Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction
Autologous fat transfer is common in breast reconstruction because of its versatility for use in contour deformities. The authors examined three different fat grafting processing techniques for complications and safety profile using their institutional database. Retrospective review was performed of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.985-991 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 991 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 985 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Ruan, Qing Zhao Rinkinen, Jacob R. Doval, Andres F. Scott, Benjamin B. Tobias, Adam M. Lin, Samuel J. Lee, Bernard T. |
description | Autologous fat transfer is common in breast reconstruction because of its versatility for use in contour deformities. The authors examined three different fat grafting processing techniques for complications and safety profile using their institutional database.
Retrospective review was performed of patients from a single institution who had undergone autologous fat transfer following breast reconstruction from 2012 to 2016. Individuals were separated into three cohorts according to fat harvest technique: (1) centrifugation, (2) Telfa gauze, or (3) Revolve. Complications between the groups were assessed.
A total of 267 cases of autologous fat transfer were identified (centrifugation, n = 168; Telfa, n = 44; and Revolve, n = 55). Grafting by means of centrifugation was associated with the greatest incidence of oil cysts (12.5 percent; p = 0.034), postoperative adverse events observed in the clinic (13.7 percent; p = 0.002), and total complications (25.6 percent; p = 0.001). The use of Telfa resulted in the lowest rates of oil cyst formation (0 percent; p = 0.002) and total complications (2.3 percent; p = 0.001). Grafting by means of centrifugation was also associated with the highest frequency of repeated injections among the three techniques after initial grafting (19.6 percent; p = 0.029). In contrast, Revolve demonstrated a repeated injection rate of just 5.45 percent, significantly lower when independently compared with centrifugation (p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total graft volume (p = 0.002) and the use of centrifugation (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for adverse events seen in the clinic postoperatively.
Significant differences in postoperative outcomes exist between varying fat transfer techniques. Autologous fat transfer by means of centrifugation harbored the highest rates of complication, whereas Telfa and Revolve exhibited similar safety profiles.
Therapeutic, III. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2200780994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2200780994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4034-970663714e73846275add1626cc4a66a2215061c90bb93d91624cfad84d7bd913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUF1PwjAUbYxGEP0HxuzRl-Htxzr6iEbUhEQC-LyUroPpWLHtQvj3doAfsS_tufecc28PQtcY-hhEejeZzvrw5ySMsBPUxQkRcXiSU9QFoCTGkJAOunDuHQCnlCfnqENBEIwx6SI5k4X2u2hiTVFW2kWmiEbSt1hp58p6Gc21WtXlZxOaZR0NG28qszSN2_PmVtau0DYqjI3urZbOR1OtTO28bZQvTX2JzgpZOX11vHvobfQ4f3iOx69PLw_DcawYUBaLFDinKWY6pQPGSZrIPMeccKWY5FwSghPgWAlYLATNRWgxVch8wPJ0ESDtoduD78aadlmfrUundFXJWodtM0IA0gEIwQKVHajKGuesLrKNLdfS7jIMWRtuFsLN_ocbZDfHCc1irfMf0Xeav75bU3lt3UfVbLXNVlpWfrX340n4KgEsgAUUtyVGvwAUc4Of</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200780994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ruan, Qing Zhao ; Rinkinen, Jacob R. ; Doval, Andres F. ; Scott, Benjamin B. ; Tobias, Adam M. ; Lin, Samuel J. ; Lee, Bernard T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Qing Zhao ; Rinkinen, Jacob R. ; Doval, Andres F. ; Scott, Benjamin B. ; Tobias, Adam M. ; Lin, Samuel J. ; Lee, Bernard T.</creatorcontrib><description>Autologous fat transfer is common in breast reconstruction because of its versatility for use in contour deformities. The authors examined three different fat grafting processing techniques for complications and safety profile using their institutional database.
Retrospective review was performed of patients from a single institution who had undergone autologous fat transfer following breast reconstruction from 2012 to 2016. Individuals were separated into three cohorts according to fat harvest technique: (1) centrifugation, (2) Telfa gauze, or (3) Revolve. Complications between the groups were assessed.
A total of 267 cases of autologous fat transfer were identified (centrifugation, n = 168; Telfa, n = 44; and Revolve, n = 55). Grafting by means of centrifugation was associated with the greatest incidence of oil cysts (12.5 percent; p = 0.034), postoperative adverse events observed in the clinic (13.7 percent; p = 0.002), and total complications (25.6 percent; p = 0.001). The use of Telfa resulted in the lowest rates of oil cyst formation (0 percent; p = 0.002) and total complications (2.3 percent; p = 0.001). Grafting by means of centrifugation was also associated with the highest frequency of repeated injections among the three techniques after initial grafting (19.6 percent; p = 0.029). In contrast, Revolve demonstrated a repeated injection rate of just 5.45 percent, significantly lower when independently compared with centrifugation (p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total graft volume (p = 0.002) and the use of centrifugation (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for adverse events seen in the clinic postoperatively.
Significant differences in postoperative outcomes exist between varying fat transfer techniques. Autologous fat transfer by means of centrifugation harbored the highest rates of complication, whereas Telfa and Revolve exhibited similar safety profiles.
Therapeutic, III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30921112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - transplantation ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Transplantation, Autologous</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.985-991</ispartof><rights>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4034-970663714e73846275add1626cc4a66a2215061c90bb93d91624cfad84d7bd913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4034-970663714e73846275add1626cc4a66a2215061c90bb93d91624cfad84d7bd913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Qing Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinkinen, Jacob R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doval, Andres F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Adam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bernard T.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Autologous fat transfer is common in breast reconstruction because of its versatility for use in contour deformities. The authors examined three different fat grafting processing techniques for complications and safety profile using their institutional database.
Retrospective review was performed of patients from a single institution who had undergone autologous fat transfer following breast reconstruction from 2012 to 2016. Individuals were separated into three cohorts according to fat harvest technique: (1) centrifugation, (2) Telfa gauze, or (3) Revolve. Complications between the groups were assessed.
A total of 267 cases of autologous fat transfer were identified (centrifugation, n = 168; Telfa, n = 44; and Revolve, n = 55). Grafting by means of centrifugation was associated with the greatest incidence of oil cysts (12.5 percent; p = 0.034), postoperative adverse events observed in the clinic (13.7 percent; p = 0.002), and total complications (25.6 percent; p = 0.001). The use of Telfa resulted in the lowest rates of oil cyst formation (0 percent; p = 0.002) and total complications (2.3 percent; p = 0.001). Grafting by means of centrifugation was also associated with the highest frequency of repeated injections among the three techniques after initial grafting (19.6 percent; p = 0.029). In contrast, Revolve demonstrated a repeated injection rate of just 5.45 percent, significantly lower when independently compared with centrifugation (p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total graft volume (p = 0.002) and the use of centrifugation (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for adverse events seen in the clinic postoperatively.
Significant differences in postoperative outcomes exist between varying fat transfer techniques. Autologous fat transfer by means of centrifugation harbored the highest rates of complication, whereas Telfa and Revolve exhibited similar safety profiles.
Therapeutic, III.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - transplantation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUF1PwjAUbYxGEP0HxuzRl-Htxzr6iEbUhEQC-LyUroPpWLHtQvj3doAfsS_tufecc28PQtcY-hhEejeZzvrw5ySMsBPUxQkRcXiSU9QFoCTGkJAOunDuHQCnlCfnqENBEIwx6SI5k4X2u2hiTVFW2kWmiEbSt1hp58p6Gc21WtXlZxOaZR0NG28qszSN2_PmVtau0DYqjI3urZbOR1OtTO28bZQvTX2JzgpZOX11vHvobfQ4f3iOx69PLw_DcawYUBaLFDinKWY6pQPGSZrIPMeccKWY5FwSghPgWAlYLATNRWgxVch8wPJ0ESDtoduD78aadlmfrUundFXJWodtM0IA0gEIwQKVHajKGuesLrKNLdfS7jIMWRtuFsLN_ocbZDfHCc1irfMf0Xeav75bU3lt3UfVbLXNVlpWfrX340n4KgEsgAUUtyVGvwAUc4Of</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Ruan, Qing Zhao</creator><creator>Rinkinen, Jacob R.</creator><creator>Doval, Andres F.</creator><creator>Scott, Benjamin B.</creator><creator>Tobias, Adam M.</creator><creator>Lin, Samuel J.</creator><creator>Lee, Bernard T.</creator><general>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction</title><author>Ruan, Qing Zhao ; Rinkinen, Jacob R. ; Doval, Andres F. ; Scott, Benjamin B. ; Tobias, Adam M. ; Lin, Samuel J. ; Lee, Bernard T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4034-970663714e73846275add1626cc4a66a2215061c90bb93d91624cfad84d7bd913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - transplantation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruan, Qing Zhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinkinen, Jacob R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doval, Andres F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Benjamin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Adam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Samuel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bernard T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruan, Qing Zhao</au><au>Rinkinen, Jacob R.</au><au>Doval, Andres F.</au><au>Scott, Benjamin B.</au><au>Tobias, Adam M.</au><au>Lin, Samuel J.</au><au>Lee, Bernard T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>985</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>985-991</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Autologous fat transfer is common in breast reconstruction because of its versatility for use in contour deformities. The authors examined three different fat grafting processing techniques for complications and safety profile using their institutional database.
Retrospective review was performed of patients from a single institution who had undergone autologous fat transfer following breast reconstruction from 2012 to 2016. Individuals were separated into three cohorts according to fat harvest technique: (1) centrifugation, (2) Telfa gauze, or (3) Revolve. Complications between the groups were assessed.
A total of 267 cases of autologous fat transfer were identified (centrifugation, n = 168; Telfa, n = 44; and Revolve, n = 55). Grafting by means of centrifugation was associated with the greatest incidence of oil cysts (12.5 percent; p = 0.034), postoperative adverse events observed in the clinic (13.7 percent; p = 0.002), and total complications (25.6 percent; p = 0.001). The use of Telfa resulted in the lowest rates of oil cyst formation (0 percent; p = 0.002) and total complications (2.3 percent; p = 0.001). Grafting by means of centrifugation was also associated with the highest frequency of repeated injections among the three techniques after initial grafting (19.6 percent; p = 0.029). In contrast, Revolve demonstrated a repeated injection rate of just 5.45 percent, significantly lower when independently compared with centrifugation (p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total graft volume (p = 0.002) and the use of centrifugation (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for adverse events seen in the clinic postoperatively.
Significant differences in postoperative outcomes exist between varying fat transfer techniques. Autologous fat transfer by means of centrifugation harbored the highest rates of complication, whereas Telfa and Revolve exhibited similar safety profiles.
Therapeutic, III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>30921112</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000005424</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.985-991 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2200780994 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adipose Tissue - transplantation Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Breast Neoplasms - surgery Female Humans Mammaplasty - adverse effects Mammaplasty - methods Middle Aged Postoperative Complications Retrospective Studies Transplantation, Autologous |
title | Safety Profiles of Fat Processing Techniques in Autologous Fat Transfer for Breast Reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Profiles%20of%20Fat%20Processing%20Techniques%20in%20Autologous%20Fat%20Transfer%20for%20Breast%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Ruan,%20Qing%20Zhao&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=985&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=985-991&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2200780994%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200780994&rft_id=info:pmid/30921112&rfr_iscdi=true |