Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis

Background: Ultrasound (US) examination is helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules (malignant vs. benign), but its accuracy relies heavily on examiner experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a less subjective diagnostic model aided by machine learning. Methods: A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thyroid (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.29 (6), p.858-867
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bin, Tian, Jie, Pei, Shufang, Chen, Yubing, He, Xin, Dong, Yuhao, Zhang, Lu, Mo, Xiaokai, Huang, Wenhui, Cong, Shuzhen, Zhang, Shuixing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 867
container_issue 6
container_start_page 858
container_title Thyroid (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 29
creator Zhang, Bin
Tian, Jie
Pei, Shufang
Chen, Yubing
He, Xin
Dong, Yuhao
Zhang, Lu
Mo, Xiaokai
Huang, Wenhui
Cong, Shuzhen
Zhang, Shuixing
description Background: Ultrasound (US) examination is helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules (malignant vs. benign), but its accuracy relies heavily on examiner experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a less subjective diagnostic model aided by machine learning. Methods: A total of 2064 thyroid nodules (2032 patients, 695 male; M age  = 45.25 ± 13.49 years) met all of the following inclusion criteria: (i) hemi- or total thyroidectomy, (ii) maximum nodule diameter 2.5 cm, (iii) examination by conventional US and real-time elastography within one month before surgery, and (iv) no previous thyroid surgery or percutaneous thermotherapy. Models were developed using 60% of randomly selected samples based on nine commonly used algorithms, and validated using the remaining 40% of cases. All models function with a validation data set that has a pretest probability of malignancy of 10%. The models were refined with machine learning that consisted of 1000 repetitions of derivatization and validation, and compared to diagnosis by an experienced radiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: A random forest algorithm led to the best diagnostic model, which performed better than radiologist diagnosis based on conventional US only (AUC = 0.924 [confidence interval (CI) 0.895–0.953] vs. 0.834 [CI 0.815–0.853]) and based on both conventional US and real-time elastography (AUC = 0.938 [CI 0.914–0.961] vs. 0.843 [CI 0.829–0.857]). Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms based on US examinations, particularly the random forest classifier, may diagnose malignant thyroid nodules better than radiologists.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/thy.2018.0380
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2201711232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-394ab22eb98a97dd76eeaeffd09beafaa6383b3f24fc5b578d567b1d908b0db73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUhi0EoqUwsqKMLCm-NHE8oapcpQIDZY7s-Lg1yqXYyZCNd-ANeRIctbAy_UdHn77hQ-ic4CnBmbhqN_2UYpJNMcvwARqTJOGxwJwfhhsnOOY0SUfoxPt3jEmacXaMRgwLKlLGx-j6SRYbW0O0BOlqW6-_P7_m3lvfgo5e-zBVZBoXrTa9a6yOnhvdlRDdWLmum4CdoiMjSw9n-52gt7vb1eIhXr7cPy7my7hgPG1jJmZSUQpKZFJwrXkKIMEYjYUCaaRMWcYUM3RmikQlPNNJyhXRAmcKa8XZBF3uvFvXfHTg27yyvoCylDU0nc9paMAJoYwGNN6hhWu8d2DyrbOVdH1OcD40y0OzfGiWD80Cf7FXd6oC_Uf_RgoA2wHDW9Z1aUGBa__R_gDHkHqV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201711232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Bin ; Tian, Jie ; Pei, Shufang ; Chen, Yubing ; He, Xin ; Dong, Yuhao ; Zhang, Lu ; Mo, Xiaokai ; Huang, Wenhui ; Cong, Shuzhen ; Zhang, Shuixing</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin ; Tian, Jie ; Pei, Shufang ; Chen, Yubing ; He, Xin ; Dong, Yuhao ; Zhang, Lu ; Mo, Xiaokai ; Huang, Wenhui ; Cong, Shuzhen ; Zhang, Shuixing</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Ultrasound (US) examination is helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules (malignant vs. benign), but its accuracy relies heavily on examiner experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a less subjective diagnostic model aided by machine learning. Methods: A total of 2064 thyroid nodules (2032 patients, 695 male; M age  = 45.25 ± 13.49 years) met all of the following inclusion criteria: (i) hemi- or total thyroidectomy, (ii) maximum nodule diameter 2.5 cm, (iii) examination by conventional US and real-time elastography within one month before surgery, and (iv) no previous thyroid surgery or percutaneous thermotherapy. Models were developed using 60% of randomly selected samples based on nine commonly used algorithms, and validated using the remaining 40% of cases. All models function with a validation data set that has a pretest probability of malignancy of 10%. The models were refined with machine learning that consisted of 1000 repetitions of derivatization and validation, and compared to diagnosis by an experienced radiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: A random forest algorithm led to the best diagnostic model, which performed better than radiologist diagnosis based on conventional US only (AUC = 0.924 [confidence interval (CI) 0.895–0.953] vs. 0.834 [CI 0.815–0.853]) and based on both conventional US and real-time elastography (AUC = 0.938 [CI 0.914–0.961] vs. 0.843 [CI 0.829–0.857]). Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms based on US examinations, particularly the random forest classifier, may diagnose malignant thyroid nodules better than radiologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-7256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/thy.2018.0380</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30929637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Thyroid Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</subject><ispartof>Thyroid (New York, N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.29 (6), p.858-867</ispartof><rights>2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-394ab22eb98a97dd76eeaeffd09beafaa6383b3f24fc5b578d567b1d908b0db73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-394ab22eb98a97dd76eeaeffd09beafaa6383b3f24fc5b578d567b1d908b0db73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30929637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yubing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Xiaokai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Shuzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuixing</creatorcontrib><title>Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis</title><title>Thyroid (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Thyroid</addtitle><description>Background: Ultrasound (US) examination is helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules (malignant vs. benign), but its accuracy relies heavily on examiner experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a less subjective diagnostic model aided by machine learning. Methods: A total of 2064 thyroid nodules (2032 patients, 695 male; M age  = 45.25 ± 13.49 years) met all of the following inclusion criteria: (i) hemi- or total thyroidectomy, (ii) maximum nodule diameter 2.5 cm, (iii) examination by conventional US and real-time elastography within one month before surgery, and (iv) no previous thyroid surgery or percutaneous thermotherapy. Models were developed using 60% of randomly selected samples based on nine commonly used algorithms, and validated using the remaining 40% of cases. All models function with a validation data set that has a pretest probability of malignancy of 10%. The models were refined with machine learning that consisted of 1000 repetitions of derivatization and validation, and compared to diagnosis by an experienced radiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: A random forest algorithm led to the best diagnostic model, which performed better than radiologist diagnosis based on conventional US only (AUC = 0.924 [confidence interval (CI) 0.895–0.953] vs. 0.834 [CI 0.815–0.853]) and based on both conventional US and real-time elastography (AUC = 0.938 [CI 0.914–0.961] vs. 0.843 [CI 0.829–0.857]). Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms based on US examinations, particularly the random forest classifier, may diagnose malignant thyroid nodules better than radiologists.</description><subject>Thyroid Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</subject><issn>1050-7256</issn><issn>1557-9077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAUhi0EoqUwsqKMLCm-NHE8oapcpQIDZY7s-Lg1yqXYyZCNd-ANeRIctbAy_UdHn77hQ-ic4CnBmbhqN_2UYpJNMcvwARqTJOGxwJwfhhsnOOY0SUfoxPt3jEmacXaMRgwLKlLGx-j6SRYbW0O0BOlqW6-_P7_m3lvfgo5e-zBVZBoXrTa9a6yOnhvdlRDdWLmum4CdoiMjSw9n-52gt7vb1eIhXr7cPy7my7hgPG1jJmZSUQpKZFJwrXkKIMEYjYUCaaRMWcYUM3RmikQlPNNJyhXRAmcKa8XZBF3uvFvXfHTg27yyvoCylDU0nc9paMAJoYwGNN6hhWu8d2DyrbOVdH1OcD40y0OzfGiWD80Cf7FXd6oC_Uf_RgoA2wHDW9Z1aUGBa__R_gDHkHqV</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Zhang, Bin</creator><creator>Tian, Jie</creator><creator>Pei, Shufang</creator><creator>Chen, Yubing</creator><creator>He, Xin</creator><creator>Dong, Yuhao</creator><creator>Zhang, Lu</creator><creator>Mo, Xiaokai</creator><creator>Huang, Wenhui</creator><creator>Cong, Shuzhen</creator><creator>Zhang, Shuixing</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis</title><author>Zhang, Bin ; Tian, Jie ; Pei, Shufang ; Chen, Yubing ; He, Xin ; Dong, Yuhao ; Zhang, Lu ; Mo, Xiaokai ; Huang, Wenhui ; Cong, Shuzhen ; Zhang, Shuixing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-394ab22eb98a97dd76eeaeffd09beafaa6383b3f24fc5b578d567b1d908b0db73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Thyroid Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Shufang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yubing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yuhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mo, Xiaokai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wenhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Shuzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Shuixing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Thyroid (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Bin</au><au>Tian, Jie</au><au>Pei, Shufang</au><au>Chen, Yubing</au><au>He, Xin</au><au>Dong, Yuhao</au><au>Zhang, Lu</au><au>Mo, Xiaokai</au><au>Huang, Wenhui</au><au>Cong, Shuzhen</au><au>Zhang, Shuixing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Thyroid (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Thyroid</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>858</spage><epage>867</epage><pages>858-867</pages><issn>1050-7256</issn><eissn>1557-9077</eissn><abstract>Background: Ultrasound (US) examination is helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules (malignant vs. benign), but its accuracy relies heavily on examiner experience. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a less subjective diagnostic model aided by machine learning. Methods: A total of 2064 thyroid nodules (2032 patients, 695 male; M age  = 45.25 ± 13.49 years) met all of the following inclusion criteria: (i) hemi- or total thyroidectomy, (ii) maximum nodule diameter 2.5 cm, (iii) examination by conventional US and real-time elastography within one month before surgery, and (iv) no previous thyroid surgery or percutaneous thermotherapy. Models were developed using 60% of randomly selected samples based on nine commonly used algorithms, and validated using the remaining 40% of cases. All models function with a validation data set that has a pretest probability of malignancy of 10%. The models were refined with machine learning that consisted of 1000 repetitions of derivatization and validation, and compared to diagnosis by an experienced radiologist. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: A random forest algorithm led to the best diagnostic model, which performed better than radiologist diagnosis based on conventional US only (AUC = 0.924 [confidence interval (CI) 0.895–0.953] vs. 0.834 [CI 0.815–0.853]) and based on both conventional US and real-time elastography (AUC = 0.938 [CI 0.914–0.961] vs. 0.843 [CI 0.829–0.857]). Conclusions: Machine-learning algorithms based on US examinations, particularly the random forest classifier, may diagnose malignant thyroid nodules better than radiologists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>30929637</pmid><doi>10.1089/thy.2018.0380</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-7256
ispartof Thyroid (New York, N.Y.), 2019-06, Vol.29 (6), p.858-867
issn 1050-7256
1557-9077
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2201711232
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Thyroid Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
title Machine Learning–Assisted System for Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20Learning%E2%80%93Assisted%20System%20for%20Thyroid%20Nodule%20Diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Thyroid%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Bin&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=858&rft.epage=867&rft.pages=858-867&rft.issn=1050-7256&rft.eissn=1557-9077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/thy.2018.0380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2201711232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201711232&rft_id=info:pmid/30929637&rfr_iscdi=true