFS9kMOC6Ue9Qct3DX1IGQ3PjsIvOXqenx2ftddLNzufeZj4NqLX8S_PUZtMyORMxuAv-e-QCUG9Tlx7y9c4Y9a7p_SVHU507c7e8pT9ubl-urorHn7d3l_9eChM3UMuGt2OrR1Ay7YeDX1Qw9CNk-3dZHrZVZOhQ2Ok02DAammmph1tD60VnTRC1KfsYt93E8PLlpZQMybj1mvtXdgmVZEnKVrZNYRe7lEymFJ0k9pEnGkvJUDtFKuV-qhY7RQrqBQFFX97m7MdZ2f_l747JeDnHnC07Su6qJJB542zGEmXsgE_M-cfZuaWhw</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Markowitz, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Monti, Gabriel K.</creator><creator>Kim, Ja-Hong</creator><creator>Haake, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations</title><author>Markowitz, Melissa A. ; Monti, Gabriel K. ; Kim, Ja-Hong ; Haake, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4a5b5d90a753bc309a096bfd8efc8762fcbfd4c7ea0c0da7cf45bd805d167c113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>body fluid analysis</topic><topic>molecular diagnostics</topic><topic>urinary traction infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti, Gabriel K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ja-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haake, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Markowitz, Melissa A.</au><au>Monti, Gabriel K.</au><au>Kim, Ja-Hong</au><au>Haake, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>371-377</pages><issn>0732-8893</issn><eissn>1879-0070</eissn><abstract>Urine culture and sensitivity (C&amp;S) remains the gold standard diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTI). To reduce the use of inaccurate or broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials, rapid identification and quantification (IDQ) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) with results within 30 and 150 min, respectively, are under development. To assess the impact of rapid diagnostics, five UTI vignettes were constructed, and ninety-one United States physicians were surveyed regarding their diagnostic, management, and antimicrobial choices before and after IDQ and AST results. Rapid diagnostics increased the postponement of antimicrobial therapy pending AST results from 16% to 38% and 5% to 54% in Vignettes 1 and 2 and reduced the use of ineffective antibiotics from 41% to 0% and 69% to 0% in Vignettes 2 and 4. Rapid diagnostics increased the use of narrow spectrum agents in the five vignettes, indicating its potential to revitalize physician responsibility in antimicrobial stewardship.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30928179</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.02.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-8893
ispartof Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2019-08, Vol.94 (4), p.371-377
issn 0732-8893
1879-0070
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201715764
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects antibiotic resistance
body fluid analysis
molecular diagnostics
urinary traction infection
title Rapid diagnostic testing in the management of urinary tract infection: Potentials and limitations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20diagnostic%20testing%20in%20the%20management%20of%20urinary%20tract%20infection:%20Potentials%20and%20limitations&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20microbiology%20and%20infectious%20disease&rft.au=Markowitz,%20Melissa%20A.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=371-377&rft.issn=0732-8893&rft.eissn=1879-0070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2201715764%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201715764&rft_id=info:pmid/30928179&rft_els_id=S0732889319300197&rfr_iscdi=true